I never said left and right are the same (though the implication that one has even suggested this is a popular point of attack on here, from what I've seen). I said they largely vote as monoliths, but neither is a monolith.I'm talking representatives and literally every vote.
There's a reason the Right is known for falling in line come hail or high water.
We would be in the middle of the Tim Kaine presidency if that was true for the Left (Because Clinton would have been elected and then impeached because Congress)
Shit you see stuffs like Q Anon with full support from the executive and you think the left and the right are the same?
what planet have you been on that republican legislators aren't closely allied with trumpGuilt by association is some McCarthy level bullshit.
"Progressive income tax was proposed by Marx, therefore, all democrats are Stalinists."
I mean sure the left can't agree on anything while the right will disagree on whether to shoot immigrants or just give them smallpox while still supporting the most cruel method but sure they're both equally not monolith.I never said left and right are the same (though the implication that one has even suggested this is a popular point of attack on here, from what I've seen). I said they largely vote as monoliths, but neither is a monolith.
With a post like this, I just can't take you seriously, so I'll pass on continuing this discussion. Enjoy your time in this thread.I mean sure the left can't agree on anything while the right will disagree on whether to shoot immigrants or just give them smallpox while still supporting the most cruel method but sure they're both equally not monolith.
Sure, sure.With a post like this, I just can't take you seriously, so I'll pass on continuing this discussion. Enjoy your time in this thread.
I just edited them into my last reply after seeing your edit. Thought I'd be faster about it lol.Bannon is certainly in the category of racial supremecist/nazi-esque, I won't deny that one. Definitely goes into the isolation bin.
But what particular policies are you referring to in the Trump organization make them fascist?
jeb bush or bustI never said left and right are the same (though the implication that one has even suggested this is a popular point of attack on here, from what I've seen). I said they largely vote as monoliths, but neither is a monolith.
I can right now, on this board, call Donald Trump a flaming pile of shit that I can't wait to see out of office so he can be prosecuted and hopefully jailed for all sorts of corrupt bullshit, without fear.They certainly vote as one.
You want the full list?
Between the attack on the free press and everything to do with immigration the listing will take a while.
Heck they got the corruption part like we're in 70's South Korea.
I'm a market socialist with a degree in political economy (aka marxism), I certainly get the difference between Marx and Stalin. The poster I replied to made claims about fascism to equate nazism, which are similar but different, just like Marxism and Stalinism. That's why I picked Stalinism isntead of Trotskyism ;)Let's compare these two.
"Progressive income tax was proposed by Marx, therefore, all democrats are Stalinists."
In this case, Stalin might have chosen to associate with Marx's ideology, but I don't think Marx chose to associate with Stalin on account of dying when Stalin was, like, twelve. Democrats don't really choose to associate with Marx or Stalin on the whole, because the communist label was poisoned in the US for a long time. Maybe individual Democrats, but not the group. So you're associating one group with a person who just claimed the ideology of someone they never really claimed to associated with.
Meanwhile, the alt-right is literally a label for Neo-Nazis, and the president has has included people who have been heavily associated with the alt-right in his administration, and has tweeted out images from alt-right websites. So in this case, you're associating a person with the people they choose to surround themselves with, and with the people who gave them the things they regurgitate. Alternatively, associating the people who support thing guy with the people they know he surrounds himself with and speaks for.
Do these two actually seem similar to you?
It's great because you're not the press and you kind of know it, right?I can right now, on this board, call Donald Trump a flaming pile of shit that I can't wait to see out of office so he can be prosecuted and hopefully jailed for all sorts of corrupt bullshit, without fear.
His economic policies are aimed at strongarming for the sake of achieving free trade. He's certainly a capitalist with a tinge of protectionism.
Fortunately our amazing constitution basically prevents a single party state, so we can forgo that aspect of fascism.
He's not a supporter of political violence.
The immigration rhetoric certainly has tinges of it, but the actual policies are way more complex to call one thing or another.
Fortunately our amazing constitution basically prevents a single party state, so we can forgo that aspect of fascism.
Quit being so pedantic, mikeyJust because someone is an idiot doesn't mean that every opinion they have is wrong. Attack the idea, not the person.
And as would be assumed by my name, I think there's a huge number of labels that are grossly overused to the point that they become almost meaningless. The common misuse of the word fascist drives me nuts.
I CANT STOP MYSELF
LOL, I was going to return to that thread, but the level of insanity in there was too much.I see you were in the Jordan Peterson thread running defense for him as well, so don't act like we don't know what you're trying to do here.
