• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Mekanos

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 17, 2018
44,176
Every episode of Evangelion ends with Rei Ayanami floating naked while the credits roll.

Very normal thing for a TV show to do. Not at all weird.
 

Deleted member 8861

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 26, 2017
10,564
This isn't just loli or hentai tho but minors in sexual situations, not exactly just sex. Many anime/manga you watch or read would be under it. lol Going from Dragon Ball, to Naruto, to Gotoubun, to To love Ru, to Monogatari and so so many series out there, going from the 70s to today.
The fallout seems to be a bit more interesting than I expected.

In any case, there have to be provisions for content that has a narrative reason to exist, otherwise, say, Lolita would be rendered illegal in these places.

My stance is that people are huge fucking creepos for being into that kinda shit, but at the end of the day, I don't think they should be jailed for it since actual children aren't involved. Though, if a law were passed that made it illegal, I wouldn't lose any sleep over it.

It would be interesting if the law was passed since it would affect way more than people expect. Shit like Evangelion would technically be illegal.
Anyone caught with it is fucking suspect (were there any studies on whether if the "im not a pedo I am not attracted to real children uwu" rationalization of this shit holds up?) but generally I agree with you, porn of real children is on another level of heinousness entirely
 

Kemono

▲ Legend ▲
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
7,669
I think nobody would seriously defend underage "sexy scenes" in any form of media but on the other end i really can't think of a "worldwide" law for this.

To begin with this whole thing is called "Optional Protocol".

If it's optional nobody has to do it.
 
Oct 26, 2017
3,896
Erm, the project is not specifically about banning content of minors in anime/manga, it's about wholesale distribution of actual child exploitation and pornography.

The objections are relatively small compared to the scope of the entire Protocol, misleading thread title.
 

RedSwirl

Member
Oct 25, 2017
10,061
More generally speaking, if anime/manga/video games are anything to go by, Japan kind of has an unhealthy obsession with youth and high school girls. Obviously, having never been to Japan, I have no idea how widespread or mainstream this actually is. I've heard/read that it actually isn't mainstream at all, and that most "normal" Japanese people don't even know about it, and would be just as shocked as people elsewhere in the world. On the other hand there have been multiple western documentaries about this issue over the decades.
 

Deleted member 35077

Self-requested ban
Banned
Dec 1, 2017
3,999
Erm, the project is not specifically about banning content of minors in anime/manga, it's about wholesale distribution of actual child exploitation and pornography.

Misleading thread title.
This is what the proposal states:
Child pornography is defined in article 2 OPSC as 'any representation of a child engaged in real or simulated explicit sexual activities, regardless of the means used, or any representation of the sexual parts of a child for primarily sexual purposes'. The qualification 'by whatever means' reflects the broad range of material available in a variety of media, online and offline. It includes, inter alia: visual material such as photographs, movies, drawings and cartoons; audio representations; any digital media representation; live performances; written materials in print or online; and physical objects such as sculptures, toys, or ornaments.
So it is more than just hentai.
 

Gifmaker

Banned
Oct 29, 2017
964
Austria's response, which you can read here, was far less indirect with your criticisms. They simply pointed out that fictional drawings and representations were not real children and therefore were not child pornography.
As far as drawings and cartoons do not contain realistic images. One could argue about the meaning of "realistic" in this context, but I don't think you are echoing their statement correctly.
 

Vas

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,016
I would argue the "sexual jokes" in Naruto and Dragon Ball are entirely different than "wet sticky panties/sexual position jokes" in To Love Ru or "Orgasm Toothbrush" from Monogatari.

What the fuck happened to To Love Ru? It was just another Urusei Yatsura clone and by the end it was literally a softcore hentai manga. I hear it was because the author went through a bad divorce and said 'fuck it.'
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 5535

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,656
More generally speaking, if anime/manga/video games are anything to go by, Japan kind of has an unhealthy obsession with youth and high school girls. Obviously, having never been to Japan, I have no idea how widespread or mainstream this actually is. I've heard/read that it actually isn't mainstream at all, and that most "normal" Japanese people don't even know about it, and would be just as shocked as people elsewhere in the world. On the other hand there have been multiple western documentaries about this issue over the decades.

