• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.

Protome

Member
Oct 27, 2017
15,677
I was always wondering about the large amount of money the GFM was able to raise.

With the new information that came to light, I'm wondering now, would there have been any (massively stupid) reason to siphon some of the trust fund money to into the gofundme campaign?
Very unlikely. Honestly, a lot of this stuff about the trustfund is bordering on VicStan-esque conspiracy theories. It's funny that Ty is connected to Nick financially and could help Vic should he try to sue for malpractice but other than that it's not that big a deal.
 

CaviarMeths

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
10,655
Western Canada
So I have no law background so I'm not sure I have all the implications of the recent revelations down, so someone correct me if I have this wrong:

- Ty Beard most likely committed notary fraud in his recent filings for the Vic case.
- This has cast suspicion on previous documents and filings notarized by Ty or with Ty as a witness.
- Ty has in fact been sanctioned in the past for similar fraudulent behavior.
- Nick has a trust fund from his father's will, which was drafted by Ty's firm and is handled by Ty himself as trustee.
- This will which appointed Ty as trustee was notarized as witnessed by Ty himself. Is this legal? If not, will Palpatine make it legal?*
- Nick likely recommended Ty to Vic as an attorney not based on any skills or experience, but due to being the one to hold Nick's purse strings.
- The GoFundMe money is going to Vic's legal representation, which is Ty. Given that Ty is Nick's trustee, it can be rationally inferred that Nick is receiving a kickback on the GFM.
- Also lol wouldn't that be something if the will was looked into and found to be fraudulent?

*No you see because Bryan Hughes (The Senate) is also a partner in Ty's firm. It's quite clever, shut up.
 

Porcupine_i

Member
Apr 9, 2018
137
Very unlikely. Honestly, a lot of this stuff about the trustfund is bordering on VicStan-esque conspiracy theories. It's funny that Ty is connected to Nick financially and could help Vic should he try to sue for malpractice but other than that it's not that big a deal.
I agree it's unlikely, because it would be incredibly stupid, so...

...it's probably exactly what happened.
 
Feb 13, 2018
3,842
Japan
I honestly think it's more likely that Ty being trustee is what lead Nick to trusting him so much rather than a nefarious plan. I think Nick believes his own bullshit and isn't intentionally running a scam.
 

Slayven

Never read a comic in his life
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
93,043
It would be the cherry on top on this shit show if the fuckery uncovered estate fraud
 

ExKage

Member
Sep 9, 2019
377
If the transcript notes or paraphrasing is right, Ty did commit notary fraud. He's not able to do online notarization and he said at the hearing he thought he could do it over the phone. You need video and audio. He also forged part of "Victor" and some people think that it was a complete forgery because of the way it aligns with the line space not just the "-tor" addition.

I don't think they committed fraud but I already thought it was sketch that they were family friends and think it's very much skating the ethics lines that Ty Beard may be a current trustee.

I don't like linking to bad faith tweets but someone decided to dig up an eviction order and small claims issue for Jamie Marchi and then tried to say it was criminal. As Marchi would be considered at least LPPF, actual malice need be a thing etc. UNLESS the tweeter lives outside of the USA. No First Amendment = defamation still a factor.
 

deimosmasque

Ugly, Queer, Gender-Fluid, Drive-In Mutant, yes?
Moderator
Apr 22, 2018
14,170
Tampa, Fl
The notarized documents over the phone always drives me crazy as notary.

It's literally one of the Universal Across All 50 States "No" to notarization. It's usually one of the "easy answer" questions on the notary exam.
 

HeroR

Banned
Dec 10, 2017
7,450
Out of curiosity, what is the context of the video of Sean mimicking Vic's voice and why are people so butt hurt over it? I asked because I have seen Sean mimic Sabat, usually his Vegeta.

That and what were Sean's original comments. I vaguely remembered him saying something, putting his foot in his mouth, and the erasing the Twitter. My guess that it wasn't favorable towards Vic since he's in the same shit seat as Sabat.
 

ExKage

Member
Sep 9, 2019
377
Out of curiosity, what is the context of the video of Sean mimicking Vic's voice and why are people so butt hurt over it? I asked because I have seen Sean mimic Sabat, usually his Vegeta.

That and what were Sean's original comments. I vaguely remembered him saying something, putting his foot in his mouth, and the erasing the Twitter. My guess that it wasn't favorable towards Vic since he's in the same shit seat as Sabat.
What exactly are you referring to?

