Had you heard about the DoorDash tipping scandal earlier this year? If not, look for it. Basically if people tipped more, the company was taking some or most of that, not the employee.
My understanding is they stopped doing that.
Had you heard about the DoorDash tipping scandal earlier this year? If not, look for it. Basically if people tipped more, the company was taking some or most of that, not the employee.
Funny how it only happens to the poors and the rich can just golden parachute their way down. You think you're advocating for some zero-sum consequences but it doesn't work out like that, your attitude just hurts the most vulnerable people.People who are bad at their jobs should lose them. I'm fully aware that giving someone a 1-star review could lead to their termination.
I've also been fired before for poor performance. I imagine most of us have. You learn from it and moved on.
Now THAT is a hell of a quote.Conversations like this remind me of Liz Bruenig's comment that the difference between liberalism and serfdom is that under liberalism it's the serf's fault for voluntarily agreeing to the contract that made them a serf.
I trust there is no hypocrisy going on here? For example, you have never gotten bids for some work on your home or yard and gone with the cheapest bid, you have never shopped at Walmart which is notorious for squeezing their suppliers, you have never bought things which were made in China instead of your country, you have never bought factory raised eggs or meat instead of free range, and so on?The point is that they aren't separate discussions. The exploitative labor practices work the way they do because of people like you. If you want to change them, the first step is changing your behavior.
I trust there is no hypocrisy going on here? For example, you have never gotten bids for some work on your home or yard and gone with the cheapest bid, you have never shopped at Walmart which is notorious for squeezing their suppliers, you have never bought things which were made in China instead of your country, you have never bought factory raised eggs or meat instead of free range, and so on?
What in holy hell is this?! And how did you respond to this BS? Tell me you gave them a holy Covenant glass whooping.
You can't just ignore all the systemic pressures behind why a decision was made when criticizing a decision though. The only way for OP to make a fair wage is to take multiple orders at once. DoorDash incentivizes this behavior through low wages and pushing additional orders on people already in the midst of a delivery. It's not OP's fault that the 2nd restaurant took forever.Empathy shouldn't be a shield against all criticism, especially when we're criticising a poor decision that led to a situation that could have easily been avoided.
Like, do better next time. That's why the feedback loop exists. If someone fucks up once, they're not going to lose their job over it. If someone continuously fucks up, they shouldn't be doing the job.
Hopefully OP does things differently next time. If they're repeatedly forced into this situation, they should look for a way to change employers.
Personally, I don't give bad reviews if there's a good reason for bad service. I was in an Uber recently where the driver's AC died halfway through the hour long ride in 100 degree heat. They got 5 stars from me because they did everything they could to make the ride as comfortable as possible. They took the fastest route that included tolls to make the ride short, they rolled down windows, they gave me water.
That's a bit different than waiting with my food in the car at a random restaurant for 45 minutes.
The poster you are replying to is one of the biggest corporate bootlickers on this forum, don't even bother it's not worth the energy.I don't even have the energy to go and find the cartoon to post in response to this
Everyone is going to be a hypocrite at some point, it's about doing the right thing when you can and advocating doing the right thing when you can. You do not need to be "pure" to advocate doing the right thing or nobody would be able to.I trust there is no hypocrisy going on here? For example, you have never gotten bids for some work on your home or yard and gone with the cheapest bid, you have never shopped at Walmart which is notorious for squeezing their suppliers, you have never bought things which were made in China instead of your country, you have never bought factory raised eggs or meat instead of free range, and so on?
The job of OP is to pick the food up and deliver it. The job of doordash and its thousands of engineers is to decide for OP what routes and which deliveries make the most sense. If they don't want to risk an order being late they shouldn't be recommending to OP to pick up that 2nd order.
You really think it's the sort of job were you can get by on taking one order at a time?
Did they do anything for you?I said several things to the cashier and the doordash delivery driver and I'd have gone even further if I didn't absolutely need more chicken. It took me a minute to realize what she was doing moving stuff out of my bags into the other.
all they did was mumble- and I tipped generously before it happened. I was STEAMED
Let us take a moment to how every single one of you dodged the question I asked.
OP chose to take 2nd order. It wasn't mandated that OP take it.
Due to OP taking it and waiting around it caused customer #1 to get their food 45 minutes after they saw it was picked up.
What OP is speaking to is 100% OP fault. End of story.
Let us take a moment to realize how every single one of you dodged the question I asked.
*moment ended*
OP chose to take 2nd order. It wasn't mandated that OP take it.
Due to OP taking it and waiting around it caused customer #1 to get their food 45 minutes after they saw it was picked up.
