• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

OmniOne

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,063
Worse yet when he looked unhinged at the debate "OH REAAALLLLY OH RREAAALY?!" When he was called out on it and the audience didn't like his answer.
 

Sheepinator

Member
Jul 25, 2018
28,018
(This is on topic) So I'm playing God of War and those Valkyrie bosses are extremely tough, as is that mist world area at first, and then I think about how much tougher the Hard mode supposedly is, which reminds me of Warren in this race. It's not fair she has to play the game in Hard mode while everyone else gets Normal or in Joe's case, Casual. As I mentioned here before, an older retired female relative said recently not only shouldn't Warren be Pres, no woman at all should be Pres. I couldn't believe it, still can't. It's taking way too long for America to elect a non-white male into the highest Office, and even the one time they did, look at the backlash after it. The UK had Thatcher in 1979, Germany had Merkel in 2005, still waiting here.
 

Tamanon

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
19,729
Bernie's campaign knows that losing Michigan is an accelerant. Maybe they can hold on with a win, but a loss there is just the dagger.

Of course, the campaign's already over......
 
Oct 25, 2017
17,537

twitter.com

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Twitter

“Today is a hard day for so many people who love and respect @ewarren and admire her campaign - and I include myself in that. Elizabeth Warren is a progressive lion, a champion for working families, and her commitment to inclusivity is exemplary. Thank you for being a role model...

Warren in good graces.

AOC is the future, its amazing how much better a messenger for the progressive movement
 

Soul Skater

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,201
He isn't far off from an expert. He just ran for state office and while it isn't often overlooked probably won except for outside election interference
I was just joking because if Gillum and Nelson had kept pace with Latino voters that went for Hillary all the florida election fuckery wouldn't have mattered and they would have won comfortably
 

metalslimer

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,566
Worse yet when he looked unhinged at the debate "OH REAAALLLLY OH RREAAALY?!" When he was called out on it and the audience didn't like his answer.

That was really sad and I was surprised people didnt bring it up more. He let the fucking audience get under his skin. It made me pretty sure he would take literally any bait trump set for him.
 

adam387

Member
Nov 27, 2017
5,215
To be fair, losing Mississippi is inevitable. If he loses Michigan this race is 100% reynalds wrap over.

It would be like if in Super Tuesday, instead of focusing on California and Texas he spent time on Alabama and Arkansas. That's potentially a lot of delegates he would have lost had he done that. Mathematically winning CA keeps him in the race as a long shot.

Bernie has to go ham on Michigan somehow getting Warren to endorse him + Ayanna Presley, bring on Michael Moore, get Steyer on board and once again light the AOC pyre. Anything less and this race is over.
Yes, Bernie is going to lose Mississippi by a million points. However, he cannot afford to be non-viable. He BARELY made viability in 2016. If Biden gets them all, that's 36 delegates. Whoever wins Michigan will not win it by more than mid to high single digits. They will not net more than a handful of delegates. Letting Mississippi go completely is...a weird choice. I would think Bernie's team would better understand a delegate race but maybe not....
 

Tamanon

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
19,729
Yes, Bernie is going to lose Mississippi by a million points. However, he cannot afford to be non-viable. He BARELY made viability in 2016. If Biden gets them all, that's 36 delegates. Whoever wins Michigan will not win it by more than mid to high single digits. They will not net more than a handful of delegates. Letting Mississippi go completely is...a weird choice. I would think Bernie's team would better understand a delegate race but maybe not....

At this point, maybe it's not a delegate game he's playing.
 

loquaciousJenny

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
2,457
Sad to hear Warren has decided to drop. I don't mind if she endorses Bernie but I don't think any of these candidates deserve her endorsement. Hope she gets a place in the eventual nominee's team if she want it.
 

Rodderick

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,667
My thinking is we need someone who can beat Trump, but we deserve someone who is organized and understands how to get the job done.

I'm taking the "need" as is what you'd need as President, not as candidate. If we're talking candidate I've always believed out of the whole field she'd be the one who wouldn't stand a chance against Trump.
 

metalslimer

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,566
Yes, Bernie is going to lose Mississippi by a million points. However, he cannot afford to be non-viable. He BARELY made viability in 2016. If Biden gets them all, that's 36 delegates. Whoever wins Michigan will not win it by more than mid to high single digits. They will not net more than a handful of delegates. Letting Mississippi go completely is...a weird choice. I would think Bernie's team would better understand a delegate race but maybe not....

He is pretty much mathematically eliminated if he becomes not viable in Miss but I guess he is more worried about the perception if he loses Michi. He was able to string his campaign along last time because he won a few more states than expected and gave people hope
 

Kaitos

Tens across the board!
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
14,707
You can't be in two places at once and Michigan has more delegates and there's more reason for Bernie to spend more time there, it's not complicated.
 
