Oh I agree, but that quote popped into my head after Wanda exploded and created her fantasy reality. It could've been a whole lot worse, like a whole lot worse. Like Lagos, but on a wider scale.I mean there are supposed to be reasons that neither side is entirely wrong yes.
I'd note the accords wouldn't have stopped this
I know. I just think it's...interesting, given some of the reactions here.
Quite frankly given how many people seem to miss or fail to understand even the most basic occurrences in not particularly complicated shows and films, I can see exactly why writers feel the need to explain things clearly.I will say that the SECOND Agatha explained in unnecessary detail what runes are and how she's using them, I knew they'd feature in how Wanda wins. It's such a fuckin overdone trope at this point, one thing will be Suspiciously Overexplained earlier in a story. Just a shameless Chekhov's Gun. MCU does this a lot, see Shuri explaining how the maglev trains work to Ross for no reason.
She's not neutral
She wants Wanda's power and she doesn't give two shits who gets hurt in the process.
She literally could have freed everyone the moment she arrived
She intentionally brainwashed Ralph and used him as a puppet, Wanda wasn't intentionally doing so.
Wanda had no idea she was torturing people, Wanda didn't even even fully realize she was in a fantasy, the show literally shows you that Westview was created by an explosion of grief which caused Wanda's true powers to emerge and grow out of control
Wanda didn't intentionally create the hex. They show us this with blatant expository flashbacks.
Agatha all along was about all the broken aspects of the hex... those were all Agatha designed to lure Wanda out and force her to full on use her magic so Agatha could take it.
That's why she let Wanda out of the basement where her ruins were neutralizing Wanda's magic
She needed Wanda to go ham on her so she could absorb the magic, that's how Agatha gets power by absorbing the magic thrown at her. She wanted Wanda so destabilized that she'd throw every ounce of her magic at Agatha si Agatha could take it all. Arguably Agatha encourages Wanda to have children (remember For the Children) so that Agatha would have another chip to play to draw Wanda's power out.
Agatha was there to kill Wanda and take her power and do whatever the fuck she wanted with it. Agatha would have nuked everyone in town if she thought it would get her that.
She was not an anti-hero.
Yeah... this changes nothing about her characters role as a chaotic nuetral anti-hero ...agatha was a dick that wanted more power for herself
it even turned out that what happened at salem was intentional
I agree with that. I understood her decision to do that. It made sense- she is not going to get closure with Westview and suddenly become a hero again.
I'm just saying it didn't play well with what Monica said to her. She should have had to actually face that rejection first before hearing praise.
Wanda for all her faults never crossed that line she could have easily killed Monica but went out her way not to kill herDid she actually kill anyone? I don't remember anyone in the show dying other than the witches Agatha killed.
This is what I believe tbh. She stumbled upon a chance to save her children, and will do so because she acts impulsively. This will cause a problem, probably something that Doctor Strange as to deal with.My read of this is that she really chose acceptance in the end when she said goodbye to the kids and Hex Vision.
But now she's going to have to face far-reaching consequences (i.e. more superhero movie/show problems) for what she did, and that's going to involve the kids and potentially White Vision.
yea I'm glad she pack up and left, the shit she dragged those poor people throughImagine if Wanda had made the town clean and unrun down
The reactions would be so the writer ia saying Wanda was a net benefit for this town!?
I actually expected Wanda to leave a nice version of the town for that very cop out reason. Glad they didn't
Quite frankly given how many people seem to miss or fail to understand even the most basic occurrences in not particularly complicated shows and films, I can see exactly why writers feel the need to explain things clearly.
It's kinda like the Necronomicon, so mega ancient and inspired by cosmic horrors
what? no. Wanda is probably in Sokovia somewhere in seclusion.
Agatha had it in her basement.
I'm not questioning the logic of anything that happened. Just whether it was the right choice narratively.I think it did because it's entirely Monica's pov as someone who too was a victim of Wanda's control.
That's why Wanda says you don't hate me?
Because Monica empathizes with losing a loved one to such an insane degree that she can excuse supervillainy.Monica has never met, worked alongside, or interacted with Wanda at all, correct?
