I wasn't gonna be "excited" about anyone, but yeah, not getting Biden through would have been a low bar. We had so many fucking choices, too.
How do you know Adam is a transphobe? Is it just the Hillary avatar? If so, then your argument is pretty weak.So having just come back for a week ban for metacommentary, why is metacommentary to minimize sexual assault given the same week ban
I have zero willingness to tolerate tone arguments in the face of TERFs and other transphobia. Swearing at transphobes is not only justified, it's probably a public service.
To be fair, all he got called was a TERF lover, not a TERF. Seems fair to me.How do you know Adam is a transphobe? Is it just the Hillary avatar? If so, then your argument is pretty weak.
So you're taking Sphag's accusation with no proof whatsoever at face value?I have zero willingness to tolerate tone arguments in the face of TERFs and other transphobia. Swearing at transphobes is not only justified, it's probably a public service.
To be fair, all he got called was a TERF lover, not a TERF. Seems fair to me.
Again everything is about him,I love have everything is tied to his imageTrump again accusing the media of wanting the markets to fail because it would make him look bad. This is going well.
Felt that way from the get-go. You got people with 100% name rec and it's shocking that it ended up in a 1 on 1 and it's shocking that Bernie did worse against someone less hated than Hillary. Nothing in this fucking primary was shocking. Not even Biden getting #metoo'd was shocking. Only shocking part of this was coronavirus and Bloomberg's brief stint. Fucking democracy in action.Yeah, I get what you mean. I'm honestly feeling resentful against Biden and Bernie for deciding to run.
Just remember, you're not choosing a President. You'd get a President regardless. You're choosing which one you'd rather have.I live in NC, so I'll have to vote Biden and the thought makes me feel gross.
Fuck. Fuck!
I wasn't gonna be "excited" about anyone, but yeah, not getting Biden through would have been a low bar. We had so many fucking choices, too.
Let me put it this way: people got bans for trying to talk around Sanders promoting Rogan's endorsement. Sure, fine, I can live with that, Rogan's no friend of mine and I'm with AOC that it was actually not great for the people who were already supporting him (I recall seeing some reporting a few weeks back that the Rogan thing actually made her back off active support on his campaign, though I can't recall where it is and that's immaterial).
If we can have these sorts of discussions about Sanders and Rogan then I think we seriously need to think about how we talk about and boost Clinton's image on this OT, because she's definitely been making TERF arguments in her public comeback tour. I voted for her in 2016 but I am absolutely happy never hearing from or seeing her ever again, because she's made it very clear where her ethical priorities lie.
Apologies, y'all. I've been trying to keep myself distracted. What's the progress on the bill so far? Has the Senate voted on it yet or are we still stuck on Graham etc being angry that the common folk are daring to get a smidgen of assistance alongside the corporations' handouts?
A investigation needs to be launched, based on the results, every effort needs to be done to find another candidate or regroup behind one. Not Bernie, moderates have made their judgement. Notably, this is why campaigns "suspend" instead of ending it. Maybe a unity ticket.
In a just world, if the allegations are true, Biden would step down, but doubt that will happen, Obama will 100% decide how to proceed and force the party forward. I hope to god he can make the right decision if this turns true and force Biden out.
Being in Oregon too, I'm on the same page. I was gonna vote Biden but this rape thing is too far, I can't justify it.I live in Oregon so my vote won't matter much so I am going to write Warren and vote Dem on the downballot
Fuck this shit
Still in the Senate, but will likely be cleared now that Trump has called for it to pass.
Why couldn't Ron Wyden run?Being in Oregon too, I'm on the same page. I was gonna vote Biden but this rape thing is too far, I can't justify it.
Again, your issue is with Clinton herself. How has Adam promoted TERF philosophy? Is the mere image of Clinton some kind of consent on his part with that philosophy? Or has he advocated for that somewhere else?Let me put it this way: people got bans for trying to talk around Sanders promoting Rogan's endorsement. Sure, fine, I can live with that, Rogan's no friend of mine and I'm with AOC that it was actually not great for the people who were already supporting him (I recall seeing some reporting a few weeks back that the Rogan thing actually made her back off active support on his campaign, though I can't recall where it is and that's immaterial).
If we can have these sorts of discussions about Sanders and Rogan then I think we seriously need to think about how we talk about and boost Clinton's image on this OT, because she's definitely been making TERF arguments in her public comeback tour. I voted for her in 2016 but I am absolutely happy never hearing from or seeing her ever again, because she's made it very clear where her ethical priorities lie.
