I think that the 2020 primary so far gives us a lot of evidence that the last sentence here isn't a good explanation of what was going on. Right? Like, what's a little weird about talking about how well Sanders supposedly did in 2016 despite [Hillary being inevitable / the country not being ready for him / rigging / whatever] is that he's still an underdog. It is clearly not the case that the ~43% (per wikipedia, and if these various explanations of Sanders' early weakness in 2016 are right then really the baseline here should be higher) of primary voters who chose him over Clinton are big-time supporters -- he's polling at at-best 20% right now. And it's not even that half of those people are instead supporting Warren, who often sounds a lot like Sanders, since only about a quarter of Warren supporters say that Sanders is their second choice. So there's not an inevitable candidate, Sanders is much less of an outlier this time around, and he's got great name ID and at least ought to have the most developed organization since he just did this same thing four years ago, and yet he's not that popular.
It kind of looks like Sanders did as well as he did in 2016 because he was a warm body. He didn't concede long past the point where it was clear he wasn't going to win, and he was the only option for a protest vote.
I'm having enough trouble getting people to watch movies in English and with sound...
Many a displaced silent movie star expressed this sentiment.
So I was thinking today about the utter uselessness of debates when it comes to expressing complex progressive ideas to the masses, when i looked up and realized this was playing in the background:
And I seriously wondered why this format hasn't really been considered with politics.
If you don't know Hollywood Reporter's Roundtable serious, it's basically a group of actors sitting around a table interviewing each other and discussing issues in Hollywood and their acting process. Sometimes there's a little back-and-forth, but that really isn't the point.
They're actually really informative, if you're into that sort of thing.
Sis, tell us about the first time you saw a talkie. I love hearing about the old days.
I think the issue stems from mainly the fact many people here hear Bernie and instantly think of douchebro memes instead of the actual message at times. Sometimes that's personal bias or miscommunication and other times that's just personalities and egos at work.What pisses me off isn't what you all think about 2016. Seriously its a very unimportant topic. What pisses me off is most of you being completely unable to discuss anything you disagree with without being jerks who don't even try to understand where the other person is coming from, and everything just being an onslaught of bad faith discussion as result.
I still like Aaron and some others here, and I think the general political beliefs here aren't that bad, but fine political views doesn't stop people from being assholes and there are too many assholes here to make discussion worth having.
It's not the format of the show people object to, it's that he has on a variety of guests, including a lot of alt-right or adjacent shitbags, and doesn't challenge them because he's either an idiot or tacitly agrees with some of their thoughts.More-or-less like a podcast environment. I know Joe Rogan is an unpopular person on Era, but his free floating thought format on his podcasts would be great for, say, a group of politicians getting together to exchange ideas and their personal stances. Not even having a moderator or host of a show. I'd rather it just be the politicians sitting at a table and talking casually about the issues.
It's not the format of the show people object to, it's that he has on a variety of guests, including a lot of alt-right or adjacent shitbags, and doesn't challenge them because he's either an idiot or tacitly agrees with some of their thoughts.
State Senator Jason Plummer (R-Edwardsville) is another interesting name who could test the waters in a primary bid for@RepShimkus' seat, sources say. Some expect GOP leaders to talk with@ErikaHarold about exploring a run, but it's not yet clear if she has any interest.
Picture it, 1928. I'd just come from a meeting with my sewing circle, the precursor to political discussion forums. I remember feeling angry because some ignorant douche had said, "Smith and Hoover are both the same. I'm writing in Lindbergh." He always criticized us for being hostile but kept coming back - probably because the Gloria Swanson impersonator whose parlor we used had the best bathtub moonshine.Sis, tell us about the first time you saw a talkie. I love hearing about the old days.
Sometimes you're just a little too good at this.Picture it, 1928. I'd just come from a meeting with my sewing circle, the precursor to political discussion forums. I remember feeling angry because some ignorant douche had said, "Smith and Hoover are both the same. I'm writing in Lindbergh." He always criticized us for being hostile but kept coming back - probably because the Gloria Swanson impersonator whose parlor we used had the best bathtub moonshine.
Anyway, I got some apple pie at the automat and caught a late showing of The Jazz Singer. I found it problematic, although that word hadn't been coined. I imagine Northam's grandparents adored it.
Bravo.Picture it, 1928. I'd just come from a meeting with my sewing circle, the precursor to political discussion forums. I remember feeling angry because some ignorant douche had said, "Smith and Hoover are both the same. I'm writing in Lindbergh." He always criticized us for being hostile but kept coming back - probably because the Gloria Swanson impersonator whose parlor we used had the best bathtub moonshine.
Anyway, I got some apple pie at the automat and caught a late showing of The Jazz Singer. I found it problematic, although that word hadn't been coined. I imagine Northam's grandparents adored it.
