Betting $100 the State Department learned about this when it broke on CNN.
Iran can't and won't retaliate directly against the US anyway so no American should be worried in that regard, US allies tho, yeah they're gonna have some fun times.
I kinda wonder what the Google Trends for "Does Iran have nukes" were, and how many people Googled that to decide if this is a big deal or notIs the kind of bullshit I hate. Because there probably won't be a way tomorrow. That would hurt Trump's approval. No, he's just permanently damaged US relations in the region forever and probably gotten more Americans killed in current and future war. But a percentage that I fear is over 50% won't care. They'll just see Trump sticking it to Iran and since there is no war tomorrow, everyone complaining is overreacting.
A moral argument does not need to rest on first capitulating to a war mongers narrative.You were present for it, but you weren't interacting with it. The media wasn't going to prepare you for actually interacting with grown adults who simply couldn't believe that the Bush admin was bullshitting. For how there was a massive, toxic wave of bullshit pressure pushing on politicians across the country to go along with the BS because of how much of the public was terrible and getting suckered. You needed to encounter that crap firsthand to understand the difference between then and now.
You mentioned "moral arguments" earlier. The thing is, the argument against doing this is not a moral one. It is a realpolitik/utilitarian one. Just like Iraq II. This is why everyone's conceding the moral argument (this guy was a monster) before launching into the arguments against doing this, because there isn't a "moral" argument for inaction available. If you attempt to argue morality, you will lose, because there's no possible way to argue that the world would be better off with this guy freely walking around if you could just teleport him to a jail cell on mars with the push of a button without any other consequences.
He is not older than me. I was in college as that disastrous march to war happened, watching it play out in slow motion with no ability to affect change in the slightest. Reliving that shit today is incredibly unpleasant.
Bush didn't start pushing to invade Iraq until after 9/11. His approval before it is irrelevant to the context here.
Can't let them know. Info might leak. Eric Trump, however.Betting $100 the State Department learned about this when it broke on CNN.
You can't just go and say "I declare warzone" and start killing people, this is not how this works, this is not how any of this works.No, a region must be declared a warzone.
Iraq is a declared warzone. Syria too.
Iran is not. US is not.
that post has a decidedly different meaning when you include the line of text I wrote, lol
DigitalOp: Fuck Americans, I hope they die in an Iranian terrorist attack so I can feel vindicated!American posters bout to be real real pissy when that Guerilla squad comes over here and does some hoodlum shit for retaliation.
Real real pissy.
Reap what you sow
You just go and say "I declare warzone" and start killing people, this is not how this works, this is not how any of this works.
You can declare war, but the US has not done that, not with Iraq and not with Iran.
I'm sure we told papa Putin.
DigitalOp: Fuck Americans, I hope they die in an Iranian terrorist attack so I can feel vindicated!
No the countries don't declare it a warzone. Another body does.You just go and say "I declare warzone" and start killing people, this is not how this works, this is not how any of this works.
You can declare war, but the US has not done that, not with Iraq and not with Iran.
Lol, that isn't what he said but go off. Stop being alarmist and actually comprehend what others are saying here.DigitalOp: Fuck Americans, I hope they die in an Iranian terrorist attack so I can feel vindicated!
It is always fascinating seeing the predictable way people start arguing softly something and by the sheer act of doing so will strengthen their resolve and dig in harder and harder.No, a region must be declared a warzone.
Iraq is a declared warzone. Syria too.
Iran is not. US is not.
Lol saying I support this nonsense.Lot of VeRy SmArT cEnTrIsTs in here going to great lengths to excuse extrajudicial assassination.
Like this nonsense lmao
Those are not moral arguments! They're political and strategic and utilitarian ones. It is impossible to argue this was a guy who made the world a better place and who should be walking around a free man. Which is why you don't try.A moral argument does not need to rest on first capitulating to a war mongers narrative.
the counter moral argument is simple, it avoids catering to American Exceptionalism and Republican capitulation and simply makes the case that extrajudicial assassination was dangerously escalatory, breaks international law that threatens our own self interest and security, puts American lives at risk at home and abroad, including at the embassy in Iraq that is at the center of this tinder box, goes hand in hand with a policy abandoning our non-proliferation agreements that has pushed us closer to another unnecessary and avoidable war that will cost trillions in treasure and countless lives. Leave the "he deserved to die" appeals at the door and it already goes without saying that hewas a bad guy. And when bad faith pundits press you that is when you can get indignant and point out the obvious but pivot back to the central contention here.
I said this was the wrong action to take. I never said killing a commander of irregular forces was a war crime.It is always fascinating seeing the predictable way people start arguing softly something and by the sheer act of doing so will strengthen their resolve and dig in harder and harder.
You startedby slightly defending the rhetorical prefacing, with sustained opposition you have slowly just started defending the entire operation.
No the countries don't declare it a warzone. Another body does.
Hence why Russia has actual soldiers in Syria but "patriots" in Ukraine.
He's just repeating what you said already in more explicit terms.
He isn't. What is wrong with you lot?He's just repeating what you said already in more explicit terms.
Its insane not only is that poster just doubling down on that take but also name calling others and defending war crimes to boot. Shit is wild in here.
I see the gang-up in here reached it's inevitable conclusion.
There is no international warzone designation body.No the countries don't declare it a warzone. Another body does.
Hence why Russia has actual soldiers in Syria but "patriots" in Ukraine.
Dude, just stop.No the countries don't declare it a warzone. Another body does.
Hence why Russia has actual soldiers in Syria but "patriots" in Ukraine.
Get out of here.Gotta love it, especially coming off the embassy thread where a handful of middle eastern and muslim posters got banned for expressing their anger about US foreign policy and the cowardly moderates here to excuse it.
24 hrs later and we got folks being cool with war crimes and shit in the name of pragmatism. Someone even mentioned we should wait for the polls aaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
These people are fucking insane
That's been pretty clear last few pages. They are baiting you and it's obvious.Get out of here.
I never said I was cool with it and you people are just putting words in my mouth now.
I'm still waiting for a single notable politician to say that we're partially to blame for 9/11. By which I mean that we've been fucking up the middle east for so long, that it's no wonder people there grew to hold such a grudge against us and our culture, and a few of them decided to take out their anger on us.
But it's political suicide, so it will never happen.
That's been pretty clear last few pages. They are baiting you and it's obvious.
I think it's fair that when you make 50+ posts downplaying the severity of it, some people may think you're cool with it. Like you can see where people are coming from, yeah?Get out of here.
I never said I was cool with it and you people are just putting words in my mouth now.
ME posters got banned in the embassy thread? For real?Gotta love it, especially coming off the embassy thread where a handful of middle eastern and muslim posters got banned for expressing their anger about US foreign policy and the cowardly moderates here to excuse it.
24 hrs later and we got folks being cool with war crimes and shit in the name of pragmatism. Someone even mentioned we should wait for the polls aaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
These people are fucking insane
EDIT: Oh and let's not forget the 'Hezbollah sleeper cells lying in wait on US soil ready to be activated at a moments notice' because you know, life wasn't hard enough for brown folks and Muslims in 2019 so let's ramp it up and make everyone a potential threat.
Get out of here.
I never said I was cool with it and you people are just putting words in my mouth now.
It started with me defending Warren and Biden from the inevitable Dems suck and guess what.I think it's fair that when you make 50+ posts downplaying the severity of it, some people may think you're cool with it. Like you can see where people are coming from, yeah?
And yet that very thing is happening.Hunter, buddy, just give it up. You're so off of your original point that you're arguing semantics. If you want to make a case that we shouldn't shame Democrats for their statements on Soleimani then come at it from a different angle.