• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

PhaZe 5

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,487
Everyone knew about the bad intelligence. I'm not being glib but op, everyone knew.

everyone. We had the secretary of defense holding prop uranium.

iraq war was about bloodlust and revenge and basically everyone bought in

"everyones so united now its amazing" stories were ran nightly
 

Aureon

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
2,819
Knowing something is false and being able to prove it to a judicial evidentiary standard are completely different.

And she voted no on the goddamn war. Go hang those who voted yes.
 

Prolepro

Ghostwire: BooShock
Banned
Nov 6, 2017
7,310
How is failing to remove him from office holding him accountable?
By setting a precedent in order to establish any kind of sensible reaction to gross misconduct, otherwise it goes unchallenged

Let's be very clear. The ONLY reason we are even getting impeachment at this point is a perfect storm of certain individuals acting on principle in the face of protocol and Trumps sheer unbridled stupidity catching up with him. The DAY AFTER the Mueller hearing, and upon seeing that he could basically get away with this shit due to people like Pelosi, Trumps dumbass blew off his own foot by making that phone call and slipping "Biden" instead of "Burisma" because he believed he was untouchable, and why shouldnt he? Pelosi had to get the golden snitch to land in her lap and STILL required push from people in her own party to do shit. And then we still had people claiming 400th Dimensional genius for waiting for such a moment on her part because of "yaas queen" bullshit.

Our entire legal system is built on this, shit doesnt just pop out of the ground.

You hold these people accountable and FORCE them to dispute it. Even if you don't "win", you force them to play the game and show which colors theyre flying.

It's not rocket science.
 
Last edited:

Balphon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
2,632
It wasn't exactly a closely guarded secret that the intelligence was dubious at the time.
 

Deleted member 8561

user requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
11,284
Pretty fair reasoning, especially considering Bush was lame duck by the time the House was taken.
 

Tracygill

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
1,853
The Left
Knowing something is false and being able to prove it to a judicial evidentiary standard are completely different.

And she voted no on the goddamn war. Go hang those who voted yes.
Impeachment is not a criminal proceeding. It's a political process.

"Lawmakers are not required to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt — the evidentiary standard in a criminal case. "
 

Inuhanyou

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,214
New Jersey
User Banned (1 Week): Inflammatory Accusation; Prior Bans for Inflammatory Behavior
We gotta b real here mates, no self respecting lib gives a shit about brown people across the globe, no matter how many die due to US influence(regardless of the administration)

This thread is two pages and will soon be at the bottom of the heap along with every other genocide level disaster.

Its just the kind of comfortable mindset these types have, like Ellen for example. Its how she can get away with saying "you can be friends with people you disagree" to a war criminal and still have people lining up to defend it ad nauseum
 

Blue Skies

Banned
Mar 27, 2019
9,224
We gotta b real here mates, no self respecting lib gives a shit about brown people across the globe, no matter how many die due to US influence(regardless of the administration)

This thread is two pages and will soon be at the bottom of the heap along with every other genocide level disaster.

Its just the kind of comfortable mindset these types have, like Ellen for example. Its how she can get away with saying "you can be friends with people you disagree" to a war criminal and still have people lining up to defend it ad nauseum
So what's the alternative, we all get mad at her
Then what
 

Prolepro

Ghostwire: BooShock
Banned
Nov 6, 2017
7,310
So what's the alternative, we all get mad at her
Then what
You should get mad when the people who run your country commit or are complacent with the committing of atrocity, yes.

And if you live in CA-12, vote her out. And if you don't, then support Shahid Buttar's campaign.
 

Deffers

Banned
Mar 4, 2018
2,402
Idk man, y'all need to balance your idealism out with some pragmatism
Pragmatically let hundreds of thousands of foreigners die. Pragmatically set the stage for the creation of ISIS.

I dunno. I think maybe there's some chronic fetishism for moral compromise. Like, you can't be a grown-up if you don't engage in complicity with a system that slaughters innocents for ephemeral wins.
 
Oct 27, 2017
11,539
Bandung Indonesia
You're talking like the impeachment would've been successful and we would've not gone to war.
What would've happened is: impeachment unsuccessful, and we still go to war.

So what, it's the fucking right thing to do.

Just like now. You want to argue that we shouldn't hold Trump accountable because in the end Republicans wouldn't indict him anyways?

And there's nothing in Trump's repertoire that could match the sheer brutality and wrongness of Iraq war.
 

mescalineeyes

Banned
May 12, 2018
4,444
Vienna
if in the face of a million dead brown people, you want to further embrace pragmatism, maybe it's time to check your privilege.
 

Deffers

Banned
Mar 4, 2018
2,402
if in the face of a million dead brown people, you want to further embrace pragmatism, maybe it's time to check your privilege.
I mean, I feel like that's the quiet part that people are afraid of saying loud, isn't it?

In America, people actively want their politicians to value American lives more than the lives of foreigners. They want their politicians to treat foreign lives as expendable, especially by comparison to American lives. That's thought of as "pragmatism" and not "callousness so severe it should be utterly disqualifying because it shows you are a fundamentally broken human."
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
14c58867df.png


That's a graphic of who controlled congress while bush was president. You wanted her to start impeachment proceedings during Bush's last 2 years, when removing him wouldn't've mattered, and would've led to Dick Cheney being president if the senate had voted to convict, wouldn't've stopped the Iraq war, and would've normalized impeachment as a tool the opposition party uses against the president, and wouldn't've have led to Bush being removed from office?
Silly Sandstar, don't you know only symbolic actions that result in nothing changing are all that actually matter?
 

AndyD

Mambo Number PS5
Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,602
Nashville
Everyone piling on her but the reality is that probably most of Congress knew. And the white House.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.