-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
-
We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
US PoliEra 2020 |OT 3| "I think he's learned his lesson" says The Concerned Immoderate Darling Collins.
- Thread starter TheHunter
- Start date
- Status
Iowa Boogaloo Pt. 74
After recount (and recanvass), Pete Buttigieg holds onto narrow Iowa caucus lead; now, results must be certified
The Iowa caucus results, which were plagued with reporting problems, delayed, recanvassed and now recounted.
www.desmoinesregister.com
This not being the case would ruin the entire point of moving SDs to the second ballot.
About that. It'll be a talking point but the question is what makes it aboard too.
Not just stupid, irresponsible. Trump is going minister of truth on something that absolutely NEEDs full transparency no matter the detrimental effect on the economy. Candidates need to make it clear this isn't normal, and its dangerous and dare anyone to say differently.
OP
OP
This cononavirus/stock market combo is actually not being looked at deep enough.
This isn't just another "whoops week". This good be a lasting wound, and can be compounded by
1. Terrible leadership
2.China and it's economic bomb waiting to go off
3. Brexit
If all three combine...
This isn't just another "whoops week". This good be a lasting wound, and can be compounded by
1. Terrible leadership
2.China and it's economic bomb waiting to go off
3. Brexit
If all three combine...
Dems also need to make the case that under M4A everyone can get tested and get vaccinated, while under Trump only those who can afford it can get it.
Hm? How is it weird? If anything it's a weird assumption to take for granted that Warren would shift to Sanders support. Sanders and Warren haven't been on the same page since her accusation about Sanders' alleged sexist comment.
I made this point several days ago that apparently made quite a few people angry, but we've entered a part of the race where only three people have realistic chances at winning the presidency -- Sanders, Biden, and Bloomberg. The candidates know this better than voters. As such, this is the time of the election when the remaining candidates "circle the wagons" so to speak. Buttigieg made his surrogacy for Biden obvious this past debate, but it's also clear from his campaign goals.
Warren, if she was planning to shift into being a Sanders surrogate, would be making similar moves -- tho not as unsubtle or amatuer as Buttigieg's. Instead, Warren attacked Sanders as much as any other candidate this past debate. She didn't target Biden meaningfully otherwise.
Yeah, I just don't see it anymore. At best, I can see Warren choosing not to endorse. But again, I'd love to be wrong.
How quickly we forget that Bill Clinton was the first black president, not more than half a year since Toni Morrison died.
Out of the large, diverse group of canditates we had at the start of this cycle, Dems really decided to just choose between the 3 oldest white men. Lol
MJ Lee on Twitter
“NEW: Michael Bloomberg’s campaign has shared previously undisclosed test results on Bloomberg’s heart, including his left ventricular ejection fraction #. It’s a key data point on heart health. Bloomberg is now calling on Bernie Sanders to do the same. https://t.co/8lsNOQsjrz”
twitter.com
Considering the takes after the election that's not really a surprise. I could have told you that'd be the likely outcome a day after the election.
That's what happens when support is driven by perceived electability panic.
I think Brexit is mostly priced in at this point. It's going to suck for the UK, but it seems likely to be a minor blip for everybody else.
China is a much longer-term issue. The market is really good at ignoring stuff where the immediate ramifications can't really be seen.
She didn't slip away. She got booted off the stage.
She done.
I look at Soul Skater's post about how this primary is a disaster and it's annoying everybody, and juxtapose that with a text I got from a relative the other day asking for articles that would explain the candidates for her. I know we say this in the abstract a lot but I think it's hard for people who discuss this shit on a daily basis to really appreciate just how uninformed and inattentive so many voters are right now.
Yep. She would've still lost against Hillary but she'd be the frontrunner now.
Does anyone have a link or an image of that hypothetical doom and gloom NY Times cover they did back in 2016 about how we would look four years into the Trump presidency? Been trying to find it and google is failing me.
One, sure, (Biden) I could see leading early on. Two, maybe. But 3!? Bloomberg parachutes in after missing like 6 debates and quickly glides past two highly qualified women senators to 3rd place, below the two other septuagenarians. I underestimated just how much people really wanted a strong white daddy.
