• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

RailWays

One Winged Slayer
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
15,667
No tears for Tulsi.

Finally we can get the Bernie vs Biden match that had been long foretold.
 

Sexy Fish

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
4,395


Biden's social media team is doing good shit.

And anyone bitching about him in the replies looks like a major tool.
 

Gashprex

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,029
I'm not ruling out a poor Biden performance and thus a swing back to Bernie.

Based one debate, you think that people are going to suddenly realize who Biden and Bernie are after 40 years in public service - and a million senior citizens and cuban americans in Florida are going to swing their vote to a democratic socialist?
 

Effect

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,945
I think Biden will be fine. More time for him to make his point isn't a negative I think. Having to condense what you're trying to say is harder. Two people on stage is also easier to control. Even if Sanders decides to be super aggressive that can easily backfire as well. Between the two he is the one with the like-ability issue and it could be see again as him doing damage to the likely nominee like he did with Hillary.
 

Pooh

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,849
The Hundred Acre Wood
Why does it feel like Dems aren't doing oversight anymore? Am I just missing news about it? Between Barr and the Coronavirus "response" alone there should be tons going on
 

SpitztheGreat

Member
May 16, 2019
2,877
Based one debate, you think that people are going to suddenly realize who Biden and Bernie are after 40 years in public service - and a million senior citizens and cuban americans in Florida are going to swing their vote to a democratic socialist?
I think the public is fickle, yes.

I'm not trying to say Bernie will REVERSE things, I'm saying that a disastrous Biden performance could result in a poll bump for Bernie which would cause the media to go into "IT'S A HORSE RACE, THE SOCIALIST MONSTER IS COMING, DEMS IN DISARY." I really don't think this is a crazy worry to have.
 

Kmonk

#TeamThierry
Member
Oct 30, 2017
3,689
US
The problem is that they prefer the empty pandering.


Remember when Obama tried to create job training for WV coal miners? And instead of opting into the training, they voted for Trump on the promise of job growth in the coal industry?

Yeah.


Why does it feel like Dems aren't doing oversight anymore? Am I just missing news about it? Between Barr and the Coronavirus "response" alone there should be tons going on


I think they're just out of levers to pull. Impeachment was an airtight case, and you saw how that went. There's no reason to pass legislation, because it just ends up in Mitch's junk drawer. The courts have been one avenue to check the admin, but with the recent decision denying the House Dems standing to sue on emoluments issues, it's pretty clear that it's not going to be effective in a lot of cases.
 

Pooh

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,849
The Hundred Acre Wood
I think they're just out of levers to pull. Impeachment was an airtight case, and you saw how that went. There's no reason to pass legislation, because it just ends up in Mitch's junk drawer. The courts have been one avenue to check the admin, but with the recent decision denying the House Dems standing to sue on emoluments issues, it's pretty clear that it's not going to be effective in a lot of cases.
This is short-sighted though, because they need to be making these things news. There's no question Republicans would be hammering Dems nonstop about the Coronavirus if their roles were reversed. This isn't just about the presidency but about informing the public and affecting ALL of the races up and down the ballot in 2020. If Dems do nothing then it just looks like there is nothing there because "if there was something bad going on, Dems would be saying something"
 

SpitztheGreat

Member
May 16, 2019
2,877
Why does it feel like Dems aren't doing oversight anymore? Am I just missing news about it? Between Barr and the Coronavirus "response" alone there should be tons going on
It feels like that because we took our best shot, it was deflected because nothing matters any more, and there's so much shit bombarding voters that it's difficult to block everything out and focus on one single issue.

I think Dem leadership is resigned to the fact that the only thing that can stop this train is them holding the House and/or winning in November. Until then we're left trying to plug holes with our fingers while the general public just wants to curl up into a ball and die.
 

adamsappel

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,503
This is possible related to any/all of the Kucinich weirdness. She threw it out there as a hunch and twitter ended up providing receipts that she was dead-on in the thread.


"Department of Peace." That's when I knew never to take Kucinich seriously (and I already knew about the UFOs and the teabag he keeps in his coat pocket).

Nice sentiment, but "Beyond the Pale" can be construed as anti-Semitic.
 

Deleted member 31817

Nov 7, 2017
30,876
Biden could get 1,991 delegates before the convention and I imagine Bernie would still stay in unfortunately.
 