Sean had some videos from years before the beginning of this year parodying Vic. It essentially hammed up a lot of the accusations against Vic without explicitly naming him or saying he did them. Kip Mangina?
 

HeroR

Banned
Dec 10, 2017
7,450
What exactly are you referring to?

Sean had some videos from years before the beginning of this year parodying Vic. It essentially hammed up a lot of the accusations against Vic without explicitly naming him or saying he did them. Kip Mangina?

Yeah, those are the videos I'm referring to. Didn't know it was years ago since all the videos I've seen were dated for this year.
 

HeroR

Banned
Dec 10, 2017
7,450
At least one has been around for over 15 years. He made them. If I knew more I'd be a mind reader.

I remembered people using the videos to paint Sean in a bad light, especially with people labeling it as 'disturbing'. Not sure why calling one of your co-workers a bully is 'disturbing', especially if this was years ago. Also not seeing how he's making fun of Vic for being a Christian.
 

Goodstyle

Banned
Nov 1, 2017
1,661
Vic to his lawyers:

EDi0-p9WkAAnen2
 

HeroR

Banned
Dec 10, 2017
7,450
Also, I'm so sick of hearing the term 'beta male'. Like serious, wtf is that even supposed to mean and how is it an insult?
 

airbagged_

Member
Jan 21, 2019
5,634
Charleston, SC
I'm trying to make a summary of events:

-In wake of the release of the Dragonball: Broly film in which Vic Micnogna plays the starring role, his many sexual misdeeds are brought to attention via #kickvic on Twitter from former fans and other voice actors
-Funimation, Rooster Teeth, and Viz media all cut ties with Vic
-#IStandWithVic is created by those who support Micnogna
-Chuck Huber becomes involved. Attempts to get certain voice actors to redact their statements and have Vic state that he has a "sex addiction" and will seek help.
-Nick Rekieta starts a Go Fund Me for Vic's "legal defense". (Nick is a "lawyer" with no bar association who apparently makes most of his money from streaming himself babbling about "law".)
-Nick introduces his trustee, Ty Beard, to Vic in order to sue voice actors, Jamie Marchi, Ron Toye, Monica Rial, and also Funimation for defamation.
-Shenanagins begin.
-Ty Beard makes the argument that it is defamatory to call his client a piece of shit since Vic is not literal feces.
-This attracts the attention of various lawyers on Twitter such as Greg Doucette to weigh in on how bad the case is.
-Vic gives a deposition where he goes into even further detail on his sexual misdeeds and damages his own case.
-Chuck Huber gives a statement for Vic's case but it mostly covers greivances against another voice actor, Chris Sabat so it is useless.
-Ty Beard (filed late and with missing documents even after asking for a extra month to prepare) brings the case before a judge.
-Ty mumbles and fumbles before the court.
-Most of the charges are dismissed completely and the judge will weigh in on the rest within the next 30 days.

Tried my best. I still don't understand the legal specifics of it all.

Incredible summary. Thank you.
 

Simon Belmont

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,037
Very unlikely. Honestly, a lot of this stuff about the trustfund is bordering on VicStan-esque conspiracy theories. It's funny that Ty is connected to Nick financially and could help Vic should he try to sue for malpractice but other than that it's not that big a deal.

I only know how things work in Canada, but from conversations I had with my wife who is a wills and estates lawyer, it would be WILDLY inappropriate for a trustee to have any business relationship with a beneficiary on a trust they were administering
 

Cheerilee

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,969
I was always wondering about the large amount of money the GFM was able to raise.

With the new information that came to light, I'm wondering now, would there have been any (massively stupid) reason to siphon some of the trust fund money to into the gofundme campaign?
Nah. Near as I can tell, mostly from reading a thread that that was linked on one of the law-twitters...

Screech's grandfather was super-mega-rich. He died, and left A TON of money to Screech (along with various members of his family). But you can only inherit $12 million before you have to start paying taxes on that inheritance. But the Republicans keep pushing that number upwards, because they think it's unfair to have to pay taxes on $5 million, and it's still unfair to have to pay taxes on $10 million, and it's even still unfair to have to pay taxes on $12 million. So that's where Ty Beard comes in. He's an "estate lawyer" (aka wills and inheritances) and he's in charge of Screech's grandpa's will. Instead of giving Screech his inheritance all-at-once, they set up a "trust fund" and they're slowly giving Screech a monthly allowance, over years and decades, waiting for the tax-free number to get pushed up as high as possible by Republicans before Screech finishes collecting his inheritance, so maybe Screech has to pay no tax on it (or as little as possible).

