• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Metallix87

User Requested Self-Ban
Banned
Nov 1, 2017
10,533
I'm talking representatives and literally every vote.
There's a reason the Right is known for falling in line come hail or high water.
We would be in the middle of the Tim Kaine presidency if that was true for the Left (Because Clinton would have been elected and then impeached because Congress)
Shit you see stuffs like Q Anon with full support from the executive and you think the left and the right are the same?
I never said left and right are the same (though the implication that one has even suggested this is a popular point of attack on here, from what I've seen). I said they largely vote as monoliths, but neither is a monolith.
 

mael

Avenger
Nov 3, 2017
16,764
I never said left and right are the same (though the implication that one has even suggested this is a popular point of attack on here, from what I've seen). I said they largely vote as monoliths, but neither is a monolith.
I mean sure the left can't agree on anything while the right will disagree on whether to shoot immigrants or just give them smallpox while still supporting the most cruel method but sure they're both equally not monolith.
 

Metallix87

User Requested Self-Ban
Banned
Nov 1, 2017
10,533
I mean sure the left can't agree on anything while the right will disagree on whether to shoot immigrants or just give them smallpox while still supporting the most cruel method but sure they're both equally not monolith.
With a post like this, I just can't take you seriously, so I'll pass on continuing this discussion. Enjoy your time in this thread.
 

mael

Avenger
Nov 3, 2017
16,764
With a post like this, I just can't take you seriously, so I'll pass on continuing this discussion. Enjoy your time in this thread.
Sure, sure.
In the mean time Kavanaugh was still appointed despite the not monolith right being conflicted about it.
Like seriously if you could give example on the not monolith behavior, it sure would be interesting to discuss over your vague BS generalities you try to pass off as arguments.
It's ok you can keep the high ground you like so much, if we ever spar with lightsabers that might be useful.
 

Baji Boxer

Chicken Chaser
Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,376
Bannon is certainly in the category of racial supremecist/nazi-esque, I won't deny that one. Definitely goes into the isolation bin.

But what particular policies are you referring to in the Trump organization make them fascist?
I just edited them into my last reply after seeing your edit. Thought I'd be faster about it lol.
 

pedanticmikey

Member
Dec 19, 2018
90
User banned (3 days): Disingenuous arguing. Ignores Trump's repeated and documented calls for political violence.
They certainly vote as one.

You want the full list?
Between the attack on the free press and everything to do with immigration the listing will take a while.
Heck they got the corruption part like we're in 70's South Korea.
I can right now, on this board, call Donald Trump a flaming pile of shit that I can't wait to see out of office so he can be prosecuted and hopefully jailed for all sorts of corrupt bullshit, without fear.

His economic policies are aimed at strongarming for the sake of achieving free trade. He's certainly a capitalist with a tinge of protectionism.

Fortunately our amazing constitution basically prevents a single party state, so we can forgo that aspect of fascism.

He's not a supporter of political violence.

The immigration rhetoric certainly has tinges of it, but the actual policies are way more complex to call one thing or another.
Let's compare these two.

"Progressive income tax was proposed by Marx, therefore, all democrats are Stalinists."

In this case, Stalin might have chosen to associate with Marx's ideology, but I don't think Marx chose to associate with Stalin on account of dying when Stalin was, like, twelve. Democrats don't really choose to associate with Marx or Stalin on the whole, because the communist label was poisoned in the US for a long time. Maybe individual Democrats, but not the group. So you're associating one group with a person who just claimed the ideology of someone they never really claimed to associated with.

Meanwhile, the alt-right is literally a label for Neo-Nazis, and the president has has included people who have been heavily associated with the alt-right in his administration, and has tweeted out images from alt-right websites. So in this case, you're associating a person with the people they choose to surround themselves with, and with the people who gave them the things they regurgitate. Alternatively, associating the people who support thing guy with the people they know he surrounds himself with and speaks for.