I really have no idea why she was the #1 Wanda Supporter from beginning to end.
I'm not questioning the logic of anything that happened. Just whether it was the right choice narratively.
yea, this is blowing me away right nowQuite frankly given how many people seem to miss or fail to understand even the most basic occurrences in not particularly complicated shows and films, I can see exactly why writers feel the need to explain things clearly.
"Uh, why were Jack and Jill on a hill to begin with? PLOT HOLE!"
Her in general unleashing her Scarlet Witch powers and embracing them will no doubt have horrendous consequences.Agatha: 'You don't know what you've done'
We're thinking this relates to the Book, right?
Are we even sure Sparky was a real dog and not just another construct?Wanda for all her faults never crossed that line she could have easily killed Monica but went out her way not to kill her
Also on Agatha
" And I've killed Sparky too"
The events of infinity war and endgame are public knowledge in the world so she knows what she has been throughMonica has never met, worked alongside, or interacted with Wanda at all, correct?
I really have no idea why she was the #1 Wanda Supporter from beginning to end.
If you don't want to explore the consequences of Wanda doing what she did that's fine. It's a superhero story. But if that's the case don't show me 10 minutes of people stuck like zombies in their yards crying because they can't control their bodies. Don't have a mom come out with tears in her eyes begging the protagonist to stop torturing her kid.
Would have been awkward..Wanda saying "oops sorry" would have been really tone deaf considering how horrifying the peoples confessions about what was going on in Westview when Agatha broke the illusion for people.
I did think that too but after what she was doing this episode I don't think she is above just killing a dog for her own goalsAre we even sure Sparky was a real dog and not just another construct?
Monica has never met, worked alongside, or interacted with Wanda at all, correct?
I really have no idea why she was the #1 Wanda Supporter from beginning to end.
So it makes me not care about her fake kids or husband who's technically still alive. Wanda didn't actually sacrifice anything, she begrudgingly STOPPED doing a terrible thing.
But she thought she was doing everyone a favor because they were living "perfect " lives. She didn't know the pain she was inflicting because she's not a trained witch.This.
The writers literally could have done the "huh...where am I? What happened? I dreamed that I was in the 50s lol" trope.
But they chose to reinforce, multiple times, that was Wanda was doing to the town was painful, invasive and traumatic. Wanda did that.
So it makes me not care about her fake kids or husband who's technically still alive. Wanda didn't actually sacrifice anything, she begrudgingly STOPPED doing a terrible thing.
She understood her pain. As she explicitly states, several times.Monica has never met, worked alongside, or interacted with Wanda at all, correct?
I really have no idea why she was the #1 Wanda Supporter from beginning to end.
Making her a villian would have been the easy way out. Her journey says she should be a villain. Orphaned, radicilized, turned into a living weapon, losing her brother, losing her husband, etc. But it is much more interesting having her a damaged character trying to do the right thing
Maria was very sick and got better, and then out of nowhere without having any control over it, Monica suddenly lost her. Seems like she might sympathize with Wanda for having a very similar experience, no?
Is she, though? Looks like she's reading up on how to become as powerful as possible.
She understood her pain. As she explicitly states, several times.
And as soon as she realized how the townspeople were actually effected, she stopped.But she thought she was doing everyone a favor because they were living "perfect " lives. She didn't know the pain she was inflicting because she's not a trained witch.
Both. Vision by his nature has to be a little more philosophical in his dialogue and Bettany's the guy to deliver it.Does vision get all the good lines or is Bettany just that good at delivering them?
"I've been as voice without a body, a body but not human, and now a memory brought to life"
So good
The Darkhold is arguably higher up the totem pole than MephistoThinking about it now, the "Mephisto" teases were legit, but they might have not been teasing Mephisto, but another demonic presence, the Darkhold. Agatha calls it "The Book of the Damned". We were just barking up the wrong tree.
Does vision get all the good lines or is Bettany just that good at delivering them?
"I've been as voice without a body, a body but not human, and now a memory brought to life"
So good