• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

RedMercury

Blue Venus
Member
Dec 24, 2017
17,657
People who are bad at their jobs should lose them. I'm fully aware that giving someone a 1-star review could lead to their termination.

I've also been fired before for poor performance. I imagine most of us have. You learn from it and moved on.
Funny how it only happens to the poors and the rich can just golden parachute their way down. You think you're advocating for some zero-sum consequences but it doesn't work out like that, your attitude just hurts the most vulnerable people.
Conversations like this remind me of Liz Bruenig's comment that the difference between liberalism and serfdom is that under liberalism it's the serf's fault for voluntarily agreeing to the contract that made them a serf.
Now THAT is a hell of a quote.
 

Sheepinator

Member
Jul 25, 2018
28,010
The point is that they aren't separate discussions. The exploitative labor practices work the way they do because of people like you. If you want to change them, the first step is changing your behavior.
I trust there is no hypocrisy going on here? For example, you have never gotten bids for some work on your home or yard and gone with the cheapest bid, you have never shopped at Walmart which is notorious for squeezing their suppliers, you have never bought things which were made in China instead of your country, you have never bought factory raised eggs or meat instead of free range, and so on?
 

pigeon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,447
I trust there is no hypocrisy going on here? For example, you have never gotten bids for some work on your home or yard and gone with the cheapest bid, you have never shopped at Walmart which is notorious for squeezing their suppliers, you have never bought things which were made in China instead of your country, you have never bought factory raised eggs or meat instead of free range, and so on?

I don't even have the energy to go and find the cartoon to post in response to this
 

Stinkles

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
20,459
What in holy hell is this?! And how did you respond to this BS? Tell me you gave them a holy Covenant glass whooping.

I said several things to the cashier and the doordash delivery driver and I'd have gone even further if I didn't absolutely need more chicken. It took me a minute to realize what she was doing moving stuff out of my bags into the other.

all they did was mumble- and I tipped generously before it happened. I was STEAMED
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
Empathy shouldn't be a shield against all criticism, especially when we're criticising a poor decision that led to a situation that could have easily been avoided.

Like, do better next time. That's why the feedback loop exists. If someone fucks up once, they're not going to lose their job over it. If someone continuously fucks up, they shouldn't be doing the job.

Hopefully OP does things differently next time. If they're repeatedly forced into this situation, they should look for a way to change employers.

Personally, I don't give bad reviews if there's a good reason for bad service. I was in an Uber recently where the driver's AC died halfway through the hour long ride in 100 degree heat. They got 5 stars from me because they did everything they could to make the ride as comfortable as possible. They took the fastest route that included tolls to make the ride short, they rolled down windows, they gave me water.

That's a bit different than waiting with my food in the car at a random restaurant for 45 minutes.
You can't just ignore all the systemic pressures behind why a decision was made when criticizing a decision though. The only way for OP to make a fair wage is to take multiple orders at once. DoorDash incentivizes this behavior through low wages and pushing additional orders on people already in the midst of a delivery. It's not OP's fault that the 2nd restaurant took forever.

Look, one could make the point that it is just as bad for the woman ordering food to only tip $4 on a $90 order as it is for OP to take a second order in order to make a fair wage. OP directly said if she had tipped enough for it to be worth it then he would've not accepted another order. You get what you pay for, so to speak.
 

RedMercury

Blue Venus
Member
Dec 24, 2017
17,657
I trust there is no hypocrisy going on here? For example, you have never gotten bids for some work on your home or yard and gone with the cheapest bid, you have never shopped at Walmart which is notorious for squeezing their suppliers, you have never bought things which were made in China instead of your country, you have never bought factory raised eggs or meat instead of free range, and so on?
Everyone is going to be a hypocrite at some point, it's about doing the right thing when you can and advocating doing the right thing when you can. You do not need to be "pure" to advocate doing the right thing or nobody would be able to.
 

Euphoria

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,522
Earth
The decision was not made in a vacuum though.

The job of OP is to pick the food up and deliver it. The job of doordash and its thousands of engineers is to decide for OP what routes and which deliveries make the most sense. If they don't want to risk an order being late they shouldn't be recommending to OP to pick up that 2nd order.


You really think it's the sort of job were you can get by on taking one order at a time?

Let us take a moment to realize how every single one of you dodged the question I asked.



*moment ended*


OP chose to take 2nd order. It wasn't mandated that OP take it.

Due to OP taking it and waiting around it caused customer #1 to get their food 45 minutes after they saw it was picked up.

Doesn't matter that food place said "it's going to be 5 minutes more" more than once. OP CHOSE to put customer #2 ahead of customer #1.