Do these two actually seem similar to you?
I'm a market socialist with a degree in political economy (aka marxism), I certainly get the difference between Marx and Stalin. The poster I replied to made claims about fascism to equate nazism, which are similar but different, just like Marxism and Stalinism. That's why I picked Stalinism isntead of Trotskyism ;)

I think the direct correlation between alt-right and Neo-Nazis is incredibly nuanced, due to the overuse and overlabeling of both terms. But until I see actual Fascist tenents being proposed as law, it's hard for me to label the guy as such. Trump is a giant piece of shit, but I really don't think he's a Nazi or even a Nazi supporter. I don't really think he's a Fascist either.
 

prophetvx

Member
Nov 28, 2017
5,329
I can't stand Jonathan Pie but he isn't exactly wrong on this. In a heavily fractured political environment, people are quick to throw labels at each other to dismiss any discussion. With that said, the current environment has certainly warranted the more frequent use of the term at times, without question.
 

mael

Avenger
Nov 3, 2017
16,764
I can right now, on this board, call Donald Trump a flaming pile of shit that I can't wait to see out of office so he can be prosecuted and hopefully jailed for all sorts of corrupt bullshit, without fear.

His economic policies are aimed at strongarming for the sake of achieving free trade. He's certainly a capitalist with a tinge of protectionism.

Fortunately our amazing constitution basically prevents a single party state, so we can forgo that aspect of fascism.

He's not a supporter of political violence.

The immigration rhetoric certainly has tinges of it, but the actual policies are way more complex to call one thing or another.
It's great because you're not the press and you kind of know it, right?
You can't say he's clean in that regard after spending literal years in office delegitimizing the press.
And not a supporter of political violence?
The guy that retweeted this?
DtEwcW2WsAADSP2.jpg


After his 2nd most popular slogan was literal call for jailing his direct opponent?
 

Flammable D

Member
Oct 30, 2017
15,205
Donald Trump doesn't support political violence might be the funniest fucking thing I have ever read on this forum
 

Jebusman

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,081
Halifax, NS
Fortunately our amazing constitution basically prevents a single party state, so we can forgo that aspect of fascism.

Republicans have made it their life mission to suppress votes for any party that isn't them, effective working towards a single party state. Your constitution doesn't mean shit.

He's not a supporter of political violence.

Did you miss all the times he's either refused to condemn violence against protests, or trots out the "Both sides are bad" line?

I see you were in the Jordan Peterson thread running defense for him as well, so don't act like we don't know what you're trying to do here.
 

pedanticmikey

Member
Dec 19, 2018
90
I really think it's rhetoric and feeding his base of idiots. I think he's a corrupt piece of shit, but he's missing too many of the key ingredients of what makes a fascist a fascist.

It's not a word that can be used interchangeably with totalitarian/authoritarian.
Quit being so pedantic, mikey
I CANT STOP MYSELF

:P

In seriousness though, this is one of the areas that I think clear definitions and appropriate use of terms is super important. Both from the perspective of being able to have rational discourse without vilifying people we disagree with, as well as being able to appropriately point out and immediately dismantle and isolate the evils of Fascism and Nazism whenever they appear. Muddying the waters hurts everyone.
 

pedanticmikey

Member
Dec 19, 2018
90
*edit* Apologies for double post.
I see you were in the Jordan Peterson thread running defense for him as well, so don't act like we don't know what you're trying to do here.
LOL, I was going to return to that thread, but the level of insanity in there was too much.

I disagree with most of Jordan Peterson's stances, I just find the disconnect from what I've watched of him to the perceived stances and positions fascinating.
Please do not label me as such. I'm a socialist that went to The Evergreen State College, full disclosure. He thinks I want to kill everyone like Mao and Stalin.
 

mael

Avenger
Nov 3, 2017
16,764
In seriousness though, this is one of the areas that I think clear definitions and appropriate use of terms is super important. Both from the perspective of being able to have rational discourse without vilifying people we disagree with, as well as being able to appropriately point out and immediately dismantle and isolate the evils of Fascism and Nazism whenever they appear. Muddying the waters hurts everyone.
I kind of disagree here.
Considering the context is always important.
You cannot have an informal conversation like we have now without using somewhat loose definitions.
(although it's certainly arguable that Trump exhibits traits unique to fascists but that's not the point here).
If we were doing anything like writing a paper, an article, an essay (vid or not) or even debating, the argument for strict definition might work.
As it is, it only serves to muddy conversation into pointless debates about forms.
I'd even argue that it's rather stupid too as actual neonazis are doing less damages to the countries they're in compared to the crypto fascists enabling them.
Be it the tories in UK, the GOP in the US or that particular vocal fringe of yellow vests in France.
Again Flake has been a bigger disgrace than Spencer and did far more damage.
Calling him "'"'moderate'"'" ain't gonna change that he did a heck of a lot more to steer the US toward dictatorship than swastika branded neonazis (and no, not in a Chamberlain way).
 

