• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ichthyosaurus

Banned
Dec 26, 2018
9,375
You dont have to worry about that here. Everyone here (minus like one or two lurkers) are voting democrat in the general. The whole "please say that you will vote for Biden in the general" stuff has been done before and it always comes across as strange.

PoliERA, sounds reasonable. Not buying it with OT. A sizable portion there hate Democrats more than Republicans.
 

Sheepinator

Member
Jul 25, 2018
27,951
I just listened to that "record player" answer linked here. He seemed to be referring to ESL kids being helped by playing the record player at night (how quaint) so they hear a lot more English words.
 

Sheepinator

Member
Jul 25, 2018
27,951
Is Cambodia even a socialist country...?
I looked that up last night because it didn't sound right. From what I could gather, it was communist until 1981, when it was pivoting to socialism. Her parents immigrated to the US in 1984, so it's questionable whether the incident she was talking about happened during socialism. Then it seems to have gone more into crony capitalism from about 1989. That was just from a quick look though. I wonder too with her being a Republican whether her parents would even be able to immigrate here under current GOP policies.
 

Schlep

Member
Oct 29, 2017
1,772
I really wish Biden would just recognize how bad he is for the moment, for a multitude of reasons, drop out and endorse Beto or Kamala. Same as Bernie needs to just drop and endorse Warren. But if I've learned one thing from this primary, it's that nobody is going to drop until it's 110% obvious that they 100% don't have a chance.
 

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,606
So in the midst of our discussion about 1976 and 1980 I forgot that Kennedy didn't actually run in the primary in 1976. Why didn't he? 1980 was a disaster, while I see why he wanted to challenge Carter in 1980 I don't think that was the best idea. If he ran in 1976 he probably would've won two terms. And we'd have UHC baked in to the law and society for decades now.
He wasn't ready for it and Chappaquiddick was still relatively fresh in the news (which sounds quaint to the point of nonsense by modern news cycle standards lol). Of course, he wasn't quite ready in '80 either...
 

RailWays

One Winged Slayer
Avenger
Oct 25, 2017
15,667
Bernie is polling quite well in the early states so there is zero reason for him to drop yet.
 

Aaron

I’m seeing double here!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,077
Minneapolis
I live to see someone call Elizabeth Warren a "compromise" candidate.
Style over substance - she's only slightly to the right of Bernie, but more eloquent in expressing how radical her reforms would be and more invested in building relationships with the party. Also has a plan for literally everything.

She's Clinton without the baggage and the same policy views as Sanders.
 

JABEE

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,850
Rewatching last night was weird how every question about Medicare For All went through Warren first even when Klobacher called him out specifically on the proposal he wrote using his zinger.
 

plagiarize

Eating crackers
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
27,511
Cape Cod, MA
He wasn't ready for it and Chappaquiddick was still relatively fresh in the news (which sounds quaint to the point of nonsense by modern news cycle standards lol). Of course, he wasn't quite ready in '80 either...
Not sure that Chappaquiddick is 'quaint' by today's standards. He'd have been toast had he run in 76. It really helped sink him in 80.

And frankly, it should have.
 

Diablos

has a title.
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,575
He wasn't ready for it and Chappaquiddick was still relatively fresh in the news (which sounds quaint to the point of nonsense by modern news cycle standards lol). Of course, he wasn't quite ready in '80 either...
Well, I think he was ready in 1980 but challenging a sitting President of the same party was too disruptive and it tore the party apart. It obviously also turned voters off, given Reagan's ridiculously huge victory.
 

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,606
Not sure that Chappaquiddick is 'quaint' by today's standards. He'd have been toast had he run in 76. It really helped sink him in 80.

And frankly, it should have.
I meant quaint as in a scandal that was about 7-8 years old was still fresh enough to hurt him, when the media churns through and forgets scandals on a weekly basis now.

Well, I think he was ready in 1980 but challenging a sitting President of the same party was too disruptive and it tore the party apart. It obviously also turned voters off, given Reagan's ridiculously huge victory.
He was asked point blank why he was running for president and he couldn't answer. tbh he might never have actually wanted to be president at all and just ran out of obligation.
 

