I am excited to see how Biden performs in a one on one debate. I'm assuming much better.
I am excited to see how Biden performs in a one on one debate. I'm assuming much better.
I'm not ruling out a poor Biden performance and thus a swing back to Bernie.It'll be interesting. Sanders is going to be desperate as fuck and go all in on attacking Biden. It'll be on Biden to prepare himself well.
I do feel kinda bad about it. I wish we'd been sitting behind Elaine Chao while Mitch was speaking instead.
I'm skeptical a poor Biden performance will even matter. Especially considering when in the race this will be.I'm not ruling out a poor Biden performance and thus a swing back to Bernie.
I'm not ruling out a poor Biden performance and thus a swing back to Bernie.
Ill rephrase to be more specific "...resulting in a minor but noticeable bump for Bernie in the polls."
I'm not ruling out a poor Biden performance and thus a swing back to Bernie.
Well, if it makes you feel better, I highly doubt Bernie drops out. So, we'll probably have a few more pointless debates.Yeah. Next weekend will be the last time Sanders is on a debate stage and I am so bummed out.
@CNBC
Trump campaign sues CNN for libel over opinion article, following suits against Times and Post https://cnb.cx/2vK3lgz
I think there's only two more left altogether.Well, if it makes you feel better, I highly doubt Bernie drops out. So, we'll probably have a few more pointless debates.
Once Sanders loses in MI, whose primary happens five days before the debate, it's over.I'm not ruling out a poor Biden performance and thus a swing back to Bernie.
I think the public is fickle, yes.Based one debate, you think that people are going to suddenly realize who Biden and Bernie are after 40 years in public service - and a million senior citizens and cuban americans in Florida are going to swing their vote to a democratic socialist?
Why does it feel like Dems aren't doing oversight anymore? Am I just missing news about it? Between Barr and the Coronavirus "response" alone there should be tons going on
This is short-sighted though, because they need to be making these things news. There's no question Republicans would be hammering Dems nonstop about the Coronavirus if their roles were reversed. This isn't just about the presidency but about informing the public and affecting ALL of the races up and down the ballot in 2020. If Dems do nothing then it just looks like there is nothing there because "if there was something bad going on, Dems would be saying something"I think they're just out of levers to pull. Impeachment was an airtight case, and you saw how that went. There's no reason to pass legislation, because it just ends up in Mitch's junk drawer. The courts have been one avenue to check the admin, but with the recent decision denying the House Dems standing to sue on emoluments issues, it's pretty clear that it's not going to be effective in a lot of cases.
It feels like that because we took our best shot, it was deflected because nothing matters any more, and there's so much shit bombarding voters that it's difficult to block everything out and focus on one single issue.Why does it feel like Dems aren't doing oversight anymore? Am I just missing news about it? Between Barr and the Coronavirus "response" alone there should be tons going on
Well, if it makes you feel better, I highly doubt Bernie drops out. So, we'll probably have a few more pointless debates.
This is possible related to any/all of the Kucinich weirdness. She threw it out there as a hunch and twitter ended up providing receipts that she was dead-on in the thread.
Biden could get 1,991 delegates before the convention and I imagine Bernie would still stay in unfortunately.
Coronavirus is a tricky thing. The way I look at it Ebola was easy, there was little chance of it spreading around the US due to how it is contracted, but it is well understood so it's easy to message around. Basically, there was little chance of a major outbreak that would result in large numbers of deaths- so there was no chance of looking like you were politicizing the deaths of thousands of people while their families were mourning. Coronavirus, by contrast, could really be a big deal, so you don't want to look like you're playing with people's lives. Instead, Dems are trying to lead at the State level, and let Trump blunder his way forward and hope that the fickle public doesn't forget how incompetent he is.This is short-sighted though, because they need to be making these things news. There's no question Republicans would be hammering Dems nonstop about the Coronavirus if their roles were reversed. This isn't just about the presidency but about informing the public and affecting ALL of the races up and down the ballot in 2020. If Dems do nothing then it just looks like there is nothing there because "if there was something bad going on, Dems would be saying something"
Pre-Warren dropout poll
"Department of Peace." That's when I knew never to take Kucinich seriously (and I already knew about the UFOs and the teabag he keeps in his coat pocket).
Nice sentiment, but "Beyond the Pale" can be construed as anti-Semitic.
"Department of Peace." That's when I knew never to take Kucinich seriously (and I already knew about the UFOs and the teabag he keeps in his coat pocket).
Nice sentiment, but "Beyond the Pale" can be construed as anti-Semitic.
It's all a bit late at that point isn't it?I'm not ruling out a poor Biden performance and thus a swing back to Bernie.
This is short-sighted though, because they need to be making these things news. There's no question Republicans would be hammering Dems nonstop about the Coronavirus if their roles were reversed. This isn't just about the presidency but about informing the public and affecting ALL of the races up and down the ballot in 2020. If Dems do nothing then it just looks like there is nothing there because "if there was something bad going on, Dems would be saying something"