The midwest folksiness and horrible MN/WI/UP region humor allllllways gets people! Uh. Eventually.Klob Klob Klob
I miss Amy Klobuchar even. Oh my god. Come back
For me the saddest part is that the most I ever wanted to vote for her was when she was a boss and didn't endorse anyone.
Can I get some fuckin' uhhhhhh
Candidates who aren't white men in their 70s with sketchy sexual assault histories?
Christ, man. I will literally stump for fucking Klobuchar if it means I don't have to vote for Biden in the GE.
I don't think this is the time to be bringing up the Warren/Sanders event.
In this scenario he would be the Barry Goldwater of the progressive movement. Aka your favorite politician's, favorite politician.
I'm reading the takes on this page in disbelief.
PoliEra didn't vote for Biden (not that it matters).
A sexual assault allegation isn't going to hurt Biden in the general. Denying it in any way will help him with Male voters.
The DNC isn't going to pull him as a candidate.
Wake up to the country you're in.
What does this whataboutism add to the topic at hand and what's the similarity in degree between an alleged sexist remark and an alleged sexual assault?
She was a snake though. /s
It's funny to me how many people on this page are suggesting, even as a joke, Klobuchar...you picked the only candidate widely accused of physical and verbal abuse lol
Senator Mitt Romney @SenatorRomney
We can't afford to wait any longer to send relief to those who need it. The Senate's #COVID19 relief package supports workers, families, and businesses across the country. The Senate and House should pass this bill now and get it to the President's desk. https://www.romney.senate.gov/romney-calls-urgent-passage-relief-package …
4:35 PM - Mar 25, 2020
What does this even mean? The DNC should "put forward" a candidate? Is this what you think the DNC does?At this point let the DNC put forward Klobuchar, even. I don't agree with her ideologically but perhaps there's a compromise ticket that can be agreed upon (which doesn't involve putting forth an alleged rapist as the nominee).
I think there's a larger point here too, which is that we could largely avoid this by nominating women and/or younger candidates. Not that woman can't be abusers but it's far less likely than with a 78 year old white man who spent decades in the United States Senate during the worst of its "boy's club" years.
.I think the proper response is, "Her claim should be investigated, and I'll refrain from commenting until that time."
Rapists are bad, but railroading black folks legally is something that we can get past, apparently.
Warren is basically the only major candidate who seemed like an actual good person, racial blind spots aside.
It's funny to me how many people on this page are suggesting, even as a joke, Klobuchar...you picked the only candidate widely accused of physical and verbal abuse lol
What does this even mean? The DNC should "put forward" a candidate? Is this what you think the DNC does?
Auto with the most rational take as usual.I think the proper response is, "Her claim should be investigated, and I'll refrain from commenting until that time."
Not too late to nominate someone else at the convention you know...
The fawning praise of Putin, full of Russian propaganda, is disgusting. TimesUP needs come clear on somethings as well. I would like to see more outlets then the Intercept or pro Bernie wishful thinkers shed some light on this.
ftfy
....believing victims literally means we investigate every allegation based on the belief it is true.I guess we're believing women unless it's inconvenient, at which point we should 'investigate'.
As, I said, I think she should be believed. All victims should. I just believe we need more information.
I mean....believing victims literally means we investigate every allegation based on the belief it is true.
Holy shit,thats why I said those 3 jackasses acting like this is a winning issue for them is insane.
I mean ignoring the 20+ women or whoever said Trump raped them and obviously the billion other awful things we will endure in him winning reelection, didnt you know, Biden is Satan? The convention is gonna get interesting if there is actual power to change candidates, but he is the certain one mathematically right now.Isn't Trump a rapist too? So if you're not voting you're voting for one regardless no?
my guy this is a hell of takeIsn't Trump a rapist too? So if you're not voting you're voting for one regardless no?
Gonna be a long election of gross takes...Isn't Trump a rapist too? So if you're not voting you're voting for one regardless no?
Edit: just to make clear I'm not saying any of this shit is copacetic
Hell this week alone is really devastating.
You can still investigate they said/they said situations. It's done all the time. Again, this shouldn't be about strengthening or weakening Biden. It should be about figuring out exactly what happened. If that means it hurts Biden? So be it. If that means it strengthens Biden? So be it. That's an irrelevant consideration. They can interview folks, find out if she divulged this to anyone contemporaneously, was there anyone else in Biden's office who was aware of this? Etc. This happens all the time when allegations are made. This is how it should work. At the end of it all, it might end up being a they said/they said thing, but both she and Biden are entitled to a full investigation.I mean
The reality of the situation is likely going to be that it's just her word against his. So if they do an investigation and that happens, all it's going to do is strengthen Biden. I'm not saying there shouldn't be an investigation but I'm not sure how this changes anyone's opinion in here, if that ends up being the case.
You know, I try very hard to disagree with folks without being disagreeable. But this kind of shit gets leveled against me all the time, is in clear violation of the site's policies and nothing seems to happen about it.If you were serious about any of this you wouldn't have a Hilary avatar. She has a history of silencing victims of assault and supporting her rapist husband. You're literally downplaying/denying her history whilst clearly bullshitting about how you think all women should be believed because looking like you have morals is more important than having morals.
I'm in no way downplaying the trauma you went through but you don't care about other victims. You're parading around an avatar celebrating a slave using terf to own Bernie bros. That's what you actually care about.
People using this story as an attempt to validate the thing they weren't already going to do is kinda gross.
People using this story as an attempt to validate the thing they weren't already going to do is kinda gross.
I mean
The reality of the situation is likely going to be that it's just her word against his. So if they do an investigation and that happens, all it's going to do is strengthen Biden. I'm not saying there shouldn't be an investigation but I'm not sure how this changes anyone's opinion in here, if that ends up being the case.
Is this the thread now? I guess so.
Tomorrow. Unemployment numbers come out tomorrow. PA was over half a million.