Azerach

Member
Oct 29, 2017
1,196
*edit* Apologies for double post.

LOL, I was going to return to that thread, but the level of insanity in there was too much.

I disagree with most of Jordan Peterson's stances, I just find the disconnect from what I've watched of him to the perceived stances and positions fascinating.
Please do not label me as such. I'm a socialist that went to The Evergreen State College, full disclosure. He thinks I want to kill everyone like Mao and Stalin.
Lol exposed.
 

TAJ

Banned
Oct 28, 2017
12,446
Trump told his supporters to physically assault people who protested his rallies.
Not only that but he offered to pay the legal bills of anyone who actually went through with it.

He called for the assassination of Hillary.
 

IrishNinja

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
9,837
Vice City
It's a character and it's co-written by a far right shit head "comedian" who thinks Tommy Robinson is a stand up bloke. Which should tell you exactly where this video is coming from. That's my thoughts.
Someone post the pictures and footage of him being best mates with Tommy Robinson during an alt-right march.

Edit: Correction, other UKIPers

here are your receipts - dude is and remains trash
 

Baji Boxer

Chicken Chaser
Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,376
I can right now, on this board, call Donald Trump a flaming pile of shit that I can't wait to see out of office so he can be prosecuted and hopefully jailed for all sorts of corrupt bullshit, without fear.

What you can and can't say on this forum isn't relevant. Are you saying a fascist isn't a fascist until he actually becomes a dictator? Trump has moved to silence critics, and advocated for violence against critics and political rivals/enemies. His attacks on the free press have been consistent and daily.

His economic policies are aimed at strongarming for the sake of achieving free trade. He's certainly a capitalist with a tinge of protectionism.
More than a "tinge" of protectionism in his message.

Fortunately our amazing constitution basically prevents a single party state, so we can forgo that aspect of fascism.

We have better protections than pre-Nazi Germany's democratic system, but that has nothing to do with whether or not a party or individual is fascist. The Republican Party has been gradually trying to usher in one party rule for awhile now by breaking the system, and circumventing the Constitution through their choice of Supreme Court Justices.

He's not a supporter of political violence.
He has been an explicit supporter of political violence. This is just objective fact.

The immigration rhetoric certainly has tinges of it, but the actual policies are way more complex to call one thing or another.
This is just false. Nothing complex at all in regards to his immigration policies. It has been outright racist on rehtoric and action.
 

pedanticmikey

Member
Dec 19, 2018
90
I kind of disagree here.
Considering the context is always important.
You cannot have an informal conversation like we have now without using somewhat loose definitions.
(although it's certainly arguable that Trump exhibits traits unique to fascists but that's not the point here).
If we were doing anything like writing a paper, an article, an essay (vid or not) or even debating, the argument for strict definition might work.
As it is, it only serves to muddy conversation into pointless debates about forms.
I'd even argue that it's rather stupid too as actual neonazis are doing less damages to the countries they're in compared to the crypto fascists enabling them.
Be it the tories in UK, the GOP in the US or that particular vocal fringe of yellow vests in France.
Again Flake has been a bigger disgrace than Spencer and did far more damage.
Calling him "'"'moderate'"'" ain't gonna change that he did a heck of a lot more to steer the US toward dictatorship than swastika branded neonazis (and no, not in a Chamberlain way).
That's fairly convincing. Of course he is going to have more power than neonazis which are appropriately removed from any real impact or political power. But, on a technicality, every single presidential administration expands presidential power.

He's more egregious than most, so Ill cede this one.
I pity you for your inability to actually engage and assume what someone is saying is what they mean. I can't fathom having to live in such a suspicious and paranoid world on a daily basis.
 

King_Moc

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,126
Seems pretty accurate, I'm not sure what part of it rustled the jimmies of most posters here.

Would it help to point out that the video was made due to right wing protesters in London hounding a female mp on her way to parliament and calling her a Nazi as she's in favour of a second brexit vote?
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
I can't stand this guy the moment he blew up after the election with his I TOLD YOU LIBS video

His whole schtick of just ending his actual journalist segment, but bursting with the truth 'he's not allowed to say' after the segment goes back to broadcasting - ugh it's just so hackneyed I'm earnestly shocked people take him seriously at all.

He recently posted a video condemning people condemning Louis CK as well. Full blown moderate centrist this guy
Yeah he started making shitty strawmen arguments about the CK thing and it was really really bad.