*avatar quote*
Thanks for posting. I'm glad to see that the doctors your brother knows are mostly in favor of change. I think it's misleading when it's presented that people like their insurance. I think what's really being said is people like the security of knowing that if something happens tomorrow then they'll be OK, hopefully without too much out of pocket cost. I also think people forget they're paying a significant amount for that employer healthcare, on average about $6K I think (not going to look up the exact figure for now), which is about 10% of the median household income. Sure, employees won't instantly get that as a pay increase if they can opt into a public plan, but I do think wages would go up some as employers who are now able to compensate more do so to attract and retain good staff.I apologize if this is long but I have been lurking in this thread and wanted to give my $.02 on this insurance debate.
My brother is a doctor in Columbus and works at a city hospital. We had a conversation about single payer health care this past Christmas and he told me that most of the doctors that he works with are in favor of scrapping our current system and going to a single payer system. One of the reasons he said he was in favor of it was that a lot of patients do not have the money to pay their out of pocket costs so they end up not getting paid that amount. He also struggles with patients not being able to afford treatment and therefore they choose to not receive the treatment they need.
IMO and my experience private insurance sucks ass. I do not like the fact that there is a middle man, whose main objective is to make money off of sick people, in between me and my health care.. If we want to keep private insurance why cant we make it non profit? I also will never understand why some people defend our system because they like the idea of not having to share a room with a poor person, or because they are richer or have better insurance then myself they are able to receive better care then me. One of my coworkers actually said he would be in favor of M4A as long as Lebron James was able to go to the best doctors and get better care because he had the money to pay for it.
Our insurance system has failed me numerous times.
On vacation a few years ago three states away I had to take my son to a stat care. Insurance denied coverage out of network. While out on medical leave last year I had to continue to make premium payments to keep my insurance or upon returning to work would have to wait 3 months to get it back as they would have to treat me as a new hire. As a divorced father of two, I live paycheck to paycheck when I get all of my paycheck let alone when I am getting 60% on short term disability. Also when finding out I needed to have surgery I was required to use a service that would check all of the area surgeons and find the best rate. If I didn't go with their choice I would have to pay a penalty. That means I would probably not gotten the Doctor I wanted. i ended up going with my Doctor. Two weeks after returning to work after six weeks of recovery, they called and told me that they were still looking for the cheapest doctor.
I understand that yes my company's insurance sucks but it's not like I can just up and leave my job either. I interviewed at two companies this year that had much better insurance plans. The first was a 4 day on 3 day off 12 hour job that also rotated shifts every month between days and midnight's. That wouldn't work with my visitation with my kids. The second was a 45 minute commute and was $2 less an hour.
American's health care should not and never should have been tied to employment. It's actually kind of ridiculous. Why can't my company negotiate the same insurance rates and coverage as other employers. I would rather my employer pay me the money from that "benefit" in a higher pay rate and I would gladly pay the payroll tax for a state run system where I know my money is going to help myself and others in need. I would feel better about that instead of lining the pocket of some insurance company CEO.
BTW nobody i know loves their private insurance. Nobody!!! They just accept it and that really pisses me off as we should not just accept the way tings are because that's the way they are.
Basically I believe that everyone should get equal access to good quality healthcare regardless of their standing in life or the negotiating prowess of their employers. Do we all not deserve a chance to live healthy and happy lives. Rich people are already able to go to better schools, buy more expensive vehicles, and live in nicer neighborhoods in bigger and better houses. So if they have to pay more then me for a universal plan I am not going to loose sleep over it.
Public Citizen @Public_Citizen
Your reminder that in Texas, you can vote with a gun permit but not a student ID.
Except people like Marcia.MarciaBernie, Bernie, Bernie...is how i felt...catching up on these last few pages
Wasn't Jan the one with the persecution complex? Who does that remind me of. 🤔
lol, He's so prickly. Did he really just answer with trickle-down? Anyone with more familiarity with this kind of stuff have a second opinion?
I am a doctor and I have never met a patient who was happy with their health insurance. It's not even being happy or satisfied in the traditional sense... it's usually "I am so glad I have a stable health insurance from my employer that is way better than what most reasonable people are able to get". It's all relative... your horse shit is slightly better than your neighbor's dog shit so that makes you feel better. You don't really have a sense what could be because this is just normal... you are just expected to pay a truck load for medical care and dealing with insurances is just a day to day thing. The only people happy with private health insurances.. are private heath insurances.
A lot of patients I get can't afford non-generic prescriptions and can't afford costs for operation. Have had an elderly woman who has refused my referrals for her knee as she can't afford the treatment/operation for it (she is just outside of medicare range as well in terms of age). There are numerous cases of it and yes Insulin rationing is a thing (though not as extreme as Sanders makes it out because we have more sophisticated technology than just raw Insulin injections through vials these days). I am constantly giving out medical samples daily to people I know who can't afford them otherwise.
As far as other doctors I have talked to about this issue... almost everyone agrees that the current system is fucked and that at the bare minimum every citizen should have access to SOME basic level of medical coverage. Many aren't too keen on single player system or complete abolishing of private health insurance. A lot of them are concerned about huge wage/salary cuts if a new system gets put in place though I personally don't know how the math will work out with a Medical For All system. It honestly can't be too bad because it's not doctors in other countries are strapped for cash... average salary of a doctor in Canada is still like $250K. Some are also concerned about specialist waiting hours in a new system, certainly in Canada it can take weeks to months to get an MRI for example.