That's more than just anime/manga/etc. The existence of junior idol, the own joshikosei business (which is hs prostitution be it by the girls themselves or not), fetish with high school girls and other things show this. You can find this information easily if you want to find things outside.
 
OP
OP

Deleted member 5535

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
13,656
What the fuck happened to To Love Ru? It was just another Urusei Yatsura clone and by the end it was literally a softcore hentai manga. I hear it was because the author went through a bad divorce and said 'fuck it.'

I mean, later on it got more heavy on those elements but since the beginning it was already a romcom with heavy ecchi

And the one which got a divorce was the artist, not the author.
 

Vas

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,016
I mean, later on it got more heavy on those elements but since the beginning it was already a romcom with heavy ecchi

And the one which got a divorce was the artist, not the author.

I didn't know they were different people. For some reason, I always presumed the mangaka was almost always the artist and the writer.
 

Katsyo

Member
Oct 27, 2017
621
Every episode of Evangelion ends with Rei Ayanami floating naked while the credits roll.

Very normal thing for a TV show to do. Not at all weird.

Yeah, I'm wondering what the current scientific consensus is on requiring all the space ship / mecha pilots in the future having to be naked since that also seems to be a prevailing thing in anime.
 

Addleburg

The Fallen
Nov 16, 2017
5,068
Unless there are studies that show that looking at underage hentai can lead people to seek out real CP or otherwise normalize that behavior, I don't disagree with the US, Japan, and Austria in this case.

The shit's gross, but my opposition to CP in a larger sense is that it is an industry that necessitates the abuse and rape of children. If that isn't happening with hentai, I'm not interested in making it illegal it even if I find it gross and disturbing.
 

Kthulhu

Member
Oct 25, 2017
14,670
Unless there are studies that show that looking at underage hentai can lead people to seek out real CP or otherwise normalize that behavior, I don't disagree with the US, Japan, and Austria in this case.

The shit's gross, but my opposition to CP in a larger sense is that it is an industry that necessitates the abuse and rape of children. If that isn't happening with hentai, I'm not interested in making it illegal it even if I find it gross and disturbing.

I would consider intercourse with a child abuse, yes.
 
Oct 25, 2017
1,103
Konoha
Either way this is not the United States taking a principled stand against people who hate certain types of anime/hentai. This is the United States defending its sovereignty like it does when sent any of these treatises. If the United States sees the need to create a law regarding something they will do that (with the pre-existing law they showed) rather than sign an international treatise.
 

Addleburg

The Fallen
Nov 16, 2017
5,068
That didn't take long.

Not sure if that's in reference to me, but if it is I guess I'm not sure what to say. I don't think anime CP is "art," or something to be celebrated or promoted. If it were banned, I wouldn't be upset about it. I just agree with these particular countries on it and their reasoning.

Anything that promotes the abuse and exploitation of minors should be illegal. If anime CP does that, it should be too. If it doesn't, I'm fine with it not being.

I would consider intercourse with a child abuse, yes.

I agree.
 

Error 52

Banned
Nov 1, 2017
2,032
I wouldn't invite anyone into lolicon to my birthday party, but this seems like it would become a total train wreck.

If this website has taught me anything, it's that "underage" in anime is really hard to actually define. And that's just idiots on this board (me included) bickering, not something that needs to be written in stone cold law.

Also, I really disagree with the characterisation of it as "child porn". Child porn is when they use real children, not drawn children. Again, I think it's skeevy, but it's a different ball game entirely.
 

Sean

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,591
Longview
Not sure if that's in reference to me, but if it is I guess I'm not sure what to say. I don't think anime CP is "art," or something to be celebrated or promoted. If it were banned, I wouldn't be upset about it. I just agree with these particular countries on it and their reasoning.

Anything that promotes the abuse and exploitation of minors should be illegal. If anime CP does that, it should be too. If it doesn't, I'm fine with it not being.

Its mere existence promotes it. Products for pedophiles should not exist. Underage Hentai is fucking Child Porn period. Just by making it you normalize it for these sick fucks. Never stan for Child Porn in any way, shape, or form.
 