What OP is speaking to is 100% OP fault. End of story.
 

excelsiorlef

Bad Praxis
Member
Oct 25, 2017
73,325
I said several things to the cashier and the doordash delivery driver and I'd have gone even further if I didn't absolutely need more chicken. It took me a minute to realize what she was doing moving stuff out of my bags into the other.

all they did was mumble- and I tipped generously before it happened. I was STEAMED
Did they do anything for you?

And what excuse did they give you for literally stealing your food
 

Siggy-P

Avenger
Mar 18, 2018
11,865
Let us take a moment to how every single one of you dodged the question I asked.


OP chose to take 2nd order. It wasn't mandated that OP take it.

Due to OP taking it and waiting around it caused customer #1 to get their food 45 minutes after they saw it was picked up.

What OP is speaking to is 100% OP fault. End of story.

No one answered your question for a reason. You presented your question as if your evaluation of the answers was Omnisciently and unaeguably absolute, when that is specifically what people are disagreeing with.
 

B.O.O.M.

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,761
Let us take a moment to realize how every single one of you dodged the question I asked.



*moment ended*


OP chose to take 2nd order. It wasn't mandated that OP take it.

Due to OP taking it and waiting around it caused customer #1 to get their food 45 minutes after they saw it was picked up.

What OP is speaking to is 100% OP fault. End of story.

Sadly I agree. I do hope the OP won't be fired but yeah he is at fault here. It's just a moment of bad judgement, which can happen to the best of us.
 

RedMercury

Blue Venus
Member
Dec 24, 2017
17,657
OP chose to take 2nd order. It wasn't mandated that OP take it.
It isn't ignoring your point- your point is very easily understood, which may be why you have it. It is only a surface-level explanation free from context and nuance. It's convenient. You are seeing things in a black and white dichotomy in the same way a libertarian would say "the market will take care of it".
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
Let us take a moment to realize how every single one of you dodged the question I asked.



*moment ended*


OP chose to take 2nd order. It wasn't mandated that OP take it.

Due to OP taking it and waiting around it caused customer #1 to get their food 45 minutes after they saw it was picked up.

What OP is speaking to is 100% OP fault. End of story.
I didn't dodge the question, I pointed out that the false dichotomy ignores the entirety of the context behind the situation. Which is why I said it was dumb. Yes, no one was going to shoot OP in the head for not taking the second order, but in order to make enough money to, you know, live...OP has to take multiple orders at once. Guess what? That's what DoorDash wants too, that's why they incentivize it.
 

Euphoria

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,522
Earth
No one answered your question for a reason. You presented your question as if your evaluation of the answers was Omnisciently and unaeguably absolute, when that is specifically what people are disagreeing with.

Really doesn't matter. Customer #1s food was 45 minutes late because OP chose to wait for the food of customer #2. This is 100% on OP.

What makes it even more apparent is that OP already had customer #1s food when he chose to take customer #2s order while continuing to wait to customer 2s order.

Sorry if it isn't liked but at some point responsibility kicks in.
 
Oct 25, 2017
9,007
Canada
Please reconsider cursing out minimum wage service workers.
As if this needs to be said.
Let us take a moment to realize how every single one of you dodged the question I asked.



*moment ended*


OP chose to take 2nd order. It wasn't mandated that OP take it.

Due to OP taking it and waiting around it caused customer #1 to get their food 45 minutes after they saw it was picked up.

Doesn't matter that food place said "it's going to be 5 minutes more" more than once. OP CHOSE to put customer #2 ahead of customer #1.

What OP is speaking to is 100% OP fault. End of story.
It sounds like the company's fault that drivers have to take multiple orders to maintain a living wage.
 

Ash735

Banned
Sep 4, 2018
907
Yeah the OP was at fault, I get wanting to squeeze as many orders as possible but when they found out the second order wasn't even done they should've got order one complete instead.
 

Euphoria

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,522
Earth
I didn't dodge the question, I pointed out that the false dichotomy ignores the entirety of the context behind the situation. Which is why I said it was dumb. Yes, no one was going to shoot OP in the head for not taking the second order, but in order to make enough money to, you know, live...OP has to take multiple orders at once. Guess what? That's what DoorDash wants too, that's why they incentivize it.

And your post ignores the person who made the order entirely. You talk about OP needing to make money but you hat about that person who spent $90 on food and got it 45 minutes late AFTER it was picked up?

Why was it 45 minutes late?
 

Soundscream

Member
Nov 2, 2017
9,234
It isn't ignoring your point- your point is very easily understood, which may be why you have it. It is only a surface-level explanation free from context and nuance. It's convenient. You are seeing things in a black and white dichotomy in the same way a libertarian would say "the market will take care of it".
WTF?

It's not that complicated, if you are in the service industry your focus has to be on SERVICE. If you provide bad service you will get bad feedback.

If you and another person were at a restaurant and placed your order before the table next to you of 20 people and your food was ready to be picked up, but your server decided to start bringing out the 20 person table order first because they could get a much larger tip, and as a result your food came out cold you would be all cool with that?
 