It seems like the only people happy with the current system are people that work in the insurance industry. We live in the richest economy in the history of the world but so many people die because their gofundme didnt go viral. It's time for change. Nobody should have to die or refuse treatment because they cant afford it. There is no reason why this country cant afford it. One less aircraft carrier would help so many people. Lets put our resources into our best commodity, the people of the country.
I am sick and tired of hearing it wont work and that we need to keep private insurance because people like it. That is bull shit and we all know it.
People like it more than the alternative because the current government alternatives are often worse benefit-wise and there's no guarantee of parity with a new system. Unions aren't pushing back on Bernie's proposals just to be dicks.It seems like the only people happy with the current system are people that work in the insurance industry. We live in the richest economy in the history of the world but so many people die because their gofundme didnt go viral. It's time for change. Nobody should have to die or refuse treatment because they cant afford it. There is no reason why this country cant afford it. One less aircraft carrier would help so many people. Lets put our resources into our best commodity, the people of the country.
I am sick and tired of hearing it wont work and that we need to keep private insurance because people like it. That is bull shit and we all know it.
Polling shows it's not bullshit.
You will need to convince people otherwise, or you won't win the election.
I mean, good luck explaining it to them.People dont understand the benefits of a single payer system. They just hear you will lose your insurance and they don't like it. Once they understand that it will be replaced with a better system public opinion will change. Thats the overall problem with our electorate, people just don't understand what single payer vs private insurance would do to improve the overall quality of life to all americans. I am sure there was resistance to medicare back in the day but I am also sure that it is pretty popular today. i think that the average american, people like me, would rather help other people then help an insurance exec buy a new yacht.
People like it more than the alternative because the current government alternatives are often worse benefit-wise and there's no guarantee of parity with a new system. Unions aren't pushing back on Bernie's proposals just to be dicks.
From the Monmouth poll:People dont understand the benefits of a single payer system. They just hear you will lose your insurance and they don't like it. Once they understand that it will be replaced with a better system public opinion will change. Thats the overall problem with our electorate, people just don't understand what single payer vs private insurance would do to improve the overall quality of life to all americans. I am sure there was resistance to medicare back in the day but I am also sure that it is pretty popular today. i think that the average american, people like me, would rather help other people then help an insurance exec buy a new yacht.
The alternative interpretation to people simultaneously wanting a public health insurance program while also wanting the ability to retain private insurance, is that the US as a society values this flexibility of choice.On the issue of health care, 58% of party voters say it is very important to them that the Democrats nominate someone who supports "Medicare for All." Another 23% say it is somewhat important, ...
When asked specifically about what type of health insurance system they prefer, 53% of Democratic voters say they want a system that offers an opt in to Medicare while retaining the private insurance market. Just 22% say they want to move to a system where Medicare for All replaces private insurance
...
Those who prefer a public option are divided into two camps that include 18% who would like to move to a universal public insurance system eventually and 33% who say that there should always be the choice of private coverage. In other words, only 4-in-10 Democrats want to get rid of the private insurance market ... at some point in the future.
No, they are afraid of the known here. They can directly compare current coverage to current examples of future coverage and find them wanting. This is where "just do the damn public option" becomes a good way of demonstrating that in the future in order to reduce resistance if the P.O. is successful in being legitimate competition to private insurance.People are afraid of the unknown. If they have a system where they only pay their premiums in the form of a tax and no out of pocket cost people will come around. It's a better system, and it will work. I said before and I will say it again, nobody should have to die because they cant afford treatment and i believe most Americans will agree. The days of gofundme healthcare are numbered.
If it was easy Obamacare would have been popular from the start.That wont be as hard as you think, most people I know are fed up with the current system. Insurance execs getting rich while people die I believe is not popular with most people.
From the Monmouth poll:
The alternative interpretation to people simultaneously wanting a public health insurance program while also wanting the ability to retain private insurance, is that the US as a society values this flexibility of choice.
To be fair making arguments for healthcare will be easier now that ACA has a foothold.If it was easy Obamacare would have been popular from the start.
So, like, hi. Okay. Lots here to unpack.People dont understand the benefits of a single payer system. They just hear you will lose your insurance and they don't like it. Once they understand that it will be replaced with a better system public opinion will change. Thats the overall problem with our electorate, people just don't understand what single payer vs private insurance would do to improve the overall quality of life to all americans. I am sure there was resistance to medicare back in the day but I am also sure that it is pretty popular today. i think that the average american, people like me, would rather help other people then help an insurance exec buy a new yacht.
If it was easy Obamacare would have been popular from the start.
It might surprise you to learn that virtually every individual Doctor's practice is a business.I cant stress enough that people dont understand what a single payer option would entail. You get the same coverage for less money for most american's.. you dont have to post a gofindme to pay medical bills. People dont to have decide if they want to stay alive or pay their bills. Nothing you say will convince me that our current system is better then giving every american quality health care regardless of social standing . Healthcare should be a right not a business.