You said, "it's not even close." It traditionally has been.
What's "visible" depends on where you're looking. If you're a member of twitter/youtube culture, I can see that stereotypical "figure" looking a particular way. For me? Growing up in the black church in LA, I can't say that some of the most homophobic and threatening language I heard growing up didn't come from the women I was raised around. So I honestly didn't even need to be varified by polling data to go, "....ehhhh..." at that particular bit of Warren's joke.
I'll cosign this. There's a very "interesting" tendency to assume that women-usually white women- are only reluctantly on board with toxic conservative positions like being against gay marriage and it's white cisgender males steering the ship.
Aint so. Women buy into that mess as enthusiastically as the men do- though they are somewhat less likely to shoot up malls and churches over it.
Growing up in several black churches as well I know EXACTLY what you're talking about with the homophobic language. It's as enthusiastic as it is universal
there.
It's a sentiment reflected in dating right now where the chasm between male and female political views is affecting it.
The kicker here is that it's usually "online" dating where this data comes from, and Rural america isn't really using Tindr or whatever as urban/suburban america does. The population density just isn't there to support it.
So yeah, where things like Tindr are popular and get a lot of use, the population is likely to be more urban- which isn't all that friendly to conservatism. Men are notoriously indiscriminate in who they connect with online, but for women? not so much.