Regardless, making a video on how some internet people overuse the word Nazi is really fruitless, how about you spend more time going after the people that are being labelled Nazis and less time tone policing anonymous users on message boards.
 

Deleted member 24118

User requested account closure
Member
Oct 29, 2017
4,920
I'd caution that Nazi Germany started out as 1% brown shirts and future SS types and 99% mixture of good people, mediocre people and "disparate, run-of-the-mill sexists, racists and common bigots."

It's not Godwin's Law when we're talking about how Nazis beget other Nazis.

That's probably a generous assumption tbh. Your average German was probably (socially) far, far right of what we'd consider "alt right" today.
 

SuperBlank

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 31, 2017
1,591
He's more or less right about what is or isn't nazism, and I agree the word does get used far too liberally now.

The title, of course, is wrong. Peak nazism was some eighty odd years ago. But I imagine that's sensationalism.
 
Nov 23, 2017
4,302
He's right though; over-judicious use of the word has cheapened it. A bit like over-using 'cunt' all the time.

It loses its impact on the brain, and becomes normalised.

Go watch a Netflix documentary about what it truely means to be a Nazi, and by lordo, there is actual US Army footage of the Extermination Camps on there.
"They don't have concentration camps yet so they aren't nazis"

Yes, this is an actual argument in 2019.
 
Nov 23, 2017
4,302
Seems pretty accurate, I'm not sure what part of it rustled the jimmies of most posters here.

Would it help to point out that the video was made due to right wing protesters in London hounding a female mp on her way to parliament and calling her a Nazi as she's in favour of a second brexit vote?
He's more or less right about what is or isn't nazism, and I agree the word does get used far too liberally now.

The title, of course, is wrong. Peak nazism was some eighty odd years ago. But I imagine that's sensationalism.

Weirdly defending bigots and saying "Tut tut, I don't personally want to consider how bad some people are, so please change how you speak about them." is a lot easier than actually trying to stop bigotry I guess.
 
Oct 27, 2017
3,826
a7Q6Wi9.png


iunno, kinda look like nazis to me.

Nah, dude. He's just saying he fingerbanged a chick thiiiiiiiiis tall. The gentleman behind him is giving a child a high five. Liberals - Sex negative and anti-family. Shame.

"They don't have concentration camps yet so they aren't nazis"

Yes, this is an actual argument in 2019.


Holocaust Survivors Recall Exact Day Holocaust Started Right Out Of The Blue
 

Grug

Member
Oct 26, 2017
4,644
The term Nazi is sometimes misapplied, yes.

But there are also plenty of examples today where the term is completely fucking apt.

I am infinitely more willing to forgive the people who use the term Nazi too readily over the people who seem to have a compulsive reflex to blanket condemn/ridicule the use of the word. Can't help but think those apologists will keep saying "oh stop being hysterical and calling people Nazis" right up until the point where we find ourselves digging through the ashes of the next Auschwitz-Birkenau.

We study history for a reason, and the people who keep hand-waving away clear warning signs of history repeating (and for little more than semantic reasons) are very, very dangerous people, regardless of their intentions.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
The term Nazi is sometimes misapplied, yes.

But there are also plenty of examples today where the term is completely fucking apt.

I am more likely to forgive the people who use the term Nazi too readily over the people who seem to have a compulsive reflex to blanket condemn/ridicule the use of the word. Can't help but think those apologists will keep saying "oh stop being hysterical and calling people Nazis" right up until the point where we find ourselves digging through the ashes of the next Auschwitz-Birkenau.

We study history for a reason, and the people who keep hand-waving away clear warning signs of history repeating (and for little more than semantic reasons) are very, very dangerous people, regardless of their intentions.
Yupppp
 

Razor Mom

Member
Jan 2, 2018
2,546
United Kingdom
Seems pretty accurate, I'm not sure what part of it rustled the jimmies of most posters here.

Would it help to point out that the video was made due to right wing protesters in London hounding a female mp on her way to parliament and calling her a Nazi as she's in favour of a second brexit vote?
Yeah I figured this was the context of the video. I know of quite a few small-town Yorkshire right wing shitheads who have been using the term nazi to refer to anyone who they think is "anti Britain", either by being pro EU or whatever other reason. It's amazing to think how meaningless the word has become.
 

RedMercury

Blue Venus
Member
Dec 24, 2017
17,649
"They don't have concentration camps yet so they aren't nazis"

Yes, this is an actual argument in 2019.

