• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Deleted member 4783

Oct 25, 2017
4,531
Pathetic is draining the fourth largest body of freshwater on earth because you couldn't pass on the real costs of the abuse to anyone benefitting from the ecological wreckage so it was externalized to the environment and future generations.

Markets like this make sure that shortages have ramifications for the highest water consumers to change their behavior. If your business has to have futures as risk-mitigators, but those futures are really expensive because everyone else needs them too, then maybe you find ways to use less water so that you aren't so sensitive to price.


Ohhh the markets! You are right! Markets are never wrong! This could never have disastrous ramifications, not at all. And if it does, we failed the market! Not otherwise! Just ignore all the third world countries ravaged by the market!

Lastly, no one is defending what happened there, bucko. it's just amazingly funny how you brought that up to drive your shitty narrative.
 

Hasseigaku

Member
Oct 30, 2017
3,538
Water rights are completely fucked. The pistachio/pomegranate magnates of California own a shitload of water.
 

FliX

Master of the Reality Stone
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
9,868
Metro Detroit
I'm not using 50L
Oh wait are we talking laundry or dishes. I'm talking laundry.
dishwasher: 5 Gal vs 27 gal if you did the same amount of dishes by hand.

You won't believe how much water dishwashers use

Water usage and energy savings are two issues that arise when debating dishwashing versus handwashing. Find out what you need to know.
.

Mileage might vary obviously, but it's pretty well established that dishwashers use significantly less water than hand-washing.
 

killerrin

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,237
Toronto
Wake me up once I can buy Oxygen Futures. I'm bullish on Oxygen.

Oh the US is definitely going to do that at some point. It's GOING to happen sadly

No need to Anex us immediately. First they'll build pipelines from the Great Lakes to their desert cities against our bitching and moaning. Then once those go dry, then they'll annex us for the swamp and marshlands by claiming something about how one of our elections was undemocratic (bonus points for NDP victory for that good old fashion fight against "Communism") and they need to put in charge a strong Conservative Democratic voice that will bring relationships back to normal (through us to selling off natural resources at firesale prices).

All the while ignoring the fact that they could have just as easily built Water Desalination plants on their two oceans, as well as artificial rivers going inland to irrigate said deserts. Which would also help eliviate the problem of their flooding economic centers on the coasts. But if course dams and rivers don't make the industrial war economy money.
 
Last edited:

Ether_Snake

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
11,306
Now they have a reason to stockpile water instead of oil. If a conservative government is elected in Canada, expect pipelines all over the north sending water to the US.
 

Sunster

The Fallen
Oct 5, 2018
10,012
"But it's the only system that works" or whatever it is that's usually trotted out in its defense, instead of at least trying to improve the world at all.
"Capitalism is the pinnacle of human consciousness. we will never and can never come up with anything more perfect. 100 trillion lives have been saved by capitalism!"
 
Oct 27, 2017
552
Omaha
Markets like this make sure that shortages have ramifications for the highest water consumers to change their behavior. If your business has to have futures as risk-mitigators, but those futures are really expensive because everyone else needs them too, then maybe you find ways to use less water so that you aren't so sensitive to price.

Or it portends collusion and manipulation of water supply and flow to the collective benefit of the largest water users, to the point where only the largest users have enough money to consume. I have zero faith in a neoliberal government to regulate water equitably pending environmental calamity, and I have absolute faith in businesses to push for growth in any means necessary. We got to this point in part because of the belief that markets "know best." But everybody needs water. Everything needs water.
 

dabig2

Member
Oct 29, 2017
5,116
Ohhh the markets! You are right! Markets are never wrong! This could never have disastrous ramifications, not at all. And if it does, we failed the market! Not otherwise! Just ignore all the third world countries ravaged by the market!

Lastly, no one is defending what happened there, bucko. it's just amazingly funny how you brought that up to drive your shitty narrative.

We're all still waiting for capitalism to fix Flint, after it fucked it up when they started privatizing things after the 2013 Detroit bankruptcy

403px-Climate_March_1085_%2834368550705%29.jpg



theintercept.com

From Pittsburgh to Flint, the Dire Consequences of Giving Private Companies Responsibility for Ailing Public Water Systems

The private water company Veolia had contracts with both Flint and Pittsburgh around the time that lead levels rose in their drinking water.
The two lead crises have another important thing in common: a private water company named Veolia. The world's largest supplier of water services, Veolia had contracts with both Flint and Pittsburgh around the time that lead levels rose in their drinking water. And in both places, Veolia wound up in legal disputes over its role in the crises.
But by this past January, it appeared Veolia had largely avoided responsibility for the lead crisis that occurred during its oversight of the Pittsburgh water system. After more than a year of closed-door arbitration over the charges, Veolia and the Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority issued a joint statement concluding that neither party "admits or concedes any allegations or claims made."
As the Trump administration plan is being hashed out, more private companies will likely profit off public water systems. Yet when something goes wrong with their provision of basic services, the public has little recourse other than to end their contracts, according to Barlow. "It's very hard to hold a private corporation accountable for this or any other kind of travesty," she said. "Governments make bad decisions too, but we can hold them accountable" by voting them out of office.

