It's a tour de force with a scope far beyond most science fiction I've ever read. Not The Culture, Foundation or any of Arthur C. Clarke's masterpieces can compare, and I love those dearly.
Obviously, we're both big Tolkien fans; but I would say that The Silmarillion is not a book I'd read for the first time again. I feel that I always get more out of it with each reading, and I see more things that I'd missed or forgotten about. As a first time read, it's a bit dense.
Indeed. I feel that subsequent readings, plus ancillary material from Tolkien scholars such as Verlyn Flieger, have somewhat diminished the sense of wonder I felt when reading it for the first time.Obviously, we're both big Tolkien fans; but I would say that The Silmarillion is not a book I'd read for the first time again. I feel that I always get more out of it with each reading, and I see more things that I'd missed or forgotten about. As a first time read, it's a bit dense.
Your wish is your wish, of course. I just find it interesting how two Tolkien fans could disagree about such a thing, trivial as it is.
They suddenly had money for groceries and could even afford a telephone.
He hoped that fat royalty checks would keep replenishing his bank account, but Carrie only sold 13,000 copies as a hardback, which convinced him to grudgingly sign a new teaching contract for the 1974 school year.
But soon after, one phone call changed everything. It was Bill Thompson again. 'Are you sitting down?' he asked.
King was home alone, standing in the doorway between his kitchen and living room. 'Do I need to? he said.
'You might,' Thompson said. 'The paperback rights to Carrie went to Signet Books for $400,000 ... 200K of it is yours. Congratulations, Stephen.'
That's very interesting. My sense of wonder was large for the Hobbit and LotR, but not so much for the Silmarillion, which felt like a dense labyrinth of mythology to explore and ruminate on, rather than to experience in awe.Indeed. I feel that subsequent readings, plus ancillary material from Tolkien scholars such as Verlyn Flieger, have somewhat diminished the sense of wonder I felt when reading it for the first time.
Wonderful list. I should add:
- The Count of Monte Cristo
- The Lord of the Rings
- The Silmarillion
- The Master and Margarita
- Excession
- Star Maker
To name but a few.
I think it primarily has to do with the fact that The Silmarillion was the first Tolkien book I read. It was unlike any other fantasy that I'd come across in my teen years. That's probably why I have less attachment to The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit.That's very interesting. My sense of wonder was large for the Hobbit and LotR, but not so much for the Silmarillion, which felt like a dense labyrinth of mythology to explore and ruminate on, rather than to experience in awe.
Different strokes and all...
Ah. That makes sense. I went the Hobbit -> LotR -> Silmarillion route.I think it primarily has to do with the fact that The Silmarillion was the first Tolkien book I read. It was unlike any other fantasy that I'd come across in my teen years. That's probably why I have less attachment to The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit.
man why. Flowers and the road fucked me up pretty bad. If anything I wish I could unread them
Since I've seen it mentioned a few times I'll ask... Does House of Leaves still hold up? Is it actually good, or was it just novel enough at the time to generate excited word of mouth?
yeah, i chase those feelings. it's hard for me to have such visceral reactions to books. i read the road in one day. on christmas. was completely blown away.man why. Flowers and the road fucked me up pretty bad. If anything I wish I could unread them