SpitztheGreat

Member
May 16, 2019
2,877
This is short-sighted though, because they need to be making these things news. There's no question Republicans would be hammering Dems nonstop about the Coronavirus if their roles were reversed. This isn't just about the presidency but about informing the public and affecting ALL of the races up and down the ballot in 2020. If Dems do nothing then it just looks like there is nothing there because "if there was something bad going on, Dems would be saying something"
Coronavirus is a tricky thing. The way I look at it Ebola was easy, there was little chance of it spreading around the US due to how it is contracted, but it is well understood so it's easy to message around. Basically, there was little chance of a major outbreak that would result in large numbers of deaths- so there was no chance of looking like you were politicizing the deaths of thousands of people while their families were mourning. Coronavirus, by contrast, could really be a big deal, so you don't want to look like you're playing with people's lives. Instead, Dems are trying to lead at the State level, and let Trump blunder his way forward and hope that the fickle public doesn't forget how incompetent he is.

There's also the issue that NOTHING seems to really move the needle anymore. At some point we need to remember that the Party is led by people, people who get tired, and demoralized, and have been banging their head against the wall for three years without a break. If they were having success in the courts, or in the polls, it would be something to give them strength, but if you aren't seeing that then it becomes hard to keep fighting with the same intensity we had a couple months ago over Ukraine.

Instead they're shifting their focus to the election. It's the best opportunity to exercise real oversight at this point.
 

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,607
With the caveat that I will probably never not be nervous about Joe Biden between now and November, the prospect of a 1v1 debate between him and Bernie makes me nervous.
 

Pooh

Member
Oct 25, 2017
8,849
The Hundred Acre Wood
Coronavirus is a tricky thing...

I think the thing is though this is an issue Trump is uniquely weak on and can be extremely effective this November, because it's going to affect people all over the country in a real way, regardless of where they live. People already don't trust Trump when it comes to healthcare, and Dems need to keep twisting the knife in that wound. Dems need to be making the case every day that Trump failed in his administration's response to this, that he was more interested in protecting the stock market than protecting the people. This can't be a "Washington has failed" story, it has to be a "Trump has failed" story.
 

OmniOne

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,063
Biden is going to win many more states than Hillary. Especially if they moved from a caucus to a primary.
 
Oct 27, 2017
17,973
"Department of Peace." That's when I knew never to take Kucinich seriously (and I already knew about the UFOs and the teabag he keeps in his coat pocket).

Nice sentiment, but "Beyond the Pale" can be construed as anti-Semitic.

The "pale" in this phrase refers to the Ashdown Forest in the UK. "beyond the pale" is considered to mean "beyond the boundary".

There is the Pale of Settlement which refers to the Russian settlement where Jews were forbidden to inhabit before, during, and even after the 19th century. This phrase has gotten mixed in with the expression a bit over time.
 

OmniOne

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,063
I think one of the dynamics at play is going to be voters saying "Hey Bernie, this is not going to go on forever. "
 

Sho_Nuff82

Member
Nov 14, 2017
18,413
Is this the first time Joe mentioned raising the minimum wage? Based on the Bernie fans in his mentions it seems so.
 

Kmonk

#TeamThierry
Member
Oct 30, 2017
3,689
US
This is short-sighted though, because they need to be making these things news. There's no question Republicans would be hammering Dems nonstop about the Coronavirus if their roles were reversed. This isn't just about the presidency but about informing the public and affecting ALL of the races up and down the ballot in 2020. If Dems do nothing then it just looks like there is nothing there because "if there was something bad going on, Dems would be saying something"


But what form would that take? There's no dedicated vehicle for dispensing Democratic opinions, as the media has been shown to have their own agenda (and TBF, they've been hammering Trump nonstop on the atrocious response to COVID-19).

They've only been able to get traction on coverage when there have been actual procedural events taking place: the release of the Mueller Report, the impeachment proceedings, and the government shutdowns.

As SpitztheGreat says above, they've chosen to spend their media capital by giving space to the presidential candidates, and focus on wining the election. It seems like the only tangible path to stopping Trump, so that's the basket in which they've put their eggs.

I feel the same frustration you do, and often find myself asking "why don't the do something?" But the reality is that many of the actions of the Trump administration that I've personally found shocking and horrifying, just haven't stuck in the media cycle.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.