FWIW, the 2020 LG OLEDs are out already (BX/CX) but they don't look like much of an upgrade over the B9/C9:
LG CX OLED review
LG CX is the successor to LG C9. In addition to HDMI 2.1 and webOS, LG CX features Filmmaker Mode, HGiG, three VRR systems & morewww.flatpanelshd.com
I do want to chime in and say LG has horrible software support for their TVs. This is why I am personally waiting for a CX price drop because I doubt the C9 get any meaningful updates now.FWIW, the 2020 LG OLEDs are out already (BX/CX) but they don't look like much of an upgrade over the B9/C9:
LG CX OLED review
LG CX is the successor to LG C9. In addition to HDMI 2.1 and webOS, LG CX features Filmmaker Mode, HGiG, three VRR systems & morewww.flatpanelshd.com
If you do not plan to connect a PC monitor to it, its not a huge deal. VRR is in the HDMI 2.1 spec that the C9 supports.cool, thank you, I didn't know that. Depending on prices and what not, maybe I will just get last year's model. Is Free Sync or any of the other features for the CX predicted to be important for next gen? I'm pretty clueless
What kind of updates are you looking for? I am a big fan of the smart tv features on the LG tvs compared to other ones I've tried. I would recommend blocking a few IPs on your router to prevent the stupid ads in the menus though.I do want to chime in and say LG has horrible software support for their TVs. This is why I am personally waiting for a CX price drop because I doubt the C9 get any meaningful updates now.
If you do not plan to connect a PC monitor to it, its not a huge deal. VRR is in the HDMI 2.1 spec that the C9 supports.
Haha, ok. So I guess I had you pegged wrong. :)This isn't the only place I've asked for advice on this, but it's the only one that seems to take gaming into consideration which makes it valuable for me. Otherwise, yeah I'm usually silently wishing my friend's would let me calibrate their TVs (at least they let me turn off motion smoothing).
The main things I'm looking for are good color accuracy, decent HDR presentation, good low light viewing, and low input lag when calibrated. Since I'm new to 4K and HDR I'm not sure what else I need to consider. I know I need hdmi 2.1 or better, HDR 10 and Dolby Vision support, at the very least.
Part of the reason I have the budget is because I'm also upgrading my sound system. I don't use headphones, and sound bars never quite hit the quality level I want. I currently have a 5.1 surround sound system with an A/V receiver and powered subwoofer, but I need a new one that supports 4K and HDR pass through, and I'm going for Dolby Atmos support, and already locked down my choices for that equipment.
Because of my space I'm limited to the 50-60" range. I'd love to be able to go as big as possible but my space is smaller, and I'm really comfortable with 50" at optimal viewing distance.
Once I have the space for it I definitely would like something in the 75-80" range and can relegate whatever I'm getting here soon to my bedroom lol. Thank you for the suggestions!
Getting Airplay 2 wouldn't been nice for C8 users since there was nothing preventing them from doing it. The newest version of WebOS would also be nice. Also, you don't always get apps. The Apple TV+ app is exclusive to the C9. As of last week, you couldn't even get it on the CX. Stuff like that is really frustrating especially when these TVs aren't cheap at all and are a multi-year investment and LG knows that.If you are ok waiting a while, I bet you can get a 55" oled fro under $1k before November.
What kind of updates are you looking for? I am a big fan of the smart tv features on the LG tvs compared to other ones I've tried. I would recommend blocking a few IPs on your router to prevent the stupid ads in the menus though.
The main things I'm looking for are good color accuracy, decent HDR presentation, good low light viewing, and low input lag when calibrated. Since I'm new to 4K and HDR I'm not sure what else I need to consider. I know I need hdmi 2.1 or better, HDR 10 and Dolby Vision support, at the very least.
