The discourse has been fairly rough lately, but I don't view the calls for to make things less 'strict' and more welcoming of 'other opinions' in good light. I remember a lot of that from the other place too, and when those things came out it was clear the original call was the right one.
However, I am hating how people do tend to try the game the system. The Biden/Reade stuff was a good example. Some Biden supporters tried to make many, who didn't want to vote for the president docket in the general election at all because of experienced trauma, out to be Trump supporters, while some of those victims would also insert/project themselves into other discussions to call all Biden voters rape apologists and supporters. Both with the goals of shutting down "opposition" with labels that could subject to a ban and projecting their fears on to others, rather than coming to terms that people with PTSD or other effects of trauma can't and shouldn't take part in that election when many could do so in their place and that most Era voters weren't gunning for Biden in the Primaries and dealing with the hand dealt in a two party, first to the post system.
I'm just not sure if there's a way to foster a more positive environment between users. Mods can lighten up or crack down all they want, but the behavior is largely on us. Myself included, even if I have managed to not get any bans or warnings across both places. Been just as guilty being a part of a dog pile, not reporting, and trying to force the tone of a thread to align to my preference rather than in-line with what the situation called for.
But on the other hand, if the bans are on the ridiculous side, that deserves to be brought up. I mean look at the Bezos guillotine thread right now. People are not happy about it, and it was a major issue of the old forum as well.
That's understandable if people were upset for prior bans around the same subject/reference. I personally think the imagery and reference is a good reminder, especially in a country that supposedly has a self-lauded amendment for similar purposes that somehow is never actually used for that reason. But I also understand the mod team having issues trying to avoid fostering implications of threat and death when it falls under "Advocating Violence" in the TOS. Luckily not my call to make, but hopefully stuff like that continues to be reviewed either way.
I wonder, is there a way to bring up genuine concerns over certain media like Naughty Dog's crunch problems or JK Rowlings TERF tirade, whilst still allowing posters to still enjoy and celebrate the media? I think this is a problem this site runs into a lot.
Unfortunately there's no way to really enforce that without likely stamping over one element or the other. You can't say that stuff is off-topic for coverage of things as it generally very much is a factor in some way. Just as people are allowed to say they're excited about a game, they should be able to say they won't support it for problematic elements that property is involved in.
I suppose that mods could attach a disclaimer on the, as an example, Wizarding World RPG reveal thread with acknowledgement of Rowling's issues and that the Wizarding World/Harry Potter franchise is very much attached to her currently for the "art isn't the artist" crowd but the thread is about the content of the reveal itself, but it still feels a bit like trying to stifle or segregate the discussion. It's bad enough that OTs are treated generally as the hype/positive or gtfo threads and all the other threads are the mud pits. It would be nice to spread it about a little more, but there's not really a solution to that I'm seeing.
I think when somone post a Bad take, you should see what others responded to it, if the six or seven responses covered what You were gonna respond just move on.
People just tend to just dog pile and not report, and the mod team has had issues of the past of getting dunked on for not responding to a situation when it was never brought to their attention in the first place until someone finally uses the feature well after or one of the mods looks in the thread by chance. No one isn't getting police called on them for getting their post reported, so snitch away or at least just ignore the user if they're a constant problem on a personal level but not in a way that is against any rules.