-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
VGTech: Call of Duty Modern Warfare PS4 Pro vs Xbox One X Frame Rate Test (Beta)
- Thread starter chandoog
- Start date
They'd only get matched with other PC players using controllers though.
I'm trying to understand how the X has the torn frames given their CPUs are the same and the X has the better GPU setup
Is this just an optimisation thing with the Pro being the lead dev platform?
Is this just an optimisation thing with the Pro being the lead dev platform?
I almost always turn off a game's AA solution, then use NVCP to clean it up to my liking. That said, there's nothing you can do to make this game look great. Fingers crossed Ultra textures appear at release.
Having no trouble running it on my laptop 1060 connected to an ultrawide, with AA off and all the settings at normal with 100% scaling, I'm getting between 65-80fps...
I didn't know this. I played the whole beta with crossplay turned off, in fear of being the laughing stock of some M/KB orgy! lol
Textures seem to be low res, but it is only a beta and I expect some tweaks for the release version.
Why do the base consoles not get compared in these things anymore? You know, the units that 90-95% of gamers have in their homes?
for all those mentioning screen tearing on X, the devs have already stated it is a known issue in the beta and they should be resolving it for launch. Whether they do or not is another matter though.
Even on PC it's a blurry mess. I'm not a big fan of that. I like to actually see what I'm shooting.
Maybe a developer can explain?
Despite running on 1X, I am not that impressed overall. Graphically it's nothing special but I suspect 1X enhancements are missing/heavily reduced. Performance wise, it seems OK. Ups and downs when things get crazy but I am sure some patches will sort those minor issue out.
At least PC owners can tweak more.
The more I played the beta, the more it made me question this "new" CoD engine.
Probably a matter of resources for those making the videos. Comparing two consoles can be time consuming, let alone four.
I'd also imagine that the majority of people interested in these sort of videos are more likely to have the enhanced consoles.
Yup. It would be sad if the XBX didn't come out on top. But I'm gonna play were my friends play...PS4.
Thats...not what I gathered by looking at the data in the op?
What bothers me is not the resolution or the performance but the consistant shadow flickering and pixelated edges from the last COD games till this new engine (which looks as good as BF now) but still even on mid-gen consoles with GPUs 2.3 and 4.6 Times more powerful than their base versions yet shadows are still very low res!!!! In what age are we? Even during the PS2 era we had games with better shadows.
Wouldn't the cross play help with that though? I don't know if there are any big limitations to cross-play but I was under the impression it uses you Activision account and allows you to play with any PC or Console player.
they probably meant comparable fps difference vs pretty big resolution gap.
Either way, there's room for improvement on both consoles, that being said, I was content with how it was running for me.
Holy shit at the image quality differences in that vid at least. Makes the texture work look worse as a result also, I haven't kept up with this years COD news but I thought this was going to be a looker this time around, new engine and stuff right?
Looks like both versions need some work, you can't be releasing a Vaseline version on the premier COD console.
Looks like both versions need some work, you can't be releasing a Vaseline version on the premier COD console.
It takes quite a bit of time to line up shots and run numbers and make sure it is right, then produce a video, publish it.. .etc. Base consoles = 2x the work.
I think the IQ in terms Anti-Aliasing is actually pretty amazing - if you do not like its softness, just use fidelity FX or Freestyle to your liking. Bam, it can be as sharp or as soft as you like. PC gaming is pretty neat.
It is probably one of the most effective TAAs we have ever seen.
Isn't it rendered more or less the 50% of more pixels which is the bandwidth advantage of the X over the Pro? Games bandwidth starving can be easily put in the shame the Pro hardware. I don't find it "much larger" than their power gap. Reasonable talking, how an hardware can overtake the power gap with the weaker? This narrative is kinda of absurd for such things.
Last edited:
Yeah. It reminded me of the Red Dead Redemption 2-situation. Some "cinematic" effects or the reconstruction method is ruining the IQ of the Pro-version, I guess.
Thanks for this.
Was asking about this in the Beta OT, but never saw any confirmation that the devs had addressed it to the community.
I would hazard a guess that despite 90% of people owning a base console, the audience for a tech analysis is probably the kind of audience who is more likely to own a mid gen upgrade.
Obviously not across the board. But in general the mainstream consumer is probably less interested in tech analysis/framerate graphs than enthusiasts who buy Pro/X.