Kitsunelaine

Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,382
Also, I really disagree with the characterisation of it as "child porn"
What do you want, a cookie? An award for having to rely on technicalities to justify people being disgusting? Also, before you respond, no, I don't give a shit about you saying "i think it's skeevy". People can say that shit all they want. I'll believe it when they stop stanning for it anyway. Right up there for me with "i'm not racist, but". Gtfo with that. If you have to qualify a statement, you know how it looks. If you know how it looks, you know why i'm mad. And you basically admit that it's justified by caving in to a qualifier. The qualifiers will never work.

If you have to ask why I'm angry and why I'm wiring a post like this-- I'm tired of people being disingenuous about their positions re: this issue. We don't need to entertain arguments like this any more. They shouldn't be listened to. This is a topic that attracts the most sleazy arguments. Honestly it should be ban worthy, getting so close to the edge of stanning for these products that your intentions are questionable in the first place.
 
Last edited:

take_marsh

Member
Oct 27, 2017
7,283
Unless they can prove this stuff helps prevent actual children from being sexually assaulted, ban it.
 

Mekanos

▲ Legend ▲
Member
Oct 17, 2018
44,176
Feel like I end up seeing the same people in these threads trying to downplay lolicon porn.
 

Error 52

Banned
Nov 1, 2017
2,032
User Banned (1 Month): Using Pedantry to Excuse the Sexualized Depictions of Minors over Multiple Posts
What do you want, a cookie? An award for having to rely on technicalities to justify people being disgusting? Also, before you respond, no, I don't give a shit about you saying "i think it's skeevy". People can say that shit all they want. I'll believe it when they stop stanning for it anyway. Right up there for me with "i'm not racist, but". Gtfo with that. If you have to qualify a statement, you know how it looks. If you know how it looks, you know why i'm mad. And you basically admit that it's justified by caving in to a qualifier. The qualifiers will never work.

If you have to ask why I'm angry and why I'm wiring a post like this-- I'm tired of people being disingenuous about their positions re: this issue. We don't need to entertain arguments like this any more. They shouldn't be listened to. This is a topic that attracts the most sleazy arguments. Honestly it should be ban worthy, getting so close to the edge of stanning for these products that your intentions are questionable in the first place.
I am not "stanning" for this stuff, I don't watch/read Loli stuff at all, I think it's gross, and I think it should be banned off Twitter, reddit, and the like.

But I just don't think it's the same as actual child porn, I don't think "into Loli" immediately equals "is a pedophile", I think what "underage" counts as in anime is way too hard to define to make this law remotely viable, and I think there is a strong free speech case to be made.
 

Sean

Member
Oct 25, 2017
1,591
Longview
I am not "stanning" for this stuff, I don't watch/read Loli stuff at all, I think it's gross, and I think it should be banned off Twitter, reddit, and the like.

But I just don't think it's the same as actual child porn, I don't think "into Loli" immediately equals "is a pedophile", I think what "underage" counts as in anime is way too hard to define to make this law remotely viable, and I think there is a strong free speech case to be made.

If you jerk off to a little kid, fictional or otherwise, you're a fucking pedophile man. If it looks like a little kid, it is a little kid for the purpose of selling sex to pedophiles. Fuck off with this shit. Lolicons are pedophiles, period.
 

Ac30

Member
Oct 30, 2017
14,527
London
To begin with this whole thing is called "Optional Protocol".

If it's optional nobody has to do it.

So are Conventions though, you're just not forced to sign up for additional Protocols to Conventions IIRC.

Also the US isn't even a party to the Convention on Rights of the Child (the only one!) so they wouldn't be on board anyways.
Will the Simpsons movie be banned cause of Bart dick
...there's a scene with Bart's dick? I assume that never made it past the censors lol
 

Mendrox

Banned
Oct 26, 2017
9,439
I mean, I'm assuming it's in the interest of the Japanese government to preserve printed lolicon for business purposes. You can literally walk into a 7/11 in Tokyo and see it on the shelves. I speak from personal experience on that one.

Not sure why America and Austria are caping for it though.

That is not true anymore fortunately. I didn't see any of those magazines in Family Mart, 7/11 or Lawson and I looked for them because of those news that Conbinis won't sell them anymore :) So there is that at least!