Oct 25, 2017
13,129

twitter.com

Sahil Kapur on Twitter

““Joe Biden’s three-day news blitz replaced an entire year of campaigning and organizing,” said Adam Green of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, which supported Warren. “It’s a little frustrating.” https://t.co/u6rMV3r7we”
 

adam387

Member
Nov 27, 2017
5,215
Actually, I think y'all are also right. It's a mindshare thing for him. If he loses Virginia, North Carolina, and Michigan...those are the three big swing states that have voted thus far. There's no electability argument to make at that point, especially if he goes on to lose Ohio, Florida, Georgia, Pennsylvania and Arizona. He has to win it for the simple fact if he doesn't he has no argument to make when he's (obviously) mathematically eliminated.
You can't be in two places at once and Michigan has more delegates and there's more reason for Bernie to spend more time there, it's not complicated.
Then he should send some of his surrogates and folks who have endors---oh wait. Maybe he could get the governor of Michigan to ...oh.
 

SpitztheGreat

Member
May 16, 2019
2,877
At this point, maybe it's not a delegate game he's playing.
If Bernie is purely playing for optics then I hope Biden crushes him. I'm not anti-Bernie, but if he is sacrificing all of Mississippi so that he can split Michigan (and understands that this dooms him with delegates) then we're better off with Biden crushing him everywhere.
 

Dahbomb

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,624
Yes, Bernie is going to lose Mississippi by a million points. However, he cannot afford to be non-viable. He BARELY made viability in 2016. If Biden gets them all, that's 36 delegates. Whoever wins Michigan will not win it by more than mid to high single digits. They will not net more than a handful of delegates. Letting Mississippi go completely is...a weird choice. I would think Bernie's team would better understand a delegate race but maybe not....
It's not just about raw delegates anymore, it's about controlling a narrative. 36 delegates can be made up later on, being in a race about electability when you lose Michigan is back breaking. Remember that Sanders has to make the claim that he is more electable than Biden, getting a win over Biden in Michigan does that. Getting like 5% better result in Mississippi does nothing for Sanders and no one is looking at MS for GE. Any hit on Biden's electability is a massive boon for Sanders. There are still a crap ton of late deciders in these elections meaning a lot of people are hesitant about who they want to vote for.

No matter what Sanders does at this point, he has to lob a hail mary. Simply continuing as is will just result in a slow and grueling loss. Biden is still a weak enough candidate that this primary can take another twist.
 

metalslimer

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
9,566
Does Bernie have a single endorsement sitting in his pocket because now would be the time to use them. It feels like every elected democrat and even people running have endorsed Biden
 

Soul Skater

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,201
It is kind of stupid that every debate, all the money, campaigning, everything that has happened since December 2018 meant less than nothing because Uncle Joe had a last minute hype machine.

but it also maybe says our election cycles are way way way way too long
 

Teiresias

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,223
10th will be the final nail in coffin if he loses Michigan, 17th going to be lowering in the coffin 6 feet under.

The desperation in the Sanders campaign is palpable.

If he loses Michigan and doesn't drop out I am I am posting a thread in OT titled "Fuck Bernie for not dropping out after losing Michigan"

Anyone who insults me for criticizing him will be reported.
 

SpitztheGreat

Member
May 16, 2019
2,877
You can't be in two places at once and Michigan has more delegates and there's more reason for Bernie to spend more time there, it's not complicated.
It speaks to his limited coalition though that he doesn't have anyone to campaign for him in Mississippi to keep him viable. While Michigan is the bigger prize, he's also much more likely to be viable there regardless- whereas in Mississippi he could be non-viable and allow Biden to get everything. The math doesn't work out well in this scenario. Even if he wins Michigan with like 54% of the vote, if he only gets 14% in Mississippi he's lost ground.
 

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,620
I was just joking because if Gillum and Nelson had kept pace with Latino voters that went for Hillary all the florida election fuckery wouldn't have mattered and they would have won comfortably
idk, maybe someone intimately familiar with being branded with the socialist label and then sinking with Florida Latino voters in an election might have some two cents to contribute to the discussion.
 

Kaitos

Tens across the board!
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
14,707
It speaks to his limited coalition though that he doesn't have anyone to campaign for him in Mississippi to keep him viable. While Michigan is the bigger prize, he's also much more likely to be viable there regardless- whereas in Mississippi he could be non-viable and allow Biden to get everything. The math doesn't work out well in this scenario. Even if he wins Michigan with like 54% of the vote, if he only gets 14% in Mississippi he's lost ground.
Where is this idea that "no surrogates" are going to be going to Mississippi? The mayor of Jackson is a Bernie surrogate -- gonna guess he'll be doing work there too.
 

