I almost feel like people miss the point of these comparisons entirely. There are 3 main pillars that make a DF video interesting. 3 things that give them value:
- They allow people to make an informed purchase decision.
- They offer an educated analysis of video games from the technical standpoint, which is educational / informative, and can go as far as helping the developers identify inconsistencies in their products.
- They are entertaining (their content has gotten a little bit more personality driven, which has been super entertaining to me).
It isn't about tribalism or a war, it's about comparing consumer products. That's not a war. It IS about which console performs the best for a particular product. That's a fair and interesting conversation to have for the reasons cited above, but there is absolutely nothing interesting about dunking on other people or gloating at them that your "team" won.
I think we may have a societal problem with tribalism, a problem we always had, but one made far worse by the age of social media. I know a common thing to say is that it was always there and that social media just gives the worst people a voice, but I genuinely do think it also did get worse with time. People feel more entitled and more empowered because of social media, it's not just a megaphone, it's fucking us up.
Digital Foundry does really great work. It doesn't just suck that people have to go and harass the team because of it, it's genuinely despicable.