Edit: I am talking about the magazines with kids in them. Adult gravure is still buyable which is okay in my book (Playboy is on the shelves too so no harm here).
 

Error 52

Banned
Nov 1, 2017
2,032
If you jerk off to a little kid, fictional or otherwise, you're a fucking pedophile man. If it looks like a little kid, it is a little kid for the purpose of selling sex to pedophiles. Fuck off with this shit. Lolicons are pedophiles, period.
I think anime is enough of an abstraction that I don't think you can easily point and say "Oh, if they're into THIS, then they're into real child porn!"
 

Eggiem

Member
Oct 27, 2017
8,781
So are Conventions though, you're just not forced to sign up for additional Protocols to Conventions IIRC.

Also the US isn't even a party to the Convention on Rights of the Child (the only one!) so they wouldn't be on board anyways.

...there's a scene with Bart's dick? I assume that never made it past the censors lol
 

Segafreak

Member
Oct 27, 2017
2,756
Can we just straight up ban big tiddie otaku shit that's infested nearly all of anime now?
 

Deleted member 35598

User requested account closure
Banned
Dec 7, 2017
6,350
Spain
The problem with this is how do you enforce it ? I guess any anime of manga producers could state any characters in story is 18+. And that's that.

I always felt a bit uncomfortable with some anime from Japan. I remember watching Raxapheon or/and Full Metal Panic and seeing straight up kids that look like 12 years old being high ranking military officers. I was like WTF !
 

Kitsunelaine

Self-requested ban
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
6,382
Last edited:

tadaima

Member
Oct 30, 2017
2,843
Tokyo, Japan
Nope, 7-11 hasn't sold porn for a while now. Go see for yourself.

Of course the main reason is probably the falling sales.

Technically they still do. The last volume of Kairakuten (Wani Magazine) to be sold in convenience stores started distribution last Wednesday and can be found in 7-11s and other convenience stores.

Whether or not you will find it, though? YMMV. It's essentially a collector's issue as a result.

Tomorrow's volume of HotMilk (Core Magazine) will not be found in convenience stores.
 

HomokHarcos

Member
Jul 11, 2018
2,447
Canada
If the United States comic industry needed to create a code just to stamp out horror and crime comics, I don't see why Japan can't stop manga with sexualized children.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
I get to post my favourite article again

Robul Hoque, 39, is believed to be the first in the UK hauled before court over his collection of Japanese Manga or Anime-style images alone.

He admitted 10 counts of possessing prohibited images of children at Teesside Crown Court.

His barrister Richard Bennett said: "These are not what would be termed as paedophilic images. These are cartoons."

And Mr Bennett revealed that such banned images were freely available on legitimate sites.

He said: "This case should serve as a warning to every Manga and Anime fan to be careful. It seems there are many thousands of people in this country, if they are less then careful, who may find themselves in that position too."

Police found the images when they seized Hoque's computer from his home on June 13, 2012, said prosecutor Harry Hadfield. He said officers found 288 still and 99 moving images, but none were of real people.

They were classified as prohibited images as they depicted young girls, some in school uniforms, some exposing themselves or taking part in sexual activity.

Judge Tony Briggs said the pictures were manufactured, stylised, and "repulsive" to varying degrees.

He said: "They are clearly all images designed to make people think they are of children. They are fictitious images in the sense that in no part of them does any real person appear.

"It is important to emphasise that there were no actual children or perpetrators involved.

"I have to tell you that if there had been, an immediate prison sentence measured in years might have been appropriate.

"You are an intelligent man. You certainly should have been aware of the risk of indulging in accessing this material, and you acknowledge your foolishness and guilt."

He added: "This is material that clearly society and the public can well do without. Its danger is that it obviously portrays sexual activity with children, and the more it's portrayed, the more the ill-disposed may think it's acceptable."

He gave Hoque a nine-month prison sentence suspended for two years. He said anything that encouraged child abuse, including word of mouth, drawings or artistic impressions, was to be "actively discouraged".

 

massoluk

Member
Oct 25, 2017
6,586
Thailand
I hate to say slippery slope.... But slippery slope. Doraemon has naked minors. Berzerk has naked minors. Many novels has vilolence against minors to show the cruelty of the society and the antagonists. I can see the case against such ban