• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

RiPPn

Member
Oct 25, 2017
4,562
Phoenix
I like to think the reason there is a lid on media appearances today is because of the second whistleblower. They don't want to have more egg on their face when the second one blows holes in their nonsense.

I also think the second whistleblower can fill in the holes in the transcript of the call that Trump has tried to claim is "word for word" but it is clear is missing chunks of conversation.
 

dabig2

Member
Oct 29, 2017
5,116
It's going to be difficult to call Democrats spineless again when you have Republicans out there scared of Donald fucking Trump and his base of uneducated, racist knuckleheads.

Republicans aren't spineless, they're complicit. Especially Mr "4th of July is a good time for Moscow" Ron Johnson.

They're not afraid of Trump or his cult, they're afraid that the information implicating them in bribes, money laundering, extortion, and the cover-up might bounce back against them.

I still want to know what happened to the RNC emails hacked but never released in 2016.
 

PantherLotus

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,900
Speaking of, I never told y'all how Blunt('s office) responded to my email.

Thank you for taking time to share your thoughts on the recent whistleblower complaint in regards to President Trump's phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The Senate voted unanimously in favor of a resolution calling on the Trump Administration to provide the whistleblower's complaint to the Senate and House Intelligence Committees. As a member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, I will be reviewing this complaint along with briefings from the Acting Director of National Intelligence and the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community. Please be assured that I will keep your thoughts in mind as this situation continues to develop.

Again, thank you for contacting me. I look forward to continuing our conversation on Facebook (www.facebook.com/SenatorBlunt) and Twitter (www.twitter.com/RoyBlunt) about the important issues facing Missouri and the country. I also encourage you to visit my website (blunt.senate.gov) to learn more about where I stand on the issues and sign-up for my e-newsletter.
Sincere regards,

Roy Blunt
United States Senator
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,877
Seriously, there's what, 30-35 of them who would supposedly vote to remove Trump if their vote was held in secret? Band together then and remove the fucker. All it takes is twenty of you to stop this orange fuck from bossing you around.

They won't though, because they're weak. They're party hacks who care first and foremost about keeping themselves in office so they can continue to sit around and do fuck-all. When Paul Ryan told them he wouldn't accept the Speaker job and Kevin McCarthy turned out to be a dud and there was seemingly no alternative, they hid in closets and cried. Grown-ass men. I don't want this to sound like I'm judging men for being emotional, but also - come on. Grow up and take responsibility. You are not helpless victims here, you are enablers.

For all the crap Democrats get for being spineless, they take tough votes all the time. Pelosi passing Obamacare probably cost the party the majority. She also passed cap & trade to no tangible benefit, even though it was wildly unpopular in many of the conservative districts Democrats held at the time, and it didn't pass in the Senate. Maybe leadership played it too safe with impeachment at first, but when the moment came they embraced it and now there are hardly any Democrats in the House who don't support the inquiry.

Fuck the GOP. Weak wills, weak minds, weak hearts. Weak weak weak. All I can think of right now is Schwarzenegger calling the Democrats "girly men" because they weren't comfortable about invading Iraq. Just look at what your party has become, Ahnold. What it's become because of people like you letting it happen.

Let's be real. The GOP got that post-2012 autopsy after R-Money lost to Obama and promptly ignored it.

They, like Trump, really like racism and sexism and ruining the lives of as many gay and trans folks as they can, so following the racist, sexist strongman down into oblivion was always the thing that they were going to do. They courted the sycophantic wild animals that form their base - I believe Hillary called them "deplorables" - because these are their people.

So them standing around unsure of what to do in private is all performative bullshit for whatever insider they want leaking to the reporters that, actually, Senate Republicans are Very Concerned, if you only knew how Very Concerned they were, independents, you would still give them your support and your vote. They know what they're doing here, and they love this shit.
 

Deleted member 8257

Oct 26, 2017
24,586
BTW, this seems to be the new talking point. I don't know how they disseminate these talking points so fast but apparently, the 1st whistleblower has been discreditted by the "transcript" so it doesn't matter that there's a 2nd person with 1st hand knowledge. Up is down, left is right, and there's nothing wrong with the call.
The cult is parroting this shit non-stop on Twitter. They are all mostly bots or can't read. Maybe both.
I don't think it's a talking point. It's just a caught flat footed moment. They are going down with Trump ship, that is a fact. What they say to media is peeling away their reasoning to expose that underlying fact. Tomorrow some random GOP will say "I am never voting to impeach no matter what".
 