I kind of disagree here.In seriousness though, this is one of the areas that I think clear definitions and appropriate use of terms is super important. Both from the perspective of being able to have rational discourse without vilifying people we disagree with, as well as being able to appropriately point out and immediately dismantle and isolate the evils of Fascism and Nazism whenever they appear. Muddying the waters hurts everyone.
Lol exposed.*edit* Apologies for double post.
LOL, I was going to return to that thread, but the level of insanity in there was too much.
I disagree with most of Jordan Peterson's stances, I just find the disconnect from what I've watched of him to the perceived stances and positions fascinating.
Please do not label me as such. I'm a socialist that went to The Evergreen State College, full disclosure. He thinks I want to kill everyone like Mao and Stalin.
It's a character and it's co-written by a far right shit head "comedian" who thinks Tommy Robinson is a stand up bloke. Which should tell you exactly where this video is coming from. That's my thoughts.
Someone post the pictures and footage of him being best mates with Tommy Robinson during an alt-right march.
Edit: Correction, other UKIPers
Was about to say the same thing.
I can right now, on this board, call Donald Trump a flaming pile of shit that I can't wait to see out of office so he can be prosecuted and hopefully jailed for all sorts of corrupt bullshit, without fear.
His economic policies are aimed at strongarming for the sake of achieving free trade. He's certainly a capitalist with a tinge of protectionism.More than a "tinge" of protectionism in his message.
Fortunately our amazing constitution basically prevents a single party state, so we can forgo that aspect of fascism.
We have better protections than pre-Nazi Germany's democratic system, but that has nothing to do with whether or not a party or individual is fascist. The Republican Party has been gradually trying to usher in one party rule for awhile now by breaking the system, and circumventing the Constitution through their choice of Supreme Court Justices.
He has been an explicit supporter of political violence. This is just objective fact.
This is just false. Nothing complex at all in regards to his immigration policies. It has been outright racist on rehtoric and action.The immigration rhetoric certainly has tinges of it, but the actual policies are way more complex to call one thing or another.
That's fairly convincing. Of course he is going to have more power than neonazis which are appropriately removed from any real impact or political power. But, on a technicality, every single presidential administration expands presidential power.I kind of disagree here.
Considering the context is always important.
You cannot have an informal conversation like we have now without using somewhat loose definitions.
(although it's certainly arguable that Trump exhibits traits unique to fascists but that's not the point here).
If we were doing anything like writing a paper, an article, an essay (vid or not) or even debating, the argument for strict definition might work.
As it is, it only serves to muddy conversation into pointless debates about forms.
I'd even argue that it's rather stupid too as actual neonazis are doing less damages to the countries they're in compared to the crypto fascists enabling them.
Be it the tories in UK, the GOP in the US or that particular vocal fringe of yellow vests in France.
Again Flake has been a bigger disgrace than Spencer and did far more damage.
Calling him "'"'moderate'"'" ain't gonna change that he did a heck of a lot more to steer the US toward dictatorship than swastika branded neonazis (and no, not in a Chamberlain way).
I pity you for your inability to actually engage and assume what someone is saying is what they mean. I can't fathom having to live in such a suspicious and paranoid world on a daily basis.
Yeah he started making shitty strawmen arguments about the CK thing and it was really really bad.I can't stand this guy the moment he blew up after the election with his I TOLD YOU LIBS video
His whole schtick of just ending his actual journalist segment, but bursting with the truth 'he's not allowed to say' after the segment goes back to broadcasting - ugh it's just so hackneyed I'm earnestly shocked people take him seriously at all.
He recently posted a video condemning people condemning Louis CK as well. Full blown moderate centrist this guy
I'd caution that Nazi Germany started out as 1% brown shirts and future SS types and 99% mixture of good people, mediocre people and "disparate, run-of-the-mill sexists, racists and common bigots."
It's not Godwin's Law when we're talking about how Nazis beget other Nazis.
That's probably a generous assumption tbh. Your average German was probably (socially) far, far right of what we'd consider "alt right" today.
I honestly did forget, thank you. Was definitely wrong on that.Do you not remember his calls for violence on the campaign trail?
Do you not remember whenever the right committed violence he harped on "both sides"?
You don't remember, or...
"They don't have concentration camps yet so they aren't nazis"He's right though; over-judicious use of the word has cheapened it. A bit like over-using 'cunt' all the time.
It loses its impact on the brain, and becomes normalised.
Go watch a Netflix documentary about what it truely means to be a Nazi, and by lordo, there is actual US Army footage of the Extermination Camps on there.