Weeniekuns

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,111
Shit like this was routine when I worked retail and restaurant back in college... you get used it after awhile and realize that people are shitheads and at the end of the day it doesnt really matter
 

molnizzle

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
17,695
User Banned (1 week): antagonizing other users
WTF?

It's not that complicated, if you are in the service industry your focus has to be on SERVICE. If you provide bad service you will get bad feedback.

If you and another person were at a restaurant and placed your order before the table next to you of 20 people and your food was ready to be picked up, but your server decided to start bringing out the 20 person table order first because they could get a much larger tip, and as a result your food came out cold you would be all cool with that?
It's just SocialistEra, someone must have linked this thread in one of their Discords or something.
 

Euphoria

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,522
Earth
Oh shit I didn't realize my Libertarian example was so on the nose, you're even using the "personal responsibility" meme haha

Try answering what I asked or said instead of equating words to memes.

I don't follow memes so spare me.

I'll make this simple:

  • OP had customer #1s food in hand.
  • OP gets update from Door Dash that another order is made.
  • OP decides that instead of taking food in car to customer #1 that they would take order for customer #2.
  • Customer #2s order isn't ready, so OP waits.
  • At end of day customer #1 gets their food 45 minutes late and customer #2 likely gets their food on time.

Who's fault is it that customer #1 got their food 45 minutes late?


This isn't that hard to understand.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
And your post ignores the person who made the order entirely. You talk about OP needing to make money but you hat about that person who spent $90 on food and got it 45 minutes late AFTER it was picked up?

Why was it 45 minutes late?
They could have tipped enough for the single delivery to be worth it to OP. They chose to tip $4 on a $90 order. Where is your 'personal responsibility' shtick for that?
 

RedMercury

Blue Venus
Member
Dec 24, 2017
17,657
WTF?

It's not that complicated, if you are in the service industry your focus has to be on SERVICE. If you provide bad service you will get bad feedback.

If you and another person were at a restaurant and placed your order before the table next to you of 20 people and your food was ready to be picked up, but your server decided to start bringing out the 20 person table order first because they could get a much larger tip, and as a result your food came out cold you would be all cool with that?
It would be frustrating but I wouldn't go to the manager and complain about the server and place it all on their shoulders in a personal way, if that would be the equivalent of giving a 1-star review to an individual. I might give the restaurant a bad review as an institution. Waitstaff rely on tips, while it might be frustrating in your example I would be able to understand the server needs to pay their rent and stuff.
 

Soundscream

Member
Nov 2, 2017
9,234
It would be frustrating but I wouldn't go to the manager and complain about the server and place it all on their shoulders in a personal way, if that would be the equivalent of giving a 1-star review to an individual. I might give the restaurant a bad review as an institution. Waitstaff rely on tips, while it might be frustrating in your example I would be able to understand the server needs to pay their rent and stuff.
LOL ok
 

RedMercury

Blue Venus
Member
Dec 24, 2017
17,657
Who's fault is it that customer #1 got their food 45 minutes late?
A multitude of factors are at play. To a degree, some of it rests on the delivery person. Some of it rests on the company. Some of it rests on the 2nd restaurant that was late. Some of it rests on the system that necessitates such a situation for someone to find themselves in.
It's just SocialistEra, someone must have linked this thread in one of their Discords or something.
Do you feel attacked

Also, if there is a socialist-era discord send me an invite haha
 

Euphoria

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,522
Earth
A multitude of factors are at play. To a degree, some of it rests on the delivery person. Some of it rests on the company. Some of it rests on the system that necessitates such a situation for someone to find themselves in.

If 2nd order isn't mandated then it's entirely on delivery person.

Delivering the food is the entire basis of their job

You're just making excuses for OP.
 

Deleted member 19003

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
3,809
The OP's responsibility is to getting a living wage first and foremost.
Seems like op could have easily dropped off the 1st order and just circled back for the 2nd? Just looks like poor time management in general, perhaps from a lack of experience in doing multiple deliveries. I feel the whole 'oh I needed to make min wage so blame the system not me' is a bit of a cop out, and there's a refusal to take a even a minimal amount of responsibility for the situation.
 

Nerokis

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,567
Another post absolutely ignoring personal responsibility.

OP had customer #1s food. Why does customer 1 wait on customer 2?

lmao

good god, my guy, how is it this hard to understand that DoorDash is fundamentally structured so that, given the opportunity, customer #1 will more often than not have to wait on customer #2?

does your conception of "personal responsibility" somehow mean that the OP is personally responsible for changing DoorDash itself, such that suddenly drivers aren't intended to multitask anymore?

I suppose we're going to ignore that OP could have not delivered order 1 if they didn't think the money was good enough?

"money was good enough to take the order" != "money was good enough that I could afford to focus exclusively on that order"
 

B.O.O.M.

