So because it likely wouldn't have been done meant that it shouldn't even be tried. Also the house can impeach without a conviction.
That wasn't what I asked. I asked "how does failing to remove him from office hold him accountable"
So because it likely wouldn't have been done meant that it shouldn't even be tried. Also the house can impeach without a conviction.
Yup. In a just world this admission would allow to Iraq sue for damages/reparations but that'll never happen.This perfectly illustrates how the American political establishment views foreign wars.
Ain't no thing. Kill kill kill.
You're talking like the impeachment would've been successful and we would've not gone to war.
What would've happened is: impeachment unsuccessful, and we still go to war.
Everyone knew about the bad intelligence. I'm not being glib but op, everyone knew.
everyone. We had the secretary of defense holding prop uranium.
She didn't have control over the senate she can only do her part, which she failed to do when she knew they lied about going to war.That wasn't what I asked. I asked "how does failing to remove him from office hold him accountable"
By setting a precedent in order to establish any kind of sensible reaction to gross misconduct, otherwise it goes unchallengedHow is failing to remove him from office holding him accountable?
We did but then people just get mad at us for being sexist/dividing the party/ridiculous purity tests.And she voted no on the goddamn war. Go hang those who voted yes.
Also thisKnowing something is false and being able to prove it to a judicial evidentiary standard are completely different.
And she voted no on the goddamn war. Go hang those who voted yes.
Like the guy who's probably gonna be the democratic primary nom this year lolAnd she voted no on the goddamn war. Go hang those who voted yes.
fuck me lolLike the guy who's probably gonna be the democratic primary nom this year lol
Impeachment is not a criminal proceeding. It's a political process.Knowing something is false and being able to prove it to a judicial evidentiary standard are completely different.
And she voted no on the goddamn war. Go hang those who voted yes.
So what's the alternative, we all get mad at herWe gotta b real here mates, no self respecting lib gives a shit about brown people across the globe, no matter how many die due to US influence(regardless of the administration)
This thread is two pages and will soon be at the bottom of the heap along with every other genocide level disaster.
Its just the kind of comfortable mindset these types have, like Ellen for example. Its how she can get away with saying "you can be friends with people you disagree" to a war criminal and still have people lining up to defend it ad nauseum
Yup and she has a primary challenger.stop voting for people like her and stop falling for the usual smears when it comes to progressives would be a start.
but also get mad at nancy for sure.
You should get mad when the people who run your country commit or are complacent with the committing of atrocity, yes.
Ok, if I i was her I would've said something, I would've leaked the info out.Then you'll prove you are a human being who actually cares about people's lives....i dont think i should need to say that
I bit my tongue for a long time leading up to impeachment but she's fucking scum and the people who defended her idleness and utter incompetency in the wake of our most recent shitshow of republican fuckery should feel ashamed.
pragmatism, thy name is nancy pelosi.Idk man, y'all need to balance your idealism out with some pragmatism
Pragmatically let hundreds of thousands of foreigners die. Pragmatically set the stage for the creation of ISIS.Idk man, y'all need to balance your idealism out with some pragmatism
You're talking like the impeachment would've been successful and we would've not gone to war.
What would've happened is: impeachment unsuccessful, and we still go to war.
fucking thank youPragmatism means when you have the power to do the right thing, you don't do it.
iraq war was about bloodlust and revenge and basically everyone bought in
"everyones so united now its amazing" stories were ran nightly
it wasn't even cool, she was being genuine but she's a fucking lizard so she can't even clap rightThis is bad, but please remember that one time she totally clapped cool.
I mean, I feel like that's the quiet part that people are afraid of saying loud, isn't it?if in the face of a million dead brown people, you want to further embrace pragmatism, maybe it's time to check your privilege.
That's a start.
The internet likes to joke about the 'wakeup sheeple' meme, but many people really are fucking asleep.
Silly Sandstar, don't you know only symbolic actions that result in nothing changing are all that actually matter?
That's a graphic of who controlled congress while bush was president. You wanted her to start impeachment proceedings during Bush's last 2 years, when removing him wouldn't've mattered, and would've led to Dick Cheney being president if the senate had voted to convict, wouldn't've stopped the Iraq war, and would've normalized impeachment as a tool the opposition party uses against the president, and wouldn't've have led to Bush being removed from office?
Silly Sandstar, don't you know only symbolic actions that result in nothing changing are all that actually matter?
This is bad, but please remember that one time she totally clapped cool.
Everyone piling on her but the reality is that probably most of Congress knew. And the white House.
Pragmatism means when you have the power to do the right thing, you don't do it.