And that sexism will never ever really go away, especially against the women politicians known for their fierceness.
^^^^^
It's exactly like you say, INEVITABLE. The finger-pointing will go from a reaction to a plan.
Provokatsiya? Check.
Flattery during a time of his fuckups? Check.
Magical Thinking in the face of reality? Check.
Shitting on a venerable month? Check.
Distraction? Check.
^^^^^
It's exactly like you say, INEVITABLE. The finger-pointing will go from a reaction to a plan.
Provokatsiya? Check.
Flattery during a time of his fuckups? Check.
Magical Thinking in the face of reality? Check.
Shitting on a venerable month? Check.
Distraction? Check.
Federal court tosses conservatives' First Amendment suit against YouTube
YouTube is not a "state actor" bound by the First Amendment, the court ruled.
www.politico.com
Totally agree.
Also instead of just pointing fingers they should take the opp to help people understand how they will make them safer. It's the same thing with border security. Dems ONLY focus on the welfare of refugees (important, yes) and cede the security argument to the GOP. We can and should do both. Dems would make the nation safer, it's time to start talking about it.
wb
so is the narrative now that after searching high and low for a moderate candidate that is actually inspiring, the non-berners are coming back to Biden and thinking, "eh, it could be worse"?
so is the narrative now that after searching high and low for a moderate candidate that is actually inspiring, the non-berners are coming back to Biden and thinking, "eh, it could be worse"?
My issue with coronavirus tepeitjf
the problem is this actually is just a big sexist swamp
i mean we only had Hillary as a choice just recently and neoliberals couldn't get off their ass to rally around herEconomist you're so dreamy. Neoliberals have both the dominant mindshare among the electorate and no real choice in the race.
the problem is this actually is just a big sexist swamp
I think Warren's only shot was to be the only one in the Goldilocks lane like 2 months ago... with this crowded of a field sexism is way too much of a factor to overcome
Source, heard this from a co-worker today who is prone to conspiracy theories so I didn't pay it much mind.
That's a loss to our community, but I really can't blame you.
And less than 500 kits to test people.
But you should note that most of the cases are repatriates at this point (they were infected outside the country and brought back under quarantine—and then the people HHS had to process them, without protection or training, were allowed to just freely run around the state and even leave it).
The governor.
>
California Gov. Gavin Newsom said Thursday that 33 people have tested positive for COVID-19 and the state is currently monitoring at least 8,400 others —a day after U.S. health officials confirmed the first possible community transmission of the coronavirus in a Solano County resident.
"This is a fluid situation right now and I want to emphaize the risk to the American public remains low," said Dr. Sonia Y. Angell, California Department of Public Health Director and State Health Officer during a press conference. "There have been a limited number of confirmed cases to date."
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention doesn't know exactly how the new California patient, who's receiving medical care in Sacramento County, contracted the virus. The patient didn't have a relevant travel history or exposure to another patient with the virus, the CDC said Wednesday.
Yashar Ali 🐘 on Twitter
“Per Governor @GavinNewsom, California is monitoring 8,400 people for Coronavirus. "We knew this was inevitable," he says”
twitter.com
Yashar Ali 🐘 on Twitter
“Per Governor @GavinNewsom, California is monitoring 8,400 people for Coronavirus. "We knew this was inevitable," he says”
Thanks
>
California Gov. Gavin Newsom said Thursday that 33 people have tested positive for COVID-19 and the state is currently monitoring at least 8,400 others —a day after U.S. health officials confirmed the first possible community transmission of the coronavirus in a Solano County resident."This is a fluid situation right now and I want to emphaize the risk to the American public remains low," said Dr. Sonia Y. Angell, California Department of Public Health Director and State Health Officer during a press conference. "There have been a limited number of confirmed cases to date."The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention doesn't know exactly how the new California patient, who's receiving medical care in Sacramento County, contracted the virus. The patient didn't have a relevant travel history or exposure to another patient with the virus, the CDC said Wednesday.
Yashar Ali 🐘 on Twitter
“Per Governor @GavinNewsom, California is monitoring 8,400 people for Coronavirus. "We knew this was inevitable," he says”
Thanks, everyone. (I'm a little nervous.)
- Status