Those independent numbers are not good for republicans.
Also, check out the Fox News effect in the republican belief in public health officials.
It seems negotiators for the WH came in with a lot of demands to scale things back or else the bill was DOA with them:
The Trump administration is asking Congress to approve a massive economic stimulus package of around $850 billion to stanch the economic free fall caused by the coronavirus, four officials familiar with the planning said Tuesday.
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin will present details to Senate Republicans later Tuesday. The package would be mostly devoted to flooding the economy with cash, through a payroll tax cut or other mechanism, two of the officials said, with some $50 billion directed specifically to helping the airline industry. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.
It's unclear how warmly the design of the White House's proposal will be received. Trump has for several weeks pushed Congress to cut or eliminate the payroll tax, which is paid by employees and employers and funds Social Security and Medicare benefits. Many Democrats have complained that such a tax cut would not necessarily directly benefit people who have lost jobs because of the coronavirus crisis. But lawmakers have, in recent days, talked about the need for a huge economic package to stabilize the economy, and it's likely that some ideas are being revisited.
Edit: Posted above.
John Roberts @johnrobertsFox
.@FoxNews has learned that @realDonaldTrump will ask Congress for more than $800 billion in economic stimulus: $500 bil in payroll tax cut, $250 bil in Small Business Association loans, $58 billion for the airlines, and a smattering of other items.
9:09 AM - Mar 17, 2020
Edit: Posted above.
John Roberts @johnrobertsFox
.@FoxNews has learned that @realDonaldTrump will ask Congress for more than $800 billion in economic stimulus: $500 bil in payroll tax cut, $250 bil in Small Business Association loans, $58 billion for the airlines, and a smattering of other items.
9:09 AM - Mar 17, 2020
Edit: Posted above.
John Roberts @johnrobertsFox
.@FoxNews has learned that @realDonaldTrump will ask Congress for more than $800 billion in economic stimulus: $500 bil in payroll tax cut, $250 bil in Small Business Association loans, $58 billion for the airlines, and a smattering of other items.
9:09 AM - Mar 17, 2020
I cannot believe I am writing this, but here it is: My reporting would indicate there's probably more bipartisan energy behind cutting $1,000 checks to people than enacting a payroll tax cut.
This fucking guy. Can't stay on message for five minutes. Always back to attacking even in the midst of a crisis.
What is his obsession with the payroll tax cut? It doesn't even address unemployment or provide any benefit to people actually out of work. It would be a complete waste of money. Dems better hold the line on shutting that nonsense down.
I'm sure he'll get back onboard with Trump soon enoughTom Cotton said he wants the checks over the payroll tax cut yesterday, so who knows.
What is his obsession with the payroll tax cut? It doesn't even address unemployment or provide any benefit to people actually out of work. It would be a complete waste of money. Dems better hold the line on shutting that nonsense down.
You're not saying it right, that's why you're not getting it, it's a payroll TAX CUTWhat is his obsession with the payroll tax cut? It doesn't even address unemployment or provide any benefit to people actually out of work. It would be a complete waste of money. Dems better hold the line on shutting that nonsense down.
Do you think he has any knowledge of who he is or what he did whatsoever?Is Trump aware of the fact that he is going down as the second coming of Herbert Hoover?
Morning Joe is rallying behind Trump after the press conference yesterday.
He doesn't know who that isIs Trump aware of the fact that he is going down as the second coming of Herbert Hoover?
I still think the base 1000 is a bad idea. Give it to people who really need it. I'm working from home and getting full pay. My wife works in a clinic and is getting full pay. I'd rather the money go to people who can't open their doors and worrying about failing businesses.Tom Cotton said he wants the checks over the payroll tax cut yesterday, so who knows.
Is Trump aware of the fact that he is going down as the second coming of Herbert Hoover?
Honestly, there's no real downside to just giving people money. You might not spend it right now, but after things chill out?I still think the base 1000 is a bad idea. Give it to people who really need it. I'm working from home and getting full pay. My wife works in a clinic and is getting full pay. I'd rather the money go to people who can't open their doors and worrying about failing businesses.
What am I going to spend1,000 on right now? Amazon? Groceries? They aren't hurting
Rent, mortgage, utilities. I doubt we're getting an Italian-style moratorium any time soon.I still think the base 1000 is a bad idea. Give it to people who really need it. I'm working from home and getting full pay. My wife works in a clinic and is getting full pay. I'd rather the money go to people who can't open their doors and worrying about failing businesses.
What am I going to spend1,000 on right now? Amazon? Groceries? They aren't hurting
I would like to put down a deposit on a PS5 and XSX so that could work for me.I still think the base 1000 is a bad idea. Give it to people who really need it. I'm working from home and getting full pay. My wife works in a clinic and is getting full pay. I'd rather the money go to people who can't open their doors and worrying about failing businesses.
What am I going to spend1,000 on right now? Amazon? Groceries? They aren't hurting
Also even if people just use it to cover rent and bills and stuff... so what's the problem? Then it's just a preventative measure against millions of people defaulting on their debt or getting evicted, which would be even more devastating.Honestly, there's no real downside to just giving people money. You might not spend it right now, but after things chill out?
Exactly. Just give people the money, there's no real downside to it.Also even if people just use it to cover rent and bills and stuff... so what's the problem? Then it's just a preventative measure against millions of people defaulting on their debt or getting evicted, which would be even more devastating.
Normally I'm right there with you. However, this is one of those things where ease of distribution is important. Don't waste time means checking it, just give it to everyone. Plus, since it's a one time thing, there's no reason to cause people to get pissed they didn't get a check when Joe Blow down the road did. Just cut everyone $1000 or whatever and be done with it. If you take that $1000 and put it into a local business struggling to keep the doors open, it's a win win for everyone involved.I still think the base 1000 is a bad idea. Give it to people who really need it. I'm working from home and getting full pay. My wife works in a clinic and is getting full pay. I'd rather the money go to people who can't open their doors and worrying about failing businesses.
What am I going to spend1,000 on right now? Amazon? Groceries? They aren't hurting
It's a bit blunt to just do it for everyone but probably the most efficient. It's not just about giving it to people who need it, but getting money flowing in the economy. You need transactions and spending for an economy to function.I still think the base 1000 is a bad idea. Give it to people who really need it. I'm working from home and getting full pay. My wife works in a clinic and is getting full pay. I'd rather the money go to people who can't open their doors and worrying about failing businesses.
What am I going to spend1,000 on right now? Amazon? Groceries? They aren't hurting