He's had like 4 cases ever iirc? And he hasn't taken on a case in over a year.
He's had like 4 cases ever iirc? And he hasn't taken on a case in over a year.
for the most part, but the lawyer part is def questionable at this point
This isn't accurate.
Ty is the person that is a real lawyer with his own law firm (though with no experience in defamation)
Nick is the one that has been streaming.
Ty has been on nicks stream from time to time but it's all nick that we see with the streams.
Nick sort of has his own firm. Up until recently it was basically just a name with no legal distinction from himself. He does also have a law degree.
As far as I know, nobody has any fucking clue if he's ever done any actual legal work.
Nick sort of has his own firm. Up until recently it was basically just a name with no legal distinction from himself. He does also have a law degree.
As far as I know, nobody has any fucking clue if he's ever done any actual legal work.
Isn't his law firm just on paper, and he let it lapse for like 2 years until lawtwitter pointed it out?
Something like that. Don't remember exactly, but something like it's a LLC (kind if a pseudo-corporation) now but only because law twitter pointed out that the structure it was before that I can't even remember of the name of had no legal protections, it was literally just Rekieta calling himself a company.Isn't his law firm just on paper, and he let it lapse for like 2 years until lawtwitter pointed it out?
Nick is a real lawyer at the very base level you can call him one. He went to law school. He passed the bar. He has a Minnesota office that operates out of a strip mall. He has, in fact, worked some cases. It's just SIGNIFICANTLY less cases than the majority of law Twitter. But he was the first lawyer to throw himself into the mix through his YouTube channel (which he works on significantly more than he does actually being a lawyer, and who knows if he's actually even representing anybody right now or if he even has this whole year). This is why people gravitated towards him at first, because he gave the atmosphere of being a real lawyer who seemed to have every reason to be trustworthy, as he appeared to have all of the qualifications of someone who should know what he was talking about.Nick sort of has his own firm. Up until recently it was basically just a name with no legal distinction from himself. He does also have a law degree.
As far as I know, nobody has any fucking clue if he's ever done any actual legal work.
Nick is a real lawyer at the very base level you can call him one. He went to law school. He passed the bar. He has a Minnesota office that operates out of a strip mall. He has, in fact, worked some cases. It's just SIGNIFICANTLY less cases than the majority of law Twitter. But he was the first lawyer to throw himself into the mix through his YouTube channel (which he works on significantly more than he does actually being a lawyer, and who knows if he's actually even representing anybody right now or if he even has this whole year). This is why people gravitated towards him at first, because he gave the atmosphere of being a real lawyer who seemed to have every reason to be trustworthy, as he appeared to have all of the qualifications of someone who should know what he was talking about.
Then LawTwitter showed up and made it obvious that, even if he did all the bare minimum steps to legally be able to be called a "lawyer", he really shouldn't be.
And why shouldn't he be a lawyer, besides being an attention seeker?
Various unrelated lawyers who have twitter accounts and have commented on the stupidity of this case; as for Rekieta, basically everything he has claimed in regards to the proceedings and possible outcomes of this case has been proven wrong by these lawyers, so his professional capabilities are highly questionable to say the least.What's LawTwitter? And why shouldn't he be a lawyer, besides being an attention seeker?
Well frankly, going by his own LinkedIn Page... he went to Law School for 4 years, but makes no mention of a degree from it. He makes mention of his BA in literature from 2005, but nothing from Law School. He's also not listed on the Minnesota Bar database probably because he never actually took it or failed it.
So yes, he has gone to law school in the sense that it appears he spent 3 years trying to become a real one and it didn't work so he took all his education he got from there to be a Youtube Streamer cosplaying as a shitty lawyer. Minnesota doesn't require you to pass the Bar to become a practicing lawyer.
Side bar, kind of sad to google his name and first comes up his Twitter where he expounds nonsense, Youtube channel where he does the same, Patreon who pay him to say stupid shit, an article about him getting suspended from Twitter, and FINALLY his woefully inept LinkedIn Page.
Various unrelated lawyers who have twitter accounts and have commented on the stupidity of this case; as for Rekieta, basically everything he has claimed in regards to the proceedings and possible outcomes of this case has been proven wrong by these lawyers, so his professional capabilities are highly questionable to say the least.
Because idiots thought it was going to be an easy case to smack down against the oppressive #MeToo so all Grifters came out of the woodwork even if they had no clue who Vic was to protect him from these FALSE ACCUSATIONS!
Also he is a decently known voice actor in the con circles, having voiced the protagonist for Fullmetal Alchemist and recently Broly for the newest Dragon Ball movie. He has amassed a relatively decent fanbase of the years.Because idiots thought it was going to be an easy case to smack down against the oppressive #MeToo so all Grifters came out of the woodwork even if they had no clue who Vic was to protect him from these FALSE ACCUSATIONS!
