I might be the only person who can live with Corbyn's Brexit stance. Nothing wrong with him staying neutral as he said he would tbh. Publically campaigning for remain didn't help Cameron. Publically campaigning for revoke won't make Swinson PM.
People will make a big deal over which way Corbyn himself would vote. But even if he is a Brexiteer, so long as he is dedicated to carrying out whatever that second referendum (Deal vs Remain) presents then I don't really care.
It's a divisive enough issue that devoting yourself to either side isn't going to work.
Labours remain campaign to oppose the Tories with leave was fucking abysmal, Corbyn deserves zero credit for that. He wasn't the right leader to oppose Brexit, but people will tell me due the Labour voting base being split on remain/leave it doesn't make much difference.
Maybe there is a bit of truth in that, but Labour were still fucking shocking during the Brexit campaign.
Corbyn then made a mess of dragging his heels on supporting something like the people's vote, but Labour are at least here now and it's not Swinson's "I'll just cancel it, YOLO!".
Frankly, just stopping it is undemocratic as fuck and would do nothing to "bring the country together".
It needs to be beaten in a second vote to have any legitimacy.
People begrudgingly have to admit this. This isn't some "Brexit means Brexit" gammonery, it's being realistic that in order to challenge the Brexit referendum, a democratic process needs to follow. Which the people's vote has always been the #1 method.
Anyone who claims a vote cannot be challenged if there is legitimacy to do so are ironically those who don't actually believe in a form of democracy. The whole of the Brexit process from start to finish has had errors, lies and deception, which is what gives it being challenged legitimacy.