Aaron

I’m seeing double here!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,077
Minneapolis
Let's be real. The GOP got that post-2012 autopsy after R-Money lost to Obama and promptly ignored it.

They, like Trump, really like racism and sexism and ruining the lives of as many gay and trans folks as they can, so following the racist, sexist strongman down into oblivion was always the thing that they were going to do. They courted the sycophantic wild animals that form their base - I believe Hillary called them "deplorables" - because these are their people.

So them standing around unsure of what to do in private is all performative bullshit for whatever insider they want leaking to the reporters that, actually, Senate Republicans are Very Concerned, if you only knew how Very Concerned they were, independents, you would still give them your support and your vote. They know what they're doing here, and they love this shit.
Yeah, I guess I just don't know whether it's better or worse that Republicans really are that evil, versus just being feckless idiots who don't want to upset the base.
 

thefit

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,243
NY Times is so pathetic, their top story is a piece trying to legitimize and normalize the investigation into the investigation regarding the Mueller report. Instead of calling out these idiots chasing a conspiracy theory on American time and money to satisfy a criminal and delegitimize our own IC. Incredible that they keep carrying obvious water for these shit heads.
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,967
Let's be real. The GOP got that post-2012 autopsy after R-Money lost to Obama and promptly ignored it.

They, like Trump, really like racism and sexism and ruining the lives of as many gay and trans folks as they can, so following the racist, sexist strongman down into oblivion was always the thing that they were going to do. They courted the sycophantic wild animals that form their base - I believe Hillary called them "deplorables" - because these are their people.

So them standing around unsure of what to do in private is all performative bullshit for whatever insider they want leaking to the reporters that, actually, Senate Republicans are Very Concerned, if you only knew how Very Concerned they were, independents, you would still give them your support and your vote. They know what they're doing here, and they love this shit.
Matt Yglesias tweeted something similar the other day (and I'm too lazy to find it).

There's too few people in media and blue check twitter willing to explore the idea that a lot of Republicans on the hIll are with Trump because...they agree with what he's doing.

There's this idea that all politicians start off neutral good, and are then swayed by the headwinds guiding their party. But, in secret, all these politicians are aligned and really believe in The Good Thing.

And...no. When someone shows you who they are, believe them. And a lot of these Republicans are just...terrible people who are riding with Trump because they agree with him.
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,877
Yeah, I guess I just don't know whether it's better or worse that Republicans really are that evil, versus just being feckless idiots who don't want to upset the base.

I think it's worse that they're that evil. If they were just feckless idiots, they eventually might be convinced to go back and take seriously the results of that autopsy and take note of the fact that later generations of soon-to-be voters have less faith in capitalism and more interest in socialism than we've had in America since the Great Depression. They might actually make the leftward shift that their party should have taken after 2012 instead of going the "milk the racism of the Baby Boomer era to rig the scales against the majority of the country and its wishes for generations" route.
 

Absent

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,045
That's why zebras are in herds - there's safety in numbers.



If they all stood up, they could get rid of the "lion" (snerk).
The real reason is they are scared of the even bigger pack of cultists.

Across the country, most GOP lawmakers have responded to questions about Trump's conduct with varying degrees of silence, shrugged shoulders or pained defenses. For now, their collective strategy is simply to survive and not make any sudden moves.
But House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy's shaky appearance last weekend on CBS's "60 Minutes" was widely panned, even among senior GOP aides, and raised questions about whether he was up to the task of protecting Trump. The California Republican falsely accused his interviewer, Scott Pelley, of misrepresenting a key phrase in the transcript of Trump's July 25 call with Ukrainian president.

But some Trump aides privately said the president likes the messages sent by surrogates such as McCarthy and White House policy adviser Stephen Miller, who are willing to sit for a grilling and disparage the media, according to two Republicans close to the president.
Many Republicans also said in interviews last week that Trump's ability to nominate and confirm dozens of conservative federal judicial nominees and pass an overhaul of the tax code makes it harder to argue to their voters that he is now a burden on the party's policy agenda.
A Republican strategist who is close with several senators and spoke on the condition of anonymity to share a candid assessment called the situation "a disaster." This consultant has been advising clients to "say as little as possible" about impeachment developments to buy time.
No one shall insult the Führer, ever.
 

