-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
US PoliEra 2020 |OT 2| Dershowitz says "Quid Pro Quo on the Go?" [See Staff Post]
- Thread starter TheHunter
- Start date
- Status
Let's not act like it's only Muslims he hates. This a guy that was talking about Nigerians would never go back to their huts it they came over here.
Honestly, if I'm Bloomberg, I open up donations, but limit them to the minimum required to get in the debates, then donate those donations to charity.
Yea, especially considering the history of genocide they've been dealing with. But I imagine a lot of those folks flee the country before seeking asylum...
Oh wait, they've weakened/destroyed that system too.
Parnas dropping all kinda names to the public now
Love it
i don't like this
I don't like having this feeling of hope that parnas is going to sing louder and harder than 6ix9ine
As he should, since the GOP have made it known they won't entertain the truthParnas dropping all kinda names to the public now
Love it
This is the time where you watch the feed and the body language and the folded arms and facepalms and wonder just what is going on.
Parnas dropping all kinda names to the public now
Love it
Uh sorry, haven't you heard? No need for witnesses, we don't need to hear what he has to say.
Things like the release above show how shortsighted decision not to call witnesses is. The Republicans have given up on the ability to delay the process, cross-examine, discredit the witnesses, or show any kind of independence whatsoever to their own voters. Instead, they're about to subject themselves to an uncontrollable public shitshow. Susan Collins did that at her peril and I see she's getting company.
Mm-hmm.
LMAO. Someone please put something about the Niger River on a teleprompter in front of Trump.
Mccaskill is saying the hold up is cause of the White House. WH wants this over with tonight, even if it takes all night while Mcconell is lobbying for a final vote sometime next week cause the republican caucus wants their turn in front of the senate camera to explain their vote.
Just like all real trials, it ends when the person being investigated wants it to.
The only small blip of light here is that now everyone is paying attention. Tilting the table doesn't work when everyone is watching your every move.
Was reading an article today on Reuters talking about how the accumulation of bots in the stock exchanges provides a buttress against "panic" in the sense that scary things spook meatbag investors. Something would have to give with this to point to poorer fundamentals, like if the virus starts providing a sizeable hit to Chinese exports or imports.
Man I'd be happy if local commuter rail service here were disrupted due to potential demonstrations. Here it's parts falling off the trains, derailments, running over people, and other sheer incompetence.
God, shut the fuck up, Bernard.
The % criterion is excellent and I love it. Should have been at 10% last debate.
OUTRAISED
This reads like something that would have happened in Veep; like, the level of incompetence involved in getting to this point by the GOP is just astonishing.
It's just really weird to say that a popular candidate doesn't get to debate because he's not taking money from people who need that money a lot more than he does, right? No one doubts that he could have cleared the donor threshold if he'd been accepting donations. The donor rule was always pretty stupid and was obviously not going to be defensible in a case like this. You change the rules not because you care about Bloomberg himself but because he's polling at ~10%, probably has sympathy in the party beyond that, and you don't want to be seen to be unfair to their preference. "Them's the rules" is just never a persuasive argument when the rules are manifestly dumb.
So... it sounds like they're redoing the witness vote for some reason, then calling it a day.
I disagree completely. Many of the bots trade on momentum, and if that's down they'll keep selling. Others provide "liquidity" which can dry up fast, leading to large drops.
Basically Schumer can submit as many amendments as possible for weeks on end, did nobody in Mitch's circle know about it?
Mitch is also free to submit an amendment ending the whole thing so it doesn't really matter.
If this is real, Schumer should fucking do everything he can with this power. Fuck this playing nice bullshit. Pull out all the stops.
Same vote as before, no witnesses.
I'm not sure if it's THAT much power, but it's apparently enough power to force McConnell to sit with him and make some deal to not make it go on indefinitely.
- Status