You know, it's not quite OJ, but I've definitely seen Trump compared to Marion Barry before.
You know, it's not quite OJ, but I've definitely seen Trump compared to Marion Barry before.
Yeah it's gone downhill fast. Meanwhile Kansas is changing as it's major cities and suburbs grow. And it helps Kansas had a absolutely imbecile for gov for like 10 years who bankrupted them.Missouri really descended into stupidity the last twenty years, huh?
That speech Barr gave to the Federalist Society was like something straight out of dystopian fiction. I still can't believe he thought it was a good idea to air those kinds of views in public while holding his current office.
Wouldn't surprise me if they had the same dealer.You know, it's not quite OJ, but I've definitely seen Trump compared to Marion Barry before.
McConnell signs on to Hawley resolution to change Senate impeachment rules. Hawley wants to alter Senate rules to dismiss impeachment articles if they are not sent to the Senate 25 days after the House acts
For the sake of argument, if this was enforceable, wouldn't the articles be dismissed the moment this passes?
For the sake of argument, if this was enforceable, wouldn't the articles be dismissed the moment this passes?
@ShimonPro
Adam Schiff told CNN that his committee has no plans to hear testimony from John Bolton before President Trump's impeachment trial in the Senate, arguing there's "little to be gained" by going that route. @mkraju
16:04 - 9 Jan 2020
Says who? That's the problem with a resolution like this, the Senate has no say over how the House conducts its business and vice versa.
Guys, I'm just talking about the 25 days part. I don't see any way this actually holds water.
Big news from South Carolina - #SC01: @JoeCunninghamSC raised $900,000 and reports $2,096,887.56 COH. @NancyMace raised $375,000 in the same time.
Why the Iranians did not shut down their airspace to civilian traffic on Tuesday night is just a level of inexplicable incompetence.
I want to believe she's like Avasarala from The Expanse when she needs to put other politicians in their place.Lol Pelosi is clearly the most powerful Democrat in Washington.
John Kasich says it's wrong to say Democrats love terrorists, but also condemns the "vicious personal attacks on Donald Trump, our president"
Do you have a single shred of evidence to back this claim up? Clinton smashed Sanders one on one in CA by 12 points.
"Shadow Group"Sunrise Movement suddenly being considered a Sanders front group the day they throw their support behind shin. HANH? Let's talk about that.
We already went over my reasoning as to why CA would be leaning Sanders had we gotten updated polling. With that said, we (finally) got a new poll from Capitol Weekly.
Previous Poll Dec 3-7
Current Poll Jan1-9
Sanders 24% (+5)
Warren 21% (0)
Biden 20% (+1)
Buttigieg 11 (-2)
Yang 7 (+2)
Bloomberg 6 (+1)
Klobuchar 5% (0)
Gabbard 2% (-2)
Steyer 2% (0)
Booker 1% (-1)
Williamson 0%
Patrick 0%
Delainie 0%
Both Biden and Bernie are running behind Clinton/Sanders 2016 levels there, but in ways that you'd expect in a multi-way race.I think that Hillary had more consolidated support in the south compared to what we have seen of Biden so far, right?
It's true, I mean they already impeached him. Unless Bolton can testify as to unrelated topics that can bring more articles of impeachment.
To jump off Aaron's point, here, using the new 538 Model,Not that like, winning California would be bad, the problem is people cling onto this when if the final result in California was S 24 W 21 B 20, those three candidates would be the only ones to get delegates (barring any district-level successes from the lower candidates) and it would split roughly 37%/32%/31% in terms of delegate counts. If Sanders is getting hosed in the South, even with Cailfornia's higher number of delegates that wouldn't cancel Biden's presumed successes.
If you break that down to the delegates it would go 153/135/127, so a net of +26 delegates for Sanders over Biden. Biden can easily make up for that if he wins Texas (by comparison, Clinton net +72 delegates from Texas in 2016), North Carolina (Clinton +13), Virginia (Clinton +29), Tennessee (Clinton +21), Alabama (Clinton +35) and Arkansas (Clinton +12) by decisive margins.
It's very hard to say because polling has been so scarce this time around.I think that Hillary had more consolidated support in the south compared to what we have seen of Biden so far, right?
Guys, I'm just talking about the 25 days part. I don't see any way this actually holds water.
Huh. His tone changed in two days.
I'd rather they focus on other things like emoluments and get new testimony towards new charges. He's right that the juice may not be worth the squeeze on pursuing Bolton. If he voluntarily came in, sure, but to spend months trying with a subpoena is probably not worth it.How many Benghazi inquiries did the Republican led House have? 11?
Punished Trudeau or Evil Trudeau?I didn't want to bring it up due to the context of the video, but yeah.. looks good.
Proceed.
I'd rather they focus on other things like emoluments and get new testimony towards new charges. He's right that the juice may not be worth the squeeze on pursuing Bolton. If he voluntarily came in, sure, but to spend months trying with a subpoena is probably not worth it.
I don't see why Warren would still be in the race by California if she doesn't win NH or Iowa.Not that like, winning California would be bad, the problem is people cling onto this when if the final result in California was S 24 W 21 B 20, those three candidates would be the only ones to get delegates (barring any district-level successes from the lower candidates) and it would split roughly 37%/32%/31% in terms of delegate counts. If Sanders is getting hosed in the South, even with Cailfornia's higher number of delegates that wouldn't cancel Biden's presumed successes.
If you break that down to the delegates it would go 153/135/127, so a net of +26 delegates for Sanders over Biden. Biden can easily make up for that if he wins Texas (by comparison, Clinton net +72 delegates from Texas in 2016), North Carolina (Clinton +13), Virginia (Clinton +29), Tennessee (Clinton +21), Alabama (Clinton +35) and Arkansas (Clinton +12) by decisive margins.
narcissismI don't see why Warren would still be in the race by California if she doesn't win NH or Iowa.
California is on super tuesday. Iowa and NH are going to be three or four way ties. Biden may have a delegate lead after SC but it'll be close.I don't see why Warren would still be in the race by California if she doesn't win NH or Iowa.
I'm waiting for the eventual "we are not going to be competitive in those southern states in the general anyways, so they shouldn't/don't matter" argument to come back againTo jump off Aaron's point, here, using the new 538 Model,
Biden would NET over Bernie:
Texas------------------38
North Carolina----24
Virginia---------------20
Mass--------------------9
Minnesota-----------5
Tennessee----------12
Alabama--------------17
Oklahoma------------6
Arkansas-------------6
That would give, on average, Biden a 137 delegate lead. So, basically, Alabama cancels out Bernie's win in California.
California is on super tuesday. Iowa and NH are going to be three or four way ties. Biden may have a delegate lead after SC but it'll be close.
Forma needs to stay in until Super Tuesday so I can vote for her.
I think after NH it'll be clear that Sanders is the only one with a chance of beating Biden. I think Warren will see that and will drop out and Endorse him.California is on super tuesday. Iowa and NH are going to be three or four way ties. Biden may have a delegate lead after SC but it'll be close.
About that...I think after NH it'll be clear that Sanders is the only one with a chance of beating Biden. I think Warren will see that and will drop out and Endorse him.