DanGo

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,742
No one shall insult the Führer, ever.
Many Republicans also said in interviews last week that Trump's ability to nominate and confirm dozens of conservative federal judicial nominees and pass an overhaul of the tax code makes it harder to argue to their voters that he is now a burden on the party's policy agenda.
As if those things are mutually exclusive. Hell, almost any other Republican could actually accomplish those things better and without violating a bunch of laws and actively destroying democracy.
 

Aaron

I’m seeing double here!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,077
Minneapolis
I think it's worse that they're that evil. If they were just feckless idiots, they eventually might be convinced to go back and take seriously the results of that autopsy and take note of the fact that later generations of soon-to-be voters have less faith in capitalism and more interest in socialism than we've had in America since the Great Depression. They might actually make the leftward shift that their party should have taken after 2012 instead of going the "milk the racism of the Baby Boomer era to rig the scales against the majority of the country and its wishes for generations" route.
Paul Ryan would never vote to cut Social Security! He's just a Very Serious person who's Very Serious about cutting the deficit, of which my understanding is we can do that just by cutting foreign aid which is 50% of the budget. No way balancing the budget would hurt me!
 
Oct 26, 2017
7,969
South Carolina




"Why should I care at all?"


Less than nothing.

They should be hounded to the moon and back with their "cant keep their stories straight" and "don't you care about our national security" and "youre a senator, cant you read something so important?"

If you aren't watching Joy interviewing Rachel right now, wow is this incredible.

EDIT for shitty description: It was a break down of Rachel's book, talking about how Putin put all his eggs in a petro-chemical basket for the Russian economy and now he's kind of screwed because sanctions, and that's why Trump is trying to get those sanctions lifted ultimately - so Putin can start getting access to western oil markets and technology.

It sold me on reading the book.

Eeeee-yup.

TOC people, TOC.

Matt Yglesias tweeted something similar the other day (and I'm too lazy to find it).

There's too few people in media and blue check twitter willing to explore the idea that a lot of Republicans on the hIll are with Trump because...they agree with what he's doing.

There's this idea that all politicians start off neutral good, and are then swayed by the headwinds guiding their party. But, in secret, all these politicians are aligned and really believe in The Good Thing.

And...no. When someone shows you who they are, believe them. And a lot of these Republicans are just...terrible people who are riding with Trump because they agree with him.

I'd say its not so much they agree with him, but are enraged and terrified that he's fucking those one or two things up AND constantly attacks the stuff they do like (strong foreign policy, free market, genteel decorum, etc) on individual levels.

So much of that death cult mentality comes from groups terrified that their "cornerstones" of American society are being passed by or being exposed and are willing to make strange bedfellows to save them...but getting involved with CNP/FS/Koch antics is a far cry from a fullblown pathological mobster who sells the country out to Putin and says the quiet parts out loud. They're being left with those cornerstones at the cost of EVERYTHING else American and they're too spineless to stand up for it largely cuz of the public executions.
 
Oct 27, 2017
248
Just reached out to Lindsay Graham. First Pol I've contacted since since Diana DeGette back in 2012 when I lived in her district in Denver. I don't have high hopes of a response, but the gist was "I'm white, mid-30s, a CFO, have met you at several fundraisers around SC. Essentially the base you want to appeal to. Impeach Trump and drop the derpers because this shit doesn't fly with my type."
 

Wilsongt

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,507
Just reached out to Lindsay Graham. First Pol I've contacted since since Diana DeGette back in 2012 when I lived in her district in Denver. I don't have high hopes of a response, but the gist was "I'm white, mid-30s, a CFO, have met you at several fundraisers around SC. Essentially the base you want to appeal to. Impeach Trump and drop the derpers because this shit doesn't fly with my type."

Good luck with that. Those who despise Graham are a minority in this state.
 

Absent

Member
Oct 26, 2017
3,045
Hey I have a fun link for anyone who needs help staying awake at night.


Our republic rests on the important constitutional principle of civilian control of a non-politicized military. But the constant drumbeat of right-wing conspiracy theories and hateful political rhetoric has found its way into a sizable portion of the U.S. military's rank and file. Not too long ago, the majority of those serving in the military would have identified themselves as Reagan Republicans. But just as that brand of Republicanism has been replaced by Trumpism among civilian Republicans, so too has it seeped into the armed forces, and by these standards, even Ronald Reagan would be viewed as a socialist.