Diablos

has a title.
Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,575
I meant quaint as in a scandal that was about 7-8 years old was still fresh enough to hurt him, when the media churns through and forgets scandals on a weekly basis now.
Unless it's Benghazi and emails emails emails

If Hillary won two terms they'd be talking about it even during her last year as President. No doubt in my mind.
 
Last edited:

plagiarize

Eating crackers
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
27,511
Cape Cod, MA
I meant quaint as in a scandal that was about 7-8 years old was still fresh enough to hurt him, when the media churns through and forgets scandals on a weekly basis now.
But it's such a massive 'scandal'. A woman died, and Kennedy got away with the lightest of punishments for the thing we factually know he did (leaving her to drown and not reporting it until the morning). I don't think the media would have forgotten something like that in a few weeks even today.
 

plagiarize

Eating crackers
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
27,511
Cape Cod, MA

The black people = poor thing is horrendous and keeps happening. The pivot from a question about reparations to saying 'parents don't know how to raise their children' has some awful implications.

But...

Hearing him talk about leaving the radio on at night or listening to records. That sort of scares me just as much. Not because he's OLD. Because he is so catastrophically out of touch.
 

JABEE

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,850
The black people = poor thing is horrendous and keeps happening. The pivot from a question about reparations to saying 'parents don't know how to raise their children' has some awful implications.

But...

Hearing him talk about leaving the radio on at night or listening to records. That sort of scares me just as much. Not because he's OLD. Because he is so catastrophically out of touch.
Both are why it makes no sense why he was receiving positive coverage last night. It was sometimes difficult to understand what point he was trying to make.
 

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,606
Christ, Trump and McConnell have pushed through *150* conservative judges. Our judiciary is going to be so badly stained by this administration and this Senate for decades.
 

plagiarize

Eating crackers
Moderator
Oct 25, 2017
27,511
Cape Cod, MA
Christ, Trump and McConnell have pushed through *150* conservative judges. Our judiciary is going to be so badly stained by this administration and this Senate for decades.
I have accepted that I will never, ever, have the luxury of being as hands off about politics as I was when Obama was President ever again for the rest of my life.

I have come to terms with that. These forces will never go away. They will never stop trying to make things as good as possible for themselves at the expense of everyone else.
 

Mcfrank

Member
Oct 28, 2017
15,201
I have accepted that I will never, ever, have the luxury of being as hands off about politics as I was when Obama was President ever again for the rest of my life.

I have come to terms with that. These forces will never go away. They will never stop trying to make things as good as possible for themselves at the expense of everyone else.
You shouldn't have been hands off during Obama. That was the problem. People took 8 years off and the gop gobbled up everything except the presidency. Then they got that too.
 

chadskin

Member
Oct 27, 2017
11,013

This is a good primer by Wright on the "progressive foreign policy" as articulated by Bernie and Warren, and some of the challenges the theoretical ideas of a Bernie or Warren doctrine would inevitably face in the real world.

True restraint—whereby the United States significantly reduces its military commitments overseas—will be all but impossible for a Democratic president to achieve in a deliberate and orderly fashion. It would involve too many compromises of core principles. Progressive presidents will not want to pursue the destruction of the alliance system, acquiesce in nuclear proliferation, or embrace the imperialist notion of spheres of influence. They will be unable and unwilling to promise credibly never to intervene militarily.

It is possible that Sanders and Warren find themselves stuck between the mainstream national-security worldview they have articulated and their aspirations to opt out of geopolitical competition and military interventions. This could hobble the early years of their administration. Alternatively, they could embrace a practical and modest progressive approach. This would seek to pull back from the Middle East, keep the basic structure of America's role in Europe and Asia intact while modernizing the military, sharpen the ideological divide with authoritarian states, and endeavor to change the world on specific issues, much as Obama did by opening up relations with Cuba, prioritizing climate change, and playing a constructive role in international institutions. In this, much of the blob would agree. If Warren or Sanders emerges as the nominee, there will undoubtedly be tensions and disagreements with the Democratic foreign-policy establishment, but this type of practical progressivism may form the basis for a rapprochement and an avoidance of the kind of schism Trump brought to Republican foreign policy.
 

DrROBschiz

Member
Oct 25, 2017
16,475
I have accepted that I will never, ever, have the luxury of being as hands off about politics as I was when Obama was President ever again for the rest of my life.