For the record, I agree with you. But I think the question here is whether your comments about TERFs have anything to do with what Adam said.Let me put it this way: people got bans for trying to talk around Sanders promoting Rogan's endorsement. Sure, fine, I can live with that, Rogan's no friend of mine and I'm with AOC that it was actually not great for the people who were already supporting him (I recall seeing some reporting a few weeks back that the Rogan thing actually made her back off active support on his campaign, though I can't recall where it is and that's immaterial).
If we can have these sorts of discussions about Sanders and Rogan then I think we seriously need to think about how we talk about and boost Clinton's image on this OT, because she's definitely been making TERF arguments in her public comeback tour. I voted for her in 2016 but I am absolutely happy never hearing from or seeing her ever again, because she's made it very clear where her ethical priorities lie.
Kadia Goba @kadiagoba
NEWS: Mnuchin says he expects checks to Americans to go out in three weeks.
6:22 PM - Mar 25, 2020
Let me put it this way: people got bans for trying to talk around Sanders promoting Rogan's endorsement. Sure, fine, I can live with that, Rogan's no friend of mine and I'm with AOC that it was actually not great for the people who were already supporting him (I recall seeing some reporting a few weeks back that the Rogan thing actually made her back off active support on his campaign, though I can't recall where it is and that's immaterial).
If we can have these sorts of discussions about Sanders and Rogan then I think we seriously need to think about how we talk about and boost Clinton's image on this OT, because she's definitely been making TERF arguments in her public comeback tour. I voted for her in 2016 but I am absolutely happy never hearing from or seeing her ever again, because she's made it very clear where her ethical priorities lie.
Biden was always my least favorite option among the last handful of major candidates, and there were plenty who dropped out before Iowa I preferred over him. To my mind, Biden's usefulness has always been solely as a vehicle for getting us a woman vice president, progressive judges on SCOTUS and elsewhere, and a Democratic Congress that can pass progressive legislation.You're just choosing policy, it's why getting excited about politicians is generally a bad idea. I mean it would be nice to be "inspired" by a candidate or whatever, but it's secondary. Albeit, that excitement gets people to the polls, but so does hate so it goes various ways there too. You vote Dem if you want the trifecta. If you don't want it, okay then.
You do realize that Clinton apologized for those comments, right?I do know how he comports himself on this forum and it does not speak kindly to his deeper character.
For the record, I agree with you. But I think the question here is whether your comments about TERFs have anything to do with what Adam said.
Who is this reporter that asked about the Kennedy Center funding and then "should we blame China and the WHO?"
Never seen him before, so I assume he's from some random conservative joint, and that's why he got two questions in a row.
This is where I am, largely--in the face of a credible allegation on this level the discussion should move to who Biden should be throwing his supporters to. I don't know who, but ideally Biden's campaign would know who best slots into his generic Dem spot and would hit the right markers to sustain his support. This is all insanely uncharted waters, though, and a lot of the discussion I've seen floating around just assumes that if this knocks Biden out Bernie gets coronated, which makes me nervous as hell.
The behavior is not okay. This story as relayed if found to be credible (and it sounds like it may be) should remove Biden from consideration. But after the infinite primary tarnishing everyone's view of everyone, I don't even know who slots into that spot without causing issues.
Just to add on to what other posters said, this is a 28 year old accusation with no witnesses, that I'm aware of. You can't investigate it. It's her word versus his (I believe he hasn't addressed this accusation specifically?) The only thing I would say corroborates this is that Joe Biden has a public record of not respecting the personal boundaries of women, and being publicly inappropriate with them. I don't like his politics, wasn't planning on voting for him in the general election regardless, but this accusation, along with the others plus his public behavior, looks awful.
Not to mention Clinton's sin is just one step removed from promoting Rogan. Clinton was basically saying "we should hear out TERFs in order to change them" which is shitty as fuck, but it's not the same as actually being a terf. Promoting Rogan is amplifying a transphobe, though it's not highlighting his transphobeness so it's not quite as bad, a different degree from Hillary's deal.While I would never tell a trans person how to feel about it, I do think it's worth pointing out that Rogan (and Cenk) are unapologetic transphobes whereas Clinton has apologized and said that she believes that trans rights are human rights. There's a degree of separation there.
Biden was always my least favorite option among the last handful of major candidates, and there were plenty who dropped out before Iowa I preferred over him. To my mind, Biden's usefulness has always been solely as a vehicle for getting us a woman vice president, progressive judges on SCOTUS and elsewhere, and a Democratic Congress that can pass progressive legislation.