I could have sworn this already happened. Ah well, don't see this actually moving the needle much.
Has anyone said this?Woc deserve a voice until they disagree with me. Some of y'all were never with it.
But if they are all polling similarly then it doesn't matter. Either the polls are right, and any of the could beat Trump, or the polls are wrong, and none of them can.Is anyone really interested in what polls say after what happened last time, though?
False:So far in this thread the only weird salty takes are from Bernie supporters salivating over the inevitable salty Warren supporter takes. Everyone else seems reasonable.
Its like either
A. Hmm I have doubts about Sanders because... or I have doubts about this working because...
or
B. LOL Warren fans bout to be so mad
It's unreasonable to threaten not to vote for an actual progressive going up against (presumably) a centrist (no left-leaning liberal is going to try to run against AOC) or a Republican while (presumably) claiming to care about progressive issues. Like holy shit. It's akin to the irony poisoned bros who say "Bernie or bust" and won't vote for another Dem in the main election (and vice versa).Yep. Makes me reconsider my planned vote for her when she's eligible too
Pretty much. Bernie and Warren are going to rip each other to shreds and that moron is going to coast to the nomination and then get destroyed by Trump. The complete lack of foresight on Bernie and Warren's part here is maddening.
I'm sorry, but this is silly. Sanders and Warren have done NOTHING but support each other. The worst they've done is... reiterate non-gaffe things the other has said. They both recognize progressivism is the way forward and one of them needs to win, but they are different enough it's worth running against each other. They are not going to attack each other until they're both above 30% in polls, which I'm not sure is going to happen.
Definitely true. It's ironically enough helpful should Warren beat Bernie, in the case of those concerned a progressive can't win due to association with socialism (even though, you know, Republicans and especially Trump will call any Democrat a socialist).
I can somewhat understand "well he might die" concerns due to his heart attack, but then the answer is for him to pick a VP who aligns with at least his most important views. The only problem there is, anyone actually that progressive is too young, too valuable to pluck from the Senate when he's already not there, or ineligible to be President. But the full on "no he cannot be president because he'll definitely die" just seems... confusing.it is weirdly defeatist to see people here pretend like sanders is a dead man walking
I can only assume said people just pay attention to their witty clapbacks and the like, which, while I agree are entertaining and at times enlightening, are not the full breadth of the policies they want to support, which upon even a cursory reading far more align with what Bernie has put forward than what Warren has. Otherwise, you're right.This makes zero sense if you're familiar with their actual politics even a little bit
At this point, I'd say it's more if, even if Warren is currently still more likely. But, I have no doubt at least AOC will. Unsure about the others or if they'll just stay quiet.as long as they get behind warren when she gets the nomination its all good
Kind of implied by Swift's post, imo, even if not outright stated.
This but oppositeI like Bernie but come on. Warren actually has a chance to beat Biden. Sanders just isn't happening, time to face reality. All this does is gives Biden a bigger chance.
That's some really terrible logic.Sanders voters turned out for Clinton in much higher numbers than Clinton voters turned out for Obama. Consider that?
People of color are only useful as a cudgel with which to hit Conservatives (and, until recently, Bernie supporters) over the back of the head. I'm Puerto Rican and I've never felt like my opinion or perspective was welcome unless I'm nodding along to whatever they're saying.Woc deserve a voice until they disagree with me. Some of y'all were never with it.
Is it? I'm a republican who voted for Hillary. Dude is trump in alt-left clothing.
You got proof of that?burnie voters were always turning out. But his rhetoric and vitriolic bullshit from both he and his supporters suppressed the folks on the fence.
Do you think the Democratic Party is perfect? Can you imagine that people have actual problems with the party and with Hillary?he completely trashed Hillary and the party. If you don't think that played a part in a trump presidency, I don't know what to tell you.
Woc deserve a voice until they disagree with me. Some of y'all were never with it.
No because they would be banned, that's why they talk their way around it. Any POC here knows out role in the party.
