Wait for a better source than the Washington Times they are shit.
US official tells CNN that are no reports of US casualties at this time but an assessment is still underway. Reports
@barbarastarrcnn
Has it though? I would sure like that but has there been any actual polling/research/any evidence at all that shows that Bernie got a boost because of this?If anything it's had a lot of people come around on Bernie because his history with the topic.
I bet Kim Jong Un will be taking some serious notes over the next few days.
Nah, nothing really concrete. But in terms of twitter and media discourse, which is all we really have this early, that's what I've seen lolHas it though? I would sure like that but has there been any actual polling/research/any evidence at all that shows that Bernie got a boost because of this?
Are they that bad that they would make something like that up?Wait for a better source than the Washington Times they are shit.
Frankly, the U.S. doesn't really care what Iraq wants.I dont see how this doesnt force Iraq to make US leave. No way they want another war there.
Washington Times is not a reliable source. Read the Mod post. Don't post shit from twitter if you're not familiar with the source.
Usual tabloid rag clickbaitThere is actually nothing in that article about the US retaliating, nor is anyone else reporting that.
Yes. so stop.Are they that bad that they would make something like that up?
Are they that bad that they would make something like that up?
Correct me if I'm wrong but this hasn't really worked for Trump so far- people know who to blame for the Iran situation. If anything it's had a lot of people come around on Bernie because his history with the topic.
Why are there so many verified Twitter accounts I wouldn't trust for the current weather outside my window? They seem as trustworthy as old ebooks bots.
so much for 'cooler heads'
Trump want to hit something before his oval office speech
All these "Iran must be suicidal" comments are triggering the fuck out of me.
It's always coming from Americans. You can't even fathom the idea of another country not wanting to be America's bitch. What fucking country in this world would just do nothing after a high ranking official of theirs was killed by a different party?
Tell me that country. It certainly wouldn't be America, now would it. And always there is this proudness of your military swinging with all of it. It's sickening.
This bullying mentality of "yeah we killed him but you retaliating is dumb because we will 'flatten you' lul" is the worst. I know you folks value the life of one American Soldier more than 1000 Iraqi lives, but at some point it's time to stop and get some fucking perspective.
US official tells CNN that are no reports of US casualties at this time but an assessment is still underway. Reports
@barbarastarrcnn
It's a good time to get rid of rats though.This is one of those times where it feels like no one should be posting news updates except mod team or something, because folks just aren't getting it
Are they that bad that they would make something like that up?
There is actually nothing in that article about the US retaliating, nor is anyone else reporting that.
election cancelled for natsec reasons probably.I have to be ignorant. But how is Trump going to be reelected for 2020 after all of this?
Twitter's blue mark check system is a joke. You have to carefully analyze every source from Twitter.
I really wonder if the Trump administration would be less honest about U.S. casualties than Iran
Launch from Turkey? That would be a Sunni/Shia conflict potentially
I thought the blue tick just meant the person is who they say they are?
That's why I'm hoping it backfires beautifully and we get an even stronger 2020 blue wave.Yes?
There hasn't been much of a precedent for a President deliberately and this obviously trying to start a war that could have resulted in the immediate loss of American lives. I find it so hard to picture his base being behind this when so many of those enlisted are probably in their families, but I've been incredibly wrong about their views on him so far.
That's literally what it means. It does not assign any legitimacy or authority to what they post.I thought the blue tick just meant the person is who they say they are?