I know that we will use Discord since it's our hub for BfA, Classic and OW alreadyWe just use the Battle Net groups feature for that, which has the benefit of being able to jsut hang out in voice chat with the rest of the people while playing another game.
Battle.net 1 was a big deal back in the day, but these days there are just so many options how to chat with your friends (and Discord is probbaly the best one, I'd argue).
who cares about those era users? What's your point?Some of those people are ERA users as well, if you think Diablo 4, Overwatch 2 and Warfracft 3 OTs on ERA won't e full with people playing and enjoying the games you are delusional.
Looks good to me. Does that first pic have FIVE races to pick from though? :O
Some people prefer the gamespy era of UI designI mean, the shots look fine. Lol, I see nothing wrong with them.
it's a rhetorical question. Someone who'd give up on their principles for a video game isn't someone I think much of. That other people don't care isn't a reason to dismiss the boycott.You are the one coming and replying to my comment, like, who cares if you don't care?
Why even post about anything game related from Bliz/Acti, just forget them.
Do you really think people will Boycott blizzard and skip Diablo 4, the new Overwatch game and Warcraft 3 Reforged? lmao
People will soon forget and forgive.
Why even post about anything game related from Bliz/Acti, just forget them.
human rights are secondary for some folksWhy even post about anything game related from Bliz/Acti, just forget them.
I absolutely respect every individual's choice to not buy from certain companies. At the same time, I hope you also realize that you are very unlikely to find a major company (entertainment or otherwise) in this day and age that is not in some way putting money above principles, or bending to questionable politics.
So unless you want Era to turn into a forum where every thread about a big, publicly traded company ends after two posts cause somebody will point out something bad the company did, I think you may just have to avoid certain topics, and let those who want to talk about them do so. At least that's how I personally handle it.
I absolutely respect every individual's choice to not buy from certain companies. At the same time, I hope you also realize that you are very unlikely to find a major company (entertainment or otherwise) in this day and age that is not in some way putting money above principles, or bending to questionable politics.
So unless you want Era to turn into a forum where every thread about a big, publicly traded company ends after two posts cause somebody will point out something bad the company did, I think you may just have to avoid certain topics, and let those who want to talk about them do so. At least that's how I personally handle it.
And have every Google, Apple, Disney, ESPN, Microsoft, Ubisoft, etc thread be prefaced by a [READ STAFF POST]?I agree with some of this but also disagree with some too.
This should be handled the same way as THQ Nordic threads are handled. People should be able to inform others about bad things that companies have done, whether that be in this thread or any thread involving the company, otherwise you get very close to the whole "keep politics out of my video games" rhetoric that the right has. At the same time people who buy products from those companies shouldn't be shamed for doing so.
And have every Google, Apple, Disney, ESPN, Microsoft, Ubisoft, etc thread be prefaced by a [READ STAFF POST]?
I mean, I can't speak for others but I'm doing exactly what you just said lol so it is possible!
This whole thing is actually a really big deal to me and at no point will games become more important than free speech and democracy. I've got tons of games to play as-is. I won't miss ActiBlizz personally
Just look at any EGS/THQN thread. The staff post eventually comes up.
I don't see the problem with discussing the boycott, the actions of Blizzard or China's importance for Warcraft 3 Reforged.
We should be able to discuss those topics and the game at hand freely. As long as we don't accuse others of principles they should or shouldn't be holding.
Just look at any EGS/THQN thread. The staff post eventually comes up.
Disney (through Marvel, Disney+, their movies, the box office threads) and Apple make a good chunk of the OT threads.
Works for me, in threads for games that I care about I just use ignore users that are boycotting etc. So there's a place for people to talk about the game AND a place for people to express their disappointment.I don't see the problem with discussing the boycott, the actions of Blizzard or China's importance for Warcraft 3 Reforged.
We should be able to discuss those topics and the game at hand freely. As long as we don't accuse others of principles they should or shouldn't be holding.
Not shaming would be the polite thing to do. That doesn't means it's wrong to do it though.At the same time people who buy products from those companies shouldn't be shamed for doing so.
You say this like Blizzard has been making good games for the last 10 years lmaoDo you really think people will Boycott blizzard and skip Diablo 4, the new Overwatch game and Warcraft 3 Reforged? lmao
People will soon forget and forgive.
Imagine defending corporations that make billions of dollars a year.Have Blizzard China closed down, lose 20% of their annual revenue and have hundreds of jobs on the line?
It's usually easy to make a statement when you don't have anything on the line.
Still it was poorly handled
Not shaming would be the polite thing to do. That doesn't means it's wrong to do it though.
You say this like Blizzard has been making good games for the last 10 years lmao
Your here to make damage control or something?Do you think it makes for a good forum culture if everyone accused everyone else because of the games they like, or companies they buy from? And I am fairly sure that almost everyone here would be guilty of playing games from a company that has done something another user deems unethical at some point.
Pointing out that a company has done something in a thread makes sense. Attacking other users over it, not so much. And if you are yourself playing games from a company that has done or supported something bad, it is pretty hypocritical I'd say. In this thread alone, you can find some users who are talking about boycotting Blizzard (which again, they have every right to), and when you look a few posts down their history on ERA, you will see that their high moral standards only seem to apply very selectively.
Warcraft 3 was/is one of my all time favorite Strategy game. Looking forward to this just from the campaign alone. It's campaign was legendary. It will have the campaign right ?
Warcraft 3 was/is one of my all time favorite Strategy game. Looking forward to this just from the campaign alone. It's campaign was legendary. It will have the campaign right ?
I'm not attacking anyone or advocating that we do that. Does having a user base with principals lead to a good forum culture? Yes. Pointing out bad things within the gaming industry is a good idea. Ignoring them is wrong. Human rights are a big deal.Do you think it makes for a good forum culture if everyone accused everyone else because of the games they like, or companies they buy from? And I am fairly sure that almost everyone here would be guilty of playing games from a company that has done something another user deems unethical at some point.
Pointing out that a company has done something in a thread makes sense. Attacking other users over it, not so much. And if you are yourself playing games from a company that has done or supported something bad, it is pretty hypocritical I'd say. In this thread alone, you can find some users who are talking about boycotting Blizzard (which again, they have every right to), and when you look a few posts down their history on ERA, you will see that their high moral standards only seem to apply very selectively.
Have Blizzard China closed down, lose 20% of their annual revenue and have hundreds of jobs on the line?
It's usually easy to make a statement when you don't have anything on the line.
Still it was poorly handled
Do you think it makes for a good forum culture if everyone accused everyone else because of the games they like, or companies they buy from? And I am fairly sure that almost everyone here would be guilty of playing games from a company that has done something another user deems unethical at some point.
Pointing out that a company has done something in a thread makes sense. Attacking other users over it, not so much. And if you are yourself playing games from a company that has done or supported something bad, it is pretty hypocritical I'd say. In this thread alone, you can find some users who are talking about boycotting Blizzard (which again, they have every right to), and when you look a few posts down their history on ERA, you will see that their high moral standards only seem to apply very selectively.
Blizzard isn't doing anything against human rights. Will you put your job on the line? As I said it's easy to take a stance when there's nothing on the line at the end of the day.Ah yes, the old 'don't criticize corporation, think of poor employees' tactic.
A classic.
'You're the real monster for even talking about human rights'
Blizzard isn't doing anything against human rights. Will you put your job on the line? As I said it's easy to take a stance when there's nothing on the line at the end of the day.
Oh and this has nothing to do with « don't criticize corporations », criticize Blizzard all you want while posting this on your smartphone/computer and using google's/apple's/microsoft's services to voice your discontent