And you also said that she was "a dyed-in-the-wool Reaganite" despite her saying Ford is the only R she voted for.I was responding to series of posts claiming that "Elizabeth Warren didn't leave the Republican party, the Republican party left her". I'm arguing that she changed.
π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€
Who at Politico is writing these candidate hit pieces? These hot takes are Chris Shitlizza level bad.
Ah, sorry I missed your post on that.
I feel like her history of having been a Republican and of having grown up poor and showing the receipts can help ameliorate the casting of her as a "socialist" or "coastal elite."
And you also said that she was "a dyed-in-the-wool Reaganite" despite her saying Ford is the only R she voted for.
Oh wow.I've encountered plenty of Trump supporters who didn't bother to vote in 2016. Warren's published writings from the time speak to her political/economic position in 1980.
You and Kirblar are really all aboard the "being called a racist is worse than being a racist", aren't you?
How in the fuck you're taking that away from what I said, I have no idea.I've encountered plenty of Trump supporters who didn't bother to vote in 2016. Warren's published writings from the time speak to her political/economic position in 1980.
You and Kirblar are really all aboard the "being called a racist is worse than being a racist" train, aren't you?
π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€π€
Who at Politico is writing these candidate hit pieces? These hot takes are Chris Shitlizza level bad.
Did she follow her heart, her intuition? Did it lead her in the right direction?
Did she follow her heart, her intuition? Did it lead her in the right direction?
Sell your sin. Just cash in.Did she follow her heart, her intuition? Did it lead her in the right direction?
Hey, but that bizarre quip about race and racism was totally warranted and not at all antagonistic or inflammatory. God forbid people are asked to defend their word choice.How in the fuck you're taking that away from what I said, I have no idea.
The political parties prior to the 90s were not ideologically polarized yet. The Southern Strategy had not yet metastasized in the GOP and you had both (actual) conservative Dems and liberal Republicans due to regional variations. One of those conservative Dems still represents Alabama as a Senator. For the GOP. Applying today's framing of the parties in a period when the realignment hadn't fully kicked in yet is a big mistake to make.
Kyle Griffin @kylegriffin1
House Republicans say they'll run in 2020 on repealing Obamacare.https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-09-13/house-gop-to-run-in-2020-on-obamacare-repeal-debt-reduction β¦
7:10 PM - Sep 13, 2019
The timeline appears to be this:I wonder if whatever this is ties in with Dan Coats' ouster. He was basically fired late July but left mid August...
Regardless of what this is, Dan Coats is definitely a guy the Dems should subpoena during their impeachment investigation. They were stopped last time but that was back when Repubs held the chamber...
The country's No. 2 intelligence official, Sue Gordon, knew it was likely she would have to eventually step down from her post, but the timing of that decision became more urgent on Thursday after her boss -- outgoing spy chief Dan Coats -- interrupted a meeting she was holding on election security and asked his deputy to submit her letter of resignation, sources familiar with the events told CNN.
While details of the conversation between Gordon, an intelligence veteran of more than 30 years, and Coats remain unclear, sources say that the situation clearly abruptly changed after the meeting was interrupted.
Shortly after her encounter with Coats, Gordon submitted her letter of resignation to Vice President Mike Pence, though the document itself was addressed to Trump, according to officials, a highly unusual move that prompted some confusion among some West Wing officials who waited for the President's tweet confirming the news.
The timeline appears to be this:
July 28: Trump announces DNI Coats departure
August 8: Deputy DNI Sue Gordon resigns effective August 15
August 12: Whistleblower files complaint
August 15: Coats and Gordon depart
Seen this story pointed out on Twitter that might take on more meaning yet...:
B or Bust.Biden and Sanders had the most exclusive supporters β 24 percent of Biden's supporters and 18 percent of Sanders's supporters aren't considering any of the other candidates who participated in the debate.
They call that the Brexit/Boris special.
Get the strongest, whitest daddy you can find, and hold on to him for dear life.
They're arguing against the Democratic rationale for enforcing the subpoena of McGahn being that they need the testimony to consider impeachment.What does this mean though? Are they trying to make a case challenging Dems impeachment proceedings in court because they feel their inconsistencies = purely political grounds for impeachment and thus unconstitutional as it should not be considered legitimate?
I think the "only considering Biden" is probably mostly soft support. He has high name recognition, polls well against Trump, and favourable associations. I.e. I don't think his floor is 24%.Get the strongest, whitest daddy you can find, and hold on to him for dear life.
You are good my friendIf it's a legitimate vape, the body has ways to try to shut the whole thing down.
But he has high black voter support so it doesn't matter rightI still can't get over the fact that Biden implied that the problem with black families is that...we don't know how to raise our kids.