-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
US PoliERA 2019 |OT5| She's got a plan for that, now sashay away
- Thread starter Aaron
- Start date
- Status
Grassley has always run his own account.
Also, I'm not really a fan of fretting whether two cumulative minutes of a debate that, while heavily watched, pales in comparison to a GE audience and concerned a policy that will probably be qualified or modified in the eventual candidate's platform indicates that we're blowing 2020... especially when the president is deeply unpopular, will not course correct, and is losing to everyone with halfway decent name recognition in polling. But I prefer to live on the sunny side of the street.
I was joking, I don't think anybody's base is all that toxic beyond Twitter users and Bernie's employees
IMPEACHMENT WATCH 2019 -- July 3rd Gallup poll update (polling June 3rd-16th)
Note that Trump is polling at 45% in favor of impeachment, Nixon topped out at 46% in Gallup polling (until literally a week before he resigned, when it went into the majority)
Note that Trump is polling at 45% in favor of impeachment, Nixon topped out at 46% in Gallup polling (until literally a week before he resigned, when it went into the majority)
lol what, Guess Massie's bullshitting with votes/trying to be the next Ron Paul is pissing the GOP off
I find this fascinating:
Observations:
Biden's group sees everyone else as roughly the same quality
Sander's group seems partial to Beto and the Booker for some reason
Harris' group loved everyone, but Sanders the least
Warren's liked Booker the least
Mayor Pete's followers seem to have an axe to grind with Sanders
Booker's group's second choice is Kamala (seems logical)
Beto's group hates everyone but him.
Now obviously this is rating debate performance, not candidate preference, but assuming bias influences the ratings, there's some interesting nuggets here, particularly in regards to Mayor Pete & Beto supporters.
I think you're reading this backwards. Candidate preference, and therefore their "group" is the column, not the row. Therefore, for example, those that preferred Warren liked Beto the least, not Booker.
I find this fascinating:
Observations:
Biden's group sees everyone else as roughly the same quality
Sander's group seems partial to Beto and the Booker for some reason
Harris' group loved everyone, but Sanders the least
Warren's liked Booker the least
Mayor Pete's followers seem to have an axe to grind with Sanders
Booker's group's second choice is Kamala (seems logical)
Beto's group hates everyone but him.
Now obviously this is rating debate performance, not candidate preference, but assuming bias influences the ratings, there's some interesting nuggets here, particularly in regards to Mayor Pete & Beto supporters.
I think you are reading with the wrong orientation...?
Yeah - Beto supporters actually gave decent marks to most candidates... in fact, they voted that Sanders/Harris/Warren did better than Beto if I'm reading this right.
I see that the PR flack for the Catholic Taliban is in the middle of a ratio. Good
Or at least get everyone else to keep saying it. So far that's the most important thing Bernie has done IMO. Pushed everyone into proper policy positions. Well. Almost everybody.
Is this what they call whistling past the graveyard? People are "investing" in what makes the numbers go up and down short term, and that's very bad.
Also, fuck your civility child poisoner, go somewhere you're wanted
I poisoned children but they're uncivil. Who are the real monsters here?
How do conservatives actively live with all the aggrievances they face while spreading and supporting toxic ideas that harm communities??
Must be hard hun...running away is always an option.
I find this fascinating:
Observations:
Biden's group sees everyone else as roughly the same quality
Sander's group seems partial to Beto and the Booker for some reason
Harris' group loved everyone, but Sanders the least
Warren's liked Booker the least
Mayor Pete's followers seem to have an axe to grind with Sanders
Booker's group's second choice is Kamala (seems logical)
Beto's group hates everyone but him.
Now obviously this is rating debate performance, not candidate preference, but assuming bias influences the ratings, there's some interesting nuggets here, particularly in regards to Mayor Pete & Beto supporters.
I think you are reading the graph wrong. To read what a candidates "supporters" thoughts of other candidates are you need to trace vertically not horizontally.
Of course. Harris will be brutal as fuck if she is going against Trump.
Y'all joke about this, but in some shitty little dark corner of the internet there's a whole group of angry white virgins trying to decipher this tweeet's hidden super mega QAnon go-code context.
OP
OP
Kamala will be great to increase the support of prosecuting the shit out of trump once he is gone.
"Okay guys, I cracked this. Pocahontas is obvious, of course. TM is the symbol for Thulium, which has an atomic number of 69, which means there is a sex tape of Elizabeth Warren having simultaneous oral sex with 43 different people! GEOTUS, MAGA MAGA MAGA!"
Par for the course with this administration.
They think nothing through ahead of time - they just shoot from the hip and hope for the best.
- Status