-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
VGTech: Resident Evil 3 Remake Xbox One X vs PS4 Pro vs PS4 vs Xbox One Frame Rate Comparison (Retail)
- Thread starter chandoog
- Start date
So weird that they've done this with the X version. At the very least they need to patch in a performance mode option that better keeps 60 fps.
Looks like Pro is mostly locked at 60 during gameplay and close to that in cutscenes, base PS4 performs equivalent to Xbox One X at around 50 fps most of the time, sometimes reaching 60 in stretches, and Xbox One trails behind at around 40-50 pretty much constantly.
Wasn't this the same with RE2? That the performance was better on PS4 Pro because the XB1X was 4K?
I see XB1X frame rate is still borked.
No reason to rush to get it. Will wait to see for improvements or a major sale I guess.
No reason to rush to get it. Will wait to see for improvements or a major sale I guess.
Why did they make it 4K on the Xbone X if it can't stay at 60fps? Should've prioritized framerate.
No. RE2 on the X ran better than the PS4 Pro framerate wise. Both seemed to run at similar resolutions, although there was more evidence of reconstruction on PS4 Pro.
I think there was a later REengine title that targeted 4K to the detriment of performance on the X, but RE2 didn't do that.
Looks like one of many flawed decisions with the REmake 3.
XOX downsamples games automatically, so no difference when it comes to performance.
The game will still render at the same resolution as it would on a 4K tv, just downsample it to 1080p.
Yeah, a bit strange. I'm pretty sure both DMC5 and RE2 on the X had better framerates and resolution advantage over the Pro. I don't think either of those are true 4K on the X though...
Thanks
Edit: I thought downsampling was something that just changes the textures, so performance would be less affected.
Capcom really should give an option for Full HD.
As I said before, something about these games with unlocked framerate tells me that they did it with the retro on XSX in mind.
Well that's annoying. I have the X version pre-ordered and it's too late to cancel from Best Buy.
Yeah, for sure. That's why I pointed out that neither DMC5 nor RE2 were running at native 4K on the X. I have RE2 on the X and would like to have that and RE3 for the same system, so it kind of sucks that the performance of RE3 is not ideal on the X (for me). First world problems lol.
Guess I'll try to seek a refund on my Xbox One X digital preorder. Not likely it'll happen. :/
I'll admit this is the deepest disappointment I've personally faced from a gaming purchase in a good long time. Such a bummer.
I'll admit this is the deepest disappointment I've personally faced from a gaming purchase in a good long time. Such a bummer.
Microsoft has been pretty good to me with regards for refunds, for what it's worth. Especially pre-order refunds (I refunded a Gears 4 digital preorder).
They even refunded me for Rise of the Tomb Raider (when it was exclusive I think, before it came to steam) after I had downloaded it and played it a bit (less than an hour, maybe even half-an-hour though).
Am I reading that pic of the results correctly that the 1X version literally [never] runs at 60fps? I'm saying that based on the "Maximum Frame Rate" result being 59 fps. That sounds odd just from a data perspective. (This sounds like they didn't do much in the way of profiling/adjustment for the launch version, and that's a disappointment.)
OP
OP
Yes, in the samples VGTech tested, the max frame rate XBX reaches is 59 FPS. The base PS4 has a higher average FPS than XBX going by their metrics.
Ouch at the OG xbox one. 38 fps, why even bother running it at unlocked framerate at this point.
I gotta wonder if thats whats going to happen to PS5 games in 6 years. third party devs dont seem to give a shit about the weakest console.
I gotta wonder if thats whats going to happen to PS5 games in 6 years. third party devs dont seem to give a shit about the weakest console.
I don't think it's native though. DF think that all versions except the PS4 use some form of checkerboard rendering. That's probably why the OP only mentions the word native with the PS4 version.
I was gonna get this on Pro anyway over my X but I think I will just wait until next gen at this point, have a ton of other stuff coming up that would put it on the backseat anyway.
OP
OP
Actually you are right, I should probably add that part in from the video description.
PS4 is the only one which renders native. All other versions are using reconstruction techniques.
Oh come on, devs can do whatever they want to. In this case they favored resolution and it seems their engine, as great results as it can produce, is not able to do proper dynamic resolution scaling which is a big disadvantage compared to other engines and thus not really future proof.
Can't blame Capcom for focusing on what's on the chip
In any case, the performance on X is completely on Capcom and it's bad.
Doubt the likely best selling console will be neglected at all. Your concern for 2025 games is noted though.
More like devs don't care about the platform where they will sell lowest. I don't see that changing next gen, and that's why we will end up both xbox and playstation being even closer than the specs.