So, it's not clear how much money Screech is inheriting, but him and Beard are clearly worried that $12 million is not a high enough tax-free ceiling for Screech's massive inheritance.

Vic Mignogna, meanwhile, also inherited millions, and he's estimated to be worth $4 million. It's why all of these assholes are Republican.

So Vic hates his co-workers for saying true things and wanted to sue the shit out of them, but he's hesitant to spend his own money on that, and his own lawyers told him that was a stupid idea and that he was going to lose.

So then Screech saw an opportunity and set up a GoFundMe, without Vic's knowledge or approval, and grifted 7500 minimum-wage misogynists and incels to the tune of about $33 each. With $0.25 million in GriftForMe money, he tempted the idiot Vic with "C'mon, sue your co-workers. It's free money..." When nobody would take the case, Screech said that he knew a super-lawyer who was an expert in libel/slander, and that super-lawyer is Ty Beard (LOL no, he doesn't know what the fuck he's doing).

Vic is apparently hilariously ignorant of the money involved in this grift, and Screech holds all the keys to the GoFundMe and could pocket the money anytime he wanted. But Screech probably isn't doing that. The grift is, Ty Beard has charged Vic (through Vic's foolish fans) a quarter of a million dollars for some half-assed incompetent work that's getting thrown out of the courtroom. Vic absorbs all of the liability for this (like the flaming destruction of his career, and being on the hook to pay the penalties), while Ty Beard is the financial winner (because he soaked up all the GFM money), and Screech's youtube show gets a ton of free advertisement.

They're not gonna fuck up Screech's $12+ million by mixing it with the GoFundMe. Screech's inheritance is one thing. Grifting Vic's fans is another. They just forgot to tell Vic that the reason Screech recommended Ty Beard as a libel/slander lawyer is because Beard is Screech's friend and they have a multi-million dollar business relationship. Oops. Haha, fuck you Vic. You got exploited for everyone else's benefit.
 

HeroR

Banned
Dec 10, 2017
7,450
What I find interesting that VAs that more or less said that they know Monica Rial for decades and have no reason to think that she's lying. This is especially pointed out in Sean's Twitter that he unfortunately delated and I had to look up scummy ISWV videos to find it since I didn't read the Twitter when he first posted it (seriously, Twitter is forever, so don't bother deleting your old Twitter). These same VAs also know Vic for decades and it's telling that only a few speaks out for him. Heck, the one who did still threw shade at him.

That should really be a big red flag instead of going 'everyone is against Vic'.
 

Lonewolf

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
3,900
Oregon
All I can add to that is the GFM will probably be empty (if it isn't already) when it comes time for Vic to pay the defendants (like Jamie).
 

Protome

Member
Oct 27, 2017
15,677
All I can add to that is the GFM will probably be empty (if it isn't already) when it comes time for Vic to pay the defendants (like Jamie).
Yep. It's why I'd be surprised if he goes for an appeal. The GFM wont cover it, he'll need to front the money himself and even if he did, hopefully even he realises how shitty Beard is. I fully expect that if he does though, rather than see him hire an appellate lawyer we'll just see Beard add it to his list of specialisations on his site...
 

ExKage

Member
Sep 9, 2019
377
I don't know if it would have even been possible to use the GFM for any sanctions and payments to those cases that were dismissed. It's my understanding (taking the most favorable account) the money is set up into IOLTA. His lawyer bills/invoices it.
 

Dernhelm

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
5,422
Nah. Near as I can tell, mostly from reading a thread that that was linked on one of the law-twitters...

Screech's grandfather was super-mega-rich. He died, and left A TON of money to Screech (along with various members of his family). But you can only inherit $12 million before you have to start paying taxes on that inheritance. But the Republicans keep pushing that number upwards, because they think it's unfair to have to pay taxes on $5 million, and it's still unfair to have to pay taxes on $10 million, and it's even still unfair to have to pay taxes on $12 million. So that's where Ty Beard comes in. He's an "estate lawyer" (aka wills and inheritances) and he's in charge of Screech's grandpa's will. Instead of giving Screech his inheritance all-at-once, they set up a "trust fund" and they're slowly giving Screech a monthly allowance, over years and decades, waiting for the tax-free number to get pushed up as high as possible by Republicans before Screech finishes collecting his inheritance, so maybe Screech has to pay no tax on it (or as little as possible).