Tamanon

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
19,729
It is kind of stupid that every debate, all the money, campaigning, everything that has happened since December 2018 meant less than nothing because Uncle Joe had a last minute hype machine.

but it also maybe says our election cycles are way way way way too long

I don't think it was a Biden hype machine. It was the other candidates not winning PoC, specifically the black vote. Without that, there's no path forward. Once they saw the clear evidence of it, it was a dead end.
 

adam387

Member
Nov 27, 2017
5,215


OK, nonviability in MS then?


It's not just about raw delegates anymore, it's about controlling a narrative. 36 delegates can be made up later on, being in a race about electability when you lose Michigan is back breaking. Remember that Sanders has to make the claim that he is more electable than Biden, getting a win over Biden in Michigan does that. Getting like 5% better result in Mississippi does nothing for Sanders and no one is looking at MS for GE. Any hit on Biden's electability is a massive boon for Sanders. There are still a crap ton of late deciders in these elections meaning a lot of people are hesitant about who they want to vote for.

No matter what Sanders does at this point, he has to lob a hail mary. Simply continuing as is will just result in a slow and grueling loss. Biden is still a weak enough candidate that this primary can take another twist.
Here's the thing, I get what you're saying. IF there were some great states for Bernie out there where he could make up 36 delegates, maybe it makes sense. But there aren't. His best hope in Florida is viability, at this point. Hell, I'll be generous and say he gets 25% of the vote. Biden is going to net 103 delegates in Florida alone. Add that to Mississippi, and it's 136. Bernie absolutely has to limit the damage everywhere he can. This was actually the thing that did Hillary in in 2008, btw. I speak from painful experience.
 

OmniOne

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,063
I think this is signaling that Sanders will most likely take it to the convention after being mathematically eliminated. (Again.) Because if you are really trying to win a delegate game you would not just give up delegates in MS like that.

The difference here though is that I think its likely not to work as well as far as pushback that will come because the Winner will have a penis.
 

Rampage

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,140
Metro Detriot
For those of you who decided to vote Biden on Tuesday and/or support his candidacy now, what changed your mind? The broad sentiment here for months was that he would be a bad candidate for several reasons, yet I don't see that now. I admit that I'm bewildered at so many primary voters' sudden confidence in him in the span of a couple days, but would like to understand the thought process.

The Bernie bubble made it near impossible to share real feeling about other candidates on ERA without getting dog-piled. Now that we have proof of "told you so that Bernie is repeating his 2016 mistakes", we don't have to hide.

Biden is not my preferred choice- but at least he will listen to a multitude of ideas and not call allies "the enemy" for not falling lock step with Bernie. We already have an authoritarian cult leader of Trump, I don't desire to switch another authoritarian cult leader like Bernie.
 

Doof

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,434
Kentucky
It is kind of stupid that every debate, all the money, campaigning, everything that has happened since December 2018 meant less than nothing because Uncle Joe had a last minute hype machine.

but it also maybe says our election cycles are way way way way too long
They are far, far too long. Most people I know, myself included, just want it to be over.
 

Dahbomb

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,624
It is kind of stupid that every debate, all the money, campaigning, everything that has happened since December 2018 meant less than nothing because Uncle Joe had a last minute hype machine.

but it also maybe says our election cycles are way way way way too long
Earned media is just too strong. Probably what accounted for the time Warren gained front runner status, the media was in love with her. Media is also the reason why Klob and Buttiegeg did well in the early states, they got non stop praise from the media and excessive fawning.

Sanders on the other hand keeps railing against the media, no one really dawns over him in mainstream media... except like weird Fox news hosts. He has never been a media darling. But again, it's still surprising at times when you start stacking his faults up that he still gets a lot of votes and support. He would be doing a lot better if he cleaned up his rhetoric but that's never going to happen so he will always get hammered by media even when he wins (ie. MSNBC having meltdowns over him winning Nevada).
 

Iolo

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,902
Britain
You can't be in two places at once and Michigan has more delegates and there's more reason for Bernie to spend more time there, it's not complicated.

Ignore the math for a second. We haven't had any of MI/PA/WI/OH vote yet, but we have had states similar to MS vote. A MI win (esp a huge one w/ a polling miss) is the last chance to make case for Bernie that doesn't involve Biden keeling over. If Bernie loses Michigan, it completely deflates any remaining electability argument. Therefore he absolutely, positively must win Michigan even if it comes at the expense of delegates.
 

Y2Kev

Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,865
He absolutely, positively must win Michigan or he will take his campaign to the convention even though he has no chance of winning or appearing viable, which is something he has never done before.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.