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,761
I suppose we're going to ignore that OP could have not delivered order 1 if they didn't think the money was good enough?

I wonder if some people are thinking the first order was for a rich person given the amount involved. Hence it becomes an instant rich vs poor scenario.

While I can empathize with OP regarding the economic pressure he is subjected to (these service apps can do better for sure), it is a bad outcome that happened to due to lapse of judgment. I don't think admitting the latter point is in contradiction to the first...but here we are.
 

Dog of Bork

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,990
Texas
lmao

good god, my guy, how is it this hard to understand that DoorDash is fundamentally structured so that, given the opportunity, customer #1 will more often than not have to wait on customer #2?

does your conception of "personal responsibility" somehow mean that the OP is personally responsible for changing DoorDash itself, such that suddenly drivers aren't intended to multitask anymore?



"money was good enough to take the order" != "money was good enough that I could afford to focus exclusively on that order"
When someone orders from DD, they're not ordering so they can get their food eventually in an hour or two. They want it fast.

Wanting someone to deliver your food != wanting someone to deliver cold food.

They still paid for the food. They also left a 1 star review, which was absolutely deserved. The cursing was over the top.
 

Euphoria

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,522
Earth
lmao

good god, my guy, how is it this hard to understand that DoorDash is fundamentally structured so that, given the opportunity, customer #1 will more often than not have to wait on customer #2?

does your conception of "personal responsibility" somehow mean that the OP is personally responsible for changing DoorDash itself, such that suddenly drivers aren't intended to multitask anymore?

Considering I use Door Dash I couldn't care less. If I ordered $90 worth of food, saw it was picked up at 7:00PM from a place 5-10 minutes away and it showed up cold 45 minutes AFTER it was picked up and the excuse given was "well someone else ordered too"... that 2nd person isn't my problem.
 

Euphoria

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,522
Earth
What vested interest do you believe I have in OP that I would make excuses for them?

Not sure. OP didn't have to take 2nd order. OP didn't have to wait for 2nd order.

OP chose both and as a result customer #1 got their food 45 minutes after it was picked up,

That is entirely on OP making a poor judgement and people in here are excuses it for a multitude or reasons, including yourself.
 

pizoxuat

Member
Jan 12, 2018
1,458
They could have tipped enough for the single delivery to be worth it to OP. They chose to tip $4 on a $90 order. Where is your 'personal responsibility' shtick for that?

The gig economy merchants have deliberately made tipping for their services confusing as fuck.

You start with UberEats banning tipping completely. That gives the customer the impression that people are being paid a living wage, not that tipping is required for them to reach minimum wage. And that $4 tip that she selected? I guarantee that was one of the three recommended tips in the DoorDash app when she placed her order. I have placed similar sized orders and never had a tip even close to $10 recommended, I'd have to go in and manually set it.

They obfuscate how they are fucking over their drivers in a number of ways. If someone doesn't have someone in their life who has run for these services before, they aren't going to know. As far as most people are aware, the tip is actually a tip for good service, not a mandatory part of the driver's pay.

That doesn't even touch how news stories about the apps stealing tips affects people's additudes.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
I suppose we're going to ignore that OP could have not delivered order 1 if they didn't think the money was good enough?
So if you don't tip what someone wants then you will have to wait 45 minutes AFTER pickup to get your food?

This can't be serious. That's how you lose a job.
You guys are dense. The business model of DoorDash is predicated on the fact that delivery drivers will be taking multiple orders at once. That's how the service works, that's how it is intended to work. That's why the pay is low and why DoorDash will keep prompting you to take on more orders while currently on an order.

If OP declined every order that didn't pay enough to be worth it ON IT'S OWN then they would never pick up any orders. This is the reality of DoorDash's business model.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
The gig economy merchants have deliberately made tipping for their services confusing as fuck.

You start with UberEats banning tipping completely. That gives the customer the impression that people are being paid a living wage, not that tipping is required for them to reach minimum wage. And that $4 tip that she selected? I guarantee that was one of the three recommended tips in the DoorDash app when she placed her order. I have placed similar sized orders and never had a tip even close to $10 recommended, I'd have to go in and manually set it.

They obfuscate how they are fucking over their drivers in a number of ways. If someone doesn't have someone in their life who has run for these services before, they aren't going to know. As far as most people are aware, the tip is actually a tip for good service, not a mandatory part of the driver's pay.

That doesn't even touch how news stories about the apps stealing tips affects people's additudes.
Sure, which is why the personal responsibility argument is dumb as fuck for both customer and delivery driver and why the real problem is DoorDash's wages and business model.
 

TangFei

Banned
Aug 18, 2019
179
I don't know how this thread turned into one about socialism and labor exploitation. I would be annoyed too if my delivery was 45 minutes late because the driver stopped to get another order after he already had mine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.