So, it's not clear how much money Screech is inheriting, but him and Beard are clearly worried that $12 million is not a high enough tax-free ceiling for Screech's massive inheritance.

Vic Mignogna, meanwhile, also inherited millions, and he's estimated to be worth $4 million. It's why all of these assholes are Republican.

So Vic hates his co-workers for saying true things and wanted to sue the shit out of them, but he's hesitant to spend his own money on that, and his own lawyers told him that was a stupid idea and that he was going to lose.

So then Screech saw an opportunity and set up a GoFundMe, without Vic's knowledge or approval, and grifted 7500 minimum-wage misogynists and incels to the tune of about $33 each. With $0.25 million in GriftForMe money, he tempted the idiot Vic with "C'mon, sue your co-workers. It's free money..." When nobody would take the case, Screech said that he knew a super-lawyer who was an expert in libel/slander, and that super-lawyer is Ty Beard (LOL no, he doesn't know what the fuck he's doing).

Vic is apparently hilariously ignorant of the money involved in this grift, and Screech holds all the keys to the GoFundMe and could pocket the money anytime he wanted. But Screech probably isn't doing that. The grift is, Ty Beard has charged Vic (through Vic's foolish fans) a quarter of a million dollars for some half-assed incompetent work that's getting thrown out of the courtroom. Vic absorbs all of the liability for this (like the flaming destruction of his career, and being on the hook to pay the penalties), while Ty Beard is the financial winner (because he soaked up all the GFM money), and Screech's youtube show gets a ton of free advertisement.

They're not gonna fuck up Screech's $12+ million by mixing it with the GoFundMe. Screech's inheritance is one thing. Grifting Vic's fans is another. They just forgot to tell Vic that the reason Screech recommended Ty Beard as a libel/slander lawyer is because Beard is Screech's friend and they have a multi-million dollar business relationship. Oops. Haha, fuck you Vic. You got exploited for everyone else's benefit.
Excellent write up right here!
 
Oct 25, 2017
12,558
RoosterTeeth had to layoff 13% of their workforce today, and the fact Vic Stans think that RT cutting ties with him (he wasnt even an employee, he was a contracted Voice Actor) was the reason the company has been having a bad year is absolutely baffling
 

Sandfox

Member
Oct 25, 2017
24,743
Nah. Near as I can tell, mostly from reading a thread that that was linked on one of the law-twitters...

Screech's grandfather was super-mega-rich. He died, and left A TON of money to Screech (along with various members of his family). But you can only inherit $12 million before you have to start paying taxes on that inheritance. But the Republicans keep pushing that number upwards, because they think it's unfair to have to pay taxes on $5 million, and it's still unfair to have to pay taxes on $10 million, and it's even still unfair to have to pay taxes on $12 million. So that's where Ty Beard comes in. He's an "estate lawyer" (aka wills and inheritances) and he's in charge of Screech's grandpa's will. Instead of giving Screech his inheritance all-at-once, they set up a "trust fund" and they're slowly giving Screech a monthly allowance, over years and decades, waiting for the tax-free number to get pushed up as high as possible by Republicans before Screech finishes collecting his inheritance, so maybe Screech has to pay no tax on it (or as little as possible).

So, it's not clear how much money Screech is inheriting, but him and Beard are clearly worried that $12 million is not a high enough tax-free ceiling for Screech's massive inheritance.

Vic Mignogna, meanwhile, also inherited millions, and he's estimated to be worth $4 million. It's why all of these assholes are Republican.

So Vic hates his co-workers for saying true things and wanted to sue the shit out of them, but he's hesitant to spend his own money on that, and his own lawyers told him that was a stupid idea and that he was going to lose.

So then Screech saw an opportunity and set up a GoFundMe, without Vic's knowledge or approval, and grifted 7500 minimum-wage misogynists and incels to the tune of about $33 each. With $0.25 million in GriftForMe money, he tempted the idiot Vic with "C'mon, sue your co-workers. It's free money..." When nobody would take the case, Screech said that he knew a super-lawyer who was an expert in libel/slander, and that super-lawyer is Ty Beard (LOL no, he doesn't know what the fuck he's doing).

