• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

TheGamingNewsGuy

One Winged Slayer
Member
Nov 5, 2017
31,618
Recently,Connor Marc Colquhoun aka CDawgVa made a intresting point in the latest Trash Taste Episode. He basically says that he feels that if you need to read supplementry material in order to understand aspects of the series then it automatically makes that anime convoulted. His point was reffering directly towards the Fate Series which is kinda infamous for its complexity but it got me thinking the same question but also applying it to comic book events which have put very nessecary material in comic book tie ins in the pasgt with the most infamous example of which had key plot details as well as set up for the main villain in a tie in issue. I am curious to know what pepole's thoughts and opinions are on this.

 

Tamanon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,767
I think if you have to read supplements to understand main motivations and relationships, it sucks. If supplements are just there for color or to flesh out events, it's fine.
 
OP
OP
TheGamingNewsGuy

TheGamingNewsGuy

One Winged Slayer
Member
Nov 5, 2017
31,618
I think if you have to read supplements to understand main motivations and relationships, it sucks. If supplements are just there for color or to flesh out events, it's fine.
I feel like Final Crisis and the Superman 3D Issue is some of the worst examples of this - without it - you would have very little clear on the final issue of FI and who Mandrakk is
 

Weiss

User requested ban
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
64,265
If it's not in the story itself its canon status is up to my discretion.
 

OrangeNova

Member
Oct 30, 2017
12,744
Canada
I think if you have to read supplements to understand main motivations and relationships, it sucks. If supplements are just there for color or to flesh out events, it's fine.
One and done.

I whole heartedly agree with this though, I love extra side content that can give more context to events, but I shouldn't have to read that to understand at least on a surface level why something is happening.

But also a story could have a point in which you're not supposed to understand why something happened until later. And supplemental reading could spoil that reason?
 
Last edited:

Korigama

Member
Oct 25, 2017
20,611
I think if you have to read supplements to understand main motivations and relationships, it sucks. If supplements are just there for color or to flesh out events, it's fine.
Basically this. Material that serves as an excuse to spend more time with certain characters/gain more perspective on the setting for flavor are one thing, but a work that requires anything tacked on to make sense of it or answer something important after the fact is a failure.
 

pbayne

Corrupted by Vengeance
Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,484
Im sure it can be done well but my mind just goes to Final Fantasy 15 and all the stuff that was in the anime/movie/dlc that was never touched on in the base game and then people wonder why some hate 15s story so much.
 

shoptroll

Member
May 29, 2018
3,680
I think if you have to read supplements to understand main motivations and relationships, it sucks. If supplements are just there for color or to flesh out events, it's fine.

I think this is what doomed StarCraft II Wings of Liberty for me. You start the game and there's a fresh cast of characters with barely any introduction to them, because Blizzard had done all their world building over the past decade in spin-off media. Absolutely frustrating and a big let down as someone who enjoyed StarCraft's campaign but wasn't invested enough to seek out the supplemental material.

Also I hated going to see Star Wars Ep 3 and never having seen any Clone Wars episodes I had no clue what the deal with Grievous was.
 
Jul 19, 2020
1,138
I personally despise it and it's a major contributing factor to me dropping Marvel and DC cape comics completely. I hate crossover events and I hate concurrently running series that are relevant to eachother. I want to start at issue/chapter 1 and just read to the end without needing to follow any other series or spinoffs.

It's why I like manga and non-cape comics so much more these days. You get the odd crossmedia mega-franchise like Fate where you practically need to follow the spinoffs to understand any "major" entry or series that ends up splintering across several titles as it goes on like Fables but they're the exception rather than the norm.
 

King Kingo

Banned
Dec 3, 2019
7,656
That's not at all true, television and film adaptation of graphic novels are always designed to be welcoming to newcomers. Reading the source material is nothing more than consumerism cross-pollination.
 

Quinton

Specialist at TheGamer / Reviewer at RPG Site
Verified
Oct 25, 2017
17,380
Midgar, With Love
A decent example of this being done mostly right would be the two Dragon Age novels leading into the third game (Inquisition). "Asunder" is Cole's tale; "The Masked Empire" is Celene's.

I wouldn't say it's perfect. Ideally, a little more from them would be integrated into the game. But for the most part, the game does a fine job of putting the Inquisitor into play with the important factors, explaining them, and inviting interested parties to find out more through the books.
 

Deleted member 25606

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
8,973
That's not at all true, television and film adaptation of graphic novels are always designed to be welcoming to newcomers. Reading the source material is nothing more than consumerism cross-pollination.
That's not what they are talking about. They are talking about putting important info in official tie ins. For instance during the recent King in Black at Marvel there was King in Black, Venom, and multiple tie-ins. Their point is instances (and it happens) where say the Hulk tie in introduces the macguffin to beat Knull not the main book or at least venom (this isn't what happened just making an example).
 

