Was about to say the same. No mention of an agreement which then gets people to shrug and say nothing to see here.
Was about to say the same. No mention of an agreement which then gets people to shrug and say nothing to see here.
The cult and hateful beliefs were all out there on the net for people to see. But a video is a million words.
@rolandsmartin
So the GOP invited clueless @RealCandaceO Owens AGAIN to a hearing on white supremacy and white nationalism? Yea, sure. She's such an expert. And then the fool says it wouldn't rank among her top 100 issues, and focuses on black-on-black crime and masculinity in men. https://twitter.com/JordanUhl/status/1175057310277939200 …
11:06 - 20 Sep 2019jordan
✔
@JordanUhl
The House is having a hearing on white supremacy and the Republicans invited Candace Owens who used her time to say it isn't actually an issue, that it wouldn't even rank in her top 100 issues and that the real issue is black-on-black crime & lack of masculinity in men.
I have terrible news
"The Founders could never suspect that a president would be so abusive of the Constitution of the United States, that the separation of powers would be irrelevant to him and that he would continue, any president would continue, to withhold facts from the Congress, which are part of the constitutional right of inquiry," Pelosi said.
The constitutional recourse for a lawbreaking president per the Constitution is impeachment. Article II, Section 4 instructs that the president "shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
Pelosi called the whistleblower's complaint "very alarming" and said "this is in a different class in terms of [Trump's] behavior."
"This case has a national security piece to it that is very alarming. It is very alarming because the inspector general is appointed by President Trump." She said the law is clear that the information must be submitted to the intelligence committees in Congress. "Right now they are breaking the law" by not providing that information, she said.
Pelosi, are you for real.In a statement released after the NPR interview, Pelosi went even further, saying the reports raise "grave, urgent concerns for our national security" and that the president and his administration must conduct "our national security and foreign policy in the best interest of the American people, not the President's personal interest."
"If the President has done what has been alleged," she said, "then he is stepping into a dangerous minefield with serious repercussions for his Administration and our democracy."
She can't just go "YES IMPEACHMENT TIME" on a dime as leader.
Seriously just retire she's been a disaster on this whole issue, no one is irreplaceable I'm sure Dems can manage without her
Pelosi Says Congress Should Pass New Laws So Sitting Presidents Can Be Indicted
If she wants impeachment to happen, she can make it happen. She's good at whipping votes. It's pretty clear she has no interest at this point.
That's completely right...Again....we have 0 of the actual details of this. Congress has not been officially briefed on what is happening. It's not the dumbest idea to, you know, want the actual facts before you start screaming about impeaching the mutha-fucker. (For this specific thing.)
We literally just had the story develop in the last 24 hours in a way an impeachment vote in the Senate would be able to hurt GOP Senators. Hence Mitch's about face.If she wants impeachment to happen, she can make it happen. She's good at whipping votes. It's pretty clear she has no interest at this point.
That's completely right...
...but I fail to see the downside of saying "The president trying to blackmail or quid pro quo a foreign leader into investigating his political opponents is an impeachable offense."
"If the President has done what has been alleged," she said, "then he is stepping into a dangerous minefield with serious repercussions for his Administration and our democracy."
We literally just had the story develop in the last 24 hours in a way an impeachment vote in the Senate would be able to hurt GOP Senators. Hence Mitch's about face.
Im giving em 2 days or so to get the ducks in a row. Then Ill prepare the cannons if nothing is being done.
The job WAS to drag impeachments out Benghazi style and ignore the votes because itd party line in the Senate.Why do you frame this so absurdly when you know nobody is saying that?
Pelosi has a job to do. She's not doing it. At this point, that deserves a City Girls Periodt.
Sure, but there's been an absurd amount of things that he can, and should, get articles of impeachment for even before this story broke. There's so many, I literally find myself forgetting some of them from time to time. If she'd been helping build momentum towards it, this could be a moment to push it over. But alas...Again....we have 0 of the actual details of this. Congress has not been officially briefed on what is happening. It's not the dumbest idea to, you know, want the actual facts before you start screaming about impeaching the mutha-fucker. (For this specific thing.)