I have come to terms with that. These forces will never go away. They will never stop trying to make things as good as possible for themselves at the expense of everyone else.

This times 1000

No more easy living for Americans. We are going to have to fight tooth and nail daily and still know in the back of our minds that we may only achieve a fraction of what a just and fair American society should be

We have no choice and could still fail in various ways regardless of effort

Im doubling down anyways and doing everything in my power to stay informed and never miss a vote
 

Cryoteck

Member
Nov 2, 2017
1,028
I have accepted that I will never, ever, have the luxury of being as hands off about politics as I was when Obama was President ever again for the rest of my life.

I have come to terms with that. These forces will never go away. They will never stop trying to make things as good as possible for themselves at the expense of everyone else.
People trying to slant the system to benefit themselves at everyone else's expense have existed since the dawn of civilization. The fight will never end, but it's always worth fighting.
 

Aaron

I’m seeing double here!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,077
Minneapolis
You shouldn't have been hands off during Obama. That was the problem. People took 8 years off and the gop gobbled up everything except the presidency. Then they got that too.
Just a reminder that we had 34% turnout in 2014 and lost three very winnable Senate seats (AK, CO and NC were all within a few points).

Had Democrats turned up in decent numbers and held those seats, we would have won the Senate in 2016 even if Trump still won, and thus been able to block his court nominations. Obama could have pushed Garland through during the lame duck and flipped the balance of the Supreme Court.

Same with the close Senate races in 2016 (NC, PA, WI, MO). Any liberal who just didn't want to vote for Clinton, maaaan and then proceeded not to vote at all, or didn't vote in the midterms is way higher on my shit list than any Stein or Bernie write-in voter. Downballot matters.
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,934
My take: Warren was disappointing. She is definitely benefiting from nobody going after her at this point. The fact that all of Biden's best moments were when he attacked her speaks to my fear of her not knowing what to do when she's the target.

Harris had a good debate. It wasn't her first debate, but it ALSO wasn't her second. She did what she needed to do.

But HOLY HELL none of this matters because Biden's answer to the slavery question is drowning everything out.
 

Maxim726x

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
13,053
Christ, Trump and McConnell have pushed through *150* conservative judges. Our judiciary is going to be so badly stained by this administration and this Senate for decades.

Mission accomplished for Moscow Mitch, then.

He'll eat shit every day if this is his only major accomplishment.

My take: Warren was disappointing. She is definitely benefiting from nobody going after her at this point. The fact that all of Biden's best moments were when he attacked her speaks to my fear of her not knowing what to do when she's the target.

Harris had a good debate. It wasn't her first debate, but it ALSO wasn't her second. She did what she needed to do.

But HOLY HELL none of this matters because Biden's answer to the slavery question is drowning everything out.

Harris had a terrible debate. She went from attack dog to milquetoast in one debate. It's a terrible strategy and as a result she's not going to gain any significant ground. She's better being tough and confrontational, but apparently the electorate doesn't like that look very much.
 

Linkura

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,943
Jun 6, 2019
1,231
My take: Warren was disappointing. She is definitely benefiting from nobody going after her at this point. The fact that all of Biden's best moments were when he attacked her speaks to my fear of her not knowing what to do when she's the target.

Harris had a good debate. It wasn't her first debate, but it ALSO wasn't her second. She did what she needed to do.

But HOLY HELL none of this matters because Biden's answer to the slavery question is drowning everything out.

She came off like a centrist borefest with no convictions. When confronted about her record on criminal justice, she basically yelled Fake News and said a bunch of words. She had an awful night. She is done.

Oh, and the jokes and then laughing at your own jokes. Was she drunk last night?
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,934
She came off like a centrist borefest with no convictions. When confronted about her record on criminal justice, she basically yelled Fake News and said a bunch of words. She had an awful night. She is done.

Oh, and the jokes and then laughing at your own jokes. Was she drunk last night?
Cool
 
Oct 25, 2017
4,819
This is mostly a PR article for Old Navy, but one line struck me hard. If you don't think we're in a recession or heading towards one very soon, you're not paying attention.

