I'm only vaguely aware of the details on this picture story. So it's never been proven the girl in the pic actually was the one claiming there was nothing wrong with what was happening in it? It could basically just have been faked bullshit like that thing where someone was suggesting shopping pics to make Vic look worse?
I mean I don't know how anyone can indisputably prove whether or not someone on the internet is the person in the image on the internet that they say they are, unless they're someone well known or can provide a shoe on head style photo.
It could very well be that girl is the one in the photo. Maybe she is and maybe she isn't. That doesn't actually prove anything at all. If one girl in one photo has no problem with Vic, it doesn't actually prove anything about anything except that single photo.
I'm not even sure the photo being referred to was ever supposed to be about a specific girl with a specific complaint. Many, many photos of girls (usually with faces blurred) with Vic were shared around in those early days of the accusations coming to light as examples of "look how close he gets to these underage girls." Many of those were never actually people saying, "I am this girl, and I am mad." Of course, some of them were.
Was the photo this girl says is her ever intended to be the latter? Or was it just an example of how weirdly close Vic puts himself to underage girls? No idea. The whole thread of that part of the discussion was left deliberately hard to follow.