Vic is apparently hilariously ignorant of the money involved in this grift, and Screech holds all the keys to the GoFundMe and could pocket the money anytime he wanted. But Screech probably isn't doing that. The grift is, Ty Beard has charged Vic (through Vic's foolish fans) a quarter of a million dollars for some half-assed incompetent work that's getting thrown out of the courtroom. Vic absorbs all of the liability for this (like the flaming destruction of his career, and being on the hook to pay the penalties), while Ty Beard is the financial winner (because he soaked up all the GFM money), and Screech's youtube show gets a ton of free advertisement.

They're not gonna fuck up Screech's $12+ million by mixing it with the GoFundMe. Screech's inheritance is one thing. Grifting Vic's fans is another. They just forgot to tell Vic that the reason Screech recommended Ty Beard as a libel/slander lawyer is because Beard is Screech's friend and they have a multi-million dollar business relationship. Oops. Haha, fuck you Vic. You got exploited for everyone else's benefit.
I'm expecting Vic to take them to court next.
 
RoosterTeeth had to layoff 13% of their workforce today, and the fact Vic Stans think that RT cutting ties with him (he wasnt even an employee, he was a contracted Voice Actor) was the reason the company has been having a bad year is absolutely baffling
It really all about finding a fault in a company or person who has done something to a person you liked. At most it just load Stans trying to have a moment.
 

deimosmasque

Ugly, Queer, Gender-Fluid, Drive-In Mutant, yes?
Moderator
Apr 22, 2018
14,170
Tampa, Fl
Given how rabid his fans are and how quickly he could turn them against those guys I don't think that would be a problem.

It will be a problem.

See the GFM is out of money. Meaning the money that will be awarded to the current Defendants is coming out of Vic's pocket. Even if they try to raise money for a "second wave" Vic being nearly bankrupted by the first wave will probably give him pause.

I firmly believe that the only reason these lawsuits happened is because Vic saw it as a free pay day. Once it hits his own wallet it will be different.

Rooster Teeth is also operated out of Texas meaning the TCPA is still there. He has even less of a case against them. And Rooster Teeth is under Warner Media, meaning another set of high priced lawyers to help bankrupt Vic further if he does it.

Unless you think his fans can raise him 1.5 million dollars, there isn't going to be a second wave.
 

neoak

Member
Oct 25, 2017
15,260
It will be a problem.

See the GFM is out of money. Meaning the money that will be awarded to the current Defendants is coming out of Vic's pocket. Even if they try to raise money for a "second wave" Vic being nearly bankrupted by the first wave will probably give him pause.

I firmly believe that the only reason these lawsuits happened is because Vic saw it as a free pay day. Once it hits his own wallet it will be different.

Rooster Teeth is also operated out of Texas meaning the TCPA is still there. He has even less of a case against them. And Rooster Teeth is under Warner Media, meaning another set of high priced lawyers to help bankrupt Vic further if he does it.

Unless you think his fans can raise him 1.5 million dollars, there isn't going to be a second wave.
I think he means Vic suing his own attorney for malpractice.
 

Arttemis

The Fallen
Oct 28, 2017
6,199
Seeing Vic lose, pay out of pocket for huge sums, and the grifter lawyer duo get caught up in fraud and ethics penalties... would be a beautiful sight.
 

Cheerilee

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,969
I think he means Vic suing his own attorney for malpractice.
IIRC, I saw someone saying that Vic can't sue Beard for malpractice, because it's not about how incompetent Beard is, it's about Beard's incompetence causing Vic to lose a case that he otherwise would have won.

And Vic's case (although serious for the defendants) was always a long shot.
 

Simon Belmont

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,037
IIRC, I saw someone saying that Vic can't sue Beard for malpractice, because it's not about how incompetent Beard is, it's about Beard's incompetence causing Vic to lose a case that he otherwise would have won.

And Vic's case (although serious for the defendants) was always a long shot.

I think you could definitely make the case that his insane filings drove up the cost to the defendants which he eventually has to pay. Don't know if that's good enough, but his incompetence definitely materially impacted the result of the case
 

Katten

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,499
I don't know if it would have even been possible to use the GFM for any sanctions and payments to those cases that were dismissed. It's my understanding (taking the most favorable account) the money is set up into IOLTA. His lawyer bills/invoices it.

That is what we know, but that is info from Screech. We will probably never see evidence of that or truly know what happened to that money.
 

deimosmasque

Ugly, Queer, Gender-Fluid, Drive-In Mutant, yes?
Moderator
Apr 22, 2018
14,170
Tampa, Fl
I think he means Vic suing his own attorney for malpractice.

