-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
US PoliEra 2020 |OT 2| Dershowitz says "Quid Pro Quo on the Go?" [See Staff Post]
- Thread starter TheHunter
- Start date
- Status
This is actually pretty bad for Pete (and also not good for Bernie) since his over performance in Iowa is completely over shadowed in the new media by botched caucus system.
And then we are going to go straight it SITU and impeachment after this which means all of this non sense will be behind us.
And then we are going to go straight it SITU and impeachment after this which means all of this non sense will be behind us.
Sanders speech is the same as most others except you're getting m4a "whether you like it or not", that seems new. But I'll give it this, each point made is concise and clear.
With impeachment and SOTU the results here no longer matter.
Thought the DNC helped Iowa dems set it up?
Warrens was way more positive/optimistic/ less I AM THE SENATE feelign
Bernie is on perpetual loop 24/7 and it's annoying. I raise an eyebrow when i hear different content from him.
Typical Bernie speech, thank god he didn't go into "rigging" because even he knows this isn't normal and not accuse anyone.
We don't even know if Pete won. That's the hilarious thing. We have 1.8% reporting.
Sure, and it also sounds like he's a bit annoyed he doesn't have any real results to talk about right now.
I like the theory that this being the first year of full data, someone on the other end looked at it and was like 'oh shit they arent doing it right, maybe ever?'
Are we allowed to complain that certain candidates had their entire speeches aired, while others didn't?
Pete's gonna be super freaking pissed (well, even more) if he ends up winning and didn't get a speech anyone saw.
Bernie was the only one that actually went down the policy list, not ramble on about how bad trump is.
lol, wouldn't surprise me based on past experiences with elections
Younger Dem gains not enough to offse erosion with older voters?
If Iowa doesn't lose it's first in the nation crown after DNC is incompetent.
And how the fuck can Dems fuck this up so badly in the age of Trump.
And how the fuck can Dems fuck this up so badly in the age of Trump.
Chris Matthews proposes a statutory way to hold elections accountable in real time
Joy Reid is praising fucking Bloomberg for skipping out
Joy Reid is praising fucking Bloomberg for skipping out
Well, probably not. He's running 5th among older voters, barely getting 5%.
Plus he lost support among young voters too.
Regardless of results they need to be dragged left and right for this. This has to be the final caucus.
The dumbest answer is likely the right one. They've probably been reporting things wrong forever.
I'm leaning towards this having to be part of the reason for the delay. Which only further illustrates why caucuses are terrible.
Joy on MSNBC just made a really good point. Assuming that turnout is level or down from 2016, this is really a repudiation of the idea that Bernie can leverage some white rural surge and win the White House. It's not reality based on what the numbers might be showing.
Apparently you can lol. You just don't report the results.
Man, between tonight and that Selzer poll getting canned...something something political blue balls
CNN saying Iowa hung up on the campaign folks when they started asking questions? Fucking coverup about to happen.
Then what does it say about the other candidates? Do we get a "final vote" in November?
They've reverted back to "why does Iowa have to go first" and "we can't beat trump" if there's not a clear winner on the first night, now they're relitigating 2016. Such despairing, it's not that bad, the on-the-ground delegate-negotiating should be telling a different story than this (perhaps for the first time) quality control.
He should be the most angry out of all of them.Imagine being Buttiegeg and spending all your cash on Iowa.
- Status