Seems pretty accurate, I'm not sure what part of it rustled the jimmies of most posters here.
Would it help to point out that the video was made due to right wing protesters in London hounding a female mp on her way to parliament and calling her a Nazi as she's in favour of a second brexit vote?
He's more or less right about what is or isn't nazism, and I agree the word does get used far too liberally now.
The title, of course, is wrong. Peak nazism was some eighty odd years ago. But I imagine that's sensationalism.
"They don't have concentration camps yet so they aren't nazis"
Yes, this is an actual argument in 2019.
YuppppThe term Nazi is sometimes misapplied, yes.
But there are also plenty of examples today where the term is completely fucking apt.
I am more likely to forgive the people who use the term Nazi too readily over the people who seem to have a compulsive reflex to blanket condemn/ridicule the use of the word. Can't help but think those apologists will keep saying "oh stop being hysterical and calling people Nazis" right up until the point where we find ourselves digging through the ashes of the next Auschwitz-Birkenau.
We study history for a reason, and the people who keep hand-waving away clear warning signs of history repeating (and for little more than semantic reasons) are very, very dangerous people, regardless of their intentions.
Yeah I figured this was the context of the video. I know of quite a few small-town Yorkshire right wing shitheads who have been using the term nazi to refer to anyone who they think is "anti Britain", either by being pro EU or whatever other reason. It's amazing to think how meaningless the word has become.Seems pretty accurate, I'm not sure what part of it rustled the jimmies of most posters here.
Would it help to point out that the video was made due to right wing protesters in London hounding a female mp on her way to parliament and calling her a Nazi as she's in favour of a second brexit vote?
"They don't have concentration camps yet so they aren't nazis"
Yes, this is an actual argument in 2019.
Waitman Wade Beorn is a Holocaust and genocide studies historian and lecturer at the University of Virginia. He is the author of "Marching Into Darkness: The Wehrmacht and the Holocaust in Belarus" and "The Holocaust in Eastern Europe: At the Epicenter of the Final Solution."
That's my take on it too - I've heard people round these parts refer to the EU as "a Nazi conspiracy" ("They conquered Europe without ever firing a shot!"), and Angela Merkel labelled the "the second coming of Hitler".Yeah I figured this was the context of the video. I know of quite a few small-town Yorkshire right wing shitheads who have been using the term nazi to refer to anyone who they think is "anti Britain", either by being pro EU or whatever other reason. It's amazing to think how meaningless the word has become.
There's a guy who's a huge BNP supporter living in a local village. He was at the pub recently making comparisons between Merkel and Hitler, exactly as you said, and saying that we should basically get back to the good old days of "scalping Nazis" and I think referencing inglorious basterds. Herein lies the massive issue with the use of the word Nazi in the modern political climate.That's my take on it too - I've heard people round these parts refer to the EU as "a Nazi conspiracy" ("They conquered Europe without ever firing a shot!"), and Angela Merkel labelled the "the second coming of Hitler".
But, y'know, screw context I guess?
There's a guy who's a huge BNP supporter living in a local village. He was at the pub recently making comparisons between Merkel and Hitler, exactly as you said, and saying that we should basically get back to the good old days of "scalping Nazis" and I think referencing inglorious basterds. Herein lies the massive issue with the use of the word Nazi in the modern political climate.
There's such a massive divide between rural and urban areas, between the big cities and the small towns, between North and South, that boiling it down to some black and white "Left vs Right" conflict is hopelessly naive - and plays right into the hands of Actual Fascists.There's a guy who's a huge BNP supporter living in a local village. He was at the pub recently making comparisons between Merkel and Hitler, exactly as you said, and saying that we should basically get back to the good old days of "scalping Nazis" and I think referencing inglorious basterds. Herein lies the massive issue with the use of the word Nazi in the modern political climate.
Yup. After watching some alt right livestreams from the Unite the Right rally, I learned 2 things.The term Nazi is sometimes misapplied, yes.
But there are also plenty of examples today where the term is completely fucking apt.
I am infinitely more willing to forgive the people who use the term Nazi too readily over the people who seem to have a compulsive reflex to blanket condemn/ridicule the use of the word. Can't help but think those apologists will keep saying "oh stop being hysterical and calling people Nazis" right up until the point where we find ourselves digging through the ashes of the next Auschwitz-Birkenau.
We study history for a reason, and the people who keep hand-waving away clear warning signs of history repeating (and for little more than semantic reasons) are very, very dangerous people, regardless of their intentions.