People of color are only useful as a cudgel with which to hit Conservatives (and, until recently, Bernie supporters) over the back of the head. I'm Puerto Rican and I've never felt like my opinion or perspective was welcome unless I'm nodding along to whatever they're saying.
how is he trump? please be specificIs it? I'm a republican who voted for Hillary. Dude is trump in alt-left clothing.
If you mean hes "trump" in that he will be president and "alt-left" as in left then yeahIs it? I'm a republican who voted for Hillary. Dude is trump in alt-left clothing.
These topics are always great at highlighting who your "allies" really are.
Shout out Bernie/AOC
Is it? I'm a republican who voted for Hillary. Dude is trump in alt-left clothing.
Is it as fun for you as it is for me when people assume you're a privileged white guy? And by fun I mean irritating.Also Puerto Rican and I've definitely felt the same for my entire life about the way people use race when talking electoral politics.
Dems should really be taking advice from Republicans who definitely have lefty interests close to heart. Thank you!Is it? I'm a republican who voted for Hillary. Dude is trump in alt-left clothing.
Era is Nancy Pelosi confirmedThreads like these do a good job of showing that some of y'all just want these women quietly wait around until it's time for another photoshoot for a magazine cover.
You can disagree but to go completely nuclear was irresponsible. But Bernie don't care. He cares about himself and his own ambition. The quicker his fan club can figure this out, the better our country will be.You got proof of that?
Do you think the Democratic Party is perfect? Can you imagine that people have actual problems with the party and with Hillary?
Is it as fun for you as it is for me when people assume you're a privileged white guy? And by fun I mean irritating.
tbh the whole Ilhan Omar/"antisemitic tropes" saga illustrates how shallow a lot of liberals' notions of allyship and solidarity are far better than anything directly related to Bernie or the 2020 primary will, but it's true nonetheless
If you want to win you do.Dems should really be taking advice from Republicans who definitely have lefty interests close to heart. Thank you!
He cares about himself...so he campaigned heavily for Clinton in 2016...You can disagree but to go completely nuclear was irresponsible. But Bernie don't care. He cares about himself and his own ambition. The quicker his fan club can figure this out, the better our country will be.
You can disagree but to go completely nuclear was irresponsible. But Bernie don't care. He cares about himself and his own ambition. The quicker his fan club can figure this out, the better our country will be.
The smart and not "disappointing" move would've been to support a candidate who doesn't share their politics, naturally.The closest we have is a few people saying what they should've done or what they did was foolish. So, more or less yeah.
Ok.That's good, everyone needs to know what it feels like to be on the losing side.
tbh the whole Ilhan Omar/"antisemitic tropes" saga illustrates how shallow a lot of liberals' notions of allyship and solidarity are far better than anything directly related to Bernie or the 2020 primary will, but it's true nonetheless
Amazing levels of revisionism on display in this post.You can disagree but to go completely nuclear was irresponsible. But Bernie don't care. He cares about himself and his own ambition. The quicker his fan club can figure this out, the better our country will be.
"If you want a Democrat to win, you must listen to me, a Republican."
Woc deserve a voice until they disagree with me. Some of y'all were never with it.
He's 78 and just had a heart attack. He's trying to get one the most stressful jobs on the planet.
It's not unreasonable to be wary of that. I'm really disappointed to see the squad throwing their support behind him.
I don't think it's "defeatist" to acknowledge that a man in his late 70's who just had a heart attack isn't the best choice for president if you're hoping for that candidate to push for their policies for two terms.
Threads like these do a good job of showing that some of y'all just want these women quietly wait around until it's time for another photoshoot for a magazine cover.
That's good, everyone needs to know what it feels like to be on the losing side.
And the very next postSo far in this thread the only weird salty takes are from Bernie supporters salivating over the inevitable salty Warren supporter takes. Everyone else seems reasonable.
Are you really just saying that it's unreasonable for Sanders' health to be a dealbreaker?it's fine to be aware of the issue without literally writing out a scenario where he dies in office as a reason not to vote for him
That's the reason people are wary though. If I wasn't worried about that then there's no question who I would be supporting right now.it's fine to be aware of the issue without literally writing out a scenario where he dies in office as a reason not to vote for him
My point exactly. Game Set Match.