Yep. except on the Switch because my mind for some reason can't process the ZR and ZL so it trips me up every time
Z on the gamecube was a shoulder button, so shouldn't the two shoulder buttons be the Z buttons and not the triggers?
Yes, but the Classic Controller Pro on the Wii had to mess things up, and Nintendo stuck with it. If we got that version of the controller first, or if it never existed, I firmly believe the triggers would be L/R and the bumpers would be ZL/ZR. But they wanted L/R to match where they were on the original Classic Controller, and here we are.
I used to be more mad about this, but when you consider Nintendo's original Z button was the N64 trigger on the rear of the middle handle, it makes more sense.
ZL and ZR don't bother me, since they're just the evolved form of the Gamecube's weird Z button
the real question is why the Gamecube controller only had one of them
Cause it was just a N64 controller designed to actually be comfortable, and use a stick instead of C buttons. Legit, I think it was just because they felt adding another button was unnecessary.
Even if that is the case, the term didn't exist until the Xbox 360. Us adults had already been using L1/R1/L2/R2 for over a decade before that console came along. The naming convention was already established.
I've been gaming since before the PS2 and don't use that terminology but go on
It's meant to show that your perception that bumper/trigger is widespread is flawed. It's mostly just kids who grew up with it that think that. L1/R1/L2/R2 existed long before bumpers and triggers, and we "gave up learning the 'correct' names of controller buttons years ago" (as you say) before the 360 came along. Mostly due to Nintendo's ridiculous naming. By the time the 360 dropped and everyone was college-age or older, L1/L2 was already the standard to avoid confusion.
This post confuses me. A lot.
People that grew up post 360 outnumber those who grew up with PS1/PS2, so arguing it's not widespread because of that is weird. Kids who were 5 years old when the 360 dropped are college-age adults now.
There's also a weird (and I believe unintentional) tone of superiority in your word choice. "It's mostly just kids who grew up with it" downplays those people as somehow less important. And "everyone was college-age or older" is just... huh? Who's everyone here? Everyone relevant?
It's like you're trying to paint the group you belong to as more important, for no other reason than you're older. Again, I'm not sure that's intentional, but that's how it's coming across.
It's also... literally true. I don't know why you took issue with that wording.
I have never heard someone my age call them bumpers.
I'm the right age to have grown up with L1/L2/R1/R2 but never owned a PlayStation. I had Nintendo consoles and therefore have only used L1/L2/R1/R2 when I know they're the only words the person I'm talking to will instantly understand.
Which I guess brings me to my answer, I'll use whatever I think the person I'm talking to is used to hearing. If I'm unsure or addressing a group, I default to bumpers/triggers as they're more general terms.