Wouldn't it be better to blame the person for using his religion in a bad way instead of the religion itself?
Has religion never made anyone a better person? Used for good?
Has religion never made anyone a better person? Used for good?
This is totally false. You'll see plenty of Islamophobia on here. There was even a major thread on it.This place only attacks Christianity. You wont see it attacking other religions. I find Christian beliefs to be very irrational but I don't think the way to deal with them is mockery. You have every right to do it, but it's not helpful. Find out what their reasons for believing are and tackle that.
I think religious people and non-religious are just as close minded as each other.
I will argue that being religious is not necessarily a choice if you are born and raised in it and never given the opportunity to actually join as an adult. You are indoctrinated from a young age to believe whatever religion it is.
Wouldn't it be better to blame the person for using his religion in a bad way instead of the religion itself?
Has religion never made anyone a better person? Used for good?
Not arguing with the second point, because I'm convinced it that, but as for the first point: Islam and Christianity literally call homosexuality a sin and sodomy - among other things.Wouldn't it be better to blame the person for using his religion in a bad way instead of the religion itself?
Has religion never made anyone a better person? Used for good?
if it can be used for good, it can be used for badWouldn't it be better to blame the person for using his religion in a bad way instead of the religion itself?
Has religion never made anyone a better person? Used for good?
Faux concern trolling because folks weren't offended enough about porn being shot in a church elicits a major eye roll.You should probably add some context to this thread. You were surprised that a mostly irreligious or atheist group of people were not bothered by people "desecrating an altar" that hold no significance for them, yet they are bothered by hateful graffiti.
I guess I could ask you the inverse. Why do actions with observable, real-life consequences such as hate speech bother you less than the non-religious not showing the same reverence to a place of worship?
This is a good point. It's the same with politics. Some people are surrounded by messed up beliefs and don't have what it takes to get out. It's our job to do what we can to help. We shouldn't just assume that they are intellectually capable persons who who stubbornly cling onto false beliefs.I will argue that being religious is not necessarily a choice if you are born and raised in it and never given the opportunity to actually join as an adult. You are indoctrinated from a young age to believe whatever religion it is.
Yeah, and the reason we reject them is because of the harm they cause. My issues with religion are mostly the bigotry that come with it a lot of the time. I would say that discrimination based on religion is wrong if it's purely based on them being religious if they aren't practicing or promoting bigoted practices.Same could be said of bigoted beliefs, depending on the environment, but that doesn't make use anymore tolerant of them just because they're difficult to reject for those people
Religion is an ideology/belief system. Not an ethnicity or sexual orientation.
Wouldn't it be better to blame the person for using his religion in a bad way instead of the religion itself?
Has religion never made anyone a better person? Used for good?
Perhaps I haven't been around here enough. I have only seen anti-Christian stuff being posted.This is totally false. You'll see plenty of Islamophobia on here. There was even a major thread on it.
I'd appreciate the answer to this, also.You should probably add some context to this thread. You were surprised that a mostly irreligious or atheist group of people were not bothered by people "desecrating an altar" that hold no significance for them, yet they are bothered by hateful graffiti.
I guess I could ask you the inverse. Why do actions with observable, real-life consequences such as hate speech bother you less than the non-religious not showing the same reverence to a place of worship?
That's true, but somehow I doubt that making fun of a guy for wearing pink or making fun of someone's hairstyle would be tolerated, so how would religion be any different in that sense?
That's true, but somehow I doubt that making fun of a guy for wearing pink or making fun of someone's hairstyle would be tolerated, so how would religion be any different in that sense?
It's not easy, but it's possible. I know this from personal experience. I know a lot of people who use the, "Well, that's the way they were raised,'" excuse to justify some pretty awful beliefs/behaviors.Partly true but most people who grow up in a family that is religious tend to favour their way to be religious and that particular religion as well. If your family is in the heart of southern America and your parents are Christians, your not gonna have much choice but be brought as a Christian as those values are what those parents will teach. It's not easy to get people out of that believe system when they have being taught their whole lives that their religious practices are the correct and only "true way". I think that applies to all religions and people who grew up with a religious family. Not to step away from the troubles and pain religion causes a lot of people, but from my opinion most people who become religious didn't have much choice growing up. Again I don't support religion and wish it continues to have its grab hold of people diminish.
Wouldn't it be better to blame the person for using his religion in a bad way instead of the religion itself?
Has religion never made anyone a better person? Used for good?
Visit any notably large thread involving discussing muslims and you'll come across it.Perhaps I haven't been around here enough. I have only seen anti-Christian stuff being posted.
Because it is often responsible for causing the other things you mentioned.
Religion is an ideology/belief system. Not an ethnicity or sexual orientation.
This. I can respect religious people without respecting their respective religions. I'm not gonna respect things taken on faith by default.You can't choose your race or your sexuality but you can definitely choose your religion which probably denigrates and steps on those who suffer by it's beliefs.
So why here in this board that preaches inclusivity find it so okay to not only trash but outright attack something as personal as someone's religion?
That's true, but somehow I doubt that making fun of a guy for wearing pink or making fun of someone's hairstyle would be tolerated, so how would religion be any different in that sense?
This is totally false. You'll see plenty of Islamophobia on here. There was even a major thread on it.
Partly true but most people who grow up in a family that is religious tend to favour their way to be religious and that particular religion as well. If your family is in the heart of southern America and your parents are Christians, your not gonna have much choice but be brought as a Christian as those values are what those parents will teach. It's not easy to get people out of that believe system when they have being taught their whole lives that their religious practices are the correct and only "true way". I think that applies to all religions and people who grew up with a religious family. Not to step away from the troubles and pain religion causes a lot of people, but from my opinion most people who become religious didn't have much choice growing up. Again I don't support religion and wish it continues to have its grab hold of people diminish.
I will argue that being religious is not necessarily a choice if you are born and raised in it and never given the opportunity to actually join. You are indoctrinated from a young age to believe whatever religion it is.
Non of the non abrahmic/eastern religions have anything in their scriptures about gay people as far as I know. The criminalization of homosexuality was introduced by the British in Asia, Africa and the other colonies they ruled due to Christianity. The recently overturned law criminalizing gay sex in India and the current criminalization of gay sex in Singapore are all British era laws.For what it's worth, I've never really seen any hostility towards Buddhism. I also don't think that they have passages saying to burn gays, so I dunno.
Hard disagree. My mother is Catholic and most of my family are too. My country is extremely conservative. I was even enrolled in a catholic school and graduated from it. Did the First Communion too. Hell, back then I always wanted to go to church on Sunday. But somewhere along the way, while I was growing up, I realized religion was a waste of time for me. Talking to an invincible being that may as well not exist was totally loco. Plus the Catholic church is so corrupt, incluiding the nuns that owned the high school, that I decided to not be involved with that organization.I will argue that being religious is not necessarily a choice if you are born and raised in it and never given the opportunity to actually join as an adult. You are indoctrinated from a young age to believe whatever religion it is.
It can be both as the two often feed into each other.From my own first hand witnessing of Islamophobia it seems to have less to do with religion and more with the main practitioners being of non-white skin tones. So it seems more a case of racism than anything.
Yep. I think to the point that Islam Era all left.This is totally false. You'll see plenty of Islamophobia on here. There was even a major thread on it.