This is the future neocons and corporatists want for us all. There's a big reason the Trump admin would love to have water join commodities on the market, and we can all be guaranteed that there's nothing altruistic to it.

Water should not be a market, especially when the reason water might be going scarce is because of rapid climate change and horrific agriculture practices - all things made worse by profit motivation.
 

Deleted member 4783

Oct 25, 2017
4,531
We're all still waiting for capitalism to fix Flint, after it fucked it up when they started privatizing things after the 2013 Detroit bankruptcy

403px-Climate_March_1085_%2834368550705%29.jpg



theintercept.com

From Pittsburgh to Flint, the Dire Consequences of Giving Private Companies Responsibility for Ailing Public Water Systems

The private water company Veolia had contracts with both Flint and Pittsburgh around the time that lead levels rose in their drinking water.




This is the future neocons and corporatists want for us all. There's a big reason the Trump admin would love to have water join commodities on the market, and we can all be guaranteed that there's nothing altruistic to it.

Water should not be a market, especially when the reason water might be going scarce is because of rapid climate change and horrific agriculture practices - all things made worse by profit motivation.
Wow BRO, BUT THE MARKETS ARE PERFECT BRO!
www.theguardian.com

The fight to stop Nestlé from taking America's water to sell in plastic bottles

Creek beds are bone dry and once-gushing springs are reduced to trickles as fights play out around the nation over control of nation’s freshwater supply
longreads.com

Nestlé Is Sucking the World's Aquifers Dry - Longreads

The multinational corporation is gradually privatizing a natural resource.
 

Rex Griswold

Member
Oct 29, 2017
221
Ya'll ready to eat the rich? I've got arms for thirty ish people.

Bad humor aside, this is actually pretty alarming, and doesn't paint a good picture for the future.
 

killerrin

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,237
Toronto
Wow BRO, BUT THE MARKETS ARE PERFECT BRO!
www.theguardian.com

The fight to stop Nestlé from taking America's water to sell in plastic bottles

Creek beds are bone dry and once-gushing springs are reduced to trickles as fights play out around the nation over control of nation’s freshwater supply
longreads.com

Nestlé Is Sucking the World's Aquifers Dry - Longreads

The multinational corporation is gradually privatizing a natural resource.

So how long until Nestle uses this as an excuse to raise the price of bottled water while paying off municipalities to continue to ignore this new market price.
 
Last edited:
Oct 27, 2017
552
Omaha
Wow BRO, BUT THE MARKETS ARE PERFECT BRO!
www.theguardian.com

The fight to stop Nestlé from taking America's water to sell in plastic bottles

Creek beds are bone dry and once-gushing springs are reduced to trickles as fights play out around the nation over control of nation’s freshwater supply
longreads.com

Nestlé Is Sucking the World's Aquifers Dry - Longreads

The multinational corporation is gradually privatizing a natural resource.

Thank you both for linking these. My mother is from Flint and I still have family there. I grew up mostly in California and now live in Texas. Socialism is not why taps, crops, wells and aquifers run dry. Socialism is not why fracking fluids or chemical plant runoffs poison our water. Socialism is not why our infrastructure is failing (hint: defunding then deregulating is "good for business"). The enormity of this situation is damning and understated. Waiting for the market to "figure out" a problem people made is a distraction to the problems we all face, and the market only helps mask real decisions real people make from their consequences.

Water is not to be fucked with. Everybody fucking loses.
 
Nov 18, 2020
1,408
I'm sure Nestle would be more than willing to supply America's tap water, for the low, low price of just $1.50 / gallon! Isn't privatization great guys?
 
Oct 25, 2017
41,368
Miami, FL

P-Bo

One Winged Slayer
Member
Jun 17, 2019
4,405
Dunno if I should be asking this here, but this feels inevitable--what should we be doing in the meantime? I won't be able to move to Canada for another 10 years, at the earliest.
 

BossAttack

Member
Oct 27, 2017
42,958
Cool, one step closer to our collective Blade Runner 2049 future where the 99% get to fight over uncontaminated water while the 1% practically drown themselves in the luxury of it:


Wow, I feel like an idiot not catching this despite how many times I've seen the film. It just keeps on giving.
 

Xaszatm

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,903
This is why era is ahead of the curve. Since so many of us don't shower, we will have more water to save!

...fuck capitalism.
 

take_marsh

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,263
Just unnecessarily checked this off my list for reasons to not have kids.

Keep it up, capitalists. You're fucking nailing it.
 

Cipherr

Member
Oct 26, 2017
13,425
On a side note, on all the market discussion forums I visit, for the last few years; new users asking how to invest in water after watching that movie has become a huge meme. I suspect stuff like this will triple that sort of question being asked.