For the reasons I have mentioned in my other post.Then why add it to begin with? If they wanted to add such a sensetive topic then they need to put effort into it.
For the reasons I have mentioned in my other post.Then why add it to begin with? If they wanted to add such a sensetive topic then they need to put effort into it.
This post?
Or this one?Yes. I think R* wants to show that nasty shit, besides being killed (as a gameplay device) can happen to the player characters as well and not only to NPCs. It basically says that it could happen to you, at any time, and it appeals right to the mindset "nah, things don't happen to me. It's always the others." Until it happens. This is dark but real. And the blatant presentation, without a cutscene, that leaves only implications, makes it actually even more scarier and authentic (I assume).
I don't know. Maybe because they didn't want to spend too much resources on that event and/or it wouldn't suit their depiction of Arthur, dealing with a trauma that's not tied to the main plot and narrative.
Seriously, I had the man tied up with potent predator bait and witnessed him being killed by an alligator only to come back weeks later.
The intent is to play the event through, which is fucking stupid imo.
Fuck Rockstar for that, seriously. Imagine if we were playing Sadie.
Of course, they're not stupid, they know they would be crucified for that. But it's a man, so it's no bid deal. Tough it up.Fuck Rockstar for that, seriously. Imagine if we were playing Sadie.
Lol, that destroys my theory.He comes back after the event aswell.
I have killed probably 5 times. All those after it.
So he comes back even when you kill him after Arthur is raped?He comes back after the event aswell.
I have killed probably 5 times. All those after it.
So he comes back even when you kill him after Arthur is raped?
God damn it Rockstar...Indeed. He seems to be a regular spawn.
But everytime you come back to him afterwards he is scared shitless of you. So the event itself never repeats.
Why? Why not? I'm not sure why the game shouldn't be allowed to "go there".
Bill makes fun of Arthur about it which embarasses Arthur and appearently the rapist respawns but is scared from you if you return after you kill him.I played this, and yeah, it's really fucked up. Went back and blew his brains to bits of course but it was so strange, especially as it's never mentioned again.
Is Arthur's trauma implied afterwards? It was towards the end of the game for me so I can't really judge if it was or not.
Oh, pleasantly handled I see. If they genuinely did something with it it could've been really interesting. A shame.Bill makes fun of Arthur about it which embarasses Arthur and appearently the rapist respawns but is scared from you if you return after you kill him.
So I am just playing RDR2 here, enjoying my ride.
I am in the middle of the forest/swamp, and there is a single cabin there. There is an NPC sitting on a chair right there. Then, he calls me. I stop by, and he invites me to come inside his house. "I have food" he says. Obviously it is a trap, I think to myself. But I am curious to see what is all about.
And then... he knocked me out of consciouness. Everything gets black, he say some words, clearly implying he raped Arthur as he struggled to free himself. Black screen.
Then Arthur wakes up far from his cabin. "Oh my Lord..." he says showing difficulty as he starts to walk.
I am... not sure how I feel about this. I actually felt really violated and cant stop thinking about it. Not sure if this was handled well... I guess feeling disgusted about it means they kind of achieved their point but it begs the question: why? Was this whole thing really necessary? I know the game touches some very dark subjects but this was a little too much.
What is your stance on this?
PS: I went back to his house and killed him btw. He said "Not you again" and something along the lines of "I dont want you anymore".
Hell one of the debt collector side missions at the beginning of the game results in you finding out you basically forced a woman into prostitution towards the end of the game and I don't see anyone starting an uproar about that. I'd say that's much, much worse than this.
I can understand the rape-scene.
But what about the doctor-bit made you drop it if I may ask?
I didn't drop the game, I pushed forward with it. It's just that those two events coming one after the other just made me have enough. It felt like after all I had put into the character and all his stats dropped and his character being diminished like that ruined it for me. Hard to explain fully right now.
Entertainment isn't always meant to teach the person consuming it a lesson. I'm not looking for an enlightened lesson on dealing with trauma and PTSD in a video game lol
No.Haven't played the game, but I'm not understanding the OP's point.
Should games not touch on these themes? I'm always perplexed how we want gaming to grow up, yet still have sensibilities of a medium meant for teens and kids. Based on the description, it obviously is not moralizing a point of view explicitly. That the scene is abhorrent should be assumed, just a rape scene would be in a movie. It's fiction. You don't have a narrator saying it is wrong. It's not an afternoon school special. You're an observer and passive participant in this scene.
Is the issue that it was not listed in the ESRB warning?
Not that I expect much nuance from Rockstar based on previous portrayals, but what if Arthur's response to such a trauma would be to bury it internally?No.
The issue is the game is undermining rape. Rape is a very sensitive matter and for the game to just brush it of like they did is bad. Arthur literally goes "oh well" and keeps going on his day after being raped when in real life a victim of rape would feel the pain through out their whole life. To add salt on the wound the game has Bill make fun of Arthur for what happened to him and even respawns the rapist even if you kill him before the rape AND after.
All it did was take a sensetive topic and make fun of it. This is the opposite of mature.
That would have been way better than we got. But sadly we don't get any internal monologue or anything.Not that I expect much nuance from Rockstar based on previous portrayals, but what if Arthur's response to such a trauma would be to bury it internally?
Some people mention he has a journal? Is it mentioned there?
Because this doesn't excuse anything on why they added rape if they won't put effort into showing the trauma. Rape affects victims their whole life and this undermines that. If they wanted to add such a sensetive topic into the game then it requires thought and effort. They don't want to do that then don't add it in the first place.
This.I thought it was a really good part of the game.
It's a sick, dark world in the wild west after all.
You say freedom yet the event doesn't even give you choice on how to tackle it. You can't fight back, you can't kill him off (he respawns) and yet you are telling me about freedom?People want freedom and role playing yet seem to need to be constantly fed informations on how they should feel.
Again, it's not the game that should tell you how to feel or how your character feels.
If it had happened to me the irrational shame and feeling of being powerless and violated wouldn't have left me the entire playthrough, silly as it may sound I wouldn't have experienced Arthur's story the same way, which begins to make you realise how one must feel.
That's not even taking into account the practical difficulties of having a random event that maybe 2% of players experienced affect the rest of the game.
This.
What the fuck with sensitive people nowadays? The game is a WILD west simulator.
They have a lot of black people racism in game...I like that you think this is a sensitivity problem because "mah historical accuracy!!!!!" So...they should have called all black people derogatory words right? Because that would be historically accurate.
Wow.
At least for me it's ok, never saw it for myself in game. It's another shocking moment in a game full of shocking moments and hard violence, and not completely out of context in that harsh times of history.
Wow.
At least for me it's ok, never saw it for myself in game. It's another shocking moment in a game full of shocking moments and hard violence, and not completely out of context in that harsh times of history.
This.
What the fuck with sensitive people nowadays? The game is a WILD west simulator.