Seriously?I was taught in economics in high school that shifting to a slightly higher tax bracket could net you less money overall.
What class would even covered it?
Seriously?I was taught in economics in high school that shifting to a slightly higher tax bracket could net you less money overall.
Not even if you teach them least common denominator to change 1/3 and 1/4 to 4/12 and 3/12, respectively, and show that 1/3 is larger than 1/4?The post about how 1/3 lb burgers inevitably fail because people are too stupid to understand that 1/3 > 1/4 makes this completely unsurprising.
The problem is that you can't fix stupid. Not even with more teaching.
I was taught in economics in high school that shifting to a slightly higher tax bracket could net you less money overall.
It makes sense now why people get so angry at the prospect of taxing millionaires 70%. they legitimately think you'll end up with 30% totalPosted this here in response to this before, but my mom has an MBA and thought the same thing last time I brought it up. It's truly amazing how ignorant people can be.
Not even if you teach them least common denominator to change 1/3 and 1/4 to 4/12 and 3/12, respectively, and show that 1/3 is larger than 1/4?
Not even if you teach them least common denominator to change 1/3 and 1/4 to 4/12 and 3/12, respectively, and show that 1/3 is larger than 1/4?
I've had people argue with me that a BOGO promotion was bullshit when on their side it showed both items discounted 50% instead of one regular price and one at zero.Not even if you teach them least common denominator to change 1/3 and 1/4 to 4/12 and 3/12, respectively, and show that 1/3 is larger than 1/4?
The is only true in two cases. The first is temporal issues- being paid 40K in 2018 and 2019 is going to be better than 80K in 2018 only. The other is when there are subsidies like the EITC and welfare in place that cut off at higher income levels and discourage working more unless you can overcome the donut hole.I was taught in economics in high school that shifting to a slightly higher tax bracket could net you less money overall.
God fucking help us allI was taught in economics in high school that shifting to a slightly higher tax bracket could net you less money overall.
There was actually a discussion on Econ Twitter yesterday about how HS AP Economics is strongly disliked for a number of reasons ranging from how the material's approached to professors feeling it weeds out women relative to the college Micro/Macro courses.Yeah. It was AP Economics. I don't remember the exact details since it has been years ago, but I remember we did some studying of tax brackets in that class.
The post about how 1/3 lb burgers inevitably fail because people are too stupid to understand that 1/3 > 1/4 makes this completely unsurprising.
The problem is that you can't fix stupid. Not even with more teaching.
This is a shockingly common belief. :/I was taught in economics in high school that shifting to a slightly higher tax bracket could net you less money overall.
Yeeesh, AP class no less.Yeah. It was AP Economics. I don't remember the exact details since it has been years ago, but I remember we did some studying of tax brackets in that class.
The is only true in two cases. The first is temporal issues- being paid 40K in 2018 and 2019 is going to be better than 80K in 2018 only. The other is when there are subsidies like the EITC and welfare in place that cut off at higher income levels and discourage working more unless you can overcome the donut hole.
The latter is a very real economics issue, but it's not going to apply for people who are going to be affected by higher marginal tax rates on upper income earners.
It's gonna be the longest ever without a doubt. The question is whether it goes weeks or months.
I don't believe they'd keep it shut down for months or years for a second.
I was taught in economics in high school that shifting to a slightly higher tax bracket could net you less money overall.
Posted this here in response to this before, but my mom has an MBA and thought the same thing last time I brought it up. It's truly amazing how ignorant people can be.
AOC rules, even if her name is one initial away from the worst movie ever.
Nope, your first $X gets taxed at the lower rate, then you get taxed at the higher one.I thought it could technically be true when you are on the very upper limit of a tax bracket and get a slight bump in pay that brings you to the lower end of the next bracket. I certainly don't think it's common, but not unfathomable that it could occur.
Pelosi supports Holmes Norton's DC statehood bill.
Madam Speaker sees the game.
I think you're onto something with #2.1. i tend to think the people worried about making 'just one more dollar' means taking home less money because of tax brackets probably won't have to worry about higher tax brackets, first;
2. i also tend to think it's not as much about ignorance and education as it is intentional obfuscation by people who benefit from other people thinking it works this way. see: rich people / republicans;
3. all that said, taxes are pretty hard to understand!
Sarah Sanders @PressSec
The President will address the press in the Rose Garden and provide an update on the meeting with Congressional Leadership. This will be open press.
I thought it could technically be true when you are on the very upper limit of a tax bracket and get a slight bump in pay that brings you to the lower end of the next bracket. I certainly don't think it's common, but not unfathomable that it could occur.
I admit I was an idiot who believed this well into adulthood. Our HS econ class was taught by the basketball coach. We were taught how to write checks and balance a checkbook, so there's that, but little overall theory.
There is no way GOP Senate will go for that, they'll push for a veto vote unless they are lunatics like him.