What OP is speaking to is 100% OP fault. End of story.
It isn't ignoring your point- your point is very easily understood, which may be why you have it. It is only a surface-level explanation free from context and nuance. It's convenient. You are seeing things in a black and white dichotomy in the same way a libertarian would say "the market will take care of it".OP chose to take 2nd order. It wasn't mandated that OP take it.
I didn't dodge the question, I pointed out that the false dichotomy ignores the entirety of the context behind the situation. Which is why I said it was dumb. Yes, no one was going to shoot OP in the head for not taking the second order, but in order to make enough money to, you know, live...OP has to take multiple orders at once. Guess what? That's what DoorDash wants too, that's why they incentivize it.Let us take a moment to realize how every single one of you dodged the question I asked.
*moment ended*
OP chose to take 2nd order. It wasn't mandated that OP take it.
Due to OP taking it and waiting around it caused customer #1 to get their food 45 minutes after they saw it was picked up.
What OP is speaking to is 100% OP fault. End of story.
No one answered your question for a reason. You presented your question as if your evaluation of the answers was Omnisciently and unaeguably absolute, when that is specifically what people are disagreeing with.
As if this needs to be said.
It sounds like the company's fault that drivers have to take multiple orders to maintain a living wage.Let us take a moment to realize how every single one of you dodged the question I asked.
*moment ended*
OP chose to take 2nd order. It wasn't mandated that OP take it.
Due to OP taking it and waiting around it caused customer #1 to get their food 45 minutes after they saw it was picked up.
Doesn't matter that food place said "it's going to be 5 minutes more" more than once. OP CHOSE to put customer #2 ahead of customer #1.
What OP is speaking to is 100% OP fault. End of story.
I didn't dodge the question, I pointed out that the false dichotomy ignores the entirety of the context behind the situation. Which is why I said it was dumb. Yes, no one was going to shoot OP in the head for not taking the second order, but in order to make enough money to, you know, live...OP has to take multiple orders at once. Guess what? That's what DoorDash wants too, that's why they incentivize it.
Did they do anything for you?
And what excuse did they give you for literally stealing your food
As if this needs to be said.
It sounds like the company's fault that drivers have to take multiple orders to maintain a living wage.
Oh shit I didn't realize my Libertarian example was so on the nose, you're even using the "personal responsibility" meme hahaSorry if it isn't liked but at some point responsibility kicks in.
"mmm sorry mmm we they he mm umm"
they didn't do anything. Any other day I'd have demanded arefund and walked out"
WTF?It isn't ignoring your point- your point is very easily understood, which may be why you have it. It is only a surface-level explanation free from context and nuance. It's convenient. You are seeing things in a black and white dichotomy in the same way a libertarian would say "the market will take care of it".
The OP's responsibility is to getting a living wage first and foremost.Another post absolutely ignoring personal responsibility.
OP had customer #1s food. Why does customer 1 wait on customer 2?
It's just SocialistEra, someone must have linked this thread in one of their Discords or something.WTF?
It's not that complicated, if you are in the service industry your focus has to be on SERVICE. If you provide bad service you will get bad feedback.
If you and another person were at a restaurant and placed your order before the table next to you of 20 people and your food was ready to be picked up, but your server decided to start bringing out the 20 person table order first because they could get a much larger tip, and as a result your food came out cold you would be all cool with that?
Oh shit I didn't realize my Libertarian example was so on the nose, you're even using the "personal responsibility" meme haha
They could have tipped enough for the single delivery to be worth it to OP. They chose to tip $4 on a $90 order. Where is your 'personal responsibility' shtick for that?And your post ignores the person who made the order entirely. You talk about OP needing to make money but you hat about that person who spent $90 on food and got it 45 minutes late AFTER it was picked up?
Why was it 45 minutes late?
Or maybe people just disagree with you?It's just SocialistEra, someone must have linked this thread in one of their Discords or something.
It's just SocialistEra, someone must have linked this thread in one of their Discords or something.
It would be frustrating but I wouldn't go to the manager and complain about the server and place it all on their shoulders in a personal way, if that would be the equivalent of giving a 1-star review to an individual. I might give the restaurant a bad review as an institution. Waitstaff rely on tips, while it might be frustrating in your example I would be able to understand the server needs to pay their rent and stuff.WTF?
It's not that complicated, if you are in the service industry your focus has to be on SERVICE. If you provide bad service you will get bad feedback.
If you and another person were at a restaurant and placed your order before the table next to you of 20 people and your food was ready to be picked up, but your server decided to start bringing out the 20 person table order first because they could get a much larger tip, and as a result your food came out cold you would be all cool with that?
