• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

pigeon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,447
weird imo to mock somebody for saying that revenge porn is bad by saying they must want to bang the target of the revenge porn
 

spx54

Member
Mar 21, 2019
3,273


Matt Gaetz defends Hill.


unimpressed.png


we all know what game you're tryna play, bub...
 

divination

Member
Oct 26, 2017
1,002
Pete what is you doing

Ugh. I don't want to be one of those "Warren and Sanders are the only good ones" guys but it's been very difficult lately not to be. At least Sanders carries a huge asterisk with him in my book.

This is where I'm at as well and it's weird because I was a Hillary supporter in 2016.
 

Powdered Egg

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
17,070
I mean, the swastika is also a Hindu symbol but I wouldn't necesarily give someone the benefit of the doubt for having that tat either.
I was a big Pete supporter and donor early on, and even though I switched my support to Warren months ago, I still viewed Pete in a good light and have been rolling my eyes for months at all the bitch eating crackers twitter bullshit that gets posted here about him almost every fucking day.

But after his no more mister nice guy performance at the last debate, and his *hard* fucking turn toward the center these past couple of weeks, it's clear he can't be trusted, doesn't truly stand for anything, is 100% in bed with the big donors, and a huge fucking disappointment. I can't think of another candidate I've seen change so compeletely so quickly.
Pete already told the world who he was with his Black Cop wiretap scandal.
 

Farmboy

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,145
Again I must ask the 'only Warren and maybe Sanders will do' crowd: what's wrong with Cory Booker? Not rhetorical, really want to know.
 

pigeon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,447
I mean, the swastika is also a Hindu symbol but I wouldn't necesarily give someone the benefit of the doubt for having that tat either.

It's crazy to me, frankly, to try to draw conclusions about someone's character based on a right-wing tabloid's description of a blurred photo of a tattoo from revenge porn leaked by an enemy of the person.

She has denied that it is an Iron Cross. I, to put it bluntly, haven't seen the photos, and wouldn't want to. I'm not really sure how you propose to advance this case.
 

pigeon

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,447
Again I must ask the 'only Warren and maybe Sanders will do' crowd: what's wrong with Cory Booker? Not rhetorical, really want to know.

Booker has a lot of entanglements with the financial industry. There's a relatively famous clip of him speaking out in support of Bain Capital in 2012. Policy-wise he isn't as far to the left as Warren or Sanders. I think that's mostly it.
 

Arm Van Dam

self-requested ban
Banned
Mar 30, 2019
5,951
Illinois


BREAKING: A federal judge held Education Secretary Betsy DeVos in contempt of court for disobeying an order to stop collecting the student loans of borrowers who attended a for-profit college. The judge ordered DeVos and the Education Department to pay $100,000 in sanctions.

Fine is a drop in the bucket
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,943
Kamala is also a good one. I'd actually say that, policy-wise, her's has probably been the most consistent and bullshit-less. She puts out detailed plans, and takes the heat while formerly progressive champions slowly absorb them months later.

Throw Castro in there too.
 
Oct 26, 2017
6,815
I was a big Pete supporter and donor early on, and even though I switched my support to Warren months ago, I still viewed Pete in a good light and have been rolling my eyes for months at all the bitch eating crackers twitter bullshit that gets posted here about him almost every fucking day.

But after his no more mister nice guy performance at the last debate, and his *hard* fucking turn toward the center these past couple of weeks, it's clear he can't be trusted, doesn't truly stand for anything, is 100% in bed with the big donors, and a huge fucking disappointment. I can't think of another candidate I've seen change so compeletely so quickly.

My thoughts 100%.

I never donated to Pete, but I was an early supporter/admirer. This forum tends to spit at whoever isn't the current Progressive-Darling, but I didn't have much animosity for Booty even when I shifted to Team Kamala/Beto.

But like you, watching that last debate was like getting a bucket of ice cold water thrown in my face. He came off really petty and unlikable and it made me open my eyes to the hard turn he's made to the center. I'd argue, he's verging on almost going center-right. Did he really name Justice Kennedy as judges he wants??? Also his plan to reform the Supreme Court was one of the major things that really got me excited about him because I thought it was a great idea and good discussion to have, so it's really disappointing that he's essentially disavowing the plan.

All candidates modulate their positions to a degree (if they care about winning), but Booty has gone from a young forward-leaning progressive to a Joe Manchin blue-dog in a span of 6 months. As you said, it's clear he doesn't really stand for anything and can be easily swayed by his high-dollar donor class. It's a shame because he really is a great communicator and he could be a great messenger for progressive issues, but if he can turn on a dime like this then you just never know where his interests will be 6 months from now and could use his great communication skills to trash progressive issues (this is already happening).

I'm officially turning in my Booty card.
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,943
...but doesn't Pete's heel turn sort of prove all the bitch eating crackers people right?

I mean, I KNOW I saw his ass for what he was and openly said so months ago. Once again for the people in the back: black people are this country's canary in the coal mine. Shit stopped smelling right with Pete the second the black folk in his own damn city started reading his ass for filth.
 

aspiegamer

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,460
ZzzzzzZzzzZzz...
Again I must ask the 'only Warren and maybe Sanders will do' crowd: what's wrong with Cory Booker? Not rhetorical, really want to know.
Booker (and Beto, and probably even Castro for that matter... hell, even Harris with a bit more experience) would be perfectly acceptable nominee material in most cycles. Rules have changed, though, between the huge field, the notion of Trump shattering previous norms, and raw charisma level mattering a ton more than it used to in the information age.

