That is a measured response, and what the leadership should be saying up until we actually know what's in the complaint.
he is stepping into a dangerous minefield with serious repercussions
I thought I saw earlier that Ukraine was like, "we're happy to turn anything over if Trump is OK with it" which means... lol
There's enough out already.Again....we have 0 of the actual details of this. Congress has not been officially briefed on what is happening. It's not the dumbest idea to, you know, want the actual facts before you start screaming about impeaching the mutha-fucker. (For this specific thing.)
Why would Ukraine do that?
Trump used the July 25 conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to pressure the recently elected leader to more aggressively pursue an investigation that Trump believed would deliver potential political dirt against one of the president's political adversaries, the people said.
Sheesh.One source familiar with the contents of the exchange said that Trump did not raise the issue of American military and intelligence aid that had been pledged to Ukraine, indicating there was not an explicit quid pro quo in that call.
Pelosi is very good at whipping voters and bringing together the House Dem caucus, perhaps better than any other House Dem leader in modern history. But she's also never whipped votes for impeachment before (and should be noted did not whip for impeachment against Bush), which I have to imagine is substantially different from whipping votes for legislation, especially when you're talking about these purple Problem Solvers Caucus moderates. The "if she wanted it to happen she could just make it happen" is not necessarily true!If she wants impeachment to happen, she can make it happen. She's good at whipping votes. It's pretty clear she has no interest at this point.
True but she could stop shielding them like she hasPelosi is very good at whipping voters and bringing together the House Dem caucus, perhaps better than any other House Dem leader in modern history. But she's also never whipped votes for impeachment before (and should be noted did not whip for impeachment against Bush), which I have to imagine is substantially different from whipping votes for legislation, especially when you're talking about these purple Problem Solvers Caucus moderates. The "if she wanted it to happen she could just make it happen" is not necessarily true!
I don't think most are likely to need the shielding anymore.
What do you have against David Brooks?
This says absolutely nothing. She doesn't list any tangible repercussions. Her mild threat is completely undermined by her concern trolling the repercussions of this admin on our democracy.
🧐
This problem goes far beyond Pelosi and you need to kill the Senate/EC to fix it.It's so embarrassing how many people (myself included) defended Pelosi when they first took back the House and she has been more than useless since then. I'm seriously so tired of Democratic leadership's strategy of just appeasing Republicans no matter what. Historically unpopular Republican president? We don't want to rock the boat, we might throw the election that's already in the bag! Popular president? He's popular, we can't make too much fuss and tank our chances even more! Everyone knows what the reality is with the Senate and what little power Democrats actually have, but the messaging is horrible. When do you ever see Pelosi or Schumer trying to energize liberals or push the dialogue to the left? It's always "now now let's not be hasty" and pushing back against policies that poll well nationally because they're afraid it might offend some middle aged white guy in Michigan. It's pathetic, and the only reason they are able to keep acting this way is because they know that the people who feel this way have absolutely no choice but to vote straight D every time and hope things change someday. This country sucks.
I really don't think this is going to be the turning point.
Mitch folded last night on the election funding all of a sudden.I really don't think this is going to be the turning point.
The "Republicans won't impeach him/this has to be bipartisan" mentality will prevent impeachment proceedings
Pelosi is very good at whipping voters and bringing together the House Dem caucus, perhaps better than any other House Dem leader in modern history. But she's also never whipped votes for impeachment before (and should be noted did not whip for impeachment against Bush), which I have to imagine is substantially different from whipping votes for legislation, especially when you're talking about these purple Problem Solvers Caucus moderates. The "if she wanted it to happen she could just make it happen" is not necessarily true!
Mitch folded last night on the election funding all of a sudden.
That's a tell.
Why, all of a sudden, would he suddenly let that bill go through? Because of a nickname in his state? Really?
It's so embarrassing how many people (myself included) defended Pelosi when they first took back the House and she has been more than useless since then. I'm seriously so tired of Democratic leadership's strategy of just appeasing Republicans no matter what. Historically unpopular Republican president? We don't want to rock the boat, we might throw the election that's already in the bag! Popular president? He's popular, we can't make too much fuss and tank our chances even more! Everyone knows what the reality is with the Senate and what little power Democrats actually have, but the messaging is horrible. When do you ever see Pelosi or Schumer trying to energize liberals or push the dialogue to the left? It's always "now now let's not be hasty" and pushing back against policies that poll well nationally because they're afraid it might offend some middle aged white guy in Michigan. It's pathetic, and the only reason they are able to keep acting this way is because they know that the people who feel this way have absolutely no choice but to vote straight D every time and hope things change someday. This country sucks.
Didn't Obama do tax cuts? Oh yeah he's black so it doesn't count
When all of a sudden he relents on it last night just as the Ukraine story was exploding in the news. That timing can't be a coincidence.
I member.
I mean, this whole thing is just kinda weird because we've already reached the point where the impeachment process has in fact started regardless and Pelosi is just trying to play pretend and act like it hasn't despite the fact it actually has, and everything's just really muddled and dumb as a result (even if that doesn't end up making any difference, it's still really weird and bizarre the way her and Nadler/Judiciary seem to be feuding in public and private alike over this).
He folded on $250 million for election security but the House passed $600 millionMitch folded last night on the election funding all of a sudden.
That's a tell.
oh holy cow I missed this. that's really surprising.Mitch folded last night on the election funding all of a sudden.
That's a tell.
Yeah I don't think it was really mentioned here. Good news.
Yeah, it wasn't, I meant to post it but got deluged last night w other stuff to do. Thread's out there in OT if you want to bump it.
The DoJ should be independent of Congress and the Executive just like the Federal Reserve.
By 2030, progressive populism burned out as right-wing populism had. The Democrats became the nation's majority party. This party ran on a one-word platform: unity. After decades of culture, class and demographic warfare, moderate liberals defined America as a universal nation, a pluralistic nation, embracing all and seeking opportunity for all.
Media will focus on the Biden stuff. Trump successfully got the story in the media.
Mitch folded last night on the election funding all of a sudden.
That's a tell.
Isn't it too late for election security for 2020?Mitch folded last night on the election funding all of a sudden.
That's a tell.