Recent polling shows that among military veterans, approval ratings for Trump are higher than among the civilian population. In my experience, the support for Donald Trump among a large segment of the U.S. military is downright cult-like.
From Michael Flynn, the rogue retired general closest to him, Trump learned just how deep the military's disdain was for Democrats—and for Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama specifically. Trump learned from Flynn that there were grievances and resentments within the military establishment to be exploited. Highly intelligent active duty and retired military officers with outstanding service records (not "deplorables") could be heard at CENTCOM repeating far-right-wing conspiracy theories like: "Hillary murdered a lot of people" and "Obama is a Kenyan Black Muslim," "The FBI and the CIA are corrupt," "The media is fake news." Trump's attacks and abuse of their former bosses, and even of a Gold Star family, didn't seem to impact their opinion of him.
CENTCOM's environment, and especially that of the Joint Intelligence Center (JIC) which houses all the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) analysts, felt political the moment you walked through its doors. Televisions in the lobby, the reception areas, in private office spaces, and even in the employee and visitor's cafe—were tuned to FOX News. It was Orwellian in its pervasiveness. People at their desks were streaming FOX News while reading Drudge and Breitbart. (By 2018, more of the common areas began showing sports or weather channels to get away from the politics, which had made some uncomfortable.)
The gulf between the civilian world and the military has been growing since the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan—wars that have touched more American families than at any time since Vietnam. Vietnam created a huge cultural divide in the U.S. that Richard Nixon successfully exploited, earning him one of the largest electoral victories in American history. But something more sinister may be afoot as we approach the 2020 election. Trump has done what Nixon ultimately could not do. He has, so far, avoided real accountability to Congress. He has successfully blurred the lines between lies and truth in the minds of the American public. He has undermined the institutions that have kept the U.S. safe since World War ll.
Thanks for posting. Disturbing read.
 

PantherLotus

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,900
(I think if you know many "gonna join the army!" types and combine it with your awareness of aging Reaganites as they fodder into elder care and what they're probably like at the Pentagon — it's not really a surprise that so many would be willing to attack American citizens in the name of Trump. Because that's what we are talking about.)
 

VectorPrime

Banned
Apr 4, 2018
11,781
Is it really shocking that the majority of the military is right-wing? This article told me nothing I couldn't have already gleaned myself.

I guarantee you that a nearly identical article could have been written in 2004 about the military's devotion to Bush and their institutional disrespect to a decorated war vet in John Kerry. Also their vile hatred of "traitors" who opposed the Iraq War.
 

Sheepinator

Member
Jul 25, 2018
28,038
Is it really shocking that the majority of the military is right-wing? This article told me nothing I couldn't have already gleaned myself.
No, but it's shocking to me that they rabidly support a draft dodger who insulted McCain's service, insulted generals, lied to their faces about pay raises he never got, took credit for VA improvements done by Obama, doesn't read (would you like to be sent into a war zone by a commander in chief who doesn't have a clue what's going on?), has an unsettling devotion to Russia, and so on. Their allegiance to the Republican party isn't surprising, but their allegiance to the clown in chief is.
 

PantherLotus

Member
Oct 27, 2017
3,900
Is it really shocking that the majority of the military is right-wing? This article told me nothing I couldn't have already gleaned myself.
You could have gleaned that working officials at CENTCOM openly discuss treason and their hatred for their Commander while they cheer a Russian-supported fascist ripping up a peace treaty as they bathe in the warm pisswater of conservative propaganda as they sit around the office? You should be a whistleblower.
 

VectorPrime

Banned
Apr 4, 2018
11,781
You could have gleaned that working officials at CENTCOM openly discuss treason and their hatred for their Commander while they cheer a Russian-supported fascist ripping up a peace treaty as they bathe in the warm pisswater of conservative propaganda as they sit around the office? You should be a whistleblower.

The military fucking hates Iran and has been barely restrained from going to war with them since Bush so of course they're glad the agreement was ripped up.
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,877
(I think if you know many "gonna join the army!" types and combine it with your awareness of aging Reaganites as they fodder into elder care and what they're probably like at the Pentagon — it's not really a surprise that so many would be willing to attack American citizens in the name of Trump. Because that's what we are talking about.)

Sure. I know we had a kerfuffle here about the military and making broad strokes about it here a few days ago, and I say this at the risk of ruffling more feathers, but I knew guys who went into the military as officers after getting college degrees and they were all True Believers.

