"I can't acknowledge this genocide because there are also other genocides that need to be recognized."
Because she's arguing in bad faith.I don't understand why she couldn't have voted for it while also posting a tweet reminding people of other atrocities...
guys we need italy to recognise the celtic genocide of 2000 years ago.
So basically she wanted to vote no but pulled an all lives matter.Omar also voted No on imposing sanctions against Turkey.
So uh, primary challengers? Step right up!
Probably to avoid setting the foundation for reparations.Why hasn't both the European transatlantic slave trade, and mass genocide of 100+ million Indingneous people of the Americas commited by the Europeans been recognized as genocides?
Genuinely curious.
"A resolution isn't worth supporting unless it covers everything" is a really dumb mindset to have. If she applied it to everything she had to vote on, she wouldn't get anything done.
"Don't piss off the people housing your nukes" is probably a big part of it as well. . https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/10/18/can-us-protect-its-nuclear-weapons-turkey/I remember reading the Armenian genocide was more or less stripped from US history books in schools because they wanted Turkey to be seen as a better ally by the public, so it's good to see some small step made in the right direction.
I don't really agree with a lot of this, but it's certainly true that this resolution is supported partly as a counterbalance to every president's refusal to recognize the genocide and the vote is not quite as straightforward as "do you think the Armenian genocide was real, yes or no".I fucking hate this genocide diplomacy.
This is not about the US all of a sudden caring about the Armenian genocide, this is about making anyone who doesn't support sanctions to look like a holocaust denier.
And it's working.
This is just like with Iraq, anyone who was against the sanctions was shouted "rape palaces, torture chambers, genocide", and I think that was a disastrous policy.
This is why sanctions always get wall to wall bipartisan support.
I think that bill is really not that well thought out, and I am still unclear about what the US policy is even in Northern Syria.
It's not crazy. She voted no on the sanctions vote. It wasn't linked to this one. This was the easiest of easy layup votes and she managed to somehow hit herself in the face with the basketball.
That seems a bit extreme, unless you have someone clearly better lined up.
What does Omar saying "present" mean?
Her statement looks like she is condemning so what does present mean?