IDreamOfHime

Member
Oct 27, 2017
14,529
It ruined Halo for me. I'd guess 99% of people think Halo 3 takes place immediately after Halo 2 and not a week later after Chiefs little adventure on Mars. Then it just snowballed out of control with Halo 5 especially being difficult to follow with all the characters and events being referenced that didn't originate from a game.
 

Weiss

User requested ban
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
64,265
That's not what they are talking about. They are talking about putting important info in official tie ins. For instance during the recent King in Black at Marvel there was King in Black, Venom, and multiple tie-ins. Their point is instances (and it happens) where say the Hulk tie in introduces the macguffin to beat Knull not the main book or at least venom (this isn't what happened just making an example).
That's a bit of a grey area since they aren't really supplenentary, they're chapters of a story in a shared universe.

They are, also, incredibly and deeply annoying to follow, so let's still count them.
 

The Unsent

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,472
I didn't like how in the Loki TV series they keep inviting the audience to guess who the mysterious mastermind is, and only comic book fans were allowed to work it out because of their knowledge of Kang/Immortus.

In series 2 I have no interest in engaging in what the mystery arc might be now because I felt I was alinated, not completely knowing the comics. It wouldn't have been as bad if they didn't keep dangling the "Who is the mastermind?" question, like you're being encouraged to work it out.
 

Weiss

User requested ban
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
64,265
I didn't like how in the Loki TV series they keep inviting the audience to guess who the mysterious mastermind is, and only comic book fans were allowed to work it out because of their knowledge of Kang/Immortus.

In series 2 I have no interest in engaging in what the mystery arc might be now because I felt it was alinated, not completely knowing the comics. It wouldn't have been as bad if they didn't keep dangling the "Who is the mastermind?" question, like you're being encouraged to work it out.
Actually yeah I wonder how that shakes out in the MCU where comic readers already know the character relations.
 

The Unsent

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,472
Actually yeah I wonder how that shakes out in the MCU where comic readers already know the character relations.
They don't exactly name him, the true mastermind is called He Who Remains, but it's a bit annoying for a casual fan like myself, where we're on Loki/Sylvie's journey to uncover the true villian, she destroys the time keepers who were just decoys, suggesting there's going to be a mind blowing true enemy behind it all, and when they open the magical door, the identity of the culprit behind it all, is one of Kang's alter egos, means more to comic book fans, more than anyone else. Personally I just found it annoying storytelling.
 

Tigerfog

Member
Oct 28, 2017
767
Montreal
Sometimes, supplementary material is not even penned by the same person, so I can't convince myself that it's canon even if it's official.
On topic, if something from a supplementary material is important and referred to in the main work, it should be in the main work. I don't want to have to go look for it elsewhere.
 

BlackGoku03

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,283
Comic book events make sense... most of the time.

Only time I can say it sucks is with Star Wars.
 
Oct 29, 2017
6,313
Supplemental media should be just that...supplemental.

The main story should be whole and self-contained so it can stand on it's own.
 

Deleted member 25606

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 29, 2017
8,973
That's a bit of a grey area since they aren't really supplenentary, they're chapters of a story in a shared universe.

They are, also, incredibly and deeply annoying to follow, so let's still count them.
I only used that because in the OP they were bitching about a Final Crisis thing being revealed in a tie-in.
 

Pellaidh

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,191
If something's required reading to understand the plot, then I wouldn't really call it supplementary, it's just a core part o the plot. And it almost always sucks, because it basically tells you that the people behind the story are more interested in selling you stuff than actually telling a story. Mass Effect in particular stands out to me for just being so terrible with this that it was legitimately funny.

But there's an interesting question here about what's actually complementary vs main content though. In the context of Fate, the core VN is mostly standalone and explains everything pretty well, and the rest is just extras for existing fans who are really into the story. The VN isn't supplementary material, everything else is. It's just that a lot of people aren't interested in the VN, and only want to consume the complementary material instead. And at that point I don't think it's fair to complain about not completely understanding it, or about having to wiki stuff that was explained in the VN.
 

RoninChaos

Member
Oct 26, 2017
8,349
Tell it in the main story. I hate when something super important is told in supplemental materials.
 
Nov 17, 2017
12,864
If it's just a free and easily accessible animated short then it's fine. If it's like a whole feature length movie or something I have to go out of my way to pay for, please don't.

Good:




Bad:


MV5BOTEwNzMxNTU5M15BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwMzMyMjg3OTE@._V1_.jpg
 

Pokemaniac

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,944
Generally speaking, supplemental material should be well... supplemental. It's kind of in the name.
 
Oct 29, 2017
4,294
I barely read events so I don't get much of this problem but when I do I don't realy care for any tie ins unless they sound interesting and/or have a good creative team.