I watched the video and this game doesn't look much better if any better than wd2.
That game was pretty demanding too tho.
That game was pretty demanding too tho.
-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Watch Dogs: Legion - RTX 3090 + i9-10900K (Benchmark) (4k Ultra Settings, Ray-Tracing, DLSS)
- Thread starter Kenzodielocke
- Start date
- News
Off topic but I don't know where to ask this. Is there any chance of us recurting people like Daniel Radcliff in the game or Idris Alba, like famous londoners overall just walking the streets?
Control has Ray Tracing for Reflections, Transparent Reflections, Diffuse Lighting, Shadows and Debris.
Control: Multiple Stunning Ray-Traced Effects Raise The Bar For Game Graphics
Remedy and 505 Games’ new third-person action game takes realism, image quality and immersion to new heights with ray-traced reflections, shadows and lighting. Learn more.
www.nvidia.com
I was mainly thinking about RT GI . Outside of that Control has the most RT stuff and it looks damn great .Control has Ray Tracing for Reflections, Transparent Reflections, Diffuse Lighting, Shadows and Debris.
Control: Multiple Stunning Ray-Traced Effects Raise The Bar For Game Graphics
Remedy and 505 Games’ new third-person action game takes realism, image quality and immersion to new heights with ray-traced reflections, shadows and lighting. Learn more.www.nvidia.com
Forgot about that
Im not actually that impressed, don't get me wrong the reflections in the car look great, and the water reflections don't artefact, but when playing 7ft from the TV I'm not gonna see that artifacting, and I don't think there's enough there for me to warrant tanking my frame rate.
Control has RT GI, Cyberpunk actually doesn't. What Cyberpunk has is diffuse illumination, which isn't exactly the same thing as GI but it can possibly provide similar end results depending on how it's used.
Rtx. It's nice when you have it's a great little thing. But nowhere near worth the performances cost.
I dont remember control having RT GI haha, I know metro exodus having that and making quite a big difference. How RT GI is different from Diffuse Illumination? Which one is better?
rtx reflections are ehhhhhhhhhhhhhh
very impressive if you look for it because of the stability and accuracy but in actual gameplay well implemented SSR is more than good enough especially considering the performance advantages.
of all the games I played with RT, metro remains to be the only one where I felt RT made an actual difference to the point where i think it bettered the game
very impressive if you look for it because of the stability and accuracy but in actual gameplay well implemented SSR is more than good enough especially considering the performance advantages.
of all the games I played with RT, metro remains to be the only one where I felt RT made an actual difference to the point where i think it bettered the game
What is burnings soo much performance?
The video isn't instilling that feel of next gen or worthy of RTX 3090 at all.
And am I the only one who thinks it looks quite similar to most games already?!
The video isn't instilling that feel of next gen or worthy of RTX 3090 at all.
And am I the only one who thinks it looks quite similar to most games already?!
Well we don't really know for sure as we haven't seen it in action and they (including nvidia) have been vague about it.
But from what I can tell by bits and pieces of information Cyberpunk will only have secondary bounce for diffuse lighting as talked about here , whereas RTGI as seen in Control or Metro does that for both specular and diffuse lighting which would make Cyberpunk's implementation less advanced than Control/Metro. Or maybe it means Cyberpunk does usual RTGI but has light scattering for the light emitted from secondary bounce which would make it better than Control/Metro implementation. It could be anything really.
Sure, why not.
I don't know why people thought that DX12 will help here as the CPU issues were stemming from game's engine, not renderer.
Nah, RT reflections are impressive no matter how you put SSRs around them. The question here is more to their placement than their usage - from what videos I've seen it looks like some reflective surfaces would've done fine with SSR instead of RT on them.
hopefully its RTGI with light scattering , tho I cant imagine the performance penalty lol, considering metro exodus is still pretty demanding
Such a strange statement.
1. Because sudden high drops are bad, even with variable refresh rates.
2. Because improving flaws is something that should have been on the to do list. Watch Dogs Legion having similar issues as AC:Origins is disappointing.
Of course we have to wait for proper performance analysis. But the benchmark reporting isn't encouraging.
The game looks 'OK'.
Adaquete, but nothing mind blowing. There is nothing that screams next gen about WD Legion.
I've seen similar looking titles on my PC for the past 2 years.
The video has also convinced me RT is a massive waste of resources. It barely looks any different with RT enabled.
Adaquete, but nothing mind blowing. There is nothing that screams next gen about WD Legion.
I've seen similar looking titles on my PC for the past 2 years.
The video has also convinced me RT is a massive waste of resources. It barely looks any different with RT enabled.
That's my biggest problem with rt. Destroys performance and you need to stop to get the details. In actual gameplay is really hard to get the details.
A lot of people who have the top of the line specs like an RTX 3090 + i9-10900K also have intense cooling options, lots of fans, and tons of lights hence my large wattage guess. Seems like Nvidia even recommends a 750w so with all the extra shit, what's absurd about 1,000w?
It also did that with my 2700x and 3900x. Game is just CPU heavy.
Because fans and LEDs would only account for a tiny, tiny fraction of a 250w overhead.
If it is like WD2, the game (and probably the engine) is extremely CPU bound.
Does anyone know when the game unlocks on PC, or whether it's a local or global unlock? Would love to jump into this Wednesday night after work via VPNing is possible
On PC you should be able to unlock the game with VPN on Wed 28th, 12PM CET. On uPlay at least.
Awesome, thanks guys!On PC you should be able to unlock the game with VPN on Wed 28th, 12PM CET. On uPlay at least.
What region? Aussie?On PC you should be able to unlock the game with VPN on Wed 28th, 12PM CET. On uPlay at least.
Screams?! Nothing even whispers Next-gen in this game IMO. Game looks OK.
Well the raytracing is definitely beyond anything we'll see in the next gen consoles, but absolutely agreed on every other aspect of the graphics.
Can't check on uPlay to be 100% sure if VPN moves release time up, but yeah. Aussie / NZ.
I meant in a sense "sure, it's still that anvil next engine which is hardly capable of scaling on CPU side".
All the issues which AC games had on PC holding 60 on CPUs like 9900K? These are hitting the new consoles in full force too now.
So without a total overhaul of this engine in how it handles CPU tasks it's totally reasonable to still expect these issues, even on Zen3 and 10900K.
But do they have the proper game ready Nvidia drivers for WD Legion ? Are those out already?
Aiming for exactly this too.
Aiming for exactly this too.
Then do those results really say much ? I remember playing the Witcher 3 before updating my drivers and it was a shitshow.
Hard to tell. GRD drivers can either be zero change or some 10-20% gains. So until these are out we don't know.
Unless Nvidia did some unseen magic with new drivers, you may see a 10-15% improvement tops.
Woah, that would mean 11am UK time tomorrow
Do you just have to use the VPN to activate the game or do you have to leave it running?
But anything below everything maxed is an unplayable mess making Reseters throw up
I posted some 4K screenshots at max settings and comparison images RTX On Vs Off