I guarantee you that a nearly identical article could have been written in 2004 about the military's devotion to Bush and their institutional disrespect to a decorated war vet in John Kerry. Also their vile hatred of "traitors" who opposed the Iraq War.

Yup.

No, but it's shocking to me that they rabidly support a draft dodger who insulted McCain's service, insulted generals, lied to their faces about pay raises he never got, took credit for VA improvements done by Obama, doesn't read (would you like to be sent into a war zone by a commander in chief who doesn't have a clue what's going on?), has an unsettling devotion to Russia, and so on. Their allegiance to the Republican party isn't surprising, but their allegiance to the clown in chief is.

For me, I'm not shocked. A lot of these dudes who I've met who went into the military were not the "just trying to escape a lower-income fate" guys that also do join up. They were already right-wing nutbars. If Trump wants to shoot people on the left, they already wanted to shoot American citizens on the left before Trump ever got into office. Their interests in that regard align with those of Trump, and that's all that matters.

You could have gleaned that working officials at CENTCOM openly discuss treason and their hatred for their Commander while they cheer a Russian-supported fascist ripping up a peace treaty as they bathe in the warm pisswater of conservative propaganda as they sit around the office? You should be a whistleblower.

How hard would it have been to glean that? A lot of dudes that go into the military go in to shoot at brown people!

Not all of them, of course, but I'm really shocked that you are shocked that the military attracts racist right-wingers to its ranks.
 

Tamanon

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
19,729
Right Wing doesn't mean willing to kill fellow Americans. There is no threat of a civil war, and no threat of Trump not relinquishing power. It's not something he has to hand over, it just stops at the next term.
 

Dahbomb

Community Resettler
Member
Oct 25, 2017
13,628
2nd whistleblower with direct knowledge and GOP be like *smokes cigarette* "I don't care."

I mean at least they are being honest now LMFAOO!!!
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,877
At the risk of doubling up on posts here, let me post this link on Army recruitment in Seattle and pick out a couple of key points:

Last year was a difficult one for recruiting, in which the army fell about 6,500 soldiers short of their nationwide goal. Normally, they focus on conservative-leaning parts of the country between Texas and Virginia to shore up numbers, where traditionally locals are more open to serving.

Additionally, the Army's emphasis on job training and educational aspects of serving tends to be less effective in cities like Seattle where similar higher-paying opportunities are plentiful.

I couldn't find the article where they did really poorly with their attempts here, like "in the single-digits of sign-ups" level of poor, but this will do.

If the military tends to attract broke conservatives (of the type who learn early from family and friends that it's those durn immigrants taking their jerbs) and to promote those conservatives up its ranks, is it shocking that so many of them are Breitbarters with gun training? I just thought that we always knew this and that a number of these soldiers would love to get rid of the leftists and start a new fascist regime straight out of Starship Troopers.
 

Kusagari

Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,468
Right Wing doesn't mean willing to kill fellow Americans. There is no threat of a civil war, and no threat of Trump not relinquishing power. It's not something he has to hand over, it just stops at the next term.

And what happens when the GOP falls in line and refuses to recognize the Democrats victory as legitimate and says the election was stolen from Trump?
 

VectorPrime

Banned
Apr 4, 2018
11,781
I think people forget just how violently polarized this country became around 03-05. Not as bad as now but it got bad. And the Republicans were much stronger.
 
Oct 25, 2017
6,877
I think people forget just how violently polarized this country became around 03-05. Not as bad as now but it got bad. And the Republicans were much stronger.

Shit, I'd argue that the LBJ/Nixon era was more polarized than now. We had actual National Guardsmen firing on citizen protesters on college campuses and at black people in cities where rioting over racism happened.

If we didn't get a second American Civil War then, we sure ain't going to get it now.

However, that we're growing an American ISIS via our military recruitment is going to be a massive problem going forward because the demographics of this country are going to change, and that's that. I always have predicted that we won't have a second Civil War, but we will have violence that outstrips what we saw in, say, the Reconstruction and post-Reconstruction South or nationwide in the era of Vietnam and the Civil Rights Movement.

Right wing infiltration of our volunteer military is why I've come around on the idea of mandatory service.

No thanks. Imagine being unlucky enough to serve under a bog-standard GOP POTUS who just can't wait to shoot up some brown people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.