Dang it your right. I guess I read the rooster teeth part together with their post.

Sandfox I'm sorry for my mixed up reply. I do doubt Vic will sue his attorney but I came into that discussion thinking you meant Rooster Teeth for some reason.

My humblest of apologies for my poor reading skills today.
 

L Thammy

Spacenoid
Member
Oct 25, 2017
49,986
Hey, let's be fair. The Fuhrer's Matriarch has been pretty involved until this legal stuff from what I've heard.
 

StarCreator

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,853
I'm trying to make a summary of events:

-In wake of the release of the Dragonball: Broly film in which Vic Micnogna plays the starring role, his many sexual misdeeds are brought to attention via #kickvic on Twitter from former fans and other voice actors
Pretty good summary, but this first point in itself is ISWV propaganda designed to make the situation look more vindictive against Vic than it actually was. The timing of this lining up with the release of the new Broly movie was purely coincidence.

The real catalyst behind all this was a significantly less famous figure in the anime convention community getting outed as a serial abuser, and some people choosing to air their laundry about Vic after seeing a similar pile of feces get his comeuppance. It's nothing new - Vic has been at this for literal decades, after all - but this time, it managed to stick.
 

Minataur

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,151
I feel like it's also disingenuous to call Vic the "star" of DBS: Broly considering he barely speaks for the first half of the film and spends the second half doing nothing but screaming. Broly's the title character, but he has fewer lines than even Frieza.
 

Katten

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,499
Pretty good summary, but this first point in itself is ISWV propaganda designed to make the situation look more vindictive against Vic than it actually was. The timing of this lining up with the release of the new Broly movie was purely coincidence.

The real catalyst behind all this was a significantly less famous figure in the anime convention community getting outed as a serial abuser, and some people choosing to air their laundry about Vic after seeing a similar pile of feces get his comeuppance. It's nothing new - Vic has been at this for literal decades, after all - but this time, it managed to stick.

Also I guess the Chuck Huber involvement is only interesting to people who, for some reason, still care about Chuck Huber. He really has no meaningful part in this. He tried and failed miserably to broker a peace, then had an affidavit fraudulently notarized, where he shat on Sabat, who also isn't meaningfully involved, and otherwise he just roasted Vic.

I do not entirely understand why the names Huber and Sabat still come up in this thread.
 

L Thammy

Spacenoid
Member
Oct 25, 2017
49,986
I feel like it's also disingenuous to call Vic the "star" of DBS: Broly considering he barely speaks for the first half of the film and spends the second half doing nothing but screaming. Broly's the title character, but he has fewer lines than even Frieza.
I think Broly's the star. Vic isn't, though, since 99% of Broly's character are the things that happen to him and almost 0% consists of the things he says.

I was going to say something like "nothing that comes out of his mouth is important" except sometimes the things that come out of his mouth are laser beams, which are definitely more important than Vic's voice.
 

Minataur

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,151
I think Broly's the star. Vic isn't, though, since 99% of Broly's character are the things that happen to him and almost 0% consists of the things he says.

I was going to say something like "nothing that comes out of his mouth is important" except sometimes the things that come out of his mouth are laser beams, which are definitely more important than Vic's voice.
Yeah, I think it's REALLY funny how so much of the literature of this case calls Vic the "star" of the movie when really, he's an entirely inessential part of it and could be easily replaced without changing much. Vic's even made several well-publicized comments about how much he hates voicing Broly, so to see him leaning on it as his big claim to fame during this case is legitimately amusing to me.
 

HeroR

Banned
Dec 10, 2017
7,450
I feel like it's also disingenuous to call Vic the "star" of DBS: Broly considering he barely speaks for the first half of the film and spends the second half doing nothing but screaming. Broly's the title character, but he has fewer lines than even Frieza.

Even without words, Broly was arguably the star more than Goku, Vegeta, and even Frieza.
 

HeroR

Banned
Dec 10, 2017
7,450
Yeah, I think it's REALLY funny how so much of the literature of this case calls Vic the "star" of the movie when really, he's an entirely inessential part of it and could be easily replaced without changing much. Vic's even made several well-publicized comments about how much he hates voicing Broly, so to see him leaning on it as his big claim to fame during this case is legitimately amusing to me.

In the videos I saw with Vic talking about Broly, he didn't say he 'hated' Broly. He just wasn't fond of him since he was hard to play. Namely, Broly severally hurt his voice and all he does is scream. He even joked about Broly being the death of his singing career.