Clip is from the audiobook of Bernie's memoir which was recorded and released in 2015 and the book is from 1997.
Why am I now just hearing about this?
This. I don't see the issue with that statement, it's accurate even if unpleasant,Because there's nothing wrong with the sentiment?
"If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."
It's the idea of creating an 'other' to place blame, so that people don't look at the real cause of their economic situation. Trump is doing the exact thing with his constant MS13 rhetoric.
Bingo
And not just once.Bingo
There isn't a context where that shits okay for him to use.
Clip is from the audiobook of Bernie's memoir which was recorded and released in 2015 and the book is from 1997.
Why am I now just hearing about this?
He also didn't use the full word to blast racism.He used it to excuse the southern white working class for being exploited.
Wait, I'm not in a place where I can listen to the actual clip.
Does Bernie actually say n****r?
(Also, the fact that I am without earphones and literally cannot risk playing that clip should settle that other dumb-as-folk debate raging on Twitter today.)
The person who did the reading did.Wait, I'm not in a place where I can listen to the actual clip.
Does Bernie actually say n****r?
(Also, the fact that I am without earphones and literally cannot risk playing that clip should settle that other dumb-as-folk debate raging on Twitter today.)
It was.I don't think the word was settled as being verboten in 1997 when used in a historical context that does not glorify racism.
Also, Bill and Barack had great charisma. No one's gonna fall in love with that tech bro shit besides libertarians and extremely online incelsThey were just 2 Governors and a US Senator! Completely out of nowhere!
Even if it was, why would you not edit that out for your audiobook 18 years laterI don't think the word was settled as being verboten in 1997 when used in a historical context that does not glorify racism.
It's not really going out of the way to point out the many, many, many flaws he has.People really going out of their way to discredit Bernie as much as possible is so telling about where some's motives are at. By people, I'm referring to the major media outlets and various influential people on Twitter with semi-large followers. It only reinforces my support for Bernie even further.
This is where I am.Seriously, what is wrong with just settling with negros at worst?
Literally nothing would change if he just said black people. The point would remain.
He just doesn't need that with his primary history (namely with black voters)
It's not really going out of the way to point out the many, many, many flaws he has.
But keep beating the "everyone's out to get him" drum I guess.
Please, dahling...
People looking to discredit him. That's the only reason really.Assuming Bernie's intentions were good and that in its whole context it's clear and informative it's still going to tug at an issue he hasn't been able to shake which is his appeal to people of color and especially I assume, older people of color.
I doubt I'd ever use the word in text except by quoting someone - or maybe in fiction? Like if you're writing a klansman as a character it would be difficult to avoid.
Why's it come up today specifically?
Bernie's about as flawless as the skin of a meth head with long nails.
lol no. Just...no. There are plenty of flaws.....but also every criticism of Bernie cannot be defended with "bu--b---buuuuuuu Biden/Hillary/Warren/Delany/Crooked Media/literally anyone else." That's not a defense. That's a cop out, and the same thing my children try to do. It doesn't work then, it ain't gonna work in politics.
So they like any supporters of politicians ?Is it me, or does it seem like the people that support Bernie are especially willing to move goalposts to answer for his flaws. It's almost like they paint him as the person they want him to be, but not who he actually is.