Pretty bad argument considering:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...the-history-with-care/?utm_term=.c4f700a73417

Waitman Wade Beorn is a Holocaust and genocide studies historian and lecturer at the University of Virginia. He is the author of "Marching Into Darkness: The Wehrmacht and the Holocaust in Belarus" and "The Holocaust in Eastern Europe: At the Epicenter of the Final Solution."
 

GamerJM

Member
Nov 8, 2017
15,615
so is this guy like, just the "I'm leftist but also the left sucks and here's why" videos guy or does he do anything else
 

Famassu

Member
Oct 27, 2017
9,186
Speak like a Nazi and support white supremacy and supremacists & their policies and I'm gonna call you a Nazi.

This alt-right shit is so fucking annoying because it's ultimately a successful rebranding of Nazism. Maybe they don't yet quite kill Others in the same scale as Nazis eventually did but we've got ICE gathering immigrants no matter if they are legal or not, leftist politicians killed on the streets of London, immigrant/refugee children gathered and even dying at what are essentially consentration camps etc. that these people fully support.
 

Dary

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,407
The English Wilderness
Yeah I figured this was the context of the video. I know of quite a few small-town Yorkshire right wing shitheads who have been using the term nazi to refer to anyone who they think is "anti Britain", either by being pro EU or whatever other reason. It's amazing to think how meaningless the word has become.
That's my take on it too - I've heard people round these parts refer to the EU as "a Nazi conspiracy" ("They conquered Europe without ever firing a shot!"), and Angela Merkel labelled the "the second coming of Hitler".

But, y'know, screw context I guess?
 

Razor Mom

Member
Jan 2, 2018
2,546
United Kingdom
That's my take on it too - I've heard people round these parts refer to the EU as "a Nazi conspiracy" ("They conquered Europe without ever firing a shot!"), and Angela Merkel labelled the "the second coming of Hitler".

But, y'know, screw context I guess?
There's a guy who's a huge BNP supporter living in a local village. He was at the pub recently making comparisons between Merkel and Hitler, exactly as you said, and saying that we should basically get back to the good old days of "scalping Nazis" and I think referencing inglorious basterds. Herein lies the massive issue with the use of the word Nazi in the modern political climate.
 

Grug

Member
Oct 26, 2017
4,644
There's a guy who's a huge BNP supporter living in a local village. He was at the pub recently making comparisons between Merkel and Hitler, exactly as you said, and saying that we should basically get back to the good old days of "scalping Nazis" and I think referencing inglorious basterds. Herein lies the massive issue with the use of the word Nazi in the modern political climate.

There will always be ignorant idiots who miss the point entirely. I don't think that's unique to today's society.
 

Dary

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,407
The English Wilderness
There's a guy who's a huge BNP supporter living in a local village. He was at the pub recently making comparisons between Merkel and Hitler, exactly as you said, and saying that we should basically get back to the good old days of "scalping Nazis" and I think referencing inglorious basterds. Herein lies the massive issue with the use of the word Nazi in the modern political climate.
There's such a massive divide between rural and urban areas, between the big cities and the small towns, between North and South, that boiling it down to some black and white "Left vs Right" conflict is hopelessly naive - and plays right into the hands of Actual Fascists.
 
Oct 27, 2017
3,826
The term Nazi is sometimes misapplied, yes.

But there are also plenty of examples today where the term is completely fucking apt.

I am infinitely more willing to forgive the people who use the term Nazi too readily over the people who seem to have a compulsive reflex to blanket condemn/ridicule the use of the word. Can't help but think those apologists will keep saying "oh stop being hysterical and calling people Nazis" right up until the point where we find ourselves digging through the ashes of the next Auschwitz-Birkenau.

We study history for a reason, and the people who keep hand-waving away clear warning signs of history repeating (and for little more than semantic reasons) are very, very dangerous people, regardless of their intentions.
Yup. After watching some alt right livestreams from the Unite the Right rally, I learned 2 things.

1. Neo-Nazis are distinct from other far right groups, and should be distinguished as such.
2. There are a fuckton more neo-nazis than I thought there were.
 

Aprikurt

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 29, 2017
18,775
I found his first few videos pretty entertaining but he's become an irresponsible centrist echo chamber with a boring shtick.

He's a very angry version of that Boogie "maybe we'll meet in the middle" .gif, and at a chaotic time like this, I can't stand for that nonsense.