That's troubling.....
Funny thing as I read the bolded I was listening to one of his videos where he actually says, 'you can report me to the Bar'. I guess we can't because he isn't even registered.
How did Vic's case even get this much attention?
It was so mind bogglingly stupid that it caught the attention of Lawyers world wide.
Okay, this guy is hilarious. His mental breakdown in March had me rolling:
I think the best punch line to the entire thing is everyone keeps calling Vic 'voice of Broly' when Vic is on record saying that he doesn't really like voicing Broly since he murders his voice and he was happy when he finally died in the third movie. Then he heard that he had to voice him in video games.
Vic's case caught attention with Lawtwitter when the first filing infamously said that calling Vic a piece of shit was defemation because "he is not actually made of feces"
It was so mind bogglingly stupid that it caught the attention of Lawyers world wide.
It's a multitude of things that lead to this blowing up.
Ron's being cucked... but now Ron's the one they're all afraid of... what a difference a few months makes...
Lol... he literally just said "CONTRACT! HE'S UNDER CONTRACT! A SIGNED PIECE OF PAPER!"
But but... I thought that wasn't what a contract was, Nick...
I think the best punch line to the entire thing is everyone keeps calling Vic 'voice of Broly' when Vic is on record saying that he doesn't really like voicing Broly since he murders his voice and he was happy when he finally died in the third movie. Then he heard that he had to voice him in video games.
I wouldn't be surprised if this was true considering Broly is the only role where he doesn't just sound like himself.I was actually told years ago that Vic's performance as Broly is digitally manipulated.
Vic's case caught attention with Lawtwitter when the first filing infamously said that calling Vic a piece of shit was defemation because "he is not actually made of feces"
It was so mind bogglingly stupid that it caught the attention of Lawyers world wide.
It's not just anime, nerd culture/community as a whole has these toxic shitstainsIt's a multitude of things that lead to this blowing up.
1) Vic has groomed/cultivated a deticated fanbase that he weaponized from very early on to attack/undermine not only the victims/accusers but also people who spread the accusations on social media, even people/other fans of anime who had nothing to do with Vic or the victims accusing him. Go back to the early days of this thing and you can find these Vic fanboys & girls coming to the twitter feeds of anyone who dared mention Vic's behaviour with the usual "Vic is being persecuted, misinterpreted waaah waah waaah" crap.
2) anime was a mistake; the whole anime community is filled with toxic shitstains of humanity who will attack any women who dare accuse anyone of their community/industry of any wrongdoing, especially when it comes to progressive issues/"SJW stuff"
3) the larger alt-right fascist Nazi cult that has also latched on to this case, who will go wherever Good, White Men(tm) are accused of sexual assault, bigotry or other shitty behaviour & try to oppress accusers into silence through doxxing, death threats & such.
4) BlackFacedMoron brought his brand of visibility to this thing.
5) Percy's first TDMA letter says it's defamatory to call Vic a piece of shit because he isn't literally made of poop.
Sure, but from nerdy subcultures, I'd say anime is on average one of the more toxic ones. Mostly because so much of it is misogynistic, pedo bait/waifu crap nowadays (even children's anime has some gross stuff) and that attracts a certain kind of audience. As much as other nerdy subcultures have similar issues & aren't perfect by any means, there's a lot more variety there on a constant basis and as such the community does not attract just the toxic shitstains & creeps but a lot more positive (sub)communities.It's not just anime, nerd culture/community as a whole has these toxic shitstains
I was actually told years ago that Vic's performance as Broly is digitally manipulated.
Yeah, repeatedly in the Threadnought it was mentioned that Minnesota's bar is voluntary or something like that. If he didn't voluntarily attempt to pass the bar (or if he did and failed) then he kinda can't get disbarred.Well frankly, going by his own LinkedIn Page... he went to Law School for 4 years, but makes no mention of a degree from it. He makes mention of his BA in literature from 2005, but nothing from Law School. He's also not listed on the Minnesota Bar database probably because he never actually took it or failed it.
So yes, he has gone to law school in the sense that it appears he spent 3 years trying to become a real one and it didn't work so he took all his education he got from there to be a Youtube Streamer cosplaying as a shitty lawyer. Minnesota doesn't require you to pass the Bar to become a practicing lawyer.
Side bar, kind of sad to google his name and first comes up his Twitter where he expounds nonsense, Youtube channel where he does the same, Patreon who pay him to say stupid shit, an article about him getting suspended from Twitter, and FINALLY his woefully inept LinkedIn Page.