It doesn't matter how many offices you open if people just don't like you or think you should be president.If Biden gets 30% of the vote with only one field office - LMAO
You don't want to wait in suspense and have all your hopes crushed on election night?
Data for Progress had 28-26-26. They'll all be viable.Voted. I hope Biden doesn't come up one vote short of viability in MA.
If Bernie doesn't win it's because he didn't get enough votes, people have to chill out with the "Democrats would rather" because it implies some nefarious conspiracy to impede Bernie. It's not his "turn", his movement shouldn't be coronated just because, if he wants to be the nominee, go out there and get a majority of people to cast their votes for him.
My thoughts exactly. Sanders winning CA by less than 10 would portend very badly for him.
DFP did weird second choice combo stuff and assumed no one will vote for Pete and Amy today. Don't know if that's how the actual results will work out.
The stock market has them shook. What a predictable bunch of shits.
I think he'll be more susceptible, he has a much longer history of being racist than she does and has never really apologized or reached out to make up for it.
Sanders supporters should strategically vote for Warren you say?Warren's worst case scenario is getting below the threshold everywhere while Biden wins by slight margins.
I guess I've lived in Floriduh too long, that shit would probably get you shot down here, and the shooter getting exonerated because your politics made them fear for their safety.
Yes, I get that he with the most votes should win, that's how it should be, but you're discounting the very public push from the establishment Dems to try to shut Bernie down. It isn't a conspiracy, it's a very real thing backed up by quotes and articles. Remember the quote that some would rather damage the Democratic party than let Bernie have the nom? They're admitting they don't want new young progressive voters, and just want things like they are now (which is garbage and only getting worse). They have no view or plan for the future. Not welcoming and embracing this progressive push is a deathwish for the party, and we're all fucked for the rest of our lives with slanted courts and a lost SCOTUS.
I'll vote blue no matter who, but man I can't stand this safe "let's not go left at all so we don't piss off the moderates", while the country has been going right for decades. Our moderate left is the rest of the world's rightwing. The fact that m4a is considered radical by so many says it all about how far right we've moved. Repeating 2016 with a male candidate this time guarantees another loss; it's the very definition of insanity.
Yes, I get that he with the most votes should win, that's how it should be, but you're discounting the very public push from the establishment Dems to try to shut Bernie down. It isn't a conspiracy, it's a very real thing backed up by quotes and articles. Remember the quote that some would rather damage the Democratic party than let Bernie have the nom? They're admitting they don't want new young progressive voters, and just want things like they are now (which is garbage and only getting worse). They have no view or plan for the future. Not welcoming and embracing this progressive push is a deathwish for the party, and we're all fucked for the rest of our lives with slanted courts and a lost SCOTUS.
I'll vote blue no matter who, but man I can't stand this safe "let's not go left at all so we don't piss off the moderates", while the country has been going right for decades. Our moderate left is the rest of the world's rightwing. The fact that m4a is considered radical by so many says it all about how far right we've moved. Repeating 2016 with a male candidate this time guarantees another loss; it's the very definition of insanity.
"Warren sweeps Super Tuesday, wins all states"Sanders supporters should strategically vote for Warren you say?
Back to back asshole statements from Ted Yoho with this and voting against the anti lynching bill
Asked what should happen with the coronavirus and patients who don't have insurance, Trump says, "We're looking at that whole situation." Asked "how so," he says, "There are many people without insurance, and we're looking at that situation for those people."
Asked how much $ should go to hospitals for the uninsured, Trump says, "We're going to look at the uninsured, because they have a big problem. And we're going to look at the uninsured people that, you know, this came as a surprise to all of us...It shows what can happen in life."
I highly doubt those mega-publishers give these frivolous lawsuits much thought, nevermind change the way they report. It'll get laughed out of court.*thinking to self*
Oh, I get it. Maybe Trump campaign isn't suing the NYT and wapo on principle but to have a chilling effect and make them think twice about what they publish about his shady shit this election season.
Sorry, a little slow on that one.
I mean, if Era is using up R money on an audience it has minimal effect on, sounds like a net positive than them spending it on Facebook or whatever.Oh that's interesting... gee I wonder how the stocks are doing today...
*Sees another 3% drop for Dow Jones today despite reactionary Fed interest rate cut.
Also ton of anti-Bernie and anti-Socialist ads on Era. No anti-Trump ads. Era what are you doing!!!
You'd be right, but they're not a monolithic entity. If this kind of thing affects one reporter or one editor actions that can be enough.I highly doubt those mega-publishers give these frivolous lawsuits much thought, nevermind change the way they report. It'll get laughed out of court.
Also ton of anti-Bernie and anti-Socialist ads on Era. No anti-Trump ads. Era what are you doing!!!
Yes, I get that he with the most votes should win, that's how it should be, but you're discounting the very public push from the establishment Dems to try to shut Bernie down. It isn't a conspiracy, it's a very real thing backed up by quotes and articles. Remember the quote that some would rather damage the Democratic party than let Bernie have the nom? They're admitting they don't want new young progressive voters, and just want things like they are now (which is garbage and only getting worse). They have no view or plan for the future. Not welcoming and embracing this progressive push is a deathwish for the party, and we're all fucked for the rest of our lives with slanted courts and a lost SCOTUS.
Medicare for All and single-payer healthcare has always been radical; "Hillarycare" was what helped propel the House Republican surge in 1994. That M4A has roughly 50% approval among Democrats, while dismal for its general election chances, I think actually reflects how far its come as an increasingly accepted proposal.I'll vote blue no matter who, but man I can't stand this safe "let's not go left at all so we don't piss off the moderates", while the country has been going right for decades. Our moderate left is the rest of the world's rightwing. The fact that m4a is considered radical by so many says it all about how far right we've moved. Repeating 2016 with a male candidate this time guarantees another loss; it's the very definition of insanity.
Great, something dems should bang the GOP on going in the election.GOP junk plans going to seriously piss off a lot of gullible citizens soon...
Oh and how did your state reps vote on choosing to expand Medicaid?