LOL okIt would be frustrating but I wouldn't go to the manager and complain about the server and place it all on their shoulders in a personal way, if that would be the equivalent of giving a 1-star review to an individual. I might give the restaurant a bad review as an institution. Waitstaff rely on tips, while it might be frustrating in your example I would be able to understand the server needs to pay their rent and stuff.
I suppose we're going to ignore that OP could have not delivered order 1 if they didn't think the money was good enough?They could have tipped enough for the single delivery to be worth it to OP. They chose to tip $4 on a $90 order. Where is your 'personal responsibility' shtick for that?
A multitude of factors are at play. To a degree, some of it rests on the delivery person. Some of it rests on the company. Some of it rests on the 2nd restaurant that was late. Some of it rests on the system that necessitates such a situation for someone to find themselves in.Who's fault is it that customer #1 got their food 45 minutes late?
Do you feel attackedIt's just SocialistEra, someone must have linked this thread in one of their Discords or something.
They could have tipped enough for the single delivery to be worth it to OP. They chose to tip $4 on a $90 order. Where is your 'personal responsibility' shtick for that?
A multitude of factors are at play. To a degree, some of it rests on the delivery person. Some of it rests on the company. Some of it rests on the system that necessitates such a situation for someone to find themselves in.
Seems like op could have easily dropped off the 1st order and just circled back for the 2nd? Just looks like poor time management in general, perhaps from a lack of experience in doing multiple deliveries. I feel the whole 'oh I needed to make min wage so blame the system not me' is a bit of a cop out, and there's a refusal to take a even a minimal amount of responsibility for the situation.The OP's responsibility is to getting a living wage first and foremost.
Another post absolutely ignoring personal responsibility.
OP had customer #1s food. Why does customer 1 wait on customer 2?
I suppose we're going to ignore that OP could have not delivered order 1 if they didn't think the money was good enough?
I suppose we're going to ignore that OP could have not delivered order 1 if they didn't think the money was good enough?
When someone orders from DD, they're not ordering so they can get their food eventually in an hour or two. They want it fast.lmao
good god, my guy, how is it this hard to understand that DoorDash is fundamentally structured so that, given the opportunity, customer #1 will more often than not have to wait on customer #2?
does your conception of "personal responsibility" somehow mean that the OP is personally responsible for changing DoorDash itself, such that suddenly drivers aren't intended to multitask anymore?
"money was good enough to take the order" != "money was good enough that I could afford to focus exclusively on that order"
What vested interest do you believe I have in OP that I would make excuses for them?
lmao
good god, my guy, how is it this hard to understand that DoorDash is fundamentally structured so that, given the opportunity, customer #1 will more often than not have to wait on customer #2?
does your conception of "personal responsibility" somehow mean that the OP is personally responsible for changing DoorDash itself, such that suddenly drivers aren't intended to multitask anymore?
What vested interest do you believe I have in OP that I would make excuses for them?
They could have tipped enough for the single delivery to be worth it to OP. They chose to tip $4 on a $90 order. Where is your 'personal responsibility' shtick for that?
I suppose we're going to ignore that OP could have not delivered order 1 if they didn't think the money was good enough?
You guys are dense. The business model of DoorDash is predicated on the fact that delivery drivers will be taking multiple orders at once. That's how the service works, that's how it is intended to work. That's why the pay is low and why DoorDash will keep prompting you to take on more orders while currently on an order.So if you don't tip what someone wants then you will have to wait 45 minutes AFTER pickup to get your food?
This can't be serious. That's how you lose a job.
Sure, which is why the personal responsibility argument is dumb as fuck for both customer and delivery driver and why the real problem is DoorDash's wages and business model.The gig economy merchants have deliberately made tipping for their services confusing as fuck.
You start with UberEats banning tipping completely. That gives the customer the impression that people are being paid a living wage, not that tipping is required for them to reach minimum wage. And that $4 tip that she selected? I guarantee that was one of the three recommended tips in the DoorDash app when she placed her order. I have placed similar sized orders and never had a tip even close to $10 recommended, I'd have to go in and manually set it.
They obfuscate how they are fucking over their drivers in a number of ways. If someone doesn't have someone in their life who has run for these services before, they aren't going to know. As far as most people are aware, the tip is actually a tip for good service, not a mandatory part of the driver's pay.
That doesn't even touch how news stories about the apps stealing tips affects people's additudes.
Most do. 🙂
nah, why would I?Do you feel attacked
Also, if there is a socialist-era discord send me an invite haha