Retail is dying, but that's not due to any economic downturn. People just aren't buying shit at stores anymore. We need to accept Trump is going into reelection with sub-4% unemployment and a strong consumer.
 

Double 0

Member
Nov 5, 2017
7,430
My take: Warren was disappointing. She is definitely benefiting from nobody going after her at this point. The fact that all of Biden's best moments were when he attacked her speaks to my fear of her not knowing what to do when she's the target.

Harris had a good debate. It wasn't her first debate, but it ALSO wasn't her second. She did what she needed to do.

But HOLY HELL none of this matters because Biden's answer to the slavery question is drowning everything out.

I think Warren can course correct. Biden ain't a chump like Delaney was, but I do think her team can get her ready by October. But she did fine enough for it not to affect her polling.


Harris did well, but she's got some huddles to hop over in terms of public perception. Mysogynoir is going to be a constant problem for her.

As expected, but made worse due to the Copmala stuff. She hasn't shaken that off yet. Not sure she ever will at this rate.

And that moderator sent a Tulsi dagger at her, which I didn't expect.


Biden though, it's about time he gets taken to task. He has had three debates. Each of them he has either not been great or had some massive fuck up. I hope that slavery comment is the last straw, but it likely won't. He is out of touch.
 

Maxim726x

Avenger
Oct 27, 2017
13,053
Retail is dying, but that's not due to any economic downturn. People just aren't buying shit at stores anymore. We need to accept Trump is going into reelection with sub-4% unemployment and a strong consumer.

Yeah, all historical indicators have him cruising to re-election.

If he were even semi-competent, this would be true. It appears Independents have come around to the sobering fact that he's scary and shouldn't be trusted, and I think that will ultimately sink him. If anything does.
 

Linkura

Member
Oct 25, 2017
19,943
Retail is dying, but that's not due to any economic downturn. People just aren't buying shit at stores anymore. We need to accept Trump is going into reelection with sub-4% unemployment and a strong consumer.
You're right that retail is dying, but the pace accelerating so much stood out to me. It's just one of many red flags.
 

Royalan

I can say DEI; you can't.
Moderator
Oct 24, 2017
11,934
And that moderator sent a Tulsi dagger at her, which I didn't expect.


Biden though, it's about time he gets taken to task. He has had three debates. Each of them he has either not been great or had some massive fuck up. I hope that slavery comment is the last straw, but it likely won't. He is out of touch.
That Kamala got that question while Klobuchar (you know, the other prosecutor on stage) was given softballs is total bullshit. I said it in the Debate thread, at this point people are expecting Kamala to apologize for a system that guys like Biden and Bernie ushered in before she was ever a public servant. But hey, it is what it is.

But Biden, my God. I put it this way: Biden is of a generation of politician where the best Black people could expect was that you not be actively racist.
 

KingK

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,845
You shouldn't have been hands off during Obama. That was the problem. People took 8 years off and the gop gobbled up everything except the presidency. Then they got that too.
Fucking exactly. George W. Bush and Mitch McConnell were/are just as bad as Trump. I would argue they were/are even worse (largely on account of being more effective at wielding power than Trump). Trump is just louder and more upfront with his villainy.

Just a reminder that we had 34% turnout in 2014 and lost three very winnable Senate seats (AK, CO and NC were all within a few points).

Had Democrats turned up in decent numbers and held those seats, we would have won the Senate in 2016 even if Trump still won, and thus been able to block his court nominations. Obama could have pushed Garland through during the lame duck and flipped the balance of the Supreme Court.

Same with the close Senate races in 2016 (NC, PA, WI, MO). Any liberal who just didn't want to vote for Clinton, maaaan and then proceeded not to vote at all, or didn't vote in the midterms is way higher on my shit list than any Stein or Bernie write-in voter. Downballot matters.

IIRC, the 2014 Midterm turnout for voters under 35 was one of the most pathetic stats I've ever seen. I want to say it was around 11% but I'm not even sure it broke double digits. I was fucking fuming at everyone my age for weeks after that election.

Then there was the the insufferable media, with wall-to-wall coverage of "EBOLA AND ISIS BOTH COMING TO INVADE AMERICA! THANKS, OBAMA." Coverage which stopped almost literally overnight after election day.