1. The setting is called TruMotion on LG TVs and you can turn it off completely, select from three presets or adjust it on two 0-10 scales for dejudder and deblur individually so you should be able to customize it to your liking just fine.If I buy a tv this year... This will be my first non Sony tv given their dumbass decision to forgo HDMI 2.1 on their somewhat premium LED line (950)... Concensus seems to be LG C9.... Couple of questions
1. 5 or so years ago when I got my last Sony Tv, I tried an LG for Cooke) couple of days... Man no matter the settings, the soap opera affect was atrocious. Hopefully that has changed now?
2. Doesn't look like C9 has full Chromecast built in. Am I wrong?
3. And no Android tv... That's a big feature missing... How's webos?
Any other hdmi 2.1 option u guys recommend? Thinking of a 55"
I disagree - most movies use HDR most often for highlights and bright vivid colors, as opposed to super black blacks or detail in really dark scenes. If someone is prioritizing better HDR, best to get a display that can get as bright as possible, and preferably maintain that brightness.coming from a plasma you will be disappointed by basically anything other than an OLED in this regard.
Not really, in the last year the TV algorithms have really improved blooming. My Samsung Q70 I rarely see blooming at all, and I even have one with large local dimming zones since I got the 49" model. More of an issue are the cases where you have a really, really dark scene with a number of tiny bright spots (outer space with stars). Local dimming can have a hard time making those spots bright without brightening the entire zone, so instead they decide to leave the zone dim, dimming the stars.LCD sets all use local dimming to achieve lower black levels, and even if they have hundreds of dimming zones you're still going to see blooming around bright objects in dark scenes.
I disagree - most movies use HDR most often for highlights and bright vivid colors, as opposed to super black blacks or detail in really dark scenes. If someone is prioritizing better HDR, best to get a display that can get as bright as possible, and preferably maintain that brightness.
Not real in the last year the TV algorithms have really improved blooming. My Samsung Q70 I rarely see blooming at all, and I even have one with large local dimming zones since I got the 49" model. More of an issue are the cases where you have a really, really dark scene with a number of tiny bright spots (outer space with stars). Local dimming can have a hard time making those spots bright without brightening the entire zone, so instead they decide to leave the zone dim, dimming the stars.
I disagree - most movies use HDR most often for highlights and bright vivid colors, as opposed to super black blacks or detail in really dark scenes. If someone is prioritizing better HDR, best to get a display that can get as bright as possible, and preferably maintain that brightness.
Not really, in the last year the TV algorithms have really improved blooming. My Samsung Q70 I rarely see blooming at all, and I even have one with large local dimming zones since I got the 49" model. More of an issue are the cases where you have a really, really dark scene with a number of tiny bright spots (outer space with stars). Local dimming can have a hard time making those spots bright without brightening the entire zone, so instead they decide to leave the zone dim, dimming the stars.
But as I said, there isn't major blooming in modern sets, even in low light situations. That is a problem that has been greatly improved in the last year. Yes, older LCDs had major blooming issues - a friend of mine has a Samsung Q60, I have the Q70, his TV has a big blooming issue, mine doesn't.right, that's the kind of thing i'm talking about. LCDs also aren't as good for bright HDR content with fine detail in the highlights — for example the contrast when showing light reflecting off a textured surface is much less noticeable even if the peak brightness is higher, because the backlight is still on for the whole area.
i agree that LCDs can be better for some HDR situations, but given OP said viewing in low light was a priority, i think they'd be put off by the blooming compared to plasma and wouldn't value the higher overall brightness as much.
But as I said, there isn't major blooming in modern sets, even in low light situations. That is a problem that has been greatly improved in the last year. Yes, older LCDs had major blooming issues - a friend of mine has a Samsung Q60, I have the Q70, his TV has a big blooming issue, mine doesn't.
I have been a Samsung purist for TVs, is LG really that great?
LG OLEDs sure, but that's because it's a totally different technology than Samsung LEDs.
Samsung hasn't truly gotten on board the OLED train yet? Or is their QLED inferior to OLED?