-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
US PoliEra 2019 |OT8| WHITE HOUSE ADMITS TO QUID PRO QUO WITH UKRAINE
- Thread starter TheHunter
- Start date
- Status
And the 33% who don't never gon vote D anyway.
I wonder if he has a fetish for getting ratio'd with the shit he posts.
Sounds like that stupid trope where a captured soldier would repeatedly say their name, class, where they served to survive interrogation.
Oh no!!!! People who used to be, and still are, marginalized in the world for hundreds of years are being snarky and fighting back! We better stop and think about how hurtful our comments can be to Christians who think we deserve to burn and our souls be tormented for all of eternity!
Rubio with the largest pile of horse shit ive ever seen
I dont even have the words for this shit
Let's make one thing clear, Marco Rubio knows exactly what he's doing.
Feel like basically every gop senator is getting ratio'd every time they tweet anything lately
Hey NJ-ERA, are we looking ok going into the General Assembly election? Do I need to worry about the trifecta going out? (Obviously voting as if otherwise, but I'd still like to ask).
Funny enough, the only real problem I had with Warren's joke is, somewhat ironically, addressed in the top response to that tweet:
And it reminds me of this picture:
And the problem is this: the continued insulation of women (particularly white women) from the perpetuation of bigoted ideas that harm at-risk minority communities.
The crux of Warren's joke is the assumption that the person insisting marriage is (and must be) between one man and one woman must be a socially maladjusted incel figure. But history and polling...shows that's not true at all. The men who believe this tend to be socially adjusted men, who have no problem getting female partners...who think just like them.
Funny enough, the only real problem I had with Warren's joke is, somewhat ironically, addressed in the top response to that tweet:
And it reminds me of this picture:
And the problem is this: the continued insulation of women (particularly white women) from the perpetuation of bigoted ideas that harm at-risk minority communities.
The crux of Warren's joke is the assumption that the person insisting marriage is (and must be) between one man and one woman must be a socially maladjusted incel figure. But history and polling...shows that's not true at all. The men who believe this tend to be socially adjusted men, who have no problem getting female partners...who think just like them.
Huh?
By far the most vocal and visible opponents to gay marriage are men, it's not even close.
Lol, the latest Pew polling has a 10 point gap between women and men in gay marriage approval. https://www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/changing-attitudes-on-gay-marriage/
Funny enough, the only real problem I had with Warren's joke is, somewhat ironically, addressed in the top response to that tweet:
And it reminds me of this picture:
And the problem is this: the continued insulation of women (particularly white women) from the perpetuation of bigoted ideas that harm at-risk minority communities.
The crux of Warren's joke is the assumption that the person insisting marriage is (and must be) between one man and one woman must be a socially maladjusted incel figure. But history and polling...shows that's not true at all. The men who believe this tend to be socially adjusted men, who have no problem getting female partners...who think just like them.
It was a guy posing the hypothetical, though. I'd agree that it does sorta echo all that, but she's addressing the response accordingly.
You're not wrong about the incel thing, though. We do have a tendency to sort of lump all socially maldujsted people in one basket, or rather, toss all shitty behaviors onto one figure.
Not really.
Women have been more enlightened on the issue. But there isn't a "chasm" separating men and women here by any means.
Not really.
Women have been more enlightened on the issue. But there isn't a "chasm" separating men and women here by any means.
Re-read what I posted, that does nothing to refute my claim.
I re-read the initial Barr memo release thread a couple months back, and that thread is ground zero for why our country is fucked. More people are outraged at the people showing how fucked our country is over the people actually fucking up said country. LIke I know ignorance is bliss but come on.
Maddow has basically been posting FACTS this entire time and it's not her fault that half of government and most of law enforcement are complicit and want to keep the public in the dark about the multitude of crimes and theft happening above them. Her job is the dissemination of knowledge and she's one of the best at it. What people do with said knowledge is up to them.
You said, "it's not even close." It traditionally has been.
What's "visible" depends on where you're looking. If you're a member of twitter/youtube culture, I can see that stereotypical "figure" looking a particular way. For me? Growing up in the black church in LA, I can't say that some of the most homophobic and threatening language I heard growing up didn't come from the women I was raised around. So I honestly didn't even need to be varified by polling data to go, "....ehhhh..." at that particular bit of Warren's joke.
Your looking at your personal experience.
I'm referring to national figures and media.
Now to what degree this is caused by disproportionate coverage of men (in general), and the lack of representation of women in religion, I can't say.
Yeah, it's smart to advertise that your candidate just had a serious health issue and is just coming back from it...
I took Warren assuming it was a guy was just for the sake of imagining the scenario, so she could use the "Just marry one woman line" Nothing deeper.
Hot take: men and women can be homophobic, but men are statistically likelier to physically hurt me. Ergo, I've always associated hateful, sonofabitch men with the word "homophobe."
I think too - and I fully admit this is just me talking out of my ass over having any statistics to back it up - in conservative, religious households you often have the men making the political decisions for the rest of the family. So if the man opposes same-sex marriage, his wife and children better too.
May be ignorance on my part but from what I've seen, women who marry into ultra-religious households sacrifice a lot of their autonomy on pretty much everything.
So when I see the gap between men and women on marriage equality not being that big, all I picture is a man screaming about the gays getting married and the woman nodding along in passive, silent approval.
She assumed a guy
That and the person questioning her was a guy and he used the phrase "one man marrying one woman." And she even prefaced this by saying "I am going to assume it's a guy" and the person didn't correct her.
Agreed. Men are far more likely to be physically violent towards LGBT people than women. Women tend to be that passive aggressive hateful.
Well, one should modify one's diet after a heart attack, especially at such an advanced age.
Hey fellas have you heard the news? You know that Bernie's back in town!
I thought she said she was assuming that it was a man for the purpose of the point so she could say "so marry one woman" and not homophobes are probably all men. At least that's how I understood it.
Yes, but let's not let Rubio off the hook for that massive massive hypocrisy, after all that his party has done to screw over so many people.
A U.S. Senator isn't an "elite"? LOL
I'm so tired of Rubio and his sanctimonious BS.
- Status