That election just pissed me off so fucking much. Udall in CO hurt especially, because him and Wyden teamed up for a lot of good shit on technology and privacy/NSA issues.

2010 was the first election I was eligible for, and that one sucked too, but at least I could feel good about my vote helping Donnelly narrowly keep his House seat that year. In 2014, 70% of the positions on the ballot were uncontested Republicans, and the few Democrats that were on the ballot all lost.
 

Deleted member 31104

User requested account closure
Banned
Nov 5, 2017
2,572
Retail is dying, but that's not due to any economic downturn. People just aren't buying shit at stores anymore. We need to accept Trump is going into reelection with sub-4% unemployment and a strong consumer.

Maybe, a few traditional early signs of recession have been flashing lately. Of course, it'll probably hit when he's just out of office and the Democrat comes in: i.e the standard American political cycle.
 

Aaron

I’m seeing double here!
Member
Oct 25, 2017
18,077
Minneapolis
IIRC, the 2014 Midterm turnout for voters under 35 was one of the most pathetic stats I've ever seen. I want to say it was around 11% but I'm not even sure it broke double digits. I was fucking fuming at everyone my age for weeks after that election.

Then there was the the insufferable media, with wall-to-wall coverage of "EBOLA AND ISIS BOTH COMING TO INVADE AMERICA! THANKS, OBAMA." Coverage which stopped almost literally overnight after election day.

That election just pissed me off so fucking much. Udall in CO hurt especially, because him and Wyden teamed up for a lot of good shit on technology and privacy/NSA issues.

2010 was the first election I was eligible for, and that one sucked too, but at least I could feel good about my vote helping Donnelly narrowly keep his House seat that year. In 2014, 70% of the positions on the ballot were uncontested Republicans, and the few Democrats that were on the ballot all lost.
I was in college during the 2014 elections and lived in a house with six other people. I was the only one who voted that year.

My girlfriend, a public school teacher, did not vote (to her credit, she tried to, but couldn't make it to the polls in time). My sister, a social worker, did not vote - she said she was going to, but then when she found out the president wasn't on the ballot, she stopped caring. Two of my roommates were in the theatre program with me, where it was constantly drilled into our heads that Republicans in the legislature were trying to slash our program's funding, and that it was imperative this didn't happen (we had already lost several federally-funded programs due to the sequester). Neither of them voted. Three of those four liked Obama and supported him. The other one was mostly apolitical and just knew that her family didn't like Obama, so she didn't either - she also didn't vote in 2016 and immediately freaked out about the possibility of her fiance (in the military) being sent to war in Iran. I'm pretty sure she didn't vote in 2018 either!

It's just like, Jesus Christ, what can you even do at that point? Why was it ever allowed to get this bad? People treated voting for fucking American Idol more seriously than politics.

Me on the other hand:

UBShUYl.png
I have always been the weird one who "cares too much" about politics.
 
Last edited:

Blader

Member
Oct 27, 2017
26,606
As expected, but made worse due to the Copmala stuff. She hasn't shaken that off yet. Not sure she ever will at this rate.

And that moderator sent a Tulsi dagger at her, which I didn't expect.

That question was really something else, and it's beyond frustrating that eight months into this campaign -- and after being gummed up by the exact same kind of questioning in the last debate -- Kamala has still not been able to vocalize a strong and concise enough response to questions about her prosecutor record. It would be one thing if she did and the media just brushed it off to keep asking about it, like with Hillary's emails, but I truly don't get why her campaign hasn't been able to settle on something concrete for this. It's not like she's in danger of losing frontrunner status by rocking the boat too much here.

That Kamala got that question while Klobuchar (you know, the other prosecutor on stage) was given softballs is total bullshit.
It's hardly equivalent. Klobuchar was a county attorney, Kamala was the attorney general of California (which we're often reminded is the second largest Department of Justice next to the United States Department of Justice!). Kamala has staked a lot of her campaign on her background as a prosecutor (naturally, it's taken up a far larger share of her life in public service than being Hennepin County attorney has for Klobuchar), knowing how to move the levers of power and change based on her experience being on the inside of that system. That is not the cornerstone of Klobuchar's campaign. This is also basically a three- our four-person race, and Klobuchar is not one of those three or four anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.