-
Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
US PoliERA 2019 |OT5| She's got a plan for that, now sashay away
- Thread starter Aaron
- Start date
- Status
I should frame it as I only felt that embarrassed because I actually like her. So seeing her get dunked on like she did and there being practically no way to even defend it was rough. I don't feel anything really in regards to trump other than anger because he sucks.
She has been doing better but not nearly enough to make me confident in her going forward. But the issue hasn't really been pushed on her for a while. Which is why I hope others bring it up and talk about it again. Really she needs to be able to talk about it where it seems like she doesn't have any decent response sort of like Hillary went forever without any decent answer on the email situation.
It's really not my intent to attack anyone here. I'm not sure how you could read it that way. I guess I should have quoted the post I was responding to that was about the Bernie campaign going after Warren over the DNA test stuff.
Bernie and Warren were, it seems, the only two democratic candidates signing off on the resolution criticizing Israel for annexation of the west bank
It'll be back, the question is if the media props it up and gives it a second (or whatever we're on) life and tries to legitimize it as a controversy.
I'd say that's likely, and that's before considering Trump's numbers might be bad enough that they'll be in 'create horse race' mode.
I was wondering why I got an alert that you quoted me but then saw nothing.
I just think it would be easier if people didn't take attack's on people they like almost personally
I actually like Warren, and I'm rooting for her. But if someone's going to actually take a reasonable shot at her like,.. yeah, go ahead? If she's good enough to be the nominee she'll be able to handle it. Same goes for anyone else. Like call Biden creepy joe to his face for all I fucking care.
Like this is a contest to see who gets to be in control of everything. It's going to get ugly and there's no way around it. So there's no point in people getting angry or personal when candidates are saying stuff they think will help them win
The "horse race" is about having something to report on though, no?
I'm sure Trump would be giving them plenty of "sore loser" and "death throes" material daily to be reporting on.
Perhaps they'd just kick the man while he is down instead reporting wise rather than prop him up?
Of course, that scenario depends on Warren being the candidate and far enough ahead in the polling to make it seem like a forgone conclusion a year from now. Right now, neither of those seem likely, though they remain possible.
blinkingguy.gif
I look forward to Huckasanders telling us we can't read and he actually meant "space as a whole" because we don't know how words work.
I look forward to Huckasanders telling us we can't read and he actually meant "space as a whole" because we don't know how words work.
I'll never get over the media not just asking Trump basic science, civics and geography questions instead of whatever the fuck else they asked him on the campaign trail
Can't wait for the "Moon is part of Mars, the President said so" Deplorable excuse
Also can't wait for the press to ask Cheeto and Sarah Sanders for an explanation
Also can't wait for the press to ask Cheeto and Sarah Sanders for an explanation
I think he garbled it and meant that the moon and Mars are part of the "bigger things" of defense and science. But even giving him the benefit of the doubt on that, it still sounds moronic.
"Focus in the bigger things we are doing (which includes the moon) like mars, defense and science"
People act like Democratic nominees attacking each other is going to give Trump ammunition but the reality is that Trump is going to do what he does regardless of what any of the Democratic primary hopefuls do or say. Every nominee has something that can be criticized: it's not your opponent's job to go easy on you and it would be a disservice to the party's overall chances to do so.
The Warren DNA thing is a perfect example. I personally want to see the other candidates go after her for it so she gets better at speaking about it because she's had a tendency to put her foot in her mouth when pressed on the issue in the past. If Democratic candidates can get negative traction there, Trump can too.
I think that she's the best candidate so far but there's always room to improve.
Holy fuck, I don't what part of all that is the saddest.
1. That the PotuS is spending his day watching fucking television (as usual)...
2. That PotuS is so easily manipulated and triggered, and is too fucking dumb to realize it....
3. That he says the complete opposite of what he just said, fuck yo couch...
4. That he thinks the Moon is a suburb on Mars.
1. That the PotuS is spending his day watching fucking television (as usual)...
2. That PotuS is so easily manipulated and triggered, and is too fucking dumb to realize it....
3. That he says the complete opposite of what he just said, fuck yo couch...
4. That he thinks the Moon is a suburb on Mars.
Only if Warren or Harris is the nominee. That poll looks very dodgy, but even if accurate, Texas really shouldn't matter.
OP
OP
Harris-O'Rourke would be the sexiest presidential ticket in American history, by far.
It would reek of overconfidence to do so. But its hard not to notice (assuming its accurate).
The post I was responding to was criticizing what some Sanders supporter said on another internet forum. I am not in support of attacking other voters, especially ones that are likely to be Democratic voters. Whether through Reddit, Facebook, YouTube, Yahoo news articles, etc. I can find idiotic comments made by any supporter. I felt the level of discourse on these boards devolved rapidly last primary cycle, due to users becoming more preoccupied with making fun of Sanders' supporters on a daily basis through random comments made on the internet. Especially when we already know that Russians were using various social media platforms impersonating American citizens and supporters of different candidates. By all means criticize the candidate, their policies, comments, tweets, speeches, etc. However, dont start attacking other voters and trying to generalize all supporters of certain candidates as thinking and acting the same way. That is my point.
True, but even just campaigning for his brother would be a better use of time.
Do you see how these two posts can seem at odds with one another? Don't attack people, and then you relitigate 2016 and attack half the US Political thread?
- Status