Time to pass the ball of responsibility away!
You know, for all of you demanding evidence, I'd also like to see some polling that not impeaching would depress Democratic turnout. I think Trump being on the ballot and being... himself will keep the negative enthusiasm strong.
You know, for all of you demanding evidence, I'd also like to see some polling that not impeaching would depress Democratic turnout. I think Trump being on the ballot and being... himself will keep the negative enthusiasm strong.
I think the point here is that there is no guarantee of any outcome, or even a strong indicator either way. We're in uncharted territory.You know, for all of you demanding evidence, I'd also like to see some polling that not impeaching would depress Democratic turnout. I think Trump being on the ballot and being... himself will keep the negative enthusiasm strong.
Mueller has given all the info he can/will. Bringing him in and just having him repeat the same things, then say "I can't answer that, or I can't speculate on that" over and over helps nobody.
If you're going to go after anyone, it should be folks like McGahn and the like.
But the Clinton impeachment and what happened to Republicans!!1!!111!!
Yep. Mueller literally only said stuff that was already detailed in the report and you've got media heads across the networks with their heads exploding with the "new damning statements by the special counsel"Meuller said nothing new today and yet it has people's heads in a tizzy. LOTS of people across the country haven't read and won't read the Meuller report. Video of him just repeating what's already in the report is likely to be very powerful.
there's a reason he's only 6/10 on the Trump scale!My Trumpo-loving aquaintances on FB are freaking the fuck out and attacking Bret Baier - along with a bunch of other Trumpo-lovers. I guess he failed to spin Mueller's speech enough to please the cult.
This is what gives me pause. You want a more dismal scenario than impeaching Trump and then having the Senate acquit him? That would be not even having enough Democrats vote to impeach in the first place. I would trust Pelosi not to get to that point unless she knew she had the numbers, but imagine if it happened and it failed due to not having enough Democratic votes. It would be a complete fucking disaster.
I think I want a poll with data on what ppl think if dems don't impeach.Regarding the impeachment polling, I'd like to see some polling that highlights the difference between him being put on trial vs. him being removed from office, ask bothe questions and see if there's any difference in the #s.
And then we lost Senate seats and made our task next year - regaining the Senate and fixing the Court - that much harder.And we already saw something like this with Kavanaugh. Even though we KNEW it was pointless, even though we knew he would be seated, Democrats were unified and loud AF. We FORCED people to watch Republicans give that man an undeserved seat, and then we watched that fire up voters for 2018.
So you don't think Mueller testifying, which he literally hasn't had to do whatsoever in this context, would produce any meaningful answers in hours of testimony. Ok.Mueller has given all the info he can/will. Bringing him in and just having him repeat the same things, then say "I can't answer that, or I can't speculate on that" over and over helps nobody.
If you're going to go after anyone, it should be folks like McGahn and the like.
Thank you.It's been nearly 2.5 years.
From the start, Democrats have failed to educate the public about GOP nonsense and Trump's crimes.
They put all their eggs into the Mueller basket, which was a mistake from day 1. They have failed countless times to hold the GOP's feet to the fire regarding Trump's many crimes (and the GOP's own crimes) because bipartisanship or some other such nonsense.
See also: shutdown where it was Pelosi/Schumer vs Trump instead of it being the rule of law and sensibility vs McConnell and all the other pieces of GOP shit in the Senate covering for Trump.
And then we lost Senate seats and made our task next year - regaining the Senate and fixing the Court - that much harder.
Joe Manchin only won and let us cling to a 53-47 minority because he voted for Kavanaugh.
Either McCaskill or Donnelly might've been saved by voting for Kavanaugh. (Heitkamp was always doomed; state too red and hole too deep.)
That's not exactly the best example to prove that doing the right thing always, unequivocally yields positive outcomes. Yes, it helped us in blue and purple districts and states but doomed us elsewhere. I actually think impeachment is a different matter because the presidential election (and next year's Senate map) will be decided in purple states, not in North Dakota. But those House districts that we just won, many for the first time ever? I understand why Pelosi's concerned.
.I'm not too concerned about the polling right now. That the majority of Americans already believe that Trump has committed crimes tells me that those numbers can be changed if a case is made. Democratic leadership doesn't even want to make the case. This is like playing a game of Mario Kart and throwing down the controller before the light hits green.
And we already saw something like this with Kavanaugh. Even though we KNEW it was pointless, even though we knew he would be seated, Democrats were unified and loud AF. We FORCED people to watch Republicans give that man an undeserved seat, and then we watched that fire up voters for 2018.
This...fires nobody up.
GAINESVILLE, Ga. — A former Georgia gubernatorial candidate who campaigned in a "deportation bus" has pleaded guilty to falsely reporting that computer servers were stolen from his office.
Michael Williams, a Republican ex-state senator, was indicted in December in Hall County, northeast of Atlanta, on charges of insurance fraud and lying to investigators.
District Attorney Lee Darragh told news outlets Williams pleaded guilty under Georgia's First Offender Act. He was sentenced last week to serve four years of probation, 120 hours of community service and a $5,000 fine.
38 strikes and you're out Mr. President!
Democrats: The party of infinite red lines
He was never going to face any consequences until he lost an election. She's not "letting him get away" with anything.Guess she's just going to make a political calculus and let him get away with a crime.
The amount of "concerns" shown by party leadership would make Susan Collins blush at this point.
He was never going to face any consequences until he lost an election. She's not "letting him get away" with anything.
Exacerbated by swing voters not holding them accountable when a Democrat is president.
Like we need to win Pennsylvania and Wisconsin in 2022. But I doubt we will if the Democrat wins next year, because enough swing voters will go "durrrrrrrrr checks and balances" which only ever means "stop Democrats from doing anything, and leave the Republicans in place to enable a Republican president down the road."
By not even pursuing impeachment, Nancy Pelosi is letting him get away with it. The end result does not matter to culpability.He was never going to face any consequences until he lost an election. She's not "letting him get away" with anything.