I'd fucking love to vote for Hillary again. It'd be a bad idea for her to enter at this point, though. Would vote for Michelle Obama in an instant.
 

rjinaz

Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
28,394
Phoenix
I still like Beto a hell of a lot more than probably anybody save Sanders and Warren, even though he should obviously drop out. The dude has passion, Democrats need it. Hope he becomes a VP or something.
 

i_am_ben

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,012
Pete never had the experience to be president and I don't know why anyone seriously paid him any attention. Guy needs like 20 more years experience.

He's nowhere near the pantomime villain some of you are painting his as, however.
 

Madison

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
8,388
Lima, Peru
i dislike the "he needs more experience" line

Hes trash. We already know that hes a puppet of his donors, do we think that being around a decade in politics will somehow make him less corrupt?
 

Deleted member 32561

User requested account closure
Banned
Nov 11, 2017
3,831
Butti is doing everything in his power to become relevant and influential on a national scale, principles be damned.
The thing I don't get is I fully believe he could've done that without sacrificing anything he's claimed to have stood for in the past, especially with proper media positioning. But he really is showing himself to be untrustworthy, really, and I have to question if he'll actually win anyone over with this, especially with people in this thread abandoning his camp....
Again I must ask the 'only Warren and maybe Sanders will do' crowd: what's wrong with Cory Booker? Not rhetorical, really want to know.
As someone in the 'only Sanders and maybe Warren will do' crowd: I feel like he's shown his ass a number of times in regards to upholding the current capitalist structures- particularly in regards to healthcare - instead of either reforming them or tearing them down. See his criticism of Obama going after Romney, for instance. This is problematic given the sheer influence lobbyists hold over politics and could, potentially, over him. Based on his stated policies thus far and how, unlike Pete, he hasn't backtracked iirc, I will say I probably prefer him or Castro to any of the other candidates besides Sanders and Warren but it's a very distant third between the two of them.
Hope he becomes a VP or something.
I could very easily see Warren picking him as VP if he drops out sooner than later, to be honest. I'm unsure about Sanders, I have a feeling he'd go with someone more left than Beto.
i dislike the "he needs more experience" line

Hes trash. We already know that hes a puppet of his donors, do we think that being around a decade in politics will somehow make him less corrupt?
This. He's not a "pantomime villain", but time isn't going to fix him. He is who is he is, and especially after this, I just don't like him as a representative for the needs of the American people, and hope I'm not going to have to vote for him come November 2020.
 
Last edited:
Oct 26, 2017
6,815
...but doesn't Pete's heel turn sort of prove all the bitch eating crackers people right?

I mean, I KNOW I saw his ass for what he was and openly said so months ago. Once again for the people in the back: black people are this country's canary in the coal mine. Shit stopped smelling right with Pete the second the black folk in his own damn city started reading his ass for filth.

Yeah I gotta admit, the bitch crackers people were right on that one. But even the sun shines on a dog's ass some days...

I lend more props to black people in his own city who weren't buying his crocodile tears. I know I should have took them more seriously. The near 0% black support he was getting early on definitely was a canary in the coal mine.
 

Linkura

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,943
I hope Katie Hill gets all the money and assets in the divorce and hubby goes to jail.

I am ok with an ethics investigation and she shouldn't be fucking the staff, but man is her husband pure fucking scum.
My thoughts 100%.

I never donated to Pete, but I was an early supporter/admirer. This forum tends to spit at whoever isn't the current Progressive-Darling, but I didn't have much animosity for Booty even when I shifted to Team Kamala/Beto.

But like you, watching that last debate was like getting a bucket of ice cold water thrown in my face. He came off really petty and unlikable and it made me open my eyes to the hard turn he's made to the center. I'd argue, he's verging on almost going center-right. Did he really name Justice Kennedy as judges he wants??? Also his plan to reform the Supreme Court was one of the major things that really got me excited about him because I thought it was a great idea and good discussion to have, so it's really disappointing that he's essentially disavowing the plan.

All candidates modulate their positions to a degree (if they care about winning), but Booty has gone from a young forward-leaning progressive to a Joe Manchin blue-dog in a span of 6 months. As you said, it's clear he doesn't really stand for anything and can be easily swayed by his high-dollar donor class. It's a shame because he really is a great communicator and he could be a great messenger for progressive issues, but if he can turn on a dime like this then you just never know where his interests will be 6 months from now and could use his great communication skills to trash progressive issues (this is already happening).

I'm officially turning in my Booty card.
Oh man, you were the first Booty stan here too.

It's a damn shame Booty turned out to be a fraud. First major out candidate and he turns out to be shit.
 

Kirblar

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
30,744
The wiretapping thing (which was legit complicated) wasn't really an issue so much as the "you haven't really done anything with the force diversity makeup" thing where he just kinda ignored that campaign promise while in office- there were roadblocks on that front but it doesn't look like he even really made an actual attempt at reform there.
 

skullmuffins

Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,419


oh goodie.

WASHINGTON — For more than two years, President Trump has repeatedly attacked the Russia investigation, portraying it as a hoax and illegal even months after the special counsel closed it. Now, Mr. Trump's own Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into how it all began.

Justice Department officials have shifted an administrative review of the Russia investigation closely overseen by Attorney General William P. Barr to a criminal inquiry, according to two people familiar with the matter. The move gives the prosecutor running it, John H. Durham, the power to subpoena for witness testimony and documents, to impanel a grand jury and to file criminal charges.

The opening of a criminal investigation is likely to raise alarms that Mr. Trump is using the Justice Department to go after his perceived enemies. Mr. Trump fired James B. Comey, the F.B.I. director under whose watch agents opened the Russia inquiry, and has long assailed other top former law